Truth is a name. That name is a performative promise of consistency. Consistency consisting of constant relations. The historical argument has been over the sufficiency of the criteria for consistency. Commonly: identity (unambiguous), internal (logical), externally (empirical). https://t.co/1RadREYzsG
Reply addressees: @quken
That would require your statement(assertion) is therefore meaningless (random, ambiguous). In other words, you can’t make that assertion without depending upon it.
Truth = Satisfaction of demand for infallibility in the context of the question we wish to decide.
Reply addressees: @quken
The only certain methods of living longer are to reside at a Mediterranean latitude, on an island if possible, near the sea otherwise, to interact with locals only, to surround yourself with family, and to eat as little processed food as possible, and spend time gardening.
Whether you practice supernatural, pseudoscientific, or sophomoric religion is immaterial. I do the truth. I have to make up for the rest of you. đ
Q: âWhat Is the Ideal Political and Economic System, and Why?â https://t.co/54UNP7031L
Here is your answer: That which is least divergent from the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, and as such produces proceeds that can be directed to the production of capitalizing (not consumptive) commons.
ORDER – Order Produces Cooperation
The ideal human order is an ethnically homogenous militia (really), wherein one is worthy of status and respect if and only if he serves (she births), and does oneâs duty – regardless of rank. The behavior this produces is superior to every other social behavior.
RULE – Rule Produces Limits
The ideal Political order is Rule of Law of the natural law of Self Determination under the criteria of individual severity, reciprocity in display word, and deed. This is a purely scientific political order that is consistent and correspondent with the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe.
GOVERNMENT – Governments Produce Commons
The ideal Government under rule of law is what we call a constitution, a professional judiciary, a constitutional monarchy where the monarch serves as Judge of last resort (like Elizabeth III ), a professional cabinet, with houses for each of the classes, with the middle-house, providing the prime minister to the cabinet, where the houses assent or dissent requests by the cabinet. And if possible where votes are either by the random selection of âjurorsâ, or directly by citizens.
ECONOMY – Economies Produce Consumption
Rule of law, the government under rule of law, will produce markets of reciprocity. This is not capitalism in the sense of âfree marketsâ but capitalism in the sense that there are greater constraints on the externalization of costs to the people, commons, and state.
As such the ideal economy under that rule of law, and ideal government, is as always a mixed economy, with the state treasury as a lender, the cabinet as venture capitalists, the private sector as short term venture capitalists using private sector funds, and the proceeds of profits returned to the treasury. Demographic distributions require liberty (rule of law capitalism for the exceptional), freedom (insured against risk for the average), serfdom (state-run-employment for the below-average), indentured slavery (military service, public service), ostracization( for the undesirable), imprisonment (for criminals), and capital punishment for the unrecoverable.
THE COST
The costs of this ideal order are high and all of us seek to escape paying those costs but we all want the benefit of having paid them (or others paying them). This is why it is so hard for people to integrate into or copy western civilization: it is counter-intuitive to pay the high cost of a militia, rule of law, constitutional government, market economies, and the continuous sense of insecurity that only ethnocentric communities of continuous support and charity and provide.
THE DIRTY SECRET
The dirty secret is that no other people other than east Asians and pre-war Europeans were willing to constrain the reproduction of the population to those who could meritocraticaly produce income sufficient to purchase or rent a household, and the means of production, necessary to produce generations by self-sufficiency. This âsoft eugenicsâ is the reason for eastern and western success as well as âeveryone elseâs failureâ. The fundamental problem of social orders is overcoming the natural human tendency for regression to the mean causing dysgenic reproduction incapable of producing self-sufficiency and surpluses that can be devoted to the production of commons.
Eugenics are as necessary as air.
Life without air will kill you faster.
Civilizations without eugenics just die slowly.
Here is your answer: That which is least divergent from the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, and as such produces proceeds that can be directed to the production of capitalizing (not consumptive) commons.
ORDER – Order Produces Cooperation
The ideal human order is an ethnically homogenous militia (really), wherein one is worthy of status and respect if and only if he serves (she births), and does oneâs duty – regardless of rank. The behavior this produces is superior to every other social behavior.
RULE – Rule Produces Limits
The ideal Political order is Rule of Law of the natural law of Self Determination under the criteria of individual severity, reciprocity in display word, and deed. This is a purely scientific political order that is consistent and correspondent with the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe.
GOVERNMENT – Governments Produce Commons
The ideal Government under rule of law is what we call a constitution, a professional judiciary, a constitutional monarchy where the monarch serves as Judge of last resort (like Elizabeth III ), a professional cabinet, with houses for each of the classes, with the middle-house, providing the prime minister to the cabinet, where the houses assent or dissent requests by the cabinet. And if possible where votes are either by the random selection of âjurorsâ, or directly by citizens.
ECONOMY – Economies Produce Consumption
Rule of law, the government under rule of law, will produce markets of reciprocity. This is not capitalism in the sense of âfree marketsâ but capitalism in the sense that there are greater constraints on the externalization of costs to the people, commons, and state.
As such the ideal economy under that rule of law, and ideal government, is as always a mixed economy, with the state treasury as a lender, the cabinet as venture capitalists, the private sector as short term venture capitalists using private sector funds, and the proceeds of profits returned to the treasury. Demographic distributions require liberty (rule of law capitalism for the exceptional), freedom (insured against risk for the average), serfdom (state-run-employment for the below-average), indentured slavery (military service, public service), ostracization( for the undesirable), imprisonment (for criminals), and capital punishment for the unrecoverable.
THE COST
The costs of this ideal order are high and all of us seek to escape paying those costs but we all want the benefit of having paid them (or others paying them). This is why it is so hard for people to integrate into or copy western civilization: it is counter-intuitive to pay the high cost of a militia, rule of law, constitutional government, market economies, and the continuous sense of insecurity that only ethnocentric communities of continuous support and charity and provide.
THE DIRTY SECRET
The dirty secret is that no other people other than east Asians and pre-war Europeans were willing to constrain the reproduction of the population to those who could meritocraticaly produce income sufficient to purchase or rent a household, and the means of production, necessary to produce generations by self-sufficiency. This âsoft eugenicsâ is the reason for eastern and western success as well as âeveryone elseâs failureâ. The fundamental problem of social orders is overcoming the natural human tendency for regression to the mean causing dysgenic reproduction incapable of producing self-sufficiency and surpluses that can be devoted to the production of commons.
Eugenics are as necessary as air.
Life without air will kill you faster.
Civilizations without eugenics just die slowly.
Q: âHow do you see the near future of Germany?â https://t.co/nKQUmj0OBk
How do you see the near future of Germany?
1 – Greater Germany (the old holy roman empire) is Europe and always has been. Napoleonâs primary objective, as were the postwar french, English, and jews, to de-Prussianize Germany, and ensure that she could not reform the holy roman empire as the core of european civilization.
2 – France (67m) is and always has been the enemy of Europe, and the enemy of Germany, the greater germanic sphere, including the English sphere. The French killed the protestant middle class, then killed the military aristocracy and institutionalized the authoritarianism of the catholic church more so than any other country in Europe. At present, France is economically nearly autarkic, has the only capable military in Europe, maintains her colonies in Africa, and the only people desirous of ruling Europe, and the only government capable of it, and the only intellectual class outside of Russia trying to accomplish it.
3 – German strategy since that period has been to âwe are surrounded so we must be betterâ – for many centuries. And germans are better. Politically, Culturally, and Economically. Unfortunately germans are âunnecessarily burdenedâ with the ww2 history. However, the future will treat that period nearly the opposite of how we have treated it over the past eighty years. The reason is that China did not imitate the communists, but the German Fascists, and China is demonstrating (a) that ethnocentric, nationalist, fascism (state capitalism) won the debate over political models, and (b) that this is the historical model of all civilizations throughout history. ( c) that the entire world is returning to historical norms now that the british-American empire has come to a close, and european advantage in technology has been redistributed across the world. Leaving only european anglo-germanic european culture as a competitive advantage. Because we have the only underclasses, laboring, working, and lower middle classes that are not âharmfulâ to the broader polity. This is in part because we have had small lower-class populations.
4 – The German (81m) economy will collapse, and devastatingly, because her economy is built upon exports, predominantly automobiles exports (20%+), and exports on issuance of debt, and she is running out of customers for her goods, who are running out of ability to pay the debt, because of demographic collapse in Europe.
Europeans destroyed self-reproduction in order to trade taxes produced by adding women to the workforce to produce redistribution to the elderly, and reproduction to the underclasses instead of continuing investment in offspring of the productive classes. Meaning that Europeans (and Americans, and Canadians) have had to import vast underclasses from alien cultures that are neither willing nor able to integrate into German culture, nor willing and able to continue german âwe must be betterâ. In fact, if the USA alone merely put a trade barrier on german cars the economy would collapse in months. (Which is how Trump threatened Merkel so that she would start re-arming.)
5 – Greater Germania cannot rely on resources, cannot defend herself, cannot create a virtual or material colonial system as did the Europeans and as are the Chinese: ~140M: Germans (78 million), Austrians (7 million), Swiss (4.6 million), Belgians (0.1 million), Dutch (22 million), Flemish people (6 million), Frisians (0.5 million), Swedes (9.5 million), Danes (6 million), Norwegians (4.7 million), Icelanders (0.3 million), Faroese (0.07 million), Ă landers (0.03 million), Finland-Swedes (0.3 million).
6 – Poland is recovering and developing too slowly to lead, so the intermarium peoples cannot defend themselves: ~110m: Lithuania (3m), Latvia(2m), Estonia(2m), Finland(5.5m), Belarus(10m), Ukraine(44m), Hungary(10m), Romania(19.4m), Slovenia(2m) and Czech Republic(10.5)
7- Whether we would consider the Balkans (~32m- 55m depending on who we include) as âeuropeanâ is an ancient question. Geostratecially yes, culturally, and institutionally no, and her legacy with Islamists in the population – that the Serbs sought to correct – is worse than the legacy of having Islam rule them. Turkey is campaigning for the restoration of her territories in Europe, her maritime territories, and her place as a potential great power.
8 – Greater Russia (144m) has the strategic need to expand, the strategic will to expand, a military, population, and culture, desirous of expansion, and like the Chinese ambitious to over come her âinsultâ. She is threatened if she doesnât expand. In addition, she effectively âownsâ Europe because of resources, and because of her military. So despite her tiny economy (1.6T – smaller than Italy and about that of spain), She can by a combination of military and economic and political activism achieve her goals – and to some degree, she must if she is to survive.
9 – America (328m) is all but autarkic, and like France can feed herself and create domestic consumption. Worldwide political, economic, and military Instability is in the near and long term American interest. Itâs most likely that the anglosphere (remains of the British Empire) will form a naval-air-space civilization – as we must – just as Europeans will maintain a continental army civilization, and both will pursue natural interests.
However, America is as unlikely to exist as is Europe. At present Mexico is colonizing the southwest the same rate that Africans now control the south. The left is destroying American cities through immigration, non-integration, and debt one at a time. And Americans are very close to a civil war between immigrant coastal regions and traditional european core. (While I and others predicted this decades ago, and most of us were very close in timing, the severity of it was something we didnât expect. )
10 – Historically if Islam can reach 10% of a population or Jews 3% of a population, either it will destroy it from within. America has the Jewish population, Britain already has the Muslim and Jewish population, and Germany is approaching the Islamic population.
11 – So between a France and Russia willing to rule, an Intermarium unable, and a greater Germania unwilling even if able, and restoration of Islamic conquest via the Bosphorus and Islam undermining the culture as did Christianity the Romans, the future of Europe is one of unique vulnerability not equaled since the fall of Rome – and likely to be as severe.
12 – So in the near term, while it is counter-intuitive, itâs extremely important that the ârightâ re-emerges in Germany, or there will be no Germany, and the core of Europe will be eradicated by some combination of authoritarian french, authoritarian Russian, and supernatural authoritarian Islam.
The best-case scenario is a gradual restoration of integration and a gradual buildup of Germany to pre-war levels of strategic influence so that she and the intermarium and Italy can keep France and Russia and Turkey at bay. And guarantee negotiating positions with them. But this will only be possible by vastly increasing and restoring Germanic peopleâs military capability and traditions. The worst-case scenario is that America has a civil war, and everyone seizes the opportunity causing germanic Europe to e the primary loser of the world competition for sovereignty.
I am sure the truth will cause hand wringing but this is my job: to deprive you of illusions that will cause catastrophes.
How do you see the near future of Germany?
1 – Greater Germany (the old holy roman empire) is Europe and always has been. Napoleonâs primary objective, as were the postwar french, English, and jews, to de-Prussianize Germany, and ensure that she could not reform the holy roman empire as the core of european civilization.
2 – France (67m) is and always has been the enemy of Europe, and the enemy of Germany, the greater germanic sphere, including the English sphere. The French killed the protestant middle class, then killed the military aristocracy and institutionalized the authoritarianism of the catholic church more so than any other country in Europe. At present, France is economically nearly autarkic, has the only capable military in Europe, maintains her colonies in Africa, and the only people desirous of ruling Europe, and the only government capable of it, and the only intellectual class outside of Russia trying to accomplish it.
3 – German strategy since that period has been to âwe are surrounded so we must be betterâ – for many centuries. And germans are better. Politically, Culturally, and Economically. Unfortunately germans are âunnecessarily burdenedâ with the ww2 history. However, the future will treat that period nearly the opposite of how we have treated it over the past eighty years. The reason is that China did not imitate the communists, but the German Fascists, and China is demonstrating (a) that ethnocentric, nationalist, fascism (state capitalism) won the debate over political models, and (b) that this is the historical model of all civilizations throughout history. ( c) that the entire world is returning to historical norms now that the british-American empire has come to a close, and european advantage in technology has been redistributed across the world. Leaving only european anglo-germanic european culture as a competitive advantage. Because we have the only underclasses, laboring, working, and lower middle classes that are not âharmfulâ to the broader polity. This is in part because we have had small lower-class populations.
4 – The German (81m) economy will collapse, and devastatingly, because her economy is built upon exports, predominantly automobiles exports (20%+), and exports on issuance of debt, and she is running out of customers for her goods, who are running out of ability to pay the debt, because of demographic collapse in Europe.
Europeans destroyed self-reproduction in order to trade taxes produced by adding women to the workforce to produce redistribution to the elderly, and reproduction to the underclasses instead of continuing investment in offspring of the productive classes. Meaning that Europeans (and Americans, and Canadians) have had to import vast underclasses from alien cultures that are neither willing nor able to integrate into German culture, nor willing and able to continue german âwe must be betterâ. In fact, if the USA alone merely put a trade barrier on german cars the economy would collapse in months. (Which is how Trump threatened Merkel so that she would start re-arming.)
5 – Greater Germania cannot rely on resources, cannot defend herself, cannot create a virtual or material colonial system as did the Europeans and as are the Chinese: ~140M: Germans (78 million), Austrians (7 million), Swiss (4.6 million), Belgians (0.1 million), Dutch (22 million), Flemish people (6 million), Frisians (0.5 million), Swedes (9.5 million), Danes (6 million), Norwegians (4.7 million), Icelanders (0.3 million), Faroese (0.07 million), Ă landers (0.03 million), Finland-Swedes (0.3 million).
6 – Poland is recovering and developing too slowly to lead, so the intermarium peoples cannot defend themselves: ~110m: Lithuania (3m), Latvia(2m), Estonia(2m), Finland(5.5m), Belarus(10m), Ukraine(44m), Hungary(10m), Romania(19.4m), Slovenia(2m) and Czech Republic(10.5)
7- Whether we would consider the Balkans (~32m- 55m depending on who we include) as âeuropeanâ is an ancient question. Geostratecially yes, culturally, and institutionally no, and her legacy with Islamists in the population – that the Serbs sought to correct – is worse than the legacy of having Islam rule them. Turkey is campaigning for the restoration of her territories in Europe, her maritime territories, and her place as a potential great power.
8 – Greater Russia (144m) has the strategic need to expand, the strategic will to expand, a military, population, and culture, desirous of expansion, and like the Chinese ambitious to over come her âinsultâ. She is threatened if she doesnât expand. In addition, she effectively âownsâ Europe because of resources, and because of her military. So despite her tiny economy (1.6T – smaller than Italy and about that of spain), She can by a combination of military and economic and political activism achieve her goals – and to some degree, she must if she is to survive.
9 – America (328m) is all but autarkic, and like France can feed herself and create domestic consumption. Worldwide political, economic, and military Instability is in the near and long term American interest. Itâs most likely that the anglosphere (remains of the British Empire) will form a naval-air-space civilization – as we must – just as Europeans will maintain a continental army civilization, and both will pursue natural interests.
However, America is as unlikely to exist as is Europe. At present Mexico is colonizing the southwest the same rate that Africans now control the south. The left is destroying American cities through immigration, non-integration, and debt one at a time. And Americans are very close to a civil war between immigrant coastal regions and traditional european core. (While I and others predicted this decades ago, and most of us were very close in timing, the severity of it was something we didnât expect. )
10 – Historically if Islam can reach 10% of a population or Jews 3% of a population, either it will destroy it from within. America has the Jewish population, Britain already has the Muslim and Jewish population, and Germany is approaching the Islamic population.
11 – So between a France and Russia willing to rule, an Intermarium unable, and a greater Germania unwilling even if able, and restoration of Islamic conquest via the Bosphorus and Islam undermining the culture as did Christianity the Romans, the future of Europe is one of unique vulnerability not equaled since the fall of Rome – and likely to be as severe.
12 – So in the near term, while it is counter-intuitive, itâs extremely important that the ârightâ re-emerges in Germany, or there will be no Germany, and the core of Europe will be eradicated by some combination of authoritarian french, authoritarian Russian, and supernatural authoritarian Islam.
The best-case scenario is a gradual restoration of integration and a gradual buildup of Germany to pre-war levels of strategic influence so that she and the intermarium and Italy can keep France and Russia and Turkey at bay. And guarantee negotiating positions with them. But this will only be possible by vastly increasing and restoring Germanic peopleâs military capability and traditions. The worst-case scenario is that America has a civil war, and everyone seizes the opportunity causing germanic Europe to e the primary loser of the world competition for sovereignty.
I am sure the truth will cause hand wringing but this is my job: to deprive you of illusions that will cause catastrophes.