A List of Hans Hermann Hoppe’s Errors https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/07/31/a-list-of-hans-hermann-hoppes-errors/ As far as I know, this is the final word on Hoppe. And unless or until he answers these objections (he won’t because he cant) we must separate Hoppe’s CONCLUSIONS from his JUSTIFICATIONS. In other words, once we reduce all social science to reciprocity and the voluntary exchange of property, we can deduce all of social science, ethics, politics, group evolutionary strategy, and law, from that reduction. However, his justifications (excuses, arguments) are nonsense up and until that point. I learned the most important ideas from him: the use of property as the unit of measure in the creation of a formal logic of natural law. However, I use science and scientific epistemology where he uses marxist and kantian rationalism: the sources of Marxist communism and socialism and social democracy, rothbardian libertinism, and Straussian neo-conservatism. If hoppe would debate me on this we would be able to illustrate that in three generations, between a jew, a german, and an anglo, we solved the second attempt at discovery of social science. But like most men he cannot (as rothbard did) accept that his most treasured justifications are only one degree removed from kantian rationals, as rothbard is one degree removed from jewish pilpul. The language of truth is science. It just took the three generations of us to complete the second scientific revolution. One that the germans started, but was cut short by the world wars.
Source: Original Site Post
-
On (My) Writing Style
(on writing style)(via pm)(with a friend) As the guys tell me, I tend to write for a cognitive elite, and it seems that it takes about a 130 IQ to understand it. Our strategy group for the past five years has been for me to work out all the fine details then hope the guys like you translate it for the masses. I try but I just don’t think I can talk tot he masses. I think in very … granular(?) terms. In my mind I’m talking about identity, math, logic, programming, and operational law. And that is just … alien to the mass of humanity that was raised upon myth, literature, and history. (the narrative.) I feel my job is to create the equivalent of the Frankfurt School, or the Jesuits, the Inquisition, and create a hundred and then a thousand people who can argue natural law. I would rather enjoy starting a revolution and getting that job done. But I think others will do that job better than I will. I would love it if I could reach the masses through speech. I would love it if I could write novels and stories as the literature of natural law – even though the Iliad and the Odyssey, the greek and roman myths, the rings of the Nibelungelied, the tales of Arthur and the Carolingians, or the story of Colonialism, and now the great heroic task that is before us, are probably sufficient and tested narrative. I’m just one guy. I’m in my 50s. I’ve been seriously ill multiple times, and had a possibly lethal amount of radiation. I have a product in development for many years which I must work on at the same time as the philosophy. Both are taxing. The purpose of the product is to fund me (and others) in taking it to its conclusion: the ‘bible’ of western civilization beyond which no man or government may tread: the cult of non-submission: the philosophy of aristocracy: sovereignty, and its ‘scripture’: natural law.
-
On (My) Writing Style
(on writing style)(via pm)(with a friend) As the guys tell me, I tend to write for a cognitive elite, and it seems that it takes about a 130 IQ to understand it. Our strategy group for the past five years has been for me to work out all the fine details then hope the guys like you translate it for the masses. I try but I just don’t think I can talk tot he masses. I think in very … granular(?) terms. In my mind I’m talking about identity, math, logic, programming, and operational law. And that is just … alien to the mass of humanity that was raised upon myth, literature, and history. (the narrative.) I feel my job is to create the equivalent of the Frankfurt School, or the Jesuits, the Inquisition, and create a hundred and then a thousand people who can argue natural law. I would rather enjoy starting a revolution and getting that job done. But I think others will do that job better than I will. I would love it if I could reach the masses through speech. I would love it if I could write novels and stories as the literature of natural law – even though the Iliad and the Odyssey, the greek and roman myths, the rings of the Nibelungelied, the tales of Arthur and the Carolingians, or the story of Colonialism, and now the great heroic task that is before us, are probably sufficient and tested narrative. I’m just one guy. I’m in my 50s. I’ve been seriously ill multiple times, and had a possibly lethal amount of radiation. I have a product in development for many years which I must work on at the same time as the philosophy. Both are taxing. The purpose of the product is to fund me (and others) in taking it to its conclusion: the ‘bible’ of western civilization beyond which no man or government may tread: the cult of non-submission: the philosophy of aristocracy: sovereignty, and its ‘scripture’: natural law.
-
Our Era in the Context of the Enlightenments: the Restoration of Europa From Semitic and Iranian Influence (deceits).
The enlightenment succeeded in the physical sciences, but not in the social sciences, and we can see the german, french, russian, jewish, chinese reactions as social counter-enlightenments. What seems to have been under development in the 1800’s in Germany was the second scientific enlightenment (which benefitted the USA mostly), and the second attempt at social scientific revolution. Poincare, Maxwell, Darwin, Weber/Pareto/Durkheim, Menger, Spencer, Nietzche, Popper(science), Hayek (law) all came very close, and Weber, Mises, Popper, Brouwer, and Bridgman actually independently came to about the same conclusion, but they could not succeed against the pseudoscientific marxists and keynesians, just as the enlightenment philosophers could not succeed against the church and state. We can succeed. Because we have cognitive science, the record of the failure of keynesian economics, the record of the failure of communism, socialism, social democracy and the record of failure of rousseauian and lockeian man. The world merely needs the answer that the first scientific enlightenment, the second failed enlightenment (german) and the american post-german attempt failed to produce. Social science = natural law = reciprocity and the unit of measure = property.
-
Our Era in the Context of the Enlightenments: the Restoration of Europa From Semitic and Iranian Influence (deceits).
The enlightenment succeeded in the physical sciences, but not in the social sciences, and we can see the german, french, russian, jewish, chinese reactions as social counter-enlightenments. What seems to have been under development in the 1800’s in Germany was the second scientific enlightenment (which benefitted the USA mostly), and the second attempt at social scientific revolution. Poincare, Maxwell, Darwin, Weber/Pareto/Durkheim, Menger, Spencer, Nietzche, Popper(science), Hayek (law) all came very close, and Weber, Mises, Popper, Brouwer, and Bridgman actually independently came to about the same conclusion, but they could not succeed against the pseudoscientific marxists and keynesians, just as the enlightenment philosophers could not succeed against the church and state. We can succeed. Because we have cognitive science, the record of the failure of keynesian economics, the record of the failure of communism, socialism, social democracy and the record of failure of rousseauian and lockeian man. The world merely needs the answer that the first scientific enlightenment, the second failed enlightenment (german) and the american post-german attempt failed to produce. Social science = natural law = reciprocity and the unit of measure = property.
-
A Short Course in Sovereignty and Agency
DEFINITION: AGENCY (SIMPLE): https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155063860317264 LONGER: https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155029341322264 DEFINITIONS: SOVEREIGNTY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154992876797264 NATURAL LAW, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE RESTORATION https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155080414747264 THE DISTILLATION OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155077593257264 THE DEFLATIONARY SPECIALIZATION OF WESTERN CIV. https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155055652697264 NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT. https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154987815492264 ARISTOCRACY: THE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION OF AGENCY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155053521147264 THE PROPERTARIAN TAKE ON WESTERN HISTORY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155027904187264 THE LANGUAGE OF SOVEREIGNTY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155019942397264 NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT. https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154987815492264 NATURAL LAW DOESN’T JUSTIFY ARISTOCRACY – IT JUSTIFIES MARKETS – IT IS JUST THAT NATURAL LAW IS ONLY POSSIBLE UNDER ARISTOCRACY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155137947447264
-
A Short Course in Sovereignty and Agency
DEFINITION: AGENCY (SIMPLE): https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155063860317264 LONGER: https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155029341322264 DEFINITIONS: SOVEREIGNTY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154992876797264 NATURAL LAW, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE RESTORATION https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155080414747264 THE DISTILLATION OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155077593257264 THE DEFLATIONARY SPECIALIZATION OF WESTERN CIV. https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155055652697264 NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT. https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154987815492264 ARISTOCRACY: THE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION OF AGENCY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155053521147264 THE PROPERTARIAN TAKE ON WESTERN HISTORY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155027904187264 THE LANGUAGE OF SOVEREIGNTY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155019942397264 NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT. https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154987815492264 NATURAL LAW DOESN’T JUSTIFY ARISTOCRACY – IT JUSTIFIES MARKETS – IT IS JUST THAT NATURAL LAW IS ONLY POSSIBLE UNDER ARISTOCRACY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155137947447264
-
The Failure of Liberalism Was Failing to Understand It.
Empirically speaking, women voting without separate houses for men and women, has been the failing of liberalism. The monarchy (state), nobility (regions), commons (businessmen), could have been expanded to the proletarian( working classes ) and the homemaker(women), and we could have continued the anglo saxon tradition of using houses to form a market between the classes. Democracy has failed worldwide because women have narrower interests and vote more consistently in blocks, and by destroying the family women have destroyed western civilization: our central unit of production of generations, production of norms and traditions, production of commons, and production of goods and services. It’s just empirical. Look at the voting history. There would never have been anything ‘left’ in this country nor its decline had women had their own house.
-
The Failure of Liberalism Was Failing to Understand It.
Empirically speaking, women voting without separate houses for men and women, has been the failing of liberalism. The monarchy (state), nobility (regions), commons (businessmen), could have been expanded to the proletarian( working classes ) and the homemaker(women), and we could have continued the anglo saxon tradition of using houses to form a market between the classes. Democracy has failed worldwide because women have narrower interests and vote more consistently in blocks, and by destroying the family women have destroyed western civilization: our central unit of production of generations, production of norms and traditions, production of commons, and production of goods and services. It’s just empirical. Look at the voting history. There would never have been anything ‘left’ in this country nor its decline had women had their own house.
-
The Good of Gods and Mythology in Decidability
If truth is the language of the gods, as it must be, then why is not bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, and deceit blasphemy? —“There might be a god archetype, in some pantheon, for almost every significant human behavioral pattern. I think that’s a helpful learning utility.”—Adam Houseman Exactly. But that is Myth and literature, for purpose of teaching by analogy. And it is not only important but necessary. Why? Because the western man uses HYPERBOLE to exaggerate, in order to show the consequence of ‘if everyone did this then..’. Kant restates this as the categorical imperative. But it is just the western method of using exaggeration of traits of individuals in order to force every living soul to ask “what if everyone did this” or “what are the consequences of this behavior over time”. Gods help us create general rules of decidability within a context by means of hyperbole (isolation of causal properties.) This is why we need myths, stated hyperbolically, and literature stated analogically: to create general rules, easily employed in a wide variety of circumstances, so that we may, through the thousands of little decisions every day, guide our civilization into that which we seek: parity with the gods.