Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Q: “What are your thoughts on stoicism and epicureanism?”

    As far as I know, just as Europeans evolved rational material war, law, government, engineering, geometric mathematics (an important distinction), and religion was more an act of loyalty, exchanges (sacrifices), and not of submission, and religion was far more ‘civic’ (social) an festival driven (expensive), philosophy (mindfulness in knowledge and understanding, stoicism (mindfulness of action) and epicureanism (mindfulness in the small joys of life), continue to reflect the realism, naturalism, productivity, achievement and forward-looking, metaphysics of Europeans. (unfortunately “Alexander brought the curse of authoritarian mysticism into European civilization”.) So Europeans had just about developed a region of cognitive behavioral therapy (stoicism) and constructive living within one’s means (epicureanism), to accompany their civic religion of nature, ancestor, archetype, and state-worship (loyalty). All humans require mindfulness (reduction of neural cost of continuous calculation in the face of uncertainty) especially as population sizes expand, the division of labor increases, and anonymity, irrelevance, uncertainty, and insecurity arrive at the cost of wealth (think of today’s ‘lost generations’ here in the west. So all civilizations developed various forms of achieving mindfulness as a consequence. Only europeans developed forward looking (evolutionary) rather than static, cyclical, or regressive metaphysical understandings of the universe, the world, and their place in it.

    Unfortunately, Overexpansion, natural problems of communication and administration, the resulting corruption, over-immigration, invasion-war, under-reproduction, increased reliance on mercenaries and those who were not devoted to the roman civilization as a solution to historical problems, were met with plague, and in particular excessive exposure to middle eastern cultures, and created a vulnerability to the false promises of Christianity (cheap, non-performative, imaginary, without responsibility), first through women, then thru slaves, then through the underclasses (just like feminism and postmodernism today), until the power over the underclasses was sufficient that men took over control of the religion from women (like doctors from midwives in the 19th century). The Christians then eventually killed the philosophers, closed the stoic schools, burned the books and writings, destroyed the statues, arts, and temples, (just like BLM/Antifa and the Postmodernists in Education today), and slowly took over administration the way that postmodernists have worked their way into academy, schools, government, and the media today.

    So my observation is that the demand for stoicism/epicureanism has returned but we are unable to construct and institutionalize it because we are presently in such a crisis due to immigration in blue cities seeking to repeat the destruction of Rome from within, and the center that is trying to preserve the military, empirical, rational tradition (and unfortunately the Christian as well).

    I have done some work on how to achieve that without the religious trappings, by ‘educating the whole person’ including mindfulness (stoicism), a good life and a good person (epicureanism), physical fitness, restoration of adversarialism throughout education, and restoration of grammar, logic, and of course, natural law (ethics), as and rhetoric (speech), and manners and etiquette. For the simple reason that they are costly behaviors that produce not only cognitive mindfulness but interpersonal and social harmony. As such we would have far less political disharmony.

    Anyway. Enough for now.

    -cheers

  • Q: “What are your thoughts on stoicism and epicureanism?”

    As far as I know, just as Europeans evolved rational material war, law, government, engineering, geometric mathematics (an important distinction), and religion was more an act of loyalty, exchanges (sacrifices), and not of submission, and religion was far more ‘civic’ (social) an festival driven (expensive), philosophy (mindfulness in knowledge and understanding, stoicism (mindfulness of action) and epicureanism (mindfulness in the small joys of life), continue to reflect the realism, naturalism, productivity, achievement and forward-looking, metaphysics of Europeans. (unfortunately “Alexander brought the curse of authoritarian mysticism into European civilization”.) So Europeans had just about developed a region of cognitive behavioral therapy (stoicism) and constructive living within one’s means (epicureanism), to accompany their civic religion of nature, ancestor, archetype, and state-worship (loyalty). All humans require mindfulness (reduction of neural cost of continuous calculation in the face of uncertainty) especially as population sizes expand, the division of labor increases, and anonymity, irrelevance, uncertainty, and insecurity arrive at the cost of wealth (think of today’s ‘lost generations’ here in the west. So all civilizations developed various forms of achieving mindfulness as a consequence. Only europeans developed forward looking (evolutionary) rather than static, cyclical, or regressive metaphysical understandings of the universe, the world, and their place in it.

    Unfortunately, Overexpansion, natural problems of communication and administration, the resulting corruption, over-immigration, invasion-war, under-reproduction, increased reliance on mercenaries and those who were not devoted to the roman civilization as a solution to historical problems, were met with plague, and in particular excessive exposure to middle eastern cultures, and created a vulnerability to the false promises of Christianity (cheap, non-performative, imaginary, without responsibility), first through women, then thru slaves, then through the underclasses (just like feminism and postmodernism today), until the power over the underclasses was sufficient that men took over control of the religion from women (like doctors from midwives in the 19th century). The Christians then eventually killed the philosophers, closed the stoic schools, burned the books and writings, destroyed the statues, arts, and temples, (just like BLM/Antifa and the Postmodernists in Education today), and slowly took over administration the way that postmodernists have worked their way into academy, schools, government, and the media today.

    So my observation is that the demand for stoicism/epicureanism has returned but we are unable to construct and institutionalize it because we are presently in such a crisis due to immigration in blue cities seeking to repeat the destruction of Rome from within, and the center that is trying to preserve the military, empirical, rational tradition (and unfortunately the Christian as well).

    I have done some work on how to achieve that without the religious trappings, by ‘educating the whole person’ including mindfulness (stoicism), a good life and a good person (epicureanism), physical fitness, restoration of adversarialism throughout education, and restoration of grammar, logic, and of course, natural law (ethics), as and rhetoric (speech), and manners and etiquette. For the simple reason that they are costly behaviors that produce not only cognitive mindfulness but interpersonal and social harmony. As such we would have far less political disharmony.

    Anyway. Enough for now.

    -cheers

  • You’re no better than the communists demonizing fascists who can’t hold a candle

    You’re no better than the communists demonizing fascists who can’t hold a candle to the murderous horrors that have resulted from leftism, socialism, and communism.

    Murders are up, violence up, crime up, everywhere? Yes, it’s BLM related because it’s BLM inspired.

    Reply addressees: @ACLEDINFO @ajplus @timcraigpost @_RichardHall @MazMHussain @michelleinbklyn @Sulliview @peterwsinger @RawyaRageh

  • In the near future, we are going to criminalize such lying: 1) Not including van

    In the near future, we are going to criminalize such lying:
    1) Not including vandalism looting as violence, or dramatic related increase in violence.
    2) Stating ‘white supremacists’ are provocateurs, rather than ANTIFA using BLM as human shields.
    3) BLM/ANTIFA co-organized/funded

    Reply addressees: @ACLEDINFO @ajplus @timcraigpost @_RichardHall @MazMHussain @michelleinbklyn @Sulliview @peterwsinger @RawyaRageh

  • Venting

    Venting. https://t.co/zYyvwS70sf

  • Venting.

    —“I’m saying you need to have a coherent message that will appeal to our target audience. You also need to explain the core concepts of proletarianism in simple language (it’s not hard, I’ve done it before) and post it on your YouTube and Facebook. We need to spread the message fast before the civil war, we don’t have much time: four more years at most. Maybe you’ll surprise me, but you’ve proven yourself incapable of doing that. If you can’t find someone like John mark, then this movement is dead”— .@Jaesun Jones

    Propertarianism will live forever and be successful forever just like calculus was successful forever. And it’s my legacy. If my legacy can’t also be a paraticipant in succeeding in saving my people from certain conquest and destruction then so be it.

    I started P as an intellectual project. It was terribly successful. More than I could have imagined. John came along and suggested we could use the civil war momentum to make our solutions popular, and convert the ”agitated right’ into a meaningful political force.

    It was a reach. A stretch. And a risk. It was an attempt to repeat the work of the founders who were not ‘peasants’ by motivating the ‘peasants”. We spent 18 months on it. We drew attention. Even such we ended up with 100k subs, not 1m. And not enough income to make it possible for full-time activism. And that meant john had to stay behind the mask. So I stepped up because of the timing, and the peasantry turned on us over optics where I’d made the right strategic call.

    So I mean, shame on me for having higher expectations of the conservative proletariat. Shame on me for not going public with the strategy in advance, and spending six months having john prepare them. But we didn’t have time. Even such, I mean, what do you do when you discover your target audience is angry, cowardly, whiny, bitches that just want to see better men get into fistfights so that they can live vicariously through them while taking none of the risk and responsibility?

    So you know, it doesn’t matter if I know how to win. It doesn’t matter if we have the best possible strategy and the best possible solution. It doesn’t matter if we can only use social media to reach incel, rage-boys, that sh-t on everything that isn’t schoolyard violence. In other words, it doesn’t matter if the people we’re trying to save are no longer of sufficient character to call european, to call Christian, or to even show up.

    You know, while I love what I do, I spent my adult life on this work this for the love of my people. But in July I had exposure to our people – and most of them are no better than, and more cowardly than, BLM and ANTIFA – they just have opposite goals. And because of that, I’ve lost faith in them as well as much of my love for them.

    So, while I want a little more emotional distance, at present I’m continuously torn between giving it another go, trying to win despite the morons, and just going back to working on the institute, education, and intellectual products with my ‘smart guys’ in the (near zero) hope that leadership will somehow emerge from somewhere to lead the morons to something other than failure.

    And what I think is in my interest, and my fellow thinkers’ interests, is to keep as much distance between the online community as possible because it’s an infectious disease that ruins everything it touches. For purely selfish reasons I might give it another try with the next few episodes of The Choice. And I’ll see how that goes. But at present, I sort of feel like whites deserve what they get. And that the anal leakage that’s the remains of the alt-right is more important to separate from than the left.

  • Venting.

    —“I’m saying you need to have a coherent message that will appeal to our target audience. You also need to explain the core concepts of proletarianism in simple language (it’s not hard, I’ve done it before) and post it on your YouTube and Facebook. We need to spread the message fast before the civil war, we don’t have much time: four more years at most. Maybe you’ll surprise me, but you’ve proven yourself incapable of doing that. If you can’t find someone like John mark, then this movement is dead”— .@Jaesun Jones

    Propertarianism will live forever and be successful forever just like calculus was successful forever. And it’s my legacy. If my legacy can’t also be a paraticipant in succeeding in saving my people from certain conquest and destruction then so be it.

    I started P as an intellectual project. It was terribly successful. More than I could have imagined. John came along and suggested we could use the civil war momentum to make our solutions popular, and convert the ”agitated right’ into a meaningful political force.

    It was a reach. A stretch. And a risk. It was an attempt to repeat the work of the founders who were not ‘peasants’ by motivating the ‘peasants”. We spent 18 months on it. We drew attention. Even such we ended up with 100k subs, not 1m. And not enough income to make it possible for full-time activism. And that meant john had to stay behind the mask. So I stepped up because of the timing, and the peasantry turned on us over optics where I’d made the right strategic call.

    So I mean, shame on me for having higher expectations of the conservative proletariat. Shame on me for not going public with the strategy in advance, and spending six months having john prepare them. But we didn’t have time. Even such, I mean, what do you do when you discover your target audience is angry, cowardly, whiny, bitches that just want to see better men get into fistfights so that they can live vicariously through them while taking none of the risk and responsibility?

    So you know, it doesn’t matter if I know how to win. It doesn’t matter if we have the best possible strategy and the best possible solution. It doesn’t matter if we can only use social media to reach incel, rage-boys, that sh-t on everything that isn’t schoolyard violence. In other words, it doesn’t matter if the people we’re trying to save are no longer of sufficient character to call european, to call Christian, or to even show up.

    You know, while I love what I do, I spent my adult life on this work this for the love of my people. But in July I had exposure to our people – and most of them are no better than, and more cowardly than, BLM and ANTIFA – they just have opposite goals. And because of that, I’ve lost faith in them as well as much of my love for them.

    So, while I want a little more emotional distance, at present I’m continuously torn between giving it another go, trying to win despite the morons, and just going back to working on the institute, education, and intellectual products with my ‘smart guys’ in the (near zero) hope that leadership will somehow emerge from somewhere to lead the morons to something other than failure.

    And what I think is in my interest, and my fellow thinkers’ interests, is to keep as much distance between the online community as possible because it’s an infectious disease that ruins everything it touches. For purely selfish reasons I might give it another try with the next few episodes of The Choice. And I’ll see how that goes. But at present, I sort of feel like whites deserve what they get. And that the anal leakage that’s the remains of the alt-right is more important to separate from than the left.

  • All Rulers in times of war are murders. Your argument is that the fascists were

    All Rulers in times of war are murders. Your argument is that the fascists were somehow worse than the communists, or that fascism was somehow worse than communism and socialism. Both of those arguments are false. Sorry. Fascism(Nationalism) is the norm in history and is again.

    Reply addressees: @Jyrkiboy_ @wax5800 @MD11dr @jimkelly522 @RealJamesWoods

  • We love TRUTHFUL RECIPROCAL free speech. The false promise of communism is not t

    We love TRUTHFUL RECIPROCAL free speech. The false promise of communism is not truthful, and communism is not reciprocal. So no.

    Reply addressees: @Jyrkiboy_ @wax5800 @MD11dr @jimkelly522 @RealJamesWoods

  • North korea is a communist government

    North korea is a communist government.

    Reply addressees: @Jyrkiboy_ @wax5800 @MD11dr @jimkelly522 @RealJamesWoods