@WhiteShariaNowPlease @WhiteShariaNowPlease 1. “Novel ideology”. There is little

@WhiteShariaNowPlease

@WhiteShariaNowPlease
1. “Novel ideology”. There is little difference between my work, the founders constitution, and Scalia’s originalist and textualist restoration, other than my work overwhelmingly completes the conversion of constitutional law into a formal science (logic); explains how western civilization is the least divergent from the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, and how that minimum divergence maximizes adaptation, which is the reason for the disproportionate success of europeans in the bronze, iron, steel, and technological ages.

2. “White Sharia” and “…that simply doesn’t happen”. You failed to understand or I failed to convey the idea. There is no reason natural law (as I’ve strictly constructed it) cannot serve as an equally secularly ‘sacred and inviolable’ law. It’s just a secular and scientific rather than supernatural body of law.

3. “…focused exclusively on the Woman Question…” and “…no choice but to raise a fresh generation of baby-machines who haven’t tasted the freedom of voting / working etc.” and “…the bad optics of racialism…”

That’s pretty logically inconsistent: (a) exhaustive power would be necessary to virtually enslave three generations of women (b) you’re claiming that racial or at least voluntary association is more impossible that such enslavment of women, that this is the only question rather than the method of obtaining power, and organizing the polity, and that your solution is the exclusive model for doing so. That’s pretty dim now isn’t it?

4. “…it’s logically unassailable …” It’s logically assailable and I just logically assailed it, and it collapse under that assault as rather ridiculous.

5. “… your policy …” My policy is (a) issue our demands for political preference and political speech to be legally protected class (b) organize rebellion (c) incremental separation (d) legal reforms that restore our civilization and prevent its further abuses, (e) economic, financial, educational, reforms that restore the laboring, working, middle classes and the family to the primacy of policy.

Of course you could read it all here:
https://propertarianinstitute.com/the-book/revolution/introduction-to-the-declaration-of-reformation/

Cheers