Can whomever owns this group please add me to admins? lol – Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute. -thanks
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-10 23:08:12 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105533937540589557
Can whomever owns this group please add me to admins? lol – Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute. -thanks
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-10 23:08:12 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105533937540589557
-“The decade that has transpired in the last few days has brought us much closer to this point than I ever could’ve imagined even a week ago, As every piece of private infrastructure is being put to use to serve a single partisan objective, it’s worth considering that the terminal point on the “Just build your own” chain of logic is to “Just build your own government”-Wartime Lomez @L0m3z
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-09 22:36:58 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105528152378199740
@WhiteShariaNowPlease
1. “Novel ideology”. There is little difference between my work, the founders constitution, and Scalia’s originalist and textualist restoration, other than my work overwhelmingly completes the conversion of constitutional law into a formal science (logic); explains how western civilization is the least divergent from the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, and how that minimum divergence maximizes adaptation, which is the reason for the disproportionate success of europeans in the bronze, iron, steel, and technological ages.
2. “White Sharia” and “…that simply doesn’t happen”. You failed to understand or I failed to convey the idea. There is no reason natural law (as I’ve strictly constructed it) cannot serve as an equally secularly ‘sacred and inviolable’ law. It’s just a secular and scientific rather than supernatural body of law.
3. “…focused exclusively on the Woman Question…” and “…no choice but to raise a fresh generation of baby-machines who haven’t tasted the freedom of voting / working etc.” and “…the bad optics of racialism…”
That’s pretty logically inconsistent: (a) exhaustive power would be necessary to virtually enslave three generations of women (b) you’re claiming that racial or at least voluntary association is more impossible that such enslavment of women, that this is the only question rather than the method of obtaining power, and organizing the polity, and that your solution is the exclusive model for doing so. That’s pretty dim now isn’t it?
4. “…it’s logically unassailable …” It’s logically assailable and I just logically assailed it, and it collapse under that assault as rather ridiculous.
5. “… your policy …” My policy is (a) issue our demands for political preference and political speech to be legally protected class (b) organize rebellion (c) incremental separation (d) legal reforms that restore our civilization and prevent its further abuses, (e) economic, financial, educational, reforms that restore the laboring, working, middle classes and the family to the primacy of policy.
Of course you could read it all here:
https://propertarianinstitute.com/the-book/revolution/introduction-to-the-declaration-of-reformation/
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-09 17:58:32 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105527057515727602
@WhiteShariaNowPlease Why do you have the confidence that (a) you’re right (b) what you want is achievable (c) if achieved it is operable, (d) and surviable?
If you can’t operationalize an ideal into a plan of action, success, operation, and survival in the real world then you’re fantasizing.
I do actionable plans.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-09 11:25:05 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105525510461617346
@WhiteShariaNowPlease Me sweathing my balls off for my people. Meanwhile nitwits continue to destroy our civilzation by their low IQ anti intellectualism. I made ‘white shara’ a reality. And you care that I have sweaty balls, and tell jokes to deescalate with street kids. You’re the reason you fail. And you drag down the rest of us with you.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-09 10:47:06 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105525361120625129
JOY
Thanks for years of joy fighting the good fight. I love all of you. Even the crazy ones. And we are now ‘free’. Because secession has begun. It has begun in mind. It’s begun in social media. And .. in politics.
Move now to Gab, Parler, Bitchute, Newsmax, Bongino
Revolution comes. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-09 04:30:30 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105523880289609586
@Jujuba831 Thanks brother. Lets fight the good fight – and win. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-09 04:29:52 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105523877667217015
“START SOCIAL MEDIA SECESSION BEFORE POLITICAL SECESSION”
1. Move to Gab for Communication, Collaboration, Opinion, and News.
2. Move to Parler for following popular Talking Heads.
3. Move to Bongino for headlines.
4. Move to Newsmax for live News
MOVE NOW!!!!
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-09 03:43:27 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105523694864768328
“What’s the difference between training Stoicism and providing education in Folk Religions?”
Stoicism can be practiced as a ritual of self-transformation toward specific goals. It is just organized cognitive behavioral therapy and there is no substitute for it. It provides mindfulness. Folk religions are social. pagan martial, and Christianity is a political religion The stoic method is simply a rational discipline of cognitive-behavioral therapy (and an action-driven alternative to the passive woo woo of Buddhism), and is the most effective and scientific method of self-authoring. The Epicurean philosophy is the least divergent from the physical nature and evolutionary laws, and it advocates a lifestyle that is optimum for the vast majority. The primary difference in application is that stoicism seeks to insulate you from status signal, status pressure, and conflict, and epicureanism seeks to provide you means of avoiding it and tolerating what little you do experience. So we see stoicism for the analytic personality that tolerates conflict and epicureanism for the empathic personality that seeks to avoid it. Realistically these are the optimum personal philosophies, just as hero, ancestor, and nature thanks (worship) is the optimum religion. So if you study the sciences, history, learn to practice the stoic methodology, live an epicurean life, you are pretty much living the optimum human existence because you are least divergent from the constraints of the universe.
“What’s the difference between training Stoicism and providing education in Folk Religions?”
Stoicism can be practiced as a ritual of self-transformation toward specific goals. It is just organized cognitive behavioral therapy and there is no substitute for it. It provides mindfulness. Folk religions are social. pagan martial, and Christianity is a political religion The stoic method is simply a rational discipline of cognitive-behavioral therapy (and an action-driven alternative to the passive woo woo of Buddhism), and is the most effective and scientific method of self-authoring. The Epicurean philosophy is the least divergent from the physical nature and evolutionary laws, and it advocates a lifestyle that is optimum for the vast majority. The primary difference in application is that stoicism seeks to insulate you from status signal, status pressure, and conflict, and epicureanism seeks to provide you means of avoiding it and tolerating what little you do experience. So we see stoicism for the analytic personality that tolerates conflict and epicureanism for the empathic personality that seeks to avoid it. Realistically these are the optimum personal philosophies, just as hero, ancestor, and nature thanks (worship) is the optimum religion. So if you study the sciences, history, learn to practice the stoic methodology, live an epicurean life, you are pretty much living the optimum human existence because you are least divergent from the constraints of the universe.