@VII@Dubious_pug@voxday Turns out JFG put out a video last night restating your ‘error’ (fraud).
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:26:09 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769441100623361
Source: Original Site Post
-
@volkischexe We had a ‘leader’ by the name of John Mark, who used my ideas to de
@volkischexe We had a ‘leader’ by the name of John Mark, who used my ideas to develop millions of followers, but gave up on the right when the moron-masses turned on him (us), because they wanted us to create another cville of jan6th using violence, and we were using the gandhi strategy of just get on stage state the message and don’t take the bait. Because the right always fails by taking the bait. And the left only has one strategy: taking the bait.
John made high quality videos, he wore a black suit and red motorcyle helmet, and he would have emerged as our politician. Unfortunately, the right is a lot of talk but doesn’t fund, so he couldn’t clear enough revenue to make it worth losing his career over, and couldn’t tolerate the threats made by the FBI against his family.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:23:01 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769428797501563
-
LESSONS LEARNED THIS WINTER 1) National socialists are right, and they’ve taken
LESSONS LEARNED THIS WINTER
1) National socialists are right, and they’ve taken over the policy wing of the right from the libertarians, who were (of course) influneced by jewish (rothbard) libertarianism instead of anglo (imperial) rule of law and german ethnic nationalism. So the ‘smart guys’ appear to be limited to this small sector.
But they can’t cleans the movement by divorcing themselves from the nazi past. Until leadership can do that, and cleans that from their ranks, they will be percieved as threat to the broader public who is interestd inpolicy not ‘power ideology’.2) The Nazi / Ethnonationalists are just well poisonders that are so angry that they can’t just shut up and ask what they can do to help other than vent their spleens of rage on anyone who has .0001% variation from their individual presumptions of comprehension – which is usually low. SO these dumb fcking rude boys poison the well so that we can’t organize anything.
3) The fundamentalist christans appear to be the internal enemy on the right, just as the jews are the internal enemy in the civilization, just as that one third of mentally ill neurotic white women we call liberals are the natural allies of the enemy of our civilization
4) The libertarians are a dead movement. Which is good. Forever. We have captured the few worth having. The rest are still little boys hoping to escape payment for the commons, while pretending their virtuous. They’re just marxists of the commons instead of marxists of private property. Same scam different take.
5) The civnats are slowly getting there but they won’t switch until the next crisis, which is arriving, as expected, on schedule.
6) And the majority of the population just wants to know what to do.
The only thing I’ve learned is that the ‘smart fraction’ is now out of the libertarian camp and in the NS camp but because they don’t have the discipline to clean the ranks they can’t scale.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:18:46 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769412103968751
-
WHAT HAPPENED TO JOHN MARK? (PINNED) (a) Recognition that uniting the right fact
WHAT HAPPENED TO JOHN MARK?
(PINNED)(a) Recognition that uniting the right factions was impossible because of the unsophistication, lack of maturity, and poisoning of social media as a vehicle for uniting the right (b) insufficient income from the audience to go public, pay the cost of production, and evolve into a politician for uniting the right, (c) the FBI showing up at his home and threateining his family.
The right doesn’t fund. Doesn’t show. Isn’t possible to organize. Consists of factions,. Most of thse factions are either of ideological of supernatural religions, rather than of political policy.
The movement wasn’t mine it was John’s. He just couldn’t be the face of it until revenues made it possible. We got ‘canceled’ by the right just like the left cancels the right. And then the FBI made it impossible for him to continue.
It’s not complicated. But the underlyig problem is that the right is full of male losers who destroy the ability to unite behind a solution that will not cause every single other person in the polity to prefer submission to the left over the kind of stupid shithead that poisons social media on the right.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:09:28 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769375520766476
-
THE INNOVATION IN DECEPTION BY THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS The Conversion of a Mothe
THE INNOVATION IN DECEPTION BY THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS
The Conversion of a Mother’s Decption of Children Into A Political Institution.
— “What is this nonsense you can’t stop about Abraham? It’s like you know some truth no one else does, wow! Genius! ” — Another Gamma Vox Day Moron
They’re called the Abrahamic Religions you nitwit.
The abrahamic religions were an innovation in religion that conflated all three forms of persuasive coercion (deception) into one monopoly narrative that was then sold by the female method of seduction using false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe, in order for the population, like a mother to her children, to possess confidence in continuing their cooperation, conflict, resistance, and warfare despite all the evidence to the contrary of their socially constructed false narrative.
This is why mother’s limited social construction was institutionalized by the abrahamic religions into a political and civilizational social construction by the sequence of israelites, jews, christians, muslims in the old world, and the sequence of marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, anti-male feminism, pc, woke, anti-west, antiiwhite, anti-white male.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:04:47 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769357136014716
-
@WhitesAdvocate @RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday Sorry man. I can’t tra
@WhitesAdvocate@RenegadeScoutr@Snidely_Whiplash@voxday
Sorry man. I can’t track all the players in this game without a scorecard, and it’s easy to error by inferring an inferrence from an inference so to speak. lol -cheers
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 17:53:01 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769310832861299
-
@Snidely_Whiplash @LegionnaireBear @Black_Rabbi @RenegadeScoutr @voxday PROSECUT
@Snidely_Whiplash @LegionnaireBear @Black_Rabbi @RenegadeScoutr @voxday
PROSECUTING THE VOX-DAY SHORT BUS:
PULL TESTIMONY FROM THE DEFENDANT, SUCH THAT HE INCRIMNATES HIMSELF BY DEMONSTRATING HE CAN”T TESTIFY TO WHAT HE CLAIMS
— “If the error is obvious, why don’t you spell it out here?
Gariepy not only never refuted it, he observably failed to understand it.
If fixation is dependent on genetic bottlenecks, you would require a genetic bottleneck every generation to fix the number of genetic mutations into the human genome that would be required to explain the genetic differences between humans and chimps.
A genetic bottleneck for literally every generation, where the breeding population is reduced to a few hundred or a few thousand closely related individuals. Every generation.
So, no, you don’t get to clain Gariepy has disproved the math, you stupid fuck.” — Another Vox MoronOMG I can’t believe you’re that stupid. But then, I know you had to go look it up and try to find some excuse that you could pretend you understood.
So, no. (Though, as I understand it JFG and I are going to cover this on Thursday Night’s show. )
In the meantime, try to demonstrate that you know what you’re talking about by explaining the variables that are assumed and unaccounted for between the variation rate and the fixation rate, that are allowing you to come to the false conclusion, and justify your socially constructed supernatural fraud.
I know you can’t. lol I know I can and I certainly know JFG can because I’ve read and heard him say it at least a dozen times.
The fact that you don’t know, is evidence you don’t know what you’re talking about. yet if I supply the information you don’t know, you will, repeating what you just did, run off and try to find another excuse that you can pretend you understand.
Talking to you morons is like talking to kindergarteners.
JFG is a teacher. He’s trying to help you understand.
But I’m a Judge, I’m trying to prevent you from continuing committing your crimes, by demonstrating that you’re not just wrong, but that you’re criminals.And I’m doing just fine in doing so. 😉 Because you take the bait every time. Which is the whole point of agitating your moral outrage so that you stay in the discourse long enough to expose yourself.
Which again, you morons fall for every time.
It’s just ordinary courtroom procedures.
I’m just using it on you.
The jury figures it out.
I don’t even have to say it until after they already have.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 17:51:39 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769305441721043
-
@WhitesAdvocate @RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday Lies by the conflation
@WhitesAdvocate@RenegadeScoutr@Snidely_Whiplash@voxday
Lies by the conflation of fiction with fictionalism, because the liar refused to do due diligence because the liar has been taught to lie, by the Abrahamic method of lying, which is an institutionalization of the female method of lying, which is the means by which women seduce children, other women, and men to do their will.
FICTION: A narrative that does not claim it is true, and instead specifically claims it is not.
FICTIONALISM: Claims it is not fiction, but true. Fictionalisms are created by one or more deceptions of the three categories of human faculties:
(a) Imaginary: Occult -> Theology
(b) Verbal: Sophistry -> Idealism (philosophy)
(c) Physical: Magic -> Pseudoscience and Pseudomathematics)There. I helped you learn the difference between fiction and fictionalism.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 17:39:36 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769258061553048
-
@RadioFreeNorthwest Yep. And it used to be confined to the west side. Now it’s e
@RadioFreeNorthwest Yep.
And it used to be confined to the west side. Now it’s everywhere. (Thank you microsoft)
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 17:17:45 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769172157593351
-
THE SCIENCE, LOGIC, AND LAW OF LYING BY SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION @curtd @RenegadeScou
THE SCIENCE, LOGIC, AND LAW OF LYING BY SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
@curtd @RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday
— “It’s not that you use difficult words. It’s that the words you mean do not mean what you think they mean.” —
Are you sure? Can you testify to that?
It’s called Continuous Recursive Adversarial Disambiguation by Serialization and Operationalzation producing terms as a spectrum of unambiguous measurements, thereby preventing the many forms of sophistry, denial, deceit, and fraud, made possible by ambiguity in terms.
At the beginning of this prosecution of the vox-moron-clique, explicitly demonstrated disambiguation of Faith(Theology) > Belief (Philosophy) > Trust (Science(Law)), to illustrated how one of the vox-morons was trying to claim that belief in the supernatural (mythicism) was equal to Trust in science (testimony).
This is why you can’t tolerate the precision of terms I’m using, or the method of argument I’m using, because they deny you the ability to justify your social construction of falsehood (technically fraud by fictionalism, using sophistry and supernaturalism), by conflation, inflation, sophistry, social construction, false promise (fraud) of freedom from the four sets of laws of the universe, where testimony (truth) would require:
Realism, Naturalism, Identity(uniqueness,unambiguous), internal consistency, operational possibility, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocity of rational choice, stated limits, full accounting within those limits, competitive parsimony, warrantability, warranty of due diligence, within the limits of your restitutability.
Because that’s the test of whether you may claim a statement is true without engaging in lying by design or by falure of due diligence. And when you fail due diligence by motivated reasoning, that means you’ve pursued self interest, and therefore committed a crime against the informational commons upon which all members of the polity depend for understanding, predicting, planning, and action.
Now, (a) I know this is over your head (b) I know it will likely always be over your head, (c) because you would never try to justify your existing network of socially constructed deceits, and your practice of female method of argument that replaces the priority of truth and falsehood with approval and disapproval, and then relies on pretense of knowledge, denial, disapproval, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, ridiculing, gossiping, rallying, poisoning the well, reputation destruction, and canceling.
So all you have done during this little expermiental prosecution of mine, a prosecution you vox-morons have initiated with your female attacks, is provide overwhelming evidence of the veracity of my accusations, arguments, and convictions of you as a criminal network whose purpose is to preserve your organized crimes against the informational commons upon which all people depend.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 17:14:07 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769157851233847