—“I recommend that you emphasize that P is a legal language and not a religious or metaphysical language, as a part of the attempt to bridge with the more religious side.
Make them understand the distinction… They’re not offered a religious frame but they’re not denied their own preference as long as it doesn’t break the bounds of reciprocity.
I would constantly put that out in front. It’s a secular legal language. Your religion isn’t actively catered to but nor is it denied or prevented (within the bounds of reciprocity).”– William Wallace
1. Deliver unto alexander (war),2. Deliver unto Caesar (law),3. Deliver unto god(faith)
Unfortunately for the faithful, that is the correct order.
War, Law, Faith.
Why? Dependency.
You know how women easily go for men they shouldn’t? Unless they have strong fathers and brothers? Women are attracted to the dominance expression that they understand. the problem is training them to be attracted to the dominance expression that isn’t bad for them.
The same applies to men, in relation to their domiance hierarchy: politics, ideology, philosophy, faith. Men are attracted to the dominance expression that they understand. The problem is training them to be attracted to the dominance expression that isn’t bad for them. in simple terms, that’s what the military tries to do.
The left excels at activism – rallying (emotion-social). But the right excels at education (reason-political).
So, without adversarial education, without military training, without men’s organizations, men are attracted to what they understand, not what is good for them.
This is our fundamental problem of ‘uniting the right’.
Education is costly and time-consuming.
Simply getting beaten in war will do some.
But victory in war would do more.
So we must ‘educate’ whether the men like it or not.
They must learn to be attracted to what is good for them.
Not what they feel that they understand.
That’s a hard job.
You know how women easily go for men they shouldn’t? Unless they have strong fathers and brothers? Women are attracted to the dominance expression that they understand. the problem is training them to be attracted to the dominance expression that isn’t bad for them.
The same applies to men, in relation to their domiance hierarchy: politics, ideology, philosophy, faith. Men are attracted to the dominance expression that they understand. The problem is training them to be attracted to the dominance expression that isn’t bad for them. in simple terms, that’s what the military tries to do.
The left excels at activism – rallying (emotion-social). But the right excels at education (reason-political).
So, without adversarial education, without military training, without men’s organizations, men are attracted to what they understand, not what is good for them.
This is our fundamental problem of ‘uniting the right’.
Education is costly and time-consuming.
Simply getting beaten in war will do some.
But victory in war would do more.
So we must ‘educate’ whether the men like it or not.
They must learn to be attracted to what is good for them.
Not what they feel that they understand.
That’s a hard job.
I’m just doing the facts. Jesus did what the did. It solved two huge problems in aristocratic civilization: virtue for the underclasses, and development of high trust outside of the military. Had he been added to the pantheon rather than paul turning it into another revolutionary movement, it would have been fine.
I’m just doing the facts. Jesus did what the did. It solved two huge problems in aristocratic civilization: virtue for the underclasses, and development of high trust outside of the military. Had he been added to the pantheon rather than paul turning it into another revolutionary movement, it would have been fine.
MORE DENIALISM – THE JEWISH DESIRE FOR A THIRD WAVE OF FALSE PROMISES
[I]t’s easy to undermine Daniel’s argument: Our techne (tools) can be turned on ourselves. We can control our population through eugenics (Prohibiting reproduction of the bottom), so that we maintain equilibrium with resources while continually evolving until we need little work to keep the population evolving. It’s interesting that he’s still trying to satisfy the female instinct for survival of all, which would lead to devolutionary dysgenics as it has outside of Europe and China.
The entire program of Jewish pseudoscience from Boas, Freud, Marx to Derrida, Friedan, (and daniel, eric, and brett) is an attempt to deny the fact that only Europeans and Chinese managed to maintain natural selection – by infanticide, agrarian manorialism, markets, credit, and aggressive capital punishment. And that the intentional defeat of the eugenics movement, and suppression of eugenics research by Jews in the postwar period, and suppression of genetic research by Christians in the post-cold war period, are the origin of the crisis of our age. Just as they have been the origin of the crisis of the russians, the germans, and a hundred other cases. Why?
Because you can try to avoid the obvious and the truthful with dreams of violating the physical (entropy, scarcity), natural (a division of labor, reciprocity), and evolution (regression to the mean, eugenics) and invent a third wave of false promises ( wave one superstition: Judaism, Christianity, Islam; wave two pseudoscience: Marxism, neo-Marxism, postmodernism, and wave three: sophistic pseudoscience? ).
Or you can do what Europeans have done, throughout our history, and embrace the reason for European successes: discovery, adaption to, and application of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.
MORE DENIALISM – THE JEWISH DESIRE FOR A THIRD WAVE OF FALSE PROMISES
[I]t’s easy to undermine Daniel’s argument: Our techne (tools) can be turned on ourselves. We can control our population through eugenics (Prohibiting reproduction of the bottom), so that we maintain equilibrium with resources while continually evolving until we need little work to keep the population evolving. It’s interesting that he’s still trying to satisfy the female instinct for survival of all, which would lead to devolutionary dysgenics as it has outside of Europe and China.
The entire program of Jewish pseudoscience from Boas, Freud, Marx to Derrida, Friedan, (and daniel, eric, and brett) is an attempt to deny the fact that only Europeans and Chinese managed to maintain natural selection – by infanticide, agrarian manorialism, markets, credit, and aggressive capital punishment. And that the intentional defeat of the eugenics movement, and suppression of eugenics research by Jews in the postwar period, and suppression of genetic research by Christians in the post-cold war period, are the origin of the crisis of our age. Just as they have been the origin of the crisis of the russians, the germans, and a hundred other cases. Why?
Because you can try to avoid the obvious and the truthful with dreams of violating the physical (entropy, scarcity), natural (a division of labor, reciprocity), and evolution (regression to the mean, eugenics) and invent a third wave of false promises ( wave one superstition: Judaism, Christianity, Islam; wave two pseudoscience: Marxism, neo-Marxism, postmodernism, and wave three: sophistic pseudoscience? ).
Or you can do what Europeans have done, throughout our history, and embrace the reason for European successes: discovery, adaption to, and application of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.