Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • The Conduct of Revolution: A Market for Action

    ( Sketch  ) Men with the Agency to demand Sovereignty for themselves, and liberty, freedom and subsidy for their kin, do not need a leader to direct them – that would be illogical.  They need an achievable goal, organization, communication, strategy, tactics, and communication.  And they need to rally a few handful of men of like minds. It is only logical that a group of men with agency, in pursue of sovereignty, natural law, markets in everything, and the transcendence that results, would conduct a revolution by market rather than means of central leadership. When throwing a revolution against a fragile but powerful state, one needs only to exploit the fragility of the fragile state, and to let fragility do the work for the revolutionaries. No civilization has been more fragile, and no time ever more full of opportunity than the anglo-american empire in the current era.

  • The Problem Isn’t Race. It’s Class.

    The Problem Isn’t Race. It’s Class.

    raceandclass.png
  • The Problem Isn’t Race. It’s Class.

    The Problem Isn’t Race. It’s Class.

    raceandclass.png

  • On Revolution: Changing the Status Quo

    1. What Has The West Been Dishonest About? We Aren’t Free of Sin Either.

    Lets face it: no civilization really understands its group evolutionary strategy. But we can understand ours: When the first Aryans combined horse, bronze and wheel, they were able to cover long distances with speed. They took big risks, and horse, chariot (cart), and armor were very expensive –  but they were able to prey upon neighboring people, as well as defend their own. So they used this military technology to expanded from western China to Spain. It turns out that if you’re militarily capable of it, and develop a professional warrior caste, that capturing better territory and enslaving primitive locals for labor, was a profitable industry.  But only some subset of the population is fit for being ruled cost effectively and at low risk.  So where consanguineous tribes had tolerated wide variations in personalities, the rulers did not, found the most aggressive the most troublesome, and by constant prosecution of outliers, the rulers achieved with man, what they had achieved with dog, sheep, pig, cow, and horse: gradual domestication of the animal man. Slavery is expensive – you are responsible for all costs, serfdom less – taking only the proceeds and some of their labor, employee less – taking most of the proceeds and paying them, and credit slave even less – using dilutive fiat credit to grant them consumption and capturing most of the real proceeds of their production. So over the centuries our ancestors have used the combination of hanging half to one percent of the population per year, delaying reproduction and limiting reproduction with manorialism, the harsh winters to starve the feeble and lazy, frequent wars under the promise of booty, and the conspiracy of the church to enfeeble the underclasses so that by the late middle ages Europe consisted largely of the progeny of the middle genetic classes. Christianity provided little more than an excuse to justify Aryanism: the industry by which the martial class domesticated man for profit.  This was followed by the White Man’s Burden – a restatement of Aryanism in Moral terms. Which was followed by the American Project – a restatement of Aryanism in heroic terms.  Which was followed by Postwar Democratic Secular Humanism – a restatement of christianity in secular terms. And which we have seen most recently as Neo-Conservatism: a restatement of Judaism in Aryan terms. Now let us flip that around and say that because we have domesticated man, maintained tripartism, practiced unconflated rule for each class, and created markets in everything, the natural common law, and an ever more correspondent definition of truth, we have dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, labor, disease, and the constant fear of the vicissitudes of nature. We have made this world more so than any other civilization. Not because we were first, but because we were FASTEST to learn and adapt, despite being a small population on the edge of the bronze age. The problem facing mankind, we didn’t finish the job: We wrongly constrained Germany’s attempt to complete the formation of the north sea’s hanseatic civilization, and created a civil war that nearly destroyed us; and allowed the second ideological invasion of the West in the form of pseudoscience, and are now bringing aboard millions of those people who we have struggled for 1400 years to prevent from spreading the cancer of their ideology – a more venomous version of the first professionalization of lying. So, will we go quietly into the night, or will we continue to domesticate mankind, or will we return to the domestication of man, profiting from the domestication of man, and continuing the transcendence of many, through the most expensive commons that any civilization has ever developed: truth.

    2. Why Doesn’t Democracy work?

    [D]emocracy does work if it’s under one-family-one-vote, in a small homogeneous polity, under agrarianism, and if we have four houses of government in the Anglo Saxon model: monarchy, aristocracy, business and industry, and the church (proletarian, insurance and caretaking). Because the classes and families have enough in common to use majority rule as a means of selecting priorities for funding with scarce resources. But democracy wherein men, women, and classes possess equal votes just results in proletarian parasitic rule with every possible malincentive. We can use majority rule to select priorities among people with common interests but we cannot use majority rule to select preferences among people with disparate interests. That’s just illogical. The data says that without women voting we would have been fine. Women expressed their reproductive strategy in politics under democracy. They undid civilization. That is a painful pill to swallow. Paternalism and property rights, the jury, and truth telling and the absolute nuclear family, and delayed reproduction under manorialism were means by which we suppressed the reproduction of the lower classes, and controlled women’s destructive behavior – reproducing at will at random and causing the tribe to bear the consequences of her Malthusian impulses. Women select by r-strategy (volume), not K-strategy (excellence). Civilization requires suppression of free riding of the masculine kind (aggression) as well as the female kind (reproduction). We undid Indo-European history and the family as the central political unit, with one act. So, how do we construct compromises rather than oppressions? Different houses – whether physical and representative, or electronic and virtual, for those groups with different reproductive strategies.

    3. Is There a Way Out of Our Current Situation? Can We Gain Control of Our Own Countries Again?

    [O]f course. But… Gossip is cheap. Violence is very expensive – but very fast and effective. And preferences are demonstrated not stated. There is no cunning solution. There is no easy answer. None. You are either going to use violence to demand change, or lose your civilization forever. We will either agitate a small minority to raise the cost of our competitors’ loading, framing, overloading, engaging in pseudoscience and lying, and raise the cost of their colonization, or we will prove we are just talking not acting.

    4. How Do We Create a Revolution?

    The problem with a revolution is that in and of itself, it‘s just an expression of frustration. It doesn’t necessarily bring change for the better. And some revolutions are far worse than their original states: France and Russia in particular. To implement change one has to have something to demand. And what one demands has to satisfy a lot of people‘s interests. Those demands have to be possible to put into operational processes that we call ‘institutions‘. They have to be possible to persist regardless of the beliefs of the participants. So they have to create the right incentives.

    1. So to create a revolution you need moral authority – something that people will willingly use violence to bring about. And as a moral imperative, and moral justification,  TRUTH IS ENOUGH. We are tired of lies, pseudoscience, and obscurant rational justifications. We are tired of our elites burning our civilization.

      The truth is enough. Unlike gossip, guilting and shaming. And unlike pseudo-science and propaganda, the truth is expensive.  Truth is the most powerful argumentative weapon ever developed. And Propertarianism teaches us how to demand truth and speak the truth.
    2. After moral authority – then you need a political solution – something to demand, and in sufficient detail that it is possible to discuss rationally, and implement as formal institutions.
    3. Then you need a sufficient plan of transition that a revolution isn‘t necessary, and people don‘t die by the millions to do it.
    4. Then you need a rough set of goals – not a plan – for nullification, secession, revolution, and civil war – and hope you can accomplish it with incremental nullification and secession but willing to conduct a revolution or civil war if need be. And you pursue all of them at once.
    5. Then you need an ‘organization‘ – a group of people who act as the general staff that answer questions, and propose ideas on how to implement, how to transition and how to raise the cost of the status quo so that the transition is preferable to the uncertainty and instability.
    6. Then you need a small number of people willing to die for their people, culture, and civilization, but who have reasonable belief that their sacrifice is not in vain.

    I don’t go into tactics because that‘s unwise. But in general, I try to get across this idea: How many hours of electricity, days of water, days of food, days of ‘order‘ are in the production line every day? I mean, if bad stuff happens in Ukraine and Russia, 40% of food is produced by the people. Everyone can go back to the village to relatives and the farm. What happens in the developed world if it‘s disrupted? We live in the most fragile time in history. It no longer takes masses in the streets to bring about revolution. It takes a small number of people to increase the friction of daily life. It has never been easier to create a revolution. People just need a plan, moral authority, and something to demand. It‘s our job to give it to them. (Or, mine at least.)

  • On Revolution: Changing the Status Quo

    1. What Has The West Been Dishonest About? We Aren’t Free of Sin Either.

    Lets face it: no civilization really understands its group evolutionary strategy. But we can understand ours: When the first Aryans combined horse, bronze and wheel, they were able to cover long distances with speed. They took big risks, and horse, chariot (cart), and armor were very expensive –  but they were able to prey upon neighboring people, as well as defend their own. So they used this military technology to expanded from western China to Spain. It turns out that if you’re militarily capable of it, and develop a professional warrior caste, that capturing better territory and enslaving primitive locals for labor, was a profitable industry.  But only some subset of the population is fit for being ruled cost effectively and at low risk.  So where consanguineous tribes had tolerated wide variations in personalities, the rulers did not, found the most aggressive the most troublesome, and by constant prosecution of outliers, the rulers achieved with man, what they had achieved with dog, sheep, pig, cow, and horse: gradual domestication of the animal man. Slavery is expensive – you are responsible for all costs, serfdom less – taking only the proceeds and some of their labor, employee less – taking most of the proceeds and paying them, and credit slave even less – using dilutive fiat credit to grant them consumption and capturing most of the real proceeds of their production. So over the centuries our ancestors have used the combination of hanging half to one percent of the population per year, delaying reproduction and limiting reproduction with manorialism, the harsh winters to starve the feeble and lazy, frequent wars under the promise of booty, and the conspiracy of the church to enfeeble the underclasses so that by the late middle ages Europe consisted largely of the progeny of the middle genetic classes. Christianity provided little more than an excuse to justify Aryanism: the industry by which the martial class domesticated man for profit.  This was followed by the White Man’s Burden – a restatement of Aryanism in Moral terms. Which was followed by the American Project – a restatement of Aryanism in heroic terms.  Which was followed by Postwar Democratic Secular Humanism – a restatement of christianity in secular terms. And which we have seen most recently as Neo-Conservatism: a restatement of Judaism in Aryan terms. Now let us flip that around and say that because we have domesticated man, maintained tripartism, practiced unconflated rule for each class, and created markets in everything, the natural common law, and an ever more correspondent definition of truth, we have dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, labor, disease, and the constant fear of the vicissitudes of nature. We have made this world more so than any other civilization. Not because we were first, but because we were FASTEST to learn and adapt, despite being a small population on the edge of the bronze age. The problem facing mankind, we didn’t finish the job: We wrongly constrained Germany’s attempt to complete the formation of the north sea’s hanseatic civilization, and created a civil war that nearly destroyed us; and allowed the second ideological invasion of the West in the form of pseudoscience, and are now bringing aboard millions of those people who we have struggled for 1400 years to prevent from spreading the cancer of their ideology – a more venomous version of the first professionalization of lying. So, will we go quietly into the night, or will we continue to domesticate mankind, or will we return to the domestication of man, profiting from the domestication of man, and continuing the transcendence of many, through the most expensive commons that any civilization has ever developed: truth.

    2. Why Doesn’t Democracy work?

    [D]emocracy does work if it’s under one-family-one-vote, in a small homogeneous polity, under agrarianism, and if we have four houses of government in the Anglo Saxon model: monarchy, aristocracy, business and industry, and the church (proletarian, insurance and caretaking). Because the classes and families have enough in common to use majority rule as a means of selecting priorities for funding with scarce resources. But democracy wherein men, women, and classes possess equal votes just results in proletarian parasitic rule with every possible malincentive. We can use majority rule to select priorities among people with common interests but we cannot use majority rule to select preferences among people with disparate interests. That’s just illogical. The data says that without women voting we would have been fine. Women expressed their reproductive strategy in politics under democracy. They undid civilization. That is a painful pill to swallow. Paternalism and property rights, the jury, and truth telling and the absolute nuclear family, and delayed reproduction under manorialism were means by which we suppressed the reproduction of the lower classes, and controlled women’s destructive behavior – reproducing at will at random and causing the tribe to bear the consequences of her Malthusian impulses. Women select by r-strategy (volume), not K-strategy (excellence). Civilization requires suppression of free riding of the masculine kind (aggression) as well as the female kind (reproduction). We undid Indo-European history and the family as the central political unit, with one act. So, how do we construct compromises rather than oppressions? Different houses – whether physical and representative, or electronic and virtual, for those groups with different reproductive strategies.

    3. Is There a Way Out of Our Current Situation? Can We Gain Control of Our Own Countries Again?

    [O]f course. But… Gossip is cheap. Violence is very expensive – but very fast and effective. And preferences are demonstrated not stated. There is no cunning solution. There is no easy answer. None. You are either going to use violence to demand change, or lose your civilization forever. We will either agitate a small minority to raise the cost of our competitors’ loading, framing, overloading, engaging in pseudoscience and lying, and raise the cost of their colonization, or we will prove we are just talking not acting.

    4. How Do We Create a Revolution?

    The problem with a revolution is that in and of itself, it‘s just an expression of frustration. It doesn’t necessarily bring change for the better. And some revolutions are far worse than their original states: France and Russia in particular. To implement change one has to have something to demand. And what one demands has to satisfy a lot of people‘s interests. Those demands have to be possible to put into operational processes that we call ‘institutions‘. They have to be possible to persist regardless of the beliefs of the participants. So they have to create the right incentives.

    1. So to create a revolution you need moral authority – something that people will willingly use violence to bring about. And as a moral imperative, and moral justification,  TRUTH IS ENOUGH. We are tired of lies, pseudoscience, and obscurant rational justifications. We are tired of our elites burning our civilization.

      The truth is enough. Unlike gossip, guilting and shaming. And unlike pseudo-science and propaganda, the truth is expensive.  Truth is the most powerful argumentative weapon ever developed. And Propertarianism teaches us how to demand truth and speak the truth.
    2. After moral authority – then you need a political solution – something to demand, and in sufficient detail that it is possible to discuss rationally, and implement as formal institutions.
    3. Then you need a sufficient plan of transition that a revolution isn‘t necessary, and people don‘t die by the millions to do it.
    4. Then you need a rough set of goals – not a plan – for nullification, secession, revolution, and civil war – and hope you can accomplish it with incremental nullification and secession but willing to conduct a revolution or civil war if need be. And you pursue all of them at once.
    5. Then you need an ‘organization‘ – a group of people who act as the general staff that answer questions, and propose ideas on how to implement, how to transition and how to raise the cost of the status quo so that the transition is preferable to the uncertainty and instability.
    6. Then you need a small number of people willing to die for their people, culture, and civilization, but who have reasonable belief that their sacrifice is not in vain.

    I don’t go into tactics because that‘s unwise. But in general, I try to get across this idea: How many hours of electricity, days of water, days of food, days of ‘order‘ are in the production line every day? I mean, if bad stuff happens in Ukraine and Russia, 40% of food is produced by the people. Everyone can go back to the village to relatives and the farm. What happens in the developed world if it‘s disrupted? We live in the most fragile time in history. It no longer takes masses in the streets to bring about revolution. It takes a small number of people to increase the friction of daily life. It has never been easier to create a revolution. People just need a plan, moral authority, and something to demand. It‘s our job to give it to them. (Or, mine at least.)

  • Learning Propertarianism (Natural Law)

    How Can I Learn About Propertarianism (Natural Law)

    Our Advice

    • Read the Overview – The Overviews page discusses key concepts and then refers  you to our ‘short courses’ or collections of posts on the novel concepts.
    • Watch The Videos – The Videos present hour long discussions of the novel concepts.
    • Take the Courses – The Propertarian Institute is Offering Courses (Spring 2017) in Natural law.

    What Else?

    • Read the posts in the “Core” – The Core contains the full spectrum of Natural Law (propertarianism) and Testimonial Law (testimonialism), and Market Government (which I, tongue-in-cheek, refer to as ‘Market Fascism’).
    • Learn to write and speak using “E-Prime” (it’s a bit hard). E-Prime will introduce you to writing ‘clearly’ by which we mean, in operational language.
    • Follow Curt on Facebook – I tend to repeat central themes in order to make it easier for new people to latch onto something familiar
    • Work your way through the Reading List – Our reading list contains the major works that will help you understand the different fields (this is a LOT of material).
    • Work your way through thousands of posts on Propertarianism.com – There is no substitute for reading a lot of short posts that repeat the basic ideas in different contexts. Propertarianism is non trivial and repetition beats concentration.

    How Long It Will Take?

    How long would it take you to learn to program a computer in an object oriented language? To study Calculus? To Study Accounting? To Study Economics? To study the law? Any technical discipline with it’s own methods and terminology takes about a year to ‘learn’, two years to feel comfortable with, and three years to be effective with, four years to be creative with, and five or six years to master: the 10,000 hour rule. This is just a rule of thumb when discussing how long it takes for humans to learn anything at all.  Some of us are faster and some of us slower, but in general, those who are faster can tolerate accumulating hours more so than those who are slower. But in the end, it’s hours.

    That said, if you read the Short Courses and watch the Videos, in one month you will see how it all fits together, and in three months you will find that it has affected your thinking.

    Our experience is that on average, if you read the articles, follow me, Eli, and a few others, that in six months you will ‘understand’ everything we say. It will take you about a year to ‘start thinking’ in Natural Law – and that’s when you’ll feel the explanatory power starts affecting your life. Then, sort of like a light switch, over a very short period of time, all human activity will ‘make sense’ in very simple terms. “Everything becomes obvious.”

    If you have come to Propertarianism through the usual route: Constitutionalist or Classical Liberal > Libertarian > Anarcho Capitalist > NRx > Propertarianism, then your progress will be much faster.

    If you have studied one of the hard sciences so that you are familiar with the scientific method and scientific epistemology, then your progress will be faster.

    If you have at least some understanding of accounting, finance, or economics, then it will be much faster.

    If you have a background in philosophy – it might actually slow you down: most of philosophy, like most of religion, is nonsense or outright falsehood: fantasy literature.

    (If you have abnormal behavior and you’re looking for justification of it, you won’t find it here – you will find that there is a differences between tolerance and advocacy and abnormal behavior is not something that will be sanctioned in any society for long. Go see the left libertarians. They love deviant, selfish, anti-social behavior.)

    But in general the more you know the easier it will be to learn.

  • Learning Propertarianism (Natural Law)

    How Can I Learn About Propertarianism (Natural Law)

    Our Advice

    • Read the Overview – The Overviews page discusses key concepts and then refers  you to our ‘short courses’ or collections of posts on the novel concepts.
    • Watch The Videos – The Videos present hour long discussions of the novel concepts.
    • Take the Courses – The Propertarian Institute is Offering Courses (Spring 2017) in Natural law.

    What Else?

    • Read the posts in the “Core” – The Core contains the full spectrum of Natural Law (propertarianism) and Testimonial Law (testimonialism), and Market Government (which I, tongue-in-cheek, refer to as ‘Market Fascism’).
    • Learn to write and speak using “E-Prime” (it’s a bit hard). E-Prime will introduce you to writing ‘clearly’ by which we mean, in operational language.
    • Follow Curt on Facebook – I tend to repeat central themes in order to make it easier for new people to latch onto something familiar
    • Work your way through the Reading List – Our reading list contains the major works that will help you understand the different fields (this is a LOT of material).
    • Work your way through thousands of posts on Propertarianism.com – There is no substitute for reading a lot of short posts that repeat the basic ideas in different contexts. Propertarianism is non trivial and repetition beats concentration.

    How Long It Will Take?

    How long would it take you to learn to program a computer in an object oriented language? To study Calculus? To Study Accounting? To Study Economics? To study the law? Any technical discipline with it’s own methods and terminology takes about a year to ‘learn’, two years to feel comfortable with, and three years to be effective with, four years to be creative with, and five or six years to master: the 10,000 hour rule. This is just a rule of thumb when discussing how long it takes for humans to learn anything at all.  Some of us are faster and some of us slower, but in general, those who are faster can tolerate accumulating hours more so than those who are slower. But in the end, it’s hours.

    That said, if you read the Short Courses and watch the Videos, in one month you will see how it all fits together, and in three months you will find that it has affected your thinking.

    Our experience is that on average, if you read the articles, follow me, Eli, and a few others, that in six months you will ‘understand’ everything we say. It will take you about a year to ‘start thinking’ in Natural Law – and that’s when you’ll feel the explanatory power starts affecting your life. Then, sort of like a light switch, over a very short period of time, all human activity will ‘make sense’ in very simple terms. “Everything becomes obvious.”

    If you have come to Propertarianism through the usual route: Constitutionalist or Classical Liberal > Libertarian > Anarcho Capitalist > NRx > Propertarianism, then your progress will be much faster.

    If you have studied one of the hard sciences so that you are familiar with the scientific method and scientific epistemology, then your progress will be faster.

    If you have at least some understanding of accounting, finance, or economics, then it will be much faster.

    If you have a background in philosophy – it might actually slow you down: most of philosophy, like most of religion, is nonsense or outright falsehood: fantasy literature.

    (If you have abnormal behavior and you’re looking for justification of it, you won’t find it here – you will find that there is a differences between tolerance and advocacy and abnormal behavior is not something that will be sanctioned in any society for long. Go see the left libertarians. They love deviant, selfish, anti-social behavior.)

    But in general the more you know the easier it will be to learn.

  • A Short Course In Perfect Government

      PERFECT GOVERNMENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/05/25/perfect-government/ THE METHODS OF PRODUCTION OF COMMONS IN MARKET GOVERNENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/07/market-production-of-commons/ THE NON OBVIOUS BENEFITS OF MARKET GOVERNMENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/01/the-non-obvious-benefits-of-market-government/ PERFECT GOVERNMENT DEFEATS DECEIT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/17/we-can-create-a-perfect-government-for-opposing-propaganda-and-deceit/ THE STRUGGLE FOR RULE OF LAW – AND AGAINST DISCRETIONARY RULE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/07/evolution-of-a-condition-of-liberty-the-struggle-from-discretionary-to-non-discretionary-to-market-rule/ IT DOESN”T MATTER WHO RULES, ONLY THAT WE DENY PEOPLE RULE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/04/24/it-doesnt-matter-who-rules-only-that-we-deny-people-rule/

    WHAT IS THE MINIMUM BASIS FOR SOVEREIGNTY, LIBERTY, FREEDOM? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/07/02/propertarianism-vs-rothbardiansm/

    POLITICS FOR DUMMIES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/19/politics-for-dummies/ PEOPLE ARE PROTECTED BY RULE OF LAW, THE MILITARY, AND THE MILITIA, NOT GOVERNMENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2012/12/19/property-is-necessary-for-a-market-society-is-the-market-government-is-the-administration-of-the-market-how-do-we-create-good-government/ OUR MISTAKEN EMPHASIS ON GOVERNMENT INSTEAD OF JURIDICAL DEFENSE FROM IT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/08/24/our-mistaken-emphasis-on-government-rather-than-juridical-defense-from-it/ IS DEMOCRACY REALLY THE PROBLEM? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/30/is-the-problem-really-democracy-here-is-your-answer/ POLITICAL PREFERENCE IS REDUCIBLE TO GENETIC STRATEGY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/19/political-preference-is-reducible-to-genetic-strategy/ MODELS OF GOVERNMENTS ARE STRATEGIES IN A GIVEN CONTEXT, NOT UNIVERSAL GOODS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/15/strategies-not-steady-states/ WE USE THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT WE CAN AFFORD https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/17/31847/ FASCISM https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/01/fascism-in-the-great-game-of-rock-paper-scissors/ https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/25/more-on-market-fascism/

  • A Short Course In Perfect Government

      PERFECT GOVERNMENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/05/25/perfect-government/ THE METHODS OF PRODUCTION OF COMMONS IN MARKET GOVERNENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/07/market-production-of-commons/ THE NON OBVIOUS BENEFITS OF MARKET GOVERNMENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/01/the-non-obvious-benefits-of-market-government/ PERFECT GOVERNMENT DEFEATS DECEIT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/17/we-can-create-a-perfect-government-for-opposing-propaganda-and-deceit/ THE STRUGGLE FOR RULE OF LAW – AND AGAINST DISCRETIONARY RULE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/07/evolution-of-a-condition-of-liberty-the-struggle-from-discretionary-to-non-discretionary-to-market-rule/ IT DOESN”T MATTER WHO RULES, ONLY THAT WE DENY PEOPLE RULE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/04/24/it-doesnt-matter-who-rules-only-that-we-deny-people-rule/

    WHAT IS THE MINIMUM BASIS FOR SOVEREIGNTY, LIBERTY, FREEDOM? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/07/02/propertarianism-vs-rothbardiansm/

    POLITICS FOR DUMMIES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/19/politics-for-dummies/ PEOPLE ARE PROTECTED BY RULE OF LAW, THE MILITARY, AND THE MILITIA, NOT GOVERNMENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2012/12/19/property-is-necessary-for-a-market-society-is-the-market-government-is-the-administration-of-the-market-how-do-we-create-good-government/ OUR MISTAKEN EMPHASIS ON GOVERNMENT INSTEAD OF JURIDICAL DEFENSE FROM IT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/08/24/our-mistaken-emphasis-on-government-rather-than-juridical-defense-from-it/ IS DEMOCRACY REALLY THE PROBLEM? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/30/is-the-problem-really-democracy-here-is-your-answer/ POLITICAL PREFERENCE IS REDUCIBLE TO GENETIC STRATEGY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/19/political-preference-is-reducible-to-genetic-strategy/ MODELS OF GOVERNMENTS ARE STRATEGIES IN A GIVEN CONTEXT, NOT UNIVERSAL GOODS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/15/strategies-not-steady-states/ WE USE THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT WE CAN AFFORD https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/17/31847/ FASCISM https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/01/fascism-in-the-great-game-of-rock-paper-scissors/ https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/25/more-on-market-fascism/

  • A Short Course In Sociology (Group Cooperation)

    HORIZONTAL CLASS CLASS MEANS REPRODUCTIVE  VALUE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/06/29/definition-of-class-reproductive-value/ THREE COERCIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND THE THREE VERTICAL CLASSES (DIAGRAM) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2011/02/15/rock-paper-scissors-three-coercive-technologies-and-three-social-classes/ MORE ON VERTICAL CLASSES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2013/11/26/propertarian-class-theory/ HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CLASSES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/17/using-horizontal-and-vertical-classes/ THE INTERTEMPORAL DIVISION OF MORAL PERCEPTION BETWEEN CLASSES (DIAGRAM) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/06/19/the-intertemporal-division-of-moral-perception/ THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CLASSES  https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/17/the-functions-of-the-classes-2/ ECONOMIC (POLITICAL) METHODS AS EXPRESSION OF CLASS PHILOSOPHY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/11/08/economic-methodologies-as-expressions-of-class-philosophy-and-reproductive-strategy/ IQ EDUCATION AND OCCUPATION https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/01/levels-of-education/   DEFINING MIDDLE CLASS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/17/qa-curt-what-defines-middle-class/ WHY SO LITTLE CLASS ROTATION? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2014/06/06/why-so-little-social-class-rotation-nature-all-nature/ THE REPRODUCTIVE CLASS HIERARCHY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/18/reproductive-classes/ — POLITICS — CLASS INTERPRETATIONS OF LIBERTIES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/24/class-liberties/ CLASSES REQUIRE DIFFERENT ECONOMIES (THERE IS NO SINGLE BEST) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/25/different-economies-for-different-classes/ THREE ORDERS: KIN, CULT, STATE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/14/the-three-orders-kin-cult-state/ KIN, CLASS, CASTE POLITICAL SYSTEMS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/25/kin-class-caste-models-and-functions/ THE MEANS OF RULE – EACH CONTEXT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/17/series-means-of-rule/ WHY MINORITY RULE IS SUPERIOR TO MAJORITY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/03/adding-depth-to-talebs-insight-that-minority-rule-is-superior-to-majority/ — MARRIAGE AND CIVILIZATION — THE ORIGINS OF CIVILIZATION, SOVEREIGNTY, PROPERTY, MILITIA, MARRIAGE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/23/the-origins-of-civilization-militia-property-marriage/ THE IMPORTANCE OF THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE AS COMPROMISE BETWEEN GENDERS – A TRADE. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/05/01/on-marriage/ HOW DO FAMILY STRUCTURES VARY? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2014/08/26/how-do-family-structures-vary/ DOMESTICATION BY FAMILY UNIT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/07/domestication-by-family-unit/ MORALS REFLECT GENETIC DISTANCE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/15/morals-reflect-genetic-distance/