If truth is the language of the gods, as it must be, then why is not bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, and deceit blasphemy? —“There might be a god archetype, in some pantheon, for almost every significant human behavioral pattern. I think that’s a helpful learning utility.”—Adam Houseman Exactly. But that is Myth and literature, for purpose of teaching by analogy. And it is not only important but necessary. Why? Because the western man uses HYPERBOLE to exaggerate, in order to show the consequence of ‘if everyone did this then..’. Kant restates this as the categorical imperative. But it is just the western method of using exaggeration of traits of individuals in order to force every living soul to ask “what if everyone did this” or “what are the consequences of this behavior over time”. Gods help us create general rules of decidability within a context by means of hyperbole (isolation of causal properties.) This is why we need myths, stated hyperbolically, and literature stated analogically: to create general rules, easily employed in a wide variety of circumstances, so that we may, through the thousands of little decisions every day, guide our civilization into that which we seek: parity with the gods.
Source: Original Site Post
-
There Are No Propertarian Objections to White Nationalism – or Any Other Nationalism
(controversial)(read it all before you jump to conclusions) Assuming it’s under our ancient group evolutionary strategy (sovereignty), and under our ancient law (rule of natural law of sovereigns), and where we produce commons by a market between the classes (multi-house-government), where we use an intergenerational judge of last resort (hereditary monarchy), and where all those with enfranchisement are trained to, and fight in a militia. (I call this market fascism). But to just separately bring white people together again, say under communism, is not to restore white civilization. And without our civilization we are nothing. I advocate that all peoples of the world adopt nationalism and the white civilizational strategy. Not just us. In fact, I have no problem demanding it at the point of a gun. Fascism for war and intentional reordering of the economy, Market fascism for when we are not at war. And that’s about as difficult as it gets. Curt
-
There Are No Propertarian Objections to White Nationalism – or Any Other Nationalism
(controversial)(read it all before you jump to conclusions) Assuming it’s under our ancient group evolutionary strategy (sovereignty), and under our ancient law (rule of natural law of sovereigns), and where we produce commons by a market between the classes (multi-house-government), where we use an intergenerational judge of last resort (hereditary monarchy), and where all those with enfranchisement are trained to, and fight in a militia. (I call this market fascism). But to just separately bring white people together again, say under communism, is not to restore white civilization. And without our civilization we are nothing. I advocate that all peoples of the world adopt nationalism and the white civilizational strategy. Not just us. In fact, I have no problem demanding it at the point of a gun. Fascism for war and intentional reordering of the economy, Market fascism for when we are not at war. And that’s about as difficult as it gets. Curt
-
Definition: Origins of Property Rights
Property rights are determined by those able to mass sufficient violence it to define their constituency and their limits. Under natural law property rights ARE absolute. It is the externalities that determine their limits not whether or not one has demonstrated investment in them. Ergo, scientifically property rights must be absolute, contingent upon the consequences of their exercise. Practically speaking property rights evolve to suit the median of the population, which is why western europeans prior to 1900 had the worlds highest degree of property rights.
-
Definition: Origins of Property Rights
Property rights are determined by those able to mass sufficient violence it to define their constituency and their limits. Under natural law property rights ARE absolute. It is the externalities that determine their limits not whether or not one has demonstrated investment in them. Ergo, scientifically property rights must be absolute, contingent upon the consequences of their exercise. Practically speaking property rights evolve to suit the median of the population, which is why western europeans prior to 1900 had the worlds highest degree of property rights.
-
The Purpose of My Work
THE PURPOSE OF THE WORK
“The purpose of my work, taking it to its conclusion, is to produce the as yet unwritten ‘Bible’ of Western Civilization – beyond which no man or government may tread: The Cult of Non-Submission; The Philosophy of Aristocracy: -Sovereignty; And its ‘Scripture’: Natural Law.”
(Because this sentence seems to strike a chord)
-
The Purpose of My Work
THE PURPOSE OF THE WORK
“The purpose of my work, taking it to its conclusion, is to produce the as yet unwritten ‘Bible’ of Western Civilization – beyond which no man or government may tread: The Cult of Non-Submission; The Philosophy of Aristocracy: -Sovereignty; And its ‘Scripture’: Natural Law.”
(Because this sentence seems to strike a chord)
-
Definitions: Possession, Property, Property Rights
POSSESSION: That which I have acted to prevent others from consumption or use. PROPERTY: That which you and I agree not to use or consume from one another. PROPERTY RIGHTS: that which a third party will insure we do not use or consume from one another.
-
Definitions: Possession, Property, Property Rights
POSSESSION: That which I have acted to prevent others from consumption or use. PROPERTY: That which you and I agree not to use or consume from one another. PROPERTY RIGHTS: that which a third party will insure we do not use or consume from one another.
-
Q&A “What Happens in a Sovereign Society if I Get People Together to Come Take Your Things?”
Under:
- a judge of last resort (hereditary monarch);
- an independent judiciary with rule of law, natural law, and universal standing;
- a market for the production of commons consisting of houses for each of the classes and genders,
- an insurer of last resort (treasury);
- every-enfranchised-man-a-sheriff;
- and every enfranchised man a member of the militia;
I would merely ask either the sheriff, or the court, to demand restitution and prevent further incursion. And that the sheriff would gather other enfranchised men and members of the militia if necessary, to achieve that goal – including me. ( I realize it is very hard to abandon god; very hard to abandon religion; and it is very hard to abandon platonism (fantasy ‘rights’). And actually reduce ‘magical-stuff-happens-here’ to ‘this sequence of events would occur’. But we all must grow up some day. Or at least enough of us must. 😉 )