ISLAMICIST SOCIAL ORDER VS EUROPEAN SOCIAL ORDER Isis(Islamism) seeks to controls mind, word, deed, regardless of property allocation, and they favor (try to enforce) a libertarian-theological-judicial social order over centralized state. In other words, they want to preserve ‘headman’ of the tribe status for as many ‘headmen’ as possible, right down to the father of the family. Between: WEST/NORTH/COLD/SPARSE: The European model (Genetic European), consisting of (Aryan) martial (aristocratic) Sovereignty, and Burgher (middle class) Liberalism(Contractualism), under aristocratic rule of empirical law; AND SOUTH/MIDDLE/HOT/DENSE The Semitic model (Jewish, Arab, Muslim), (Genetic Afro-Asiatic) consisting of underclass rule of religious law. The SIMILARITY is obvious: Preserve head-man rule (King/Ruler, Judicial Priesthood (tribal and Clan headman), and Strong Father (family Headman) of extended family. The DIFFERNCES are: Aristocratic, Evolutionary, Eugenic, Small Numbers, Technological, Weaponized Professional Warriors, Trust, Economy, and Technology, high consumption living and reproduction. Tactics: concentration of capital and adaptability – solve problems quickly so that opportunities cannot be seized when we are otherwise weak or occupied.) -vs- Priestly, Devolutionary, Dysgenic, mandated ignorance, subsistence living and reproduction. Weaponized raiding, distrust, deception, and reproduction. Tactics: concentration of numbers – wear down the opponent over long periods of time) Curt DOolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
Source: Original Site Post
-
Um. Ukrainian Nazis? Please Don’t Signal Your Virtues Around Serious People.
Apr 10, 2017 11:11am UKRAINIAN NAZIS? OMFG. ACTUALLY COMPARE THE BRITS TO THE NAZIS AND WHO WAS WORSE FOR OUR CIVILIZATION? —“I heard there were Nazi Sympathizers in the Ukrainian military. Is that true?”— omg. Listen. what kind of privilege do you have to live under to virtue signal on that scale? You’d have to be be entirely incognizant of the desperation of a people who live under pervasive corruption, russian paid-for corruption, an oligarchy (libertarians desire a return to) that is basically nothing more than organized crime syndicate, that pays for the government to keep the people in poverty. So here is how I (and others in ukraine) would translate your question: “What kind of ignorant, privileged, overweight, unfit, tv-watching, spoiled, effeminate idiot cares about the symbolism young men adopt in order to give themselves courage when fighting vast pervasive corruption foreign, domestic, public, and private in order to save their families and friends from Next time you hear that from someone punch him, or slap her, in the face, and tell them to visit a ukrainian village or apartment block where fellow white people who are devoutly christian and far more moral than any brit has the pretense to be, live on $80 a month, because russians want to expand eastward toward europe again, and the people who were entrenched by the russians in the political system, and then entrenched further by the oligarchs (gangsters) want to protect their profits. You tell me who is the more moral man? The one who seeks out costumes of fear and power over vastly superior numbers in order to gain courage so that he can take his ife into his own hands on behalf of his people, or the pathetic virtue signal spiral of western privileged do-nothings who destroy their civilization through such posturing? Who do you lionize? What political power does it seek? What self confidence does it give you? Howe do you lie to yourself that your life has meaning other than conspicuous consumption? ANd worse, conspicuous consumption of virtue signals – little lies we tell ourselves to say we are anything other than excess burden on the carrying capacity of the planet. These people are fighting for their families, friends, future, and nascent nation. I’ll tell you who. It’s obvious. And that’s the end of the story. Virtue signaling makes me sick. And angry. And for that matter, what the hell is wrong with Nazi anything any more, what century are you (they) living in? They dress nice. They cared for their people. And they were loved by their citizenry. And if it weren’t for the brits and Americans we would never have had the first world war, the nazis or the cold war, or the iron curtain, or the rise of islam. So if you wanna know who the shitty tyrants in this world are it wasn’t the nazies trying to save their people, it was the brits and americans who destroyed european civilization out of imperial greed.
-
Um. Ukrainian Nazis? Please Don’t Signal Your Virtues Around Serious People.
Apr 10, 2017 11:11am UKRAINIAN NAZIS? OMFG. ACTUALLY COMPARE THE BRITS TO THE NAZIS AND WHO WAS WORSE FOR OUR CIVILIZATION? —“I heard there were Nazi Sympathizers in the Ukrainian military. Is that true?”— omg. Listen. what kind of privilege do you have to live under to virtue signal on that scale? You’d have to be be entirely incognizant of the desperation of a people who live under pervasive corruption, russian paid-for corruption, an oligarchy (libertarians desire a return to) that is basically nothing more than organized crime syndicate, that pays for the government to keep the people in poverty. So here is how I (and others in ukraine) would translate your question: “What kind of ignorant, privileged, overweight, unfit, tv-watching, spoiled, effeminate idiot cares about the symbolism young men adopt in order to give themselves courage when fighting vast pervasive corruption foreign, domestic, public, and private in order to save their families and friends from Next time you hear that from someone punch him, or slap her, in the face, and tell them to visit a ukrainian village or apartment block where fellow white people who are devoutly christian and far more moral than any brit has the pretense to be, live on $80 a month, because russians want to expand eastward toward europe again, and the people who were entrenched by the russians in the political system, and then entrenched further by the oligarchs (gangsters) want to protect their profits. You tell me who is the more moral man? The one who seeks out costumes of fear and power over vastly superior numbers in order to gain courage so that he can take his ife into his own hands on behalf of his people, or the pathetic virtue signal spiral of western privileged do-nothings who destroy their civilization through such posturing? Who do you lionize? What political power does it seek? What self confidence does it give you? Howe do you lie to yourself that your life has meaning other than conspicuous consumption? ANd worse, conspicuous consumption of virtue signals – little lies we tell ourselves to say we are anything other than excess burden on the carrying capacity of the planet. These people are fighting for their families, friends, future, and nascent nation. I’ll tell you who. It’s obvious. And that’s the end of the story. Virtue signaling makes me sick. And angry. And for that matter, what the hell is wrong with Nazi anything any more, what century are you (they) living in? They dress nice. They cared for their people. And they were loved by their citizenry. And if it weren’t for the brits and Americans we would never have had the first world war, the nazis or the cold war, or the iron curtain, or the rise of islam. So if you wanna know who the shitty tyrants in this world are it wasn’t the nazies trying to save their people, it was the brits and americans who destroyed european civilization out of imperial greed.
-
John Derbyshire And The Riddle of the Anglos
THE ANGLO SELF ANALYSIS – THE RIDDLE OF TRUTH. —“I’m torn between thinking its a shame that we’re so stubborn that we require a way to prove we were right all along rather than just accepting it based on favorability of outcomes, and thinking it’s awe-inspiring that we are so dedicated to truth that we would likely change what we’ve assumed was correct if we were able to develop a reliable prediction model that shows us to be in error.”—@John Derbyshire
-
John Derbyshire And The Riddle of the Anglos
THE ANGLO SELF ANALYSIS – THE RIDDLE OF TRUTH. —“I’m torn between thinking its a shame that we’re so stubborn that we require a way to prove we were right all along rather than just accepting it based on favorability of outcomes, and thinking it’s awe-inspiring that we are so dedicated to truth that we would likely change what we’ve assumed was correct if we were able to develop a reliable prediction model that shows us to be in error.”—@John Derbyshire
-
Love.
You think I’m passionate about the different regions of the USA? About Ukraine? About Poland? About every secessionist movement? About the people of Nigeria and Ghana? That’s just because it’s what I know well enough to argue about. LOOK: Nation, tribe, clan, family <-> father, Headman, Nobleman, Monarchy Only the west could develop rule without rulers: natural law. BUT EVERY PEOPLE CAN BE FREE BY USING IT. *NATIONALISM* Love thyself, love thy kin, then thy neighbor, then mankind. Because it is through this love we redistribute and bear the costs of persistence, and through constraint of our own against the parasitism upon others that we bear the costs of transcendence.
-
Love.
You think I’m passionate about the different regions of the USA? About Ukraine? About Poland? About every secessionist movement? About the people of Nigeria and Ghana? That’s just because it’s what I know well enough to argue about. LOOK: Nation, tribe, clan, family <-> father, Headman, Nobleman, Monarchy Only the west could develop rule without rulers: natural law. BUT EVERY PEOPLE CAN BE FREE BY USING IT. *NATIONALISM* Love thyself, love thy kin, then thy neighbor, then mankind. Because it is through this love we redistribute and bear the costs of persistence, and through constraint of our own against the parasitism upon others that we bear the costs of transcendence.
-
The Poor Want To Survive, The Privileged Talk Politics
THE POOR WANT TO SURVIVE. THE PRIVILEGE TALK POLITICS. –“Are the People of the Donbas Communist Sympathisers?”— Again, a privileged bit of silliness. The people in the donbas are fucking dirt poor and it sucks like hell, and the technological revolution that is floating ukraine in the other cities is not there. Right now it is a depopulated wasteland. Think detroit after a civil war. Think of the donbas as say, coal mining regions of wales, or the hills of kentucky, or any of the cities in america that live off state financed military (naval) production, all rolled into one. in 1992 their freaking world fell apart and without the organized redistribution of commerical activity to their region by state military investment, they have NO HOPE. They want pensions, redistribution, and they remember the REAL GOOD that was done for them by the soviet union. THe soviets were TERRIBLE for eastern europe but they were not terrible for many rural russian peasants. PEOPLE REACH FOR WHAT THEY UNDERSTAND. what they just want is food, clothing, shelter, security, family and to have a few hopes that are within reach of achievement. A middle or working class privileged person is a communist sympathizer. He has a luxury. A poor person is just DESPERATE.
-
The Poor Want To Survive, The Privileged Talk Politics
THE POOR WANT TO SURVIVE. THE PRIVILEGE TALK POLITICS. –“Are the People of the Donbas Communist Sympathisers?”— Again, a privileged bit of silliness. The people in the donbas are fucking dirt poor and it sucks like hell, and the technological revolution that is floating ukraine in the other cities is not there. Right now it is a depopulated wasteland. Think detroit after a civil war. Think of the donbas as say, coal mining regions of wales, or the hills of kentucky, or any of the cities in america that live off state financed military (naval) production, all rolled into one. in 1992 their freaking world fell apart and without the organized redistribution of commerical activity to their region by state military investment, they have NO HOPE. They want pensions, redistribution, and they remember the REAL GOOD that was done for them by the soviet union. THe soviets were TERRIBLE for eastern europe but they were not terrible for many rural russian peasants. PEOPLE REACH FOR WHAT THEY UNDERSTAND. what they just want is food, clothing, shelter, security, family and to have a few hopes that are within reach of achievement. A middle or working class privileged person is a communist sympathizer. He has a luxury. A poor person is just DESPERATE.
-
Pursuit of Happiness In Social Orders
HAPPINESS IN SOCIAL ORDERS Humans in general, are generally happy if they are working to produce gains, not to forestall losses. It does not take a great deal of income to do that. Most of what we spend is on status signaling to ourselves and others. Food, clothing, shelter, heat, water, electricity, appliances, air conditioning, children, family, friends. But we need be insulated from ‘the evil people’ who are unsatisfied with such – so we pay heavily to keep away from them. We pay even more heavily to be with people who are better than us, that we can learn from, and gain from the opportunities of proximity. If you truncate your lower classes, occupy your mischievous young males with physical labor in support of the commons, occupy your young women with children, and invest heavily in commons, most of us will be able to live very well, and the few that make our living-well possible will live far above us in signals – as they should. We have economics all wrong. We need multiple economies both martial(slave), public works (underclass), syndicalism(labor), and capitalism( middle, upper middle, and upper) And we do not need this hamster wheel of continuous consumption. We need only eradicate immigration except for the very best of the upper classes, eradicate through constraint on reproduction the lower classes, and eradicate the ability for non-kin to compete with us for control over the production of commons, and the status signals that are the reward for assisting in the production of those commons. Unfortunately we have not learned to constrain the impulses of women to satisfy the need to give (free endorphins for redistributing the production of others), and we have not learned to constrain the impulses of all (as did the communists) to satisfy the need to feel ‘above’ someone, or that they are not the low rung on the ladder, (free endorphins for false status signals), or the need to demonstrate status through conspicuous consumption (endorphins for possessing that which others do not), or the need to virtue signal (free endorphins for empty talk or gossip). Other societies, including ours, in much of our history, have suppressed unearned signals as a form of theft. It seems like this more than anything, combined with democracy that let it loose, has been the reason we are not happy. The hamster wheel of consumption is merely selling us the curse of Sisyphus by the promise of a utopia, the same way a drug dealer sells drugs, a fast food chain sells sugars and fats, a dietary supplement manufacturer sells ‘vitamins’ an advertiser sells status, a politician sells socialism or communism, or priest and his prophet sells life after death or some number of virgins. They’re all lies. Happiness is simple. Working to produce gains, not to forestall losses. And we can only forestall losses if we have the inventory that is sufficient to live off our gains.