—“Mr. Doolittle, I have a question for you. What are the non-parasitic parts of Christianity that we can push forward, and how do we solve the problem of leftist progressive subversion in the Church? I’m a Christian so as you can imagine, this issue is close to me.”— A Friend
This is a deep discussion and please realize that it’s people like you I most definitely want to make happy if at all possible.
Some people are church-ists ( authority, institutions, social mindfulness), some people are bible-ists (words, meaning, mental mindfulness), and some people are jesus-ists (Person, Role model, emotional mindfulness ).
Jesus solved the problem of the prisoner’s dilemma – the ultimate problem of human cooperation. Jesus stands as one of the great thinkers in history, and a role model for all of us regardless of what reasons we have for justifying his teachings. There are three ways of interpreting Jesus. As the evidence of divine intent, as emergently divine, or as a philosopher. But we all vary a bit in our psychology. And we all have different psychological needs. So whether choose to see him as the hand of God, as a prophet, or as a philosopher, is a psychological choice. And that choice is a personal one. The science says he was right regardless of our psychological needs. As long as we behave as he instructs then the reason we choose to do so is not material except to our own psychology.
The net result is that what he says to do, regardless of how he says it, is the scientifically optimum means of human existence. Period. And in simple terms: If Jesus said it, then it’s Christian. If anyone else did, it isn’t. It’s an opinion, storytelling, mythology, or worse. And the only part of Christianity that’s certainly, scientifically, true is the role model he gives us. There is a reason the catholic church stopped using the bible and incrementally evolved dogma as a merger of philosophy and theology.As I’ve said before we have seen the collapse of the traditional churches. We have seen a 50/50 split between people abandoning religion and joining fundamentalist groups. We have a good idea of why that is – but it doesn’t matter. What we have not done is modernize the people and the dogma, and the functions of the church to fill the needs of modernity, and to provide the three different interpretations of Jesus to three different audiences, whether fundamentalist, traditionalist ritualists or secular philosophicals. I am fairly sure I know how to do that but to test that theory would take a great deal of time and effort and political will. It may however be necessary to defend our civilization against the evils that seek to convert us to worse ideologies.
I do science. I’m not critical of Jesus at all just the opposite. However, I have to separate Jesus from the fictional literature of the bible, from the corruption of the church in claiming that the bible’s wisdom literature is history, and from the dark ages of ignorance the church and her corruption subject our people to.
—“Mr. Doolittle, I have a question for you. What are the non-parasitic parts of Christianity that we can push forward, and how do we solve the problem of leftist progressive subversion in the Church? I’m a Christian so as you can imagine, this issue is close to me.”— A Friend
This is a deep discussion and please realize that it’s people like you I most definitely want to make happy if at all possible.
Some people are church-ists ( authority, institutions, social mindfulness), some people are bible-ists (words, meaning, mental mindfulness), and some people are jesus-ists (Person, Role model, emotional mindfulness ).
Jesus solved the problem of the prisoner’s dilemma – the ultimate problem of human cooperation. Jesus stands as one of the great thinkers in history, and a role model for all of us regardless of what reasons we have for justifying his teachings. There are three ways of interpreting Jesus. As the evidence of divine intent, as emergently divine, or as a philosopher. But we all vary a bit in our psychology. And we all have different psychological needs. So whether choose to see him as the hand of God, as a prophet, or as a philosopher, is a psychological choice. And that choice is a personal one. The science says he was right regardless of our psychological needs. As long as we behave as he instructs then the reason we choose to do so is not material except to our own psychology.
The net result is that what he says to do, regardless of how he says it, is the scientifically optimum means of human existence. Period. And in simple terms: If Jesus said it, then it’s Christian. If anyone else did, it isn’t. It’s an opinion, storytelling, mythology, or worse. And the only part of Christianity that’s certainly, scientifically, true is the role model he gives us. There is a reason the catholic church stopped using the bible and incrementally evolved dogma as a merger of philosophy and theology.As I’ve said before we have seen the collapse of the traditional churches. We have seen a 50/50 split between people abandoning religion and joining fundamentalist groups. We have a good idea of why that is – but it doesn’t matter. What we have not done is modernize the people and the dogma, and the functions of the church to fill the needs of modernity, and to provide the three different interpretations of Jesus to three different audiences, whether fundamentalist, traditionalist ritualists or secular philosophicals. I am fairly sure I know how to do that but to test that theory would take a great deal of time and effort and political will. It may however be necessary to defend our civilization against the evils that seek to convert us to worse ideologies.
I do science. I’m not critical of Jesus at all just the opposite. However, I have to separate Jesus from the fictional literature of the bible, from the corruption of the church in claiming that the bible’s wisdom literature is history, and from the dark ages of ignorance the church and her corruption subject our people to.
Curt: What is the difference between rule of law, rule by legislation, and discretionary rule?
The difference is that there is only one way to construct rule of law – which is just the empirical science of jurisprudence discovered by dispute resolution like any other science. Legislation is not law. It is command. it is command we justify. In theory, the legislators should be limited to the provision of commons and there should be no other laws, because there need be none.
The Natural Law is a universal law of behavioral science that we discovered logically and empirically, just as we discovered the logical and physical laws. It consists of:
0. Reciprocity in Display Word And Deed
Consisting of survival of the tests of:
1. Productive (reciprocal increase in inventory of interests that save time.)
2. Exhaustively Informed (disclosed) by test of:
… 1. Realism(materialism),
… 2. Naturalism(natural causes),
… 3. indentity consistency(non conflation),
… 4. internal consistency (logical),
… 5. operational consistency (existentially possible),
… 6. external correspondence (meaning empirical consistency),
… 7. Rational choice (rationality),
… … 8. of action or inaction
… … 8. and of Voluntary Transfer (non-coercive)
… … 9. of Demonstrated Interests (any interest that you have born a cost by action or inaction in order to obtain that interest, producing that value)
… … 10. Free of Imposition of Costs upon the demonstrated interests of others (negative consequences)
… 11. reciprocal rational choice (ethics and morality), and
… 12. completeness
… … consisting of:
… … … 13. stating limits,
… … … 14. full accounting within them,
… … and surviving;
… … … 15. competitive parsimony.
16. Reversible and Restitutable upon failure
17. involuntarily warrantied and liable for all of the above.
Why?
1. All disputes, without exception, are logically resolvable by the test of reciprocity, and any claim otherwise is an act of crime by parasitism predation upon the interests of others. Reciprocity is a logical necessity.
2. These are the only terms under which there is no incentive to retaliate, producing retaliation cycles, lowering trust, lowering cooperative velocity, increasing transaction costs and generating conflict in the economy and a demand for authority.
3. Rule of Law by the Natural Law of Reciprocity suppresses all involuntary impositions of cost upon the demonstrated intersets of others, forcing us all to cooperate by competitin in adversarial markets for the service of one another, thereby producing the incentive to treat everyone as a possible customer, for association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and defense.
But?
Markets continue natural selection so those who cannot compete in them must be cared for in exchange for the suppression (prevention) of their reproduction.
Why?
This process evolves the population in parallel to the rate of our adaptivity (invention, technology, cooperation), preventing ignorance, poverty, stagnation, and decline, allowing the maximum well being for all people as we continue to evolve under a condition of maximum opportunity, safety, and joy.
Sovereignty is a legal term for the Judge of self-determination of last resort.
There are at least the following claims of sovereignty:
1. The sovereignty of the law (individuals) – for sovereign individuals.
2. The sovereignty of parliament (representatives) – for unsovereign citizens
3. The sovereignty of the State (authorities) – for unfree serfs
There are at least three theories of law:
1. Rule by Natural Law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity (tort)
2. Rule by Legislation: Legitimate Law, say, of Democratic Parliaments
3. Rule by Command: Arbitrary law by any given authority
These are produced by:
1. Findings of Law by the Court (Law proper, juridical science)
2. Legislative Contract (Legislation), requiring legislative process.
3. Authoritarian Command (Command), requiring any arbitrary authority (regulation)
and:
4. Regulation: general rules for the administration and enforcement of law, legislation, or command
Under Conditions of:
1. Windfalls (periods of wealth)
2. Productivity (periods of peace and productivity)
3. Transformation (periods of necessary rapid adaptation to external conditions)
4. War (periods of war of any kind)
However, there are only really two theories:
1. Natural Law of Reciprocity (tort) (as a going concern)
2. Arbitrary or “Positive” Law (as in transformational periods)
And one necessity:
3. Arbitrary (military) Command (as in war)
Legitimizing law and Arbitrary Law are just different excuses for not using natural law. 😉
Rule of Law, of Natural Law, Where the Law is Sovereign is the only possible Rule of Law.
1. Construction from self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity
2. By findings of the Court Under the natural law of reciprocity consisting of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity
3. By negotiation of Legislation between groups, Consisting of Contracts Of The Commons, And Adjudicated as Legislative Contracts – not law
4. By regulations administering and enforcing contracts of the commons, approved by the legislature and the Court .
5. By Command of the Military in time of war or peace necessary for the defense of the demonstrated interests of the people.
Because the perfect government is one that escalates to war, de-escalates into transformation, de-escalates further into peace, and plunges into windfalls
Where those findings of the court, legislative contracts of the commons, and regulations pass the tests of:
1. General (universal) – not specific – to an individual or group.
2. Equally applicable, and exceptionless
3. Prospective, meaning non-retroactive (no law no crime)
4. Understandable, well-known, and not-secret or obscured. (no entrapment)
5. Possible to obey (no hazard)
6. Enforcible (not just symbolic)
7. Certain (predictable)
and
8. Warrantied by the signatories as within the natural law. (this prevents incrementalism)
The reason for differences and the problem in the US constitution is:
1. The common law is stated, but not defined.
2. The common law is the Natural Law is implied, but is not stated.
3. It doesn’t define the term natural right from the contractual or legislative right.
4. It specifies rights but rarely obligations.
5. It requires enumeration of rights because it doesn’t define the foundations of natural law, the common, law or rights, thus leaving them open to interpretation.
6. It does not require the court to test legislation for constitutional legality.
7. It provides no means for the court to return undecidable cases to the legislature, thus creating the problem of legislation from the bench.
8. It doesn’t maintain the British barrister vs advocate and the pursuit of truth vs victory, which has created all the distrust of the jury system, because of the malincentives of lawyers.
9. It doesn’t provide for the right of DISASSOCIATION which is the cause of most of our present social problems – because it eliminates the normative marketplace.
10. It doesn’t make the elective Sherrif the enforcer of the courts decisions and therefore a least line of defense against an irresponsible state.
The Optimum Government consists of :
1. A universal, trained, militia in reserve, a citizen corps for administration, logistics, supply, and support enlisted at will, a permanent professional fighting military
2. Rule of Law by the Natural Law Administered by an Independent, Professional “Cult” of the Law, with criminal, family, civil, commercial, administrative (state), and military courts.
3. A monarchy as the judge of last resort (see Elizabeth), empowered to restore the law because of violations of the law in the event of military, state, and civil failure.
4. A professional cabinet that administers the offices of the state.
5. A house for each of the classes and sexes, for facilitating contracts of the commons.
6. A treasury for the assets of the polity and facilitation of finance, cooperation and trade.
7. An Insurer of last resort for the unfortunate.
8. An Education system in:
… 1. fitness, hygiene, dress, manners, ethics, and morals, and testimony (truth).
… 3. reading, writing, money, accounting, contract and law, mathematics, engineering and economics, politics(commons) and war.
… 2. the ‘Grammars’ (logics) of the formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary sciences, and the grammars of deceit.
9. A “religion” consisting of training by the sacred (prohibition on self-satisfaction), mythology (group strategy as narrative), ritual, oath, feast,and festival, that provides intellectual, emotional, and social mindfulness regardless of ability in exchange for the observance of the laws of the universe.
Where, as in Rome;
1. The military takes authority in time of war at the expense of the totality of the people (discretionary rule)
2. The courts regulate the people and the economy (means of cooperation) (rule of law)
3. The state produces commons for the people (families, not individuals) and generations that follow (classical liberalism)
4. The legislatures decide what to do with windfalls (unexpected profits) but may not create enduring dependencies.
Where the Houses of the classes operate by:
1. Production of Legislation by the Cabinet
2. Production of Legislation by Representatives (now)
3. Production of Legislation by the citizenry.
And;
1. Direct or representative economic democracy
2. Direct or representative proportional economic democracy
3. Direct or representative proportional democracy (now)
or;
Where the people merely assent or veto legislative proposals.
1. Direct or representative economic assent or dissent
2. Direct or representative proportional economic assent or dissent
3. Direct or representative proportional assent or dissent
Where the people merely assent or veto to appropriations
THE IMPORTANT BITWhat Creates Demand For Rule of Law, Rule of Legislation, or Rule of Command?
Rule of Law: a homogenous, ethnocentric, polity with less than 5m people
Rule of Legislation, an homogenous, ethnocentric, polity with more than 5m people. 3. Rule of Command: a heterogeneous, multicultural polity of any size.
Why? Homogeneity or Heterogeneity of the Population.
The government provides a market for commons under rule of law and only seeks to select priorities for scarce resources among people with nearly identical interests and where differences are mediated by the non-objection of redistribution in favor of kin selection
If the population is large enough that there are competing economic interests then legislation can function as a means of performing trades between people willing to compromise, who find no benefit in access to power, and find benefit in mutual satisfaction due to kin selection.
If the population is diverse, has different demographic distributions (abilities), are unequal in competition in the markets, unequal in tax contribution, seek access to power, and are in political competition, then the authoritarian government is necessary.
This is a natural law at scale.
I hope you found this useful.
Curt: What is the difference between rule of law, rule by legislation, and discretionary rule?
The difference is that there is only one way to construct rule of law – which is just the empirical science of jurisprudence discovered by dispute resolution like any other science. Legislation is not law. It is command. it is command we justify. In theory, the legislators should be limited to the provision of commons and there should be no other laws, because there need be none.
The Natural Law is a universal law of behavioral science that we discovered logically and empirically, just as we discovered the logical and physical laws. It consists of:
0. Reciprocity in Display Word And Deed
Consisting of survival of the tests of:
1. Productive (reciprocal increase in inventory of interests that save time.)
2. Exhaustively Informed (disclosed) by test of:
… 1. Realism(materialism),
… 2. Naturalism(natural causes),
… 3. indentity consistency(non conflation),
… 4. internal consistency (logical),
… 5. operational consistency (existentially possible),
… 6. external correspondence (meaning empirical consistency),
… 7. Rational choice (rationality),
… … 8. of action or inaction
… … 8. and of Voluntary Transfer (non-coercive)
… … 9. of Demonstrated Interests (any interest that you have born a cost by action or inaction in order to obtain that interest, producing that value)
… … 10. Free of Imposition of Costs upon the demonstrated interests of others (negative consequences)
… 11. reciprocal rational choice (ethics and morality), and
… 12. completeness
… … consisting of:
… … … 13. stating limits,
… … … 14. full accounting within them,
… … and surviving;
… … … 15. competitive parsimony.
16. Reversible and Restitutable upon failure
17. involuntarily warrantied and liable for all of the above.
Why?
1. All disputes, without exception, are logically resolvable by the test of reciprocity, and any claim otherwise is an act of crime by parasitism predation upon the interests of others. Reciprocity is a logical necessity.
2. These are the only terms under which there is no incentive to retaliate, producing retaliation cycles, lowering trust, lowering cooperative velocity, increasing transaction costs and generating conflict in the economy and a demand for authority.
3. Rule of Law by the Natural Law of Reciprocity suppresses all involuntary impositions of cost upon the demonstrated intersets of others, forcing us all to cooperate by competitin in adversarial markets for the service of one another, thereby producing the incentive to treat everyone as a possible customer, for association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and defense.
But?
Markets continue natural selection so those who cannot compete in them must be cared for in exchange for the suppression (prevention) of their reproduction.
Why?
This process evolves the population in parallel to the rate of our adaptivity (invention, technology, cooperation), preventing ignorance, poverty, stagnation, and decline, allowing the maximum well being for all people as we continue to evolve under a condition of maximum opportunity, safety, and joy.
Sovereignty is a legal term for the Judge of self-determination of last resort.
There are at least the following claims of sovereignty:
1. The sovereignty of the law (individuals) – for sovereign individuals.
2. The sovereignty of parliament (representatives) – for unsovereign citizens
3. The sovereignty of the State (authorities) – for unfree serfs
There are at least three theories of law:
1. Rule by Natural Law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity (tort)
2. Rule by Legislation: Legitimate Law, say, of Democratic Parliaments
3. Rule by Command: Arbitrary law by any given authority
These are produced by:
1. Findings of Law by the Court (Law proper, juridical science)
2. Legislative Contract (Legislation), requiring legislative process.
3. Authoritarian Command (Command), requiring any arbitrary authority (regulation)
and:
4. Regulation: general rules for the administration and enforcement of law, legislation, or command
Under Conditions of:
1. Windfalls (periods of wealth)
2. Productivity (periods of peace and productivity)
3. Transformation (periods of necessary rapid adaptation to external conditions)
4. War (periods of war of any kind)
However, there are only really two theories:
1. Natural Law of Reciprocity (tort) (as a going concern)
2. Arbitrary or “Positive” Law (as in transformational periods)
And one necessity:
3. Arbitrary (military) Command (as in war)
Legitimizing law and Arbitrary Law are just different excuses for not using natural law. 😉
Rule of Law, of Natural Law, Where the Law is Sovereign is the only possible Rule of Law.
1. Construction from self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity
2. By findings of the Court Under the natural law of reciprocity consisting of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity
3. By negotiation of Legislation between groups, Consisting of Contracts Of The Commons, And Adjudicated as Legislative Contracts – not law
4. By regulations administering and enforcing contracts of the commons, approved by the legislature and the Court .
5. By Command of the Military in time of war or peace necessary for the defense of the demonstrated interests of the people.
Because the perfect government is one that escalates to war, de-escalates into transformation, de-escalates further into peace, and plunges into windfalls
Where those findings of the court, legislative contracts of the commons, and regulations pass the tests of:
1. General (universal) – not specific – to an individual or group.
2. Equally applicable, and exceptionless
3. Prospective, meaning non-retroactive (no law no crime)
4. Understandable, well-known, and not-secret or obscured. (no entrapment)
5. Possible to obey (no hazard)
6. Enforcible (not just symbolic)
7. Certain (predictable)
and
8. Warrantied by the signatories as within the natural law. (this prevents incrementalism)
The reason for differences and the problem in the US constitution is:
1. The common law is stated, but not defined.
2. The common law is the Natural Law is implied, but is not stated.
3. It doesn’t define the term natural right from the contractual or legislative right.
4. It specifies rights but rarely obligations.
5. It requires enumeration of rights because it doesn’t define the foundations of natural law, the common, law or rights, thus leaving them open to interpretation.
6. It does not require the court to test legislation for constitutional legality.
7. It provides no means for the court to return undecidable cases to the legislature, thus creating the problem of legislation from the bench.
8. It doesn’t maintain the British barrister vs advocate and the pursuit of truth vs victory, which has created all the distrust of the jury system, because of the malincentives of lawyers.
9. It doesn’t provide for the right of DISASSOCIATION which is the cause of most of our present social problems – because it eliminates the normative marketplace.
10. It doesn’t make the elective Sherrif the enforcer of the courts decisions and therefore a least line of defense against an irresponsible state.
The Optimum Government consists of :
1. A universal, trained, militia in reserve, a citizen corps for administration, logistics, supply, and support enlisted at will, a permanent professional fighting military
2. Rule of Law by the Natural Law Administered by an Independent, Professional “Cult” of the Law, with criminal, family, civil, commercial, administrative (state), and military courts.
3. A monarchy as the judge of last resort (see Elizabeth), empowered to restore the law because of violations of the law in the event of military, state, and civil failure.
4. A professional cabinet that administers the offices of the state.
5. A house for each of the classes and sexes, for facilitating contracts of the commons.
6. A treasury for the assets of the polity and facilitation of finance, cooperation and trade.
7. An Insurer of last resort for the unfortunate.
8. An Education system in:
… 1. fitness, hygiene, dress, manners, ethics, and morals, and testimony (truth).
… 3. reading, writing, money, accounting, contract and law, mathematics, engineering and economics, politics(commons) and war.
… 2. the ‘Grammars’ (logics) of the formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary sciences, and the grammars of deceit.
9. A “religion” consisting of training by the sacred (prohibition on self-satisfaction), mythology (group strategy as narrative), ritual, oath, feast,and festival, that provides intellectual, emotional, and social mindfulness regardless of ability in exchange for the observance of the laws of the universe.
Where, as in Rome;
1. The military takes authority in time of war at the expense of the totality of the people (discretionary rule)
2. The courts regulate the people and the economy (means of cooperation) (rule of law)
3. The state produces commons for the people (families, not individuals) and generations that follow (classical liberalism)
4. The legislatures decide what to do with windfalls (unexpected profits) but may not create enduring dependencies.
Where the Houses of the classes operate by:
1. Production of Legislation by the Cabinet
2. Production of Legislation by Representatives (now)
3. Production of Legislation by the citizenry.
And;
1. Direct or representative economic democracy
2. Direct or representative proportional economic democracy
3. Direct or representative proportional democracy (now)
or;
Where the people merely assent or veto legislative proposals.
1. Direct or representative economic assent or dissent
2. Direct or representative proportional economic assent or dissent
3. Direct or representative proportional assent or dissent
Where the people merely assent or veto to appropriations
THE IMPORTANT BITWhat Creates Demand For Rule of Law, Rule of Legislation, or Rule of Command?
Rule of Law: a homogenous, ethnocentric, polity with less than 5m people
Rule of Legislation, an homogenous, ethnocentric, polity with more than 5m people. 3. Rule of Command: a heterogeneous, multicultural polity of any size.
Why? Homogeneity or Heterogeneity of the Population.
The government provides a market for commons under rule of law and only seeks to select priorities for scarce resources among people with nearly identical interests and where differences are mediated by the non-objection of redistribution in favor of kin selection
If the population is large enough that there are competing economic interests then legislation can function as a means of performing trades between people willing to compromise, who find no benefit in access to power, and find benefit in mutual satisfaction due to kin selection.
If the population is diverse, has different demographic distributions (abilities), are unequal in competition in the markets, unequal in tax contribution, seek access to power, and are in political competition, then the authoritarian government is necessary.
This is a natural law at scale.
I hope you found this useful.
THERE IS GOING TO BE A REVOLUTION – I KNOW BECAUSE I’M ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO WILL START IT.
(Re-Posted from last year for Nostalgic Purposes 😉 )
Hello. I’m Curt Doolittle.
Moral men need a reason for rebellion. (they have it: rule by credit, familicide, genocide, culturecide, civilization. )
They need an institutional solution implementable as law, to demand that resolves their issues, (we have it) and to which they can feel, claim, argue, and fight for, as a moral high ground (they can).
They need a plan of transition to the new institutional system that they can envision bringing to fruition. (we have it)
They need a strategy and a plan of action making use of available means by which to conduct a rebellion that will succeed. (we have it)
They need an opportunity to seize under which the revolution can be visibly successful (we do – no civilization in history has been more fragile)
They need a communication system by which to coordinate their efforts over large territories that are impossible for standard police, emergency, and military to concentrate power against. (we have it).
If possible they need an icon behind which to anthropomorphize their actions (we have it)
(Some of us have been at this a while)
Sovereignty. Rule of Natural Judge Discovered, Common Law. Direct Democracy over a Market Commons with Houses for the Classes. Direct redistribution of proceeds from the commons, and liquidity from the treasury to the citizenry. An end to Fiat Credit Capitalism, an end to Politicians, and an end to propaganda, misrepresentation, pseudoscience, and deceit in the informational commons (public discourse). And the creation of opportunities in every state by the decentralization of power, and the devolution of the federal government to regions.
The American Empire was useful in the conquest of the continent. It was useful in the preservation of the British Empire’s patterns of finance and trade. It was useful in the defeat of world communism. But it is not useful in the defeat of Islamism, nor our own suicidal pseudoscientific secular humanism – it is the sponsor of both in the deep state’s pursuit of customers from both.
We are going to end the empire. Preserve the military as overwhelmingly powerful domestic rather than overstretched international force. Preserve the systems of insurers of last resort. But eliminate the discretion of the federal government over our daily lives. We are not equal. We do not have equal desires. And both the European imperial and American imperial systems must end. Or like all empires, they will kill the host that made them possible.
Revolution, Restoration of our Constitution, and Resulting Renaissance are coming.
Thank you for listening.
THERE IS GOING TO BE A REVOLUTION – I KNOW BECAUSE I’M ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO WILL START IT.
(Re-Posted from last year for Nostalgic Purposes 😉 )
Hello. I’m Curt Doolittle.
Moral men need a reason for rebellion. (they have it: rule by credit, familicide, genocide, culturecide, civilization. )
They need an institutional solution implementable as law, to demand that resolves their issues, (we have it) and to which they can feel, claim, argue, and fight for, as a moral high ground (they can).
They need a plan of transition to the new institutional system that they can envision bringing to fruition. (we have it)
They need a strategy and a plan of action making use of available means by which to conduct a rebellion that will succeed. (we have it)
They need an opportunity to seize under which the revolution can be visibly successful (we do – no civilization in history has been more fragile)
They need a communication system by which to coordinate their efforts over large territories that are impossible for standard police, emergency, and military to concentrate power against. (we have it).
If possible they need an icon behind which to anthropomorphize their actions (we have it)
(Some of us have been at this a while)
Sovereignty. Rule of Natural Judge Discovered, Common Law. Direct Democracy over a Market Commons with Houses for the Classes. Direct redistribution of proceeds from the commons, and liquidity from the treasury to the citizenry. An end to Fiat Credit Capitalism, an end to Politicians, and an end to propaganda, misrepresentation, pseudoscience, and deceit in the informational commons (public discourse). And the creation of opportunities in every state by the decentralization of power, and the devolution of the federal government to regions.
The American Empire was useful in the conquest of the continent. It was useful in the preservation of the British Empire’s patterns of finance and trade. It was useful in the defeat of world communism. But it is not useful in the defeat of Islamism, nor our own suicidal pseudoscientific secular humanism – it is the sponsor of both in the deep state’s pursuit of customers from both.
We are going to end the empire. Preserve the military as overwhelmingly powerful domestic rather than overstretched international force. Preserve the systems of insurers of last resort. But eliminate the discretion of the federal government over our daily lives. We are not equal. We do not have equal desires. And both the European imperial and American imperial systems must end. Or like all empires, they will kill the host that made them possible.
Revolution, Restoration of our Constitution, and Resulting Renaissance are coming.
Thank you for listening.
@sopan123 No. Gold standard was necessary beacue there was no other commodity that was equally liqud. Once fiat money was possible – which required advanced banks to clear fiat money, gold was not necesary. Fiat money prevents what you’re complaining about, which is effectiely rent-seeking on the necessary commodity we call money.
(sort of. it’s close)The Choice – Episode 0018 – The Right’s Judgement and Sentencing of The Left
—“You can’t run on a civil war footing hopped up on conspiracy theories hating everyone who lives in cities, mainlining [conspiracy theories], threatening to kidnap governors and shoot protesters, without people trying to figure out how to reverse the brainwashing.”— Typical Democratic Party Member
You have it backward. The fact that you’ve succeeded in brainwashing the majority is only evidence of the relative incompetence of the majority. Here is the evidence. We don’t presume you conspire intentionally, but you do conspire by common interest, and fail to perform due diligence against error, bias, deceit, fraud, theft free riding, parasitism and predation. So let us see how you failed due diligence. In the resolution of disputes, we do not need consider intent, only harm, where harm is the result of the failure of due diligence to prevent yourself and others from doing harm. Intent only increases the severity of the three categories of sentencing: restitution, punishment, and prevention of repetition. And once aware that one’s actions are a crime, a harm, a violation of reciprocity in display word and deed,
These words constitute as ‘service’ making you aware of your crimes, demanding you cease and desist from your crimes, or you shall suffer the increased severity of restitution, punishment and prevention you are due for having continued your crimes.
What are those crimes?
Our Core Dispute: the success of Europe over the rest is the development of the institution of rule of law before state or faith; all civilizations are anchored in group strategy, mythology, tradition, method of persuasion, vocabulary, and logic of their first institutions. Those first are sometimes modified by the second, and the third rarely has any influence. The european Common law is five thousand years old, it is empirical, and the institution of that empirical law resulted in the empirical discovery of formal(logical), physical, natural and evolutionary laws, and caused european markets, and european soft market eugenics: culling of the underclasses tht other peoples failed to cull.
The left can’t tolerate that it’s entire pseudoscientific and sophomoric project, including gould’s evolution, boaz’s anthropology, freud’s psychology, marx’s economics and sociology, the frankfurt school’s history culture and aesthetics, derrida’s sophistry, friedan’s feminism, the political-correctness and woke movements, cantor’s and borh’s mathematics, are COUNTER REVOLUTIONS against the Darwinian explanation for the success of the west over the rest: our maximization of adaptation using rule of law, Markets rewarding innnovation, and the market Eugenics that result – continuing the process of natural selection, leaving the europeans by the beginning of the 19th century with an extraordinary genetic, institutional, cultural, and technological advantage of continuous rapid evolution and adaptation – that was undermined the largely jewish postwar attack on the american and european eugenics movements – and expanded into immigration of undesirables that has all but eliminated our genetic, institutional, political, cultural, social, technolgical advantages in less than a century.
The right is masculine, militaristic, hierarchical, conformal, role-finding (position finding in the hierarchy), limiting consumption, limiting reproduction, capitalizing gains in family and commons. The left: dysgenic hyperconsumption and reproduction: CANCER.
You are, quite unknowingly, by your revolt against western civilization, it’s rule of law, empiricism, markets, hierarchy, and soft eugenics, against science, against, truth, are nothing more than a pseudoscientific cult repeating the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim dark ages. The decline in human ability over the past three decades is due to YOU. The loss of productivity do to YOU.
You took advantage of the media to industrialize your lying, your baiting into hazard, your false promise of freedom from the natural laws; and you accused european men of oppression rather than observance of the laws of the universe, and preservation of their gains, and the vast disproportionate gains for mankind by continuing their traditions. Traditions for which lesser evovled peoples are empirically unfit by their failure to integrate and adapt to them, and their failure in economic and social markets because of iit.
What is the immense cost of your crimes? Is it measurable? It’s so vast it’s incomprehensible. You have spent down into reproductive number and dysgenia over a thousand years of civilizational, territorial, institutional, traditional, cultural, normative, intellectual, and genetic capital – in just a century. You are worse than any plague – plagues take lives but cultures endure. You’re even worse. You’re informational, behavioral, and social cancer. And you are doing to the west what you did to mesopotamia, egypt, north africa, persia, old india, the romans, the byzantines, and old europe. If science had an equivalent of the devil or the antichrist it would be the left, and leftism the woship of evil itself. You are nothing but a war against evolution and man itself with the false promise of violation of the laws of nature if you destroy those who discover. adapt to, and apply them as proxies for hating the universe who finds you unfit for it. A truth that you cannot bear.
Christianity provided the only possible comfort for adherence to the laws of nature and nature’s god: reciprocal insurance in the community of every member of it. It came a the price of false promise of life after death. The Christians only sought to expand charity by interpersonal(empirical) redistribution to others in exchange for conformity to our traditions (Europen group strategy is uniquely scientific).The LEFT tried to WAR AGAINST US – against every aspect of our civilization – against all our capital in all its forms – through the new institutions of mass media, fiat money, the debt expansion, our charity in opening up democarcy, our presumption of the good that it wouldn’t be abused, using the descendence of slaves to impose undue guilt our virtuos self image could not bear, the frailty of our laws, our courts, and ourconstitution, the poisoning our education and our academy and finally our bureaucracy, and our entertainment, and our news media and social media – meanwhile spreading immigration, reproductive distribution from te middle class to the underclasses and immigrants, and justifying the parasitism of trillions every year from our people through financialization, made possible by it,
The fact that european practiced this tradition of ‘scientific government of civilization’ by tradition rather than articulated expression is something I’ve solved for Europeans, by writing it down as their group strategy: the formal logic of the natural law of cooperation.
And in doing so I’ve also demonstrated you are the equivalent of the great plages, responsible for 100M recent and 1B ancient deaths, the loss of 5 great civilizations of the ancient world – an intellectual, social, economic, and political cancer of uncontrolled dysgenic growth.
So you and your lies, your pseudoscience, your revolt against the formal(correspondence with reality), physical(scarcity), natural (reciprocity, amorality), evolutionary(regression to the mean, the defeat of the red queen), is just another cult we must stop to prevent your Dark Age.
You violate the only law necessary for cooperation: reciprocal grant of self determination, by self-determined means, using reciprocity in display word and deed and duty of reciprocal insurance of reciprocity in display word and deed, and markets for voluntary association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities . If you violate that one law, then we may negotiate an exchange, you may pay restitution, but if you persist in your crimes, and do not willingly separate, then we have no choice but war. War to separate, war to conquer, war to rule, or war to eliminate.
We have, obeying that law, chosen reciprocity. The choice of response is yours. Any choice other than separation means war, and you will bear the full consequences that decision.
You deserve every act of retaliation, retribution, punishment, and restitution for your crimes.
Natural Law(Tort) does not require intent to do harm – it requires only you fail due diligence.
You failed.
You are accused, prosecuted, convicted, sentenced, and awaiting your punishment.
–“if you had not sinned, your gods would not have sent us to punish you.”–Genghis Khan