Source: Original Site Post

  • Non-Conflationary West

    The west is deconflationary. We do not confuse methods of arguments, disciplines that make use of them, institutions that provide and manage them. We maintain a competition, and circumvent any monopoly: *power*. |— LIMITS ——- > UTILITY ——–> GOALS/IDEALS–>

    • LIMITS: Law, legal jurisdiction – secular jurisdiction – a discovered science of dispute resolution.
    • UTILITY: Trade – practical jurisdiction – a learned craft of pragmatism.
    • IDEALS: Matters spiritual – are literary – and an imagined art of aspiration.

    Islam and Judaism are ‘simpler’ methods than western. simpler than Chinese. And suitable for a people less intelligent —Curt

  • Strategies – Not Steady States

    STRATEGIES NOT STEADY STATES Communism …. (lower class – short term – consumption – r-selection ) …. (mandatory consumption) …. (reproductive offense – distribution of assets ) …. (strength in numbers) Market Government …. (middle class – medium term – production) …. (mandatory exchange) …. (productive offense – market exchange of assets) …. (strength in adaptation/evolution) Fascism …. (upper class – long term – preservation – K-selection) …. (mandatory production/contribution) …. (organizational offense – concentration of assets) …. (strength in ability[resources])
    Innovative < —————- > Defensive …. …. …. Communism (universalism) (impossible) …. …. Socialism (competitively impossible) …. Social Democracy (possible as long as competitive) Market Government (Trade) …. Anarchism (impossible) ….Classical-Liberalism, (competitively possible) …. ….Christian Monarchism (competitively possible) …. …. ….Fascism (particularism) We alter between these strategies as our prosperity allows. —Curt
  • Strategies – Not Steady States

    STRATEGIES NOT STEADY STATES Communism …. (lower class – short term – consumption – r-selection ) …. (mandatory consumption) …. (reproductive offense – distribution of assets ) …. (strength in numbers) Market Government …. (middle class – medium term – production) …. (mandatory exchange) …. (productive offense – market exchange of assets) …. (strength in adaptation/evolution) Fascism …. (upper class – long term – preservation – K-selection) …. (mandatory production/contribution) …. (organizational offense – concentration of assets) …. (strength in ability[resources])
    Innovative < —————- > Defensive …. …. …. Communism (universalism) (impossible) …. …. Socialism (competitively impossible) …. Social Democracy (possible as long as competitive) Market Government (Trade) …. Anarchism (impossible) ….Classical-Liberalism, (competitively possible) …. ….Christian Monarchism (competitively possible) …. …. ….Fascism (particularism) We alter between these strategies as our prosperity allows. —Curt
  • Definition: Paedomorphic Evolution

    It’s called Paedomorphic Evolution: Genetic Pacification selecting for lower maturity – the “juvenile”. One of which is Gracilization: loss of bone mass. The ‘strange’ sexual interests of the Japanese (and the asians) and our men’s attraction to Asian women, is very likely due to the greater paedomorphism of the asians and the lower levels of testosterone. The east and the west have been engaging in genetic pacification over a long long time. The rest of the world has not. Because they were unable to reduce the bottom population.

  • Definition: Paedomorphic Evolution

    It’s called Paedomorphic Evolution: Genetic Pacification selecting for lower maturity – the “juvenile”. One of which is Gracilization: loss of bone mass. The ‘strange’ sexual interests of the Japanese (and the asians) and our men’s attraction to Asian women, is very likely due to the greater paedomorphism of the asians and the lower levels of testosterone. The east and the west have been engaging in genetic pacification over a long long time. The rest of the world has not. Because they were unable to reduce the bottom population.

  • We Have No Recourse But Civil War

    Democrats own responsibility for the 1965 immigration bill designed to flood the country with underclasses – reversing two centuries of the Puritan’s American eugenic experimentation. Why? Because socialism is undesirable to the productive people, and the people would not have it. The democrats are responsible for the destruction of the family. And the destruction of the family as the central object of policy: creating good strong productive, inter generational families.

    Democrats are responsible for moving the black family from the farm to the ghetto and destroying their families. The reason? To concentrate votes in cities in order to politically take their possession. Democrats are responsible for ongoing racial hatred be forced bussing and urban planning. Traditions, norms, and habits in any subculture are grown through adaptation over generations. There is no shortcut. Forced integration we’d the catastrophe that took the black man from potential working class to permanent underclass by interfering with the necessary natural adaptation to western high trust low impulse civic society. Democrats are responsible for the competitive decline of education, and blocking all attempts at reform. Why? Control of education using unskilled labor (most teachers ) is useful in indoctrinating generations into socialist submission. Furthermore, it allows women the false hope that their children are by and large mediocre and that the only control they have over the success of their offspring is the quality of man they choose to reproduce with. Democrats are responsible for the disintegration of rule of law. By intentionally designed suits that create law though activist judges. Democrats are responsible for all our ills. They set out with the help of early socialists to steal a continent by importing votes, creating single mothers, and constructing permanent underclasses. We have no recourse but civil war. Welcome to the revolution.
  • We Have No Recourse But Civil War

    Democrats own responsibility for the 1965 immigration bill designed to flood the country with underclasses – reversing two centuries of the Puritan’s American eugenic experimentation. Why? Because socialism is undesirable to the productive people, and the people would not have it. The democrats are responsible for the destruction of the family. And the destruction of the family as the central object of policy: creating good strong productive, inter generational families.

    Democrats are responsible for moving the black family from the farm to the ghetto and destroying their families. The reason? To concentrate votes in cities in order to politically take their possession. Democrats are responsible for ongoing racial hatred be forced bussing and urban planning. Traditions, norms, and habits in any subculture are grown through adaptation over generations. There is no shortcut. Forced integration we’d the catastrophe that took the black man from potential working class to permanent underclass by interfering with the necessary natural adaptation to western high trust low impulse civic society. Democrats are responsible for the competitive decline of education, and blocking all attempts at reform. Why? Control of education using unskilled labor (most teachers ) is useful in indoctrinating generations into socialist submission. Furthermore, it allows women the false hope that their children are by and large mediocre and that the only control they have over the success of their offspring is the quality of man they choose to reproduce with. Democrats are responsible for the disintegration of rule of law. By intentionally designed suits that create law though activist judges. Democrats are responsible for all our ills. They set out with the help of early socialists to steal a continent by importing votes, creating single mothers, and constructing permanent underclasses. We have no recourse but civil war. Welcome to the revolution.
  • Women and Men

    Women exist as our mothers, sisters, daughters, wives and friends. In that capacity we are equal. But in politics and war women are as incapable as men are of conception and birth. And it is more likely that men will give birth than women will demonstrate capability in politics and war. Dependence upon female defense of communal capital is as suicidal as dependence upon male bearing of offspring.

  • Women and Men

    Women exist as our mothers, sisters, daughters, wives and friends. In that capacity we are equal. But in politics and war women are as incapable as men are of conception and birth. And it is more likely that men will give birth than women will demonstrate capability in politics and war. Dependence upon female defense of communal capital is as suicidal as dependence upon male bearing of offspring.

  • It’s not that the best must rule, it’s that the worst must not.

    Just as falsification tells us what may be true by that which we cannot make false; and proofs tell us what is not false but not what is true; and the law tells us now what we must do, but only what we must not do; and evolution tells us only what fails, not what succeeds, it is not important that the best people lead, as much as it is important that the worst do not. For this reason we must limit access to power to those least likely to lead poorly. How do we know? Demonstrated character in familial, entrepreneurial, political, and military excellence over multiple generations. And the elimination of consideration of those who fail the test of character in familial, entrepreneurial, and military excellence across multiple generations.

    Nobility is most frequently demonstrated by intergenerational excellence. For those who cannot master their passions enough for good breeding, good rearing, good production, and good defense, have demonstrated by their actions that they and their families are unsuitable for leadership. Note that survival from the opinions of others in schooling, academy, politics and church, tell us nothing about an individual other than his ability remember and to obey, while engaging in various forms of politicking and deceit. Only family, commercial, and military experience tell us about the capacity of an individual to lead.