Source: Original Site Post
-
Nietzsche Failed. It Was In Our Law.
Nietzche identified slave morality, reminded us of our ancient ‘values’, and provided a continental(childish) fantasy ‘psychology’ for our restoration – in typical german fashion using a secular theology. Instead, the answer was in our ancient law, not faith, myth or ‘values’.
-
Ukrainian 2014 and American 2021 Revolutions
In America, we have corrupt global elites, politicians dependent on them, deep state employed and empowered by them, and an attempted communist (democratic party, leftists, globalist) takeover in progress, with ‘people who work for a living’ (Right, meritocracy) against them. In the Ukrainian Revolution 1.Mass Assembly in near the govt. bldgs. 2.Barricading the roads with tires, filling them with rubble – bulletproof. 3.Small number of nationalists fight, take buildings. “visit” police, politicians, at home. 4.Draw fire. Delegitimizes govt/mil/pol. 5. Win. The American equivalent of this strategy requires a slight variation because of the larger scale, but is equally easy, because the minute you have civil war it’s an post-verbal, existential demonstration of a failed govt, and firing on people with moral claims is delegitimizing. This delegitimization has an immediate effect on military and police, the bureaucracy, formerly neutral population segments, radicalizes sympathizers, and most importantly, the international community – in which the govt immediately loses all soft power and can’t function. Threats to markets and finance cause large networks to seek to end the crisis as soon as possible, in order to preserve the full spectrum of investments. The consequences for the entire world would drive us to settlement. The USA cannot recover from six months of civil war. We cannot recover within six months from harm to the internet, and years with harm to telco, and possibly ever from harm to power and natural gas. So a successful ‘revolt to restore rule of law, meritocracy, and defense from parasites’ requires ‘making the case for the left’s corruption, and a ‘policy solution that fixes the conflict’ We have that solution using peaceful separation using constitutional restoration to form. You can find the working documents on http://propertarianinstitute.com > main menu > Reforms The detail is too technical but the front summary should be accessible to a college-level audience.
-
Ukrainian 2014 and American 2021 Revolutions
In America, we have corrupt global elites, politicians dependent on them, deep state employed and empowered by them, and an attempted communist (democratic party, leftists, globalist) takeover in progress, with ‘people who work for a living’ (Right, meritocracy) against them. In the Ukrainian Revolution 1.Mass Assembly in near the govt. bldgs. 2.Barricading the roads with tires, filling them with rubble – bulletproof. 3.Small number of nationalists fight, take buildings. “visit” police, politicians, at home. 4.Draw fire. Delegitimizes govt/mil/pol. 5. Win. The American equivalent of this strategy requires a slight variation because of the larger scale, but is equally easy, because the minute you have civil war it’s an post-verbal, existential demonstration of a failed govt, and firing on people with moral claims is delegitimizing. This delegitimization has an immediate effect on military and police, the bureaucracy, formerly neutral population segments, radicalizes sympathizers, and most importantly, the international community – in which the govt immediately loses all soft power and can’t function. Threats to markets and finance cause large networks to seek to end the crisis as soon as possible, in order to preserve the full spectrum of investments. The consequences for the entire world would drive us to settlement. The USA cannot recover from six months of civil war. We cannot recover within six months from harm to the internet, and years with harm to telco, and possibly ever from harm to power and natural gas. So a successful ‘revolt to restore rule of law, meritocracy, and defense from parasites’ requires ‘making the case for the left’s corruption, and a ‘policy solution that fixes the conflict’ We have that solution using peaceful separation using constitutional restoration to form. You can find the working documents on http://propertarianinstitute.com > main menu > Reforms The detail is too technical but the front summary should be accessible to a college-level audience.
-
“Spying”
—“[Ukraine’ Maidan] was a coup by intel but I’ll never tell by whom.”– Not really. Intel isn’t that smart or influential. It’s just smarter than State and Defense. 😉 Everyone everywhere was surprised and exploited the opportunity. But it was the oligarchs that really brought it into being. The EU or Russia would destroy them. They couldn’t afford another other scenario than the status quo, and the Ukrainan people still suffer for no reason because of it. It would take the USA or Russia to fix it since the real ‘state’ is the oligarchs, they are heavily armed, and desperate to retain position and control, and Ukraine doesn’t, like Putin, have Chechens to do the ‘hard work’ of eliminating them. We (everyone I knew) ASKED for help and couldn’t get ANYTHING. Then, once it really kicked off, then fast, total flip, and it rained money from USA heaven. But it wasn’t just the states, it was everyone. I think the poles were the most helpful because they’re trusted. So I don’t like it when people overstate anything I’ve done. There are serious people doing serious things. I was a contractor and volunteer like many patriots. My personality and skillset was suitable for ‘training’ people how to get certain things done, providing cover for them, and as a ‘volunteer’, in developing relationships, collecting information (none of which was useful really) and ‘distribution’ of certain things (which was). People will talk to me because smart, I’m interesting, listen, patient, and helpful. That’s really all it takes other than totally compartmentalizing that part of your life (and mind) from even your significant other. The only reason I’m upfront about these kinds of things is that I found that the rumors people spread develop a life of their own, grow continuously, and it’s better to ‘contain’ them with the truth: a lot of international biz/prof patriots ‘assist’ directly, indirectly, knowingly and not. I got ‘outed’, by someone influential, I don’t know how, and it spread fast. So I contained it. And moved on – meaning I stopped. Besides, what I learned was how easy it would be to reproduce the UA revolt here in the states. That became my focus: how to make sure if it happens ‘the good guys win’: the constitution as it was designed for the great american experiment.
-
“Spying”
—“[Ukraine’ Maidan] was a coup by intel but I’ll never tell by whom.”– Not really. Intel isn’t that smart or influential. It’s just smarter than State and Defense. 😉 Everyone everywhere was surprised and exploited the opportunity. But it was the oligarchs that really brought it into being. The EU or Russia would destroy them. They couldn’t afford another other scenario than the status quo, and the Ukrainan people still suffer for no reason because of it. It would take the USA or Russia to fix it since the real ‘state’ is the oligarchs, they are heavily armed, and desperate to retain position and control, and Ukraine doesn’t, like Putin, have Chechens to do the ‘hard work’ of eliminating them. We (everyone I knew) ASKED for help and couldn’t get ANYTHING. Then, once it really kicked off, then fast, total flip, and it rained money from USA heaven. But it wasn’t just the states, it was everyone. I think the poles were the most helpful because they’re trusted. So I don’t like it when people overstate anything I’ve done. There are serious people doing serious things. I was a contractor and volunteer like many patriots. My personality and skillset was suitable for ‘training’ people how to get certain things done, providing cover for them, and as a ‘volunteer’, in developing relationships, collecting information (none of which was useful really) and ‘distribution’ of certain things (which was). People will talk to me because smart, I’m interesting, listen, patient, and helpful. That’s really all it takes other than totally compartmentalizing that part of your life (and mind) from even your significant other. The only reason I’m upfront about these kinds of things is that I found that the rumors people spread develop a life of their own, grow continuously, and it’s better to ‘contain’ them with the truth: a lot of international biz/prof patriots ‘assist’ directly, indirectly, knowingly and not. I got ‘outed’, by someone influential, I don’t know how, and it spread fast. So I contained it. And moved on – meaning I stopped. Besides, what I learned was how easy it would be to reproduce the UA revolt here in the states. That became my focus: how to make sure if it happens ‘the good guys win’: the constitution as it was designed for the great american experiment.
-
All The Thinkers Have Discovered the Problem of 20th C. Thought By Discovering the Limits of Mathematics in Present Form
Weinstein (Geometry, physics, economics), Taleb (financial modeling), Mandelbrot (computation) and I, Doolittle, (AI simulation, law, and econ) all discovered the same problems with 20th century thought, and Joscha Bach is the only other person that appears to understand fully: ‘Mathiness’. (Difference is I didn’t, and still don’t, care for public attention, and only tolerate it for the purpose of solving the crisis of our age.) To understand mathiness (mathematical sophistry), It’s more important that you understand the operational foundations of mathematics, what’s possible and not with mathematics as we understand it, what the ‘next’ mathematics would consist of – than it matters HOW TO DO THAT MATH. Understanding what’s said is all that’s necessary. Once you know the foundations of math (and how simple it is), then you are less subject to the frailties of ‘Mathiness’. Mathiness is analogous to sophistry in logic of language. “Mathiness” is a problem because math serves as the cognitive gold standard of reduction of errors in perception, deduction, inference. Why? because numbers (positional names) have only one property “position” and for all intents and purposes, because each position consisting of a unique name, is almost impossible to engage in conflation or inflation – that’s the problem with language that P-Law tries to solve: ending the possibility of ambiguity that permits errors or deceits of deduction and inference. So we can treat math as a language using set logic (ideal), or as an instrument, measurement using operations (real) without the failure of the ideal. And we can treat language as mathematics using operational names that are equally closed to errors or deceits of deduction and inference by using P-Law’s Disambiguation by serialization and operationalization.
-
All The Thinkers Have Discovered the Problem of 20th C. Thought By Discovering the Limits of Mathematics in Present Form
Weinstein (Geometry, physics, economics), Taleb (financial modeling), Mandelbrot (computation) and I, Doolittle, (AI simulation, law, and econ) all discovered the same problems with 20th century thought, and Joscha Bach is the only other person that appears to understand fully: ‘Mathiness’. (Difference is I didn’t, and still don’t, care for public attention, and only tolerate it for the purpose of solving the crisis of our age.) To understand mathiness (mathematical sophistry), It’s more important that you understand the operational foundations of mathematics, what’s possible and not with mathematics as we understand it, what the ‘next’ mathematics would consist of – than it matters HOW TO DO THAT MATH. Understanding what’s said is all that’s necessary. Once you know the foundations of math (and how simple it is), then you are less subject to the frailties of ‘Mathiness’. Mathiness is analogous to sophistry in logic of language. “Mathiness” is a problem because math serves as the cognitive gold standard of reduction of errors in perception, deduction, inference. Why? because numbers (positional names) have only one property “position” and for all intents and purposes, because each position consisting of a unique name, is almost impossible to engage in conflation or inflation – that’s the problem with language that P-Law tries to solve: ending the possibility of ambiguity that permits errors or deceits of deduction and inference. So we can treat math as a language using set logic (ideal), or as an instrument, measurement using operations (real) without the failure of the ideal. And we can treat language as mathematics using operational names that are equally closed to errors or deceits of deduction and inference by using P-Law’s Disambiguation by serialization and operationalization.
-
Male and European vs Female and Semitic Methods of Conflict
Why did females develop verbal and social superpredation by undermining and conflict generation, using gossiping, rallying, outraging, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, projecting, fictionalizing? Why did males develop physical and political superpredation by violence (truth)? Answer? Weakness vs Strength. Why did the Europeans and East Asians institutionalize military, state or law, reciprocity, markets, eugenics? Same reason. Why did the Jews institutionalize the female means of adversarial competition as their group strategy instead? Same reason.
-
Male and European vs Female and Semitic Methods of Conflict
Why did females develop verbal and social superpredation by undermining and conflict generation, using gossiping, rallying, outraging, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, projecting, fictionalizing? Why did males develop physical and political superpredation by violence (truth)? Answer? Weakness vs Strength. Why did the Europeans and East Asians institutionalize military, state or law, reciprocity, markets, eugenics? Same reason. Why did the Jews institutionalize the female means of adversarial competition as their group strategy instead? Same reason.