As far as i know, gods, like the rest of the universe, consist entirely of information. They hold, and transfer information. And by information, we mean, influences upon individual decidability. The question is, what is the quality of the information that they transfer? And how do we measure the consequences of the information that they transfer? These various gods exist, since humans act as though they exist, even if they only exist, like all of the universe, as information. And some of these gods are ideal, some helpful, some unhelpful, and some nothing more than the embodiment of evil. The way we know, is the truth or falsehood of their information, the productivity or parasitism of their people, and the genetic, economic, informational, and aesthetic achievement of their people. Gods are measurable and decidable. We can JUDGE THE GODS WORTHY OR NOT.
Source: Original Site Post
-
The Climate Change Question is a Deception to Distract from the Real Problem: Populations and Energy.
—“Curt: What are your views on anthropogenic climate change?”— The question is not whether the climate is changing (it always does), and not whether we are contributing to it (it seems like we might be), but whether our contributions are meaningful (causing a marginal difference), or whether they are merely noise amidst the normal solar cycles (hard to tell), and whether given that we should be entering another period of cooling (it seems though we are), even if we will raise the temperature, if it’s actually harmful or beneficial. Now, even if that is said we must choose between lowering the consumption of energy, lowering our use of petroleum products, or lowering the size of the population. The evidence would indicate that the most important method of correcting the problem is to convert to nuclear power where possible, and to reduce the population of the planet to the point where we able to consume (convert) as much energy as we possibly can, in order to innovate (and exit the planet) as fast as we can. Or whether we expand the population indefinitely. This is the real debate. And the rest of it’s all lies as far as I can understand. 1B seems to be a good top number for a planet like earth.
-
The Climate Change Question is a Deception to Distract from the Real Problem: Populations and Energy.
—“Curt: What are your views on anthropogenic climate change?”— The question is not whether the climate is changing (it always does), and not whether we are contributing to it (it seems like we might be), but whether our contributions are meaningful (causing a marginal difference), or whether they are merely noise amidst the normal solar cycles (hard to tell), and whether given that we should be entering another period of cooling (it seems though we are), even if we will raise the temperature, if it’s actually harmful or beneficial. Now, even if that is said we must choose between lowering the consumption of energy, lowering our use of petroleum products, or lowering the size of the population. The evidence would indicate that the most important method of correcting the problem is to convert to nuclear power where possible, and to reduce the population of the planet to the point where we able to consume (convert) as much energy as we possibly can, in order to innovate (and exit the planet) as fast as we can. Or whether we expand the population indefinitely. This is the real debate. And the rest of it’s all lies as far as I can understand. 1B seems to be a good top number for a planet like earth.
-
It’s Not ‘Bourgeoise To Build An Economy’ You Idiots.
Warriors are cheap because testosterone is cheap. Warfare is expensive. High Art – Monuments, culture, arts – are the result of conquest. So stop wasting my time. Ok? Culture is the result of wealth made possible by the organized application of violence to construct means of production that provide superior technological and logistical advantage. So please. masturbate somewhere else. ok? I am thrilled to keep the teenagers happy, and individual excellence is an exceptional resource. But if you can’t accumulate numbers necessary for warfare you’re just jerking off. You aren’t a warrior you’re a dilatant.
Wars are won by technology and supply lines. And technology costs. Why? The marginal difference between individuals with weapons is far more a factor of exhaustion than it is of ability. War is a game of errors, not excellences. (It’s like I gotta take everyone back to f—ing grade school) -
It’s Not ‘Bourgeoise To Build An Economy’ You Idiots.
Warriors are cheap because testosterone is cheap. Warfare is expensive. High Art – Monuments, culture, arts – are the result of conquest. So stop wasting my time. Ok? Culture is the result of wealth made possible by the organized application of violence to construct means of production that provide superior technological and logistical advantage. So please. masturbate somewhere else. ok? I am thrilled to keep the teenagers happy, and individual excellence is an exceptional resource. But if you can’t accumulate numbers necessary for warfare you’re just jerking off. You aren’t a warrior you’re a dilatant.
Wars are won by technology and supply lines. And technology costs. Why? The marginal difference between individuals with weapons is far more a factor of exhaustion than it is of ability. War is a game of errors, not excellences. (It’s like I gotta take everyone back to f—ing grade school) -
Decreasing The Error, Bias, And Deceit, To Identify Cheaply Opportunities To Seize
The political questions we face are very different if we seek to eliminate error, bias, and deceit, rather than if we seek to identify optimums by which to obtain discounts. People will seize the discounts no matter what. the problem is in decreasing the error, bias, and deceit, so that those opportunities are more readily visible. It’s not that we should ignore error bias and deceit so we must constantly thrash through them to find the opportunities amidst the clutter.
-
Decreasing The Error, Bias, And Deceit, To Identify Cheaply Opportunities To Seize
The political questions we face are very different if we seek to eliminate error, bias, and deceit, rather than if we seek to identify optimums by which to obtain discounts. People will seize the discounts no matter what. the problem is in decreasing the error, bias, and deceit, so that those opportunities are more readily visible. It’s not that we should ignore error bias and deceit so we must constantly thrash through them to find the opportunities amidst the clutter.
-
No. Science Is A Moral Discipline Within Natural Law: The Means By Which We Warrant The Truthfulness Of Our Statements.
(Ethelbert, Jesus, and Kant say the same thing) The languages of science(testimony), physical science, propertarianism (social science), natural law (science of dispute resolution), accounting, finance, and economics, (measurement of production), function as the universal language of truth-telling.
The discipline of science asks us to warranty that we have performed due diligence on our statements. We warranty that we have eliminated error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, and deceit from our utterances. That’s what science is: A NATURAL LAW: a warranty of our information, just like the warranty of our services, just as the warranty of our products, just as the warranty of our speech. Period. End of story. I know. You thought you were smart. You were so proud that you had transcended superstition. But it never occurred to you that you were just as ridiculous in the present generation due to the pseudosciences of Marx, Freud, Boaz, Adorno than your superstitious ancestors were in the pseudoscience of theology. Ok. Have we got that straight? Look in the mirror. Repeat after me: “I was suckered by pseudoscience, just like my ancestors were suckered by superstition. I am a sucker. I pledge not to be a sucker any longer. There is only one moral rule in both silver(negative) and gold (positive) forms: Impose not cost upon the cost born by others, by limiting yourself to actions and words, consisting only of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities. Ethelbert (Anglo-Saxon Silver Rule), Jesus (Golden-Rule), and Kant (bi-metal rule), all said the same thing. Everything else is lies to justify theft and to circumvent voluntary transfers between individuals classes and groups. Ok. We’re done here. “Please stop torturing me with your postmodern superstitions, ok?. Thanks, -The Management.” Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy -
No. Science Is A Moral Discipline Within Natural Law: The Means By Which We Warrant The Truthfulness Of Our Statements.
(Ethelbert, Jesus, and Kant say the same thing) The languages of science(testimony), physical science, propertarianism (social science), natural law (science of dispute resolution), accounting, finance, and economics, (measurement of production), function as the universal language of truth-telling.
The discipline of science asks us to warranty that we have performed due diligence on our statements. We warranty that we have eliminated error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, and deceit from our utterances. That’s what science is: A NATURAL LAW: a warranty of our information, just like the warranty of our services, just as the warranty of our products, just as the warranty of our speech. Period. End of story. I know. You thought you were smart. You were so proud that you had transcended superstition. But it never occurred to you that you were just as ridiculous in the present generation due to the pseudosciences of Marx, Freud, Boaz, Adorno than your superstitious ancestors were in the pseudoscience of theology. Ok. Have we got that straight? Look in the mirror. Repeat after me: “I was suckered by pseudoscience, just like my ancestors were suckered by superstition. I am a sucker. I pledge not to be a sucker any longer. There is only one moral rule in both silver(negative) and gold (positive) forms: Impose not cost upon the cost born by others, by limiting yourself to actions and words, consisting only of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities. Ethelbert (Anglo-Saxon Silver Rule), Jesus (Golden-Rule), and Kant (bi-metal rule), all said the same thing. Everything else is lies to justify theft and to circumvent voluntary transfers between individuals classes and groups. Ok. We’re done here. “Please stop torturing me with your postmodern superstitions, ok?. Thanks, -The Management.” Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy -
Tweets
We always, like children, test one another.Sometimes we find the limits.Unfortunately, the limit in politics is the restoration of violence. But be very careful what you do with that violence. Because men are very aware that the proxy is revokable, and we can return to violence. Politics is a proxy for violence between men. A market for trades to avoid violence. Women have permission to use this proxy -within limits. Of course suburbans and rurals have higher sensitivity to costs imposed: the police vast commons that urbanites take for granted. The primary problem is the differences in opportunity costs as density decreases. Rural people police vast commons that urbans dont. If houses were restored to requirements for membership classes could conduct exchanges truthfully rather than propagandize with falsehoods. We end monopoly democracy and restore the market for commons by trade between the houses of the classes. The city-suburb warfare ends. Immigrant cities are excellent plantations for wage and tax slavery. Unfortunately, they don’t understand that they took the bait. End The Age of Monopoly Rule, and restore the west to it’s genius: markets in everything. Democracy created the age of monopoly rule, where the west had forever suppressed it. Houses of government created a market, not monopoly.