Source: Original Site Post

  • Religion Via-Negativa

    RELIGION VIA NEGATIVA So, when you say ‘religion’, we all need the services provided by ‘religion’ whether or not we consume them directly or indirectly through others. The question is whether we need supernaturalism, fictionalism, and outright falsehood. The answer is demonstrably no.

    On the other hand – more precisely – it means those of us with a great deal of agency do not need it, but desire it’s consequences. It means that those with the pretense of agency – the ‘atheists’ need a substitute for it, and have chosen pseudo-rationalism and pseudoscience. It means that some of us mouth pretense to it because we understand the value of religion but find the superstition, supernaturalism, fictionalism, and outright falsehood merely an absurd cost of obtaining the good produced by the rituals and discipline. And it means that those without the ability to trust those with more agency than they, need the superstition to sate their emotions, the supernaturalism to grant authority to the fictionalism, and the outright falsehood as a means of insulating themselves from suggestion by those who would sway them from the strategies embodied in all of the above. There is no reason we cannot cause the production of truthful religion by the suppression of fictional religion. History replaces myth. Fiction fictionalism. Science superstition. And the natural law of men, resistance against suggestion, deception, and predation. Curt Doolittle
  • Um. Wiki is a monopoly, and acts like it.

    Jimmy Wales: No, access to information cannot be a right. And wikipedia has become politicized under the false cover of a monopoly under citation and NPoV, which merely deterministically justifies universalism, globalism, consumerism, and cultural marxism. An honest wikipedia would provide multiple points of view, and test them by investment, reciprocity or parasitism. wikipedia is immoral.

  • Um. Wiki is a monopoly, and acts like it.

    Jimmy Wales: No, access to information cannot be a right. And wikipedia has become politicized under the false cover of a monopoly under citation and NPoV, which merely deterministically justifies universalism, globalism, consumerism, and cultural marxism. An honest wikipedia would provide multiple points of view, and test them by investment, reciprocity or parasitism. wikipedia is immoral.

  • Lolz: Comprehension requires similar units of measure… Your tape is too short.

    —“All your statuses make you seem like you are drunk whenever i read them i hear a drunk man rambling”— Anon I understand. Comprehension can only exist as a contract requiring specific performance by both parties. You cannot provide specific performance required of you. This merely means you are too stupid to understand. But do not feel bad. You are not special. There are a lot of stupid people.

  • Lolz: Comprehension requires similar units of measure… Your tape is too short.

    —“All your statuses make you seem like you are drunk whenever i read them i hear a drunk man rambling”— Anon I understand. Comprehension can only exist as a contract requiring specific performance by both parties. You cannot provide specific performance required of you. This merely means you are too stupid to understand. But do not feel bad. You are not special. There are a lot of stupid people.

  • Via Negativa Goods: Intolerance

    Nick Heywood on Via Negativa: Intolerance We don’t need tolerance in a culturally homogeneous, high trust, society bound by self evident (Common sense) principles. There’s nothing to tolerate! Therefore, “Western Tolerance” is a myth. Used by those seeking to acquire the power, the individual and sovereign once possessed. To surrender their principles, values, sovereignty and culture. This leads to decisional confusion. There are no limits with in which decisions can be made. Confusions reigns! And it worked! By Bob Moran on Via Negativa: Intolerance. Tolerance as a virtue is a deception. Everything we care for we build and protect with INTOLERANCE. If you want your company to succeed, you don’t tolerate incompetence. If you want a degree to be worth something, you don’t tolerate idiots. If you want your family to to be safe, you don’t tolerate a random hobo coming in your house. Intolerance is a tool against entropy; we separate the good from the bad. Remove it, and everything will immediately start to decay and turn to dust.  

  • Via Negativa Goods: Intolerance

    Nick Heywood on Via Negativa: Intolerance We don’t need tolerance in a culturally homogeneous, high trust, society bound by self evident (Common sense) principles. There’s nothing to tolerate! Therefore, “Western Tolerance” is a myth. Used by those seeking to acquire the power, the individual and sovereign once possessed. To surrender their principles, values, sovereignty and culture. This leads to decisional confusion. There are no limits with in which decisions can be made. Confusions reigns! And it worked! By Bob Moran on Via Negativa: Intolerance. Tolerance as a virtue is a deception. Everything we care for we build and protect with INTOLERANCE. If you want your company to succeed, you don’t tolerate incompetence. If you want a degree to be worth something, you don’t tolerate idiots. If you want your family to to be safe, you don’t tolerate a random hobo coming in your house. Intolerance is a tool against entropy; we separate the good from the bad. Remove it, and everything will immediately start to decay and turn to dust.  

  • Pursuit of Prosperity vs Natural Law Results in Neither.

    WORSHIP OF THE LAW VERSUS THE COMMERCIAL; FULL ACCOUNTING VIA POSITIVA, VIA NEGATIVA. Let me help you: by worship of the commercial we violate natural law and consume our previously accumulated capital. By the worship of natural law we cannot exist by other than the commercial but we are limited in that we cannot consume our previously accumulated capital. Worshipping the commercial is to love the consequence that kills you, rather than the cause that transcends you. Natural Law of Reciprocity creates wealth. It’s the property that results from reciprocity that causes the common law of torts.

    The grammar of experiences, the grammar of intentions, the grammar of goods, and the grammar of morality, are all via positiva. The grammar of causality requires the grammar of operations. The adage that property is the result of the law of torts is only a half truth. Property results from reciprocity, results from the preservation of the incentive to cooperate, which results from the suppression of parasitism that violates cooperation – in all its forms. Half truths are deadly. If you cannot describe via negativa as well as via positiva you are failing to construct a full accounting and creating a moral hazard, and as such you are a danger to us all.
  • Pursuit of Prosperity vs Natural Law Results in Neither.

    WORSHIP OF THE LAW VERSUS THE COMMERCIAL; FULL ACCOUNTING VIA POSITIVA, VIA NEGATIVA. Let me help you: by worship of the commercial we violate natural law and consume our previously accumulated capital. By the worship of natural law we cannot exist by other than the commercial but we are limited in that we cannot consume our previously accumulated capital. Worshipping the commercial is to love the consequence that kills you, rather than the cause that transcends you. Natural Law of Reciprocity creates wealth. It’s the property that results from reciprocity that causes the common law of torts.

    The grammar of experiences, the grammar of intentions, the grammar of goods, and the grammar of morality, are all via positiva. The grammar of causality requires the grammar of operations. The adage that property is the result of the law of torts is only a half truth. Property results from reciprocity, results from the preservation of the incentive to cooperate, which results from the suppression of parasitism that violates cooperation – in all its forms. Half truths are deadly. If you cannot describe via negativa as well as via positiva you are failing to construct a full accounting and creating a moral hazard, and as such you are a danger to us all.
  • It Makes Sense

    —Those who function by gossip and rallying will of course suppress all language that violates gossip, the same way that those of us who function by property and responsibility will of course suppress all action that violates property.— Curt Doolittle