Apr 27, 2017 7:57am HERE IS WHY YOU’RE AN IDIOT: CAPITALISM VS SOCIAL DEMOCRACY, SOCIALISM, COMMUNISM? Morons fall into the trap of capitalism vs communism, neither of which are possible, and both of which constitute means of parasitism, rather than advocating Rule of Natural Law. One can rule by command, one can rule by Religion, one can rule by Credit, and one can rule by Natural Law. Command does not require information, just obedience. Religion is a deception with which anything can be justified. Credit and financialization are a deception by which to abstractly steal from you. And only RULE OF NATURAL LAW requires productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer free of imposition of costs by externality. So markets in everything – public and private – MUST result from Natural Law. But natural law DOES NOT RESULT FROM CAPITALISM. (If you read this, I assume you’re not a moron. lol)
Source: Original Site Post
-
We Do Not Ask Permission of Man to Rule, But Forgiveness of the Gods if We Fail.
WE DO NOT ASK PERMISSION OF MAN TO RULE, WE ASK FORGIVENESS OF THE GODS IF WE FAIL. You do not ask permission to rule by natural law. You overthrow the current order. You rule. You profit from it. People Prosper. Agency Emerges. Man Transcends.
-
We Do Not Ask Permission of Man to Rule, But Forgiveness of the Gods if We Fail.
WE DO NOT ASK PERMISSION OF MAN TO RULE, WE ASK FORGIVENESS OF THE GODS IF WE FAIL. You do not ask permission to rule by natural law. You overthrow the current order. You rule. You profit from it. People Prosper. Agency Emerges. Man Transcends.
-
Slap Advocates of Capitalism Rather than Natural Law
Slap advocates of capitalism. Property rights and markets will evolve under Rule of Law by Natural Law. Capitalism is just a cosmopolitan distraction to justify every form of parasitism possible under financialization. Financialization like Religion like Divine Right is simply another means of preying parasitically upon our people. Interest is necessary for the measurement of production, and as a means of compensating each other for the cost of producing rule of law by natural law and the markets that emerge from it. But all consumer credit under fiat money is simply theft from the people, and a means of their indentured servitude. You were fooled. Punish those who fooled you. Forcibly produce every means of restitution possible. Back to the introduction of fiat money. All of it. Every cent. Everywhere in the world.
-
Slap Advocates of Capitalism Rather than Natural Law
Slap advocates of capitalism. Property rights and markets will evolve under Rule of Law by Natural Law. Capitalism is just a cosmopolitan distraction to justify every form of parasitism possible under financialization. Financialization like Religion like Divine Right is simply another means of preying parasitically upon our people. Interest is necessary for the measurement of production, and as a means of compensating each other for the cost of producing rule of law by natural law and the markets that emerge from it. But all consumer credit under fiat money is simply theft from the people, and a means of their indentured servitude. You were fooled. Punish those who fooled you. Forcibly produce every means of restitution possible. Back to the introduction of fiat money. All of it. Every cent. Everywhere in the world.
-
Another Leap in Progress
Over the past week or so I’ve had another significant insight on language and measurement. This as simplified the epistemology significantly.
-
Another Leap in Progress
Over the past week or so I’ve had another significant insight on language and measurement. This as simplified the epistemology significantly.
-
In Retrospect: Hegel.
I don’t remember who said it… I think it might have been Durant? That at the end of your journey through history and philosophy, you’ll find Hegel there waiting for you. Unfortunately, you cannot, from the reading of hegel, know that he is right. In retrospect, despite his pseudoscientific language, he was the closest of all. But I only know that, because of my use of scientific language.
-
In Retrospect: Hegel.
I don’t remember who said it… I think it might have been Durant? That at the end of your journey through history and philosophy, you’ll find Hegel there waiting for you. Unfortunately, you cannot, from the reading of hegel, know that he is right. In retrospect, despite his pseudoscientific language, he was the closest of all. But I only know that, because of my use of scientific language.
-
Political Classes
Dependent
- Non self supporting
Independent(Freeman)
- Self Supporting
- Militia, Emergency, or Hospitalier Service, Continuing Male Regimental Service
- Self Supporting, Married, three children, Continuing Male Regimental Service
- Self Supporting, Married, three children, Male Regimental Service, Employs 25 or more non-kin in the commercial production of goods, services, and information.
- Self Supporting, Married, More than three Children, Continuing Male Regimental Service, four consecutive generations of Burghers, Territorial Governor
- Married, Six or more children, Male Regimental Service, Noble Family
Citizen Burgher Nobility Monarchy