I have been busting my a– and my brain for the past two weeks and dammit this section of the work is … omg. Killing me. I just can’t narrow down the concepts into an incremental sequence that I think the audience can follow without having their heads explode….
Thanks for letting me think out loud.
If my head explodes it will be really messy. Like that guy in Scanners. Ya know? Boom… and Michael Ironside makes that weird face and then expresses that look of evil joy afterwards…
Anyway. Thanks for letting me think out loud.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Bernie Sanders has gone from cute, well intentioned fool, to absolute lunatic al
Bernie Sanders has gone from cute, well intentioned fool, to absolute lunatic along with Maxine Waters. At least we know Feinstein and Nanci Pelosi are just dishonest pragmatists. -
Bernie Sanders has gone from cute, well intentioned fool, to absolute lunatic al
Bernie Sanders has gone from cute, well intentioned fool, to absolute lunatic along with Maxine Waters. At least we know Feinstein and Nanci Pelosi are just dishonest pragmatists. -
Saw This Silent Generation Post Somewhere Else
Bothers me because I see them as the “naive and abused generation”. The generation like their parents that were the most and first affected by the Propaganda Generation. The first substantial victims of the Industrialization of Lying. And through that lens this set of statements reads somewhat differently from how the author intended. —–BEGIN—- Born in the 1930’s and 40’s, we exist as a very special age cohort. We are the Silent Generation. We are the smallest number of children born since the early 1900’s. We are the “last ones.” We are the last generation, climbing out of the depression, who can remember the winds of war and the impact of a world at war which rattled the structure of our daily lives for years. We are the last to remember ration books for everything from gas to sugar to shoes to stoves. We saved tin foil and poured fat into tin cans. We hand mixed ’white stuff’ with ‘yellow stuff’ to make fake butter. We saw cars up on blocks because tires weren’t available. We can remember milk being delivered to our house early in the morning and placed in the “milk box” on the porch. [A friend’s mother delivered milk in a horse drawn cart.] We sometimes fed the horse, and our dog, Spot, a Fox Terrier, would greet the milkman when he made our delivery, then he would ride in Glenn’s truck till the end of his route, when Glenn would drive by the house and let Spot off the truck just in time to greet us coming home from elementary school. Many of us are the last to hear Roosevelt ’s radio assurances and to see gold stars in the front windows of our grieving neighbors. Many of us can also remember the parades on August 15, 1945; VJ Day. We saw the ‘boys’ home from the war, build their little houses, pouring the cellar, tar papering it over and living there until they could afford the time and money to build it out. We are the last generation who spent much of our childhood without television; instead we imagined what we heard on the radio. As we all like to brag, with no TV, we spent our childhood “playing outside until the street lights came on.” We did play outside and we did play on our own. We turned the hose or the fire hydrants on and ran through the spray to play in the water. The lack of television in our early years meant, for most of us, that we had little real understanding of what the world was like. Our Saturday afternoons, if at the movies, gave us newsreels of the war sandwiched in between westerns and cartoons. Telephones were one to a house, often shared and hung on the wall. Computers were called calculators, they only added and were hand cranked; typewriters were driven by pounding fingers, throwing the carriage, and changing the ribbon. The ‘Internet’ and ‘GOOGLE’ were words that didn’t exist. Newspapers and magazines were written for adults and the news was broadcast on our table radio in the evening by H.V Kaltenborne and Gabriel Heatter. We are the last group who had to find out for ourselves. As we grew up, the country was exploding with growth. The G.I. Bill gave returning veterans the means to get an education and spurred colleges to grow. VA loans fanned a housing boom. Pent up demand coupled with new installment payment plans put factories to work. New highways would bring jobs and mobility. The veterans joined civic clubs and became active in politics. In the late 40’s and early 50’s the country seemed to lie in the embrace of brisk but quiet order as it gave birth to its new middle class (which became known as ‘Baby Boomers’). …. it goes on … -
Saw This Silent Generation Post Somewhere Else
Bothers me because I see them as the “naive and abused generation”. The generation like their parents that were the most and first affected by the Propaganda Generation. The first substantial victims of the Industrialization of Lying. And through that lens this set of statements reads somewhat differently from how the author intended. —–BEGIN—- Born in the 1930’s and 40’s, we exist as a very special age cohort. We are the Silent Generation. We are the smallest number of children born since the early 1900’s. We are the “last ones.” We are the last generation, climbing out of the depression, who can remember the winds of war and the impact of a world at war which rattled the structure of our daily lives for years. We are the last to remember ration books for everything from gas to sugar to shoes to stoves. We saved tin foil and poured fat into tin cans. We hand mixed ’white stuff’ with ‘yellow stuff’ to make fake butter. We saw cars up on blocks because tires weren’t available. We can remember milk being delivered to our house early in the morning and placed in the “milk box” on the porch. [A friend’s mother delivered milk in a horse drawn cart.] We sometimes fed the horse, and our dog, Spot, a Fox Terrier, would greet the milkman when he made our delivery, then he would ride in Glenn’s truck till the end of his route, when Glenn would drive by the house and let Spot off the truck just in time to greet us coming home from elementary school. Many of us are the last to hear Roosevelt ’s radio assurances and to see gold stars in the front windows of our grieving neighbors. Many of us can also remember the parades on August 15, 1945; VJ Day. We saw the ‘boys’ home from the war, build their little houses, pouring the cellar, tar papering it over and living there until they could afford the time and money to build it out. We are the last generation who spent much of our childhood without television; instead we imagined what we heard on the radio. As we all like to brag, with no TV, we spent our childhood “playing outside until the street lights came on.” We did play outside and we did play on our own. We turned the hose or the fire hydrants on and ran through the spray to play in the water. The lack of television in our early years meant, for most of us, that we had little real understanding of what the world was like. Our Saturday afternoons, if at the movies, gave us newsreels of the war sandwiched in between westerns and cartoons. Telephones were one to a house, often shared and hung on the wall. Computers were called calculators, they only added and were hand cranked; typewriters were driven by pounding fingers, throwing the carriage, and changing the ribbon. The ‘Internet’ and ‘GOOGLE’ were words that didn’t exist. Newspapers and magazines were written for adults and the news was broadcast on our table radio in the evening by H.V Kaltenborne and Gabriel Heatter. We are the last group who had to find out for ourselves. As we grew up, the country was exploding with growth. The G.I. Bill gave returning veterans the means to get an education and spurred colleges to grow. VA loans fanned a housing boom. Pent up demand coupled with new installment payment plans put factories to work. New highways would bring jobs and mobility. The veterans joined civic clubs and became active in politics. In the late 40’s and early 50’s the country seemed to lie in the embrace of brisk but quiet order as it gave birth to its new middle class (which became known as ‘Baby Boomers’). …. it goes on … -
The Grammars Of Decidability
Brain breaking, maybe, but informative if you grok it. Can I get feedback on this from fellow supergeeks? In order to show Testimonial grammar I’m trying to demonstrate the scope of each grammar (language) we have developed for making comparisons. I want to do this so that I can recategorize natural language from just ‘verbs’ to categories of verbs. And just names to names of types, functions, classes, objects, etc…. Lots to write about on this topic. Lots also to write about on axiomatic vs algorithmic vs rational, vs theoretic etc. -
The Grammars Of Decidability
Brain breaking, maybe, but informative if you grok it. Can I get feedback on this from fellow supergeeks? In order to show Testimonial grammar I’m trying to demonstrate the scope of each grammar (language) we have developed for making comparisons. I want to do this so that I can recategorize natural language from just ‘verbs’ to categories of verbs. And just names to names of types, functions, classes, objects, etc…. Lots to write about on this topic. Lots also to write about on axiomatic vs algorithmic vs rational, vs theoretic etc. -
“My question concerns technical and scientific language rather than colloquial l
—“My question concerns technical and scientific language rather than colloquial language: I would like to ask if there is any inclination in English to give the words class and category more or less different meanings or shades of meaning, or are they completely interchangeable in all kinds of use?”— From Elsewhere You CLASSIFY things that exist (Science – referents that exist into a hierarchy) whose organization doesn’t change, and you CATEGORIZE ideas (Philosophy – referents that have meaning into a list) because they can change. So classify(things, hierarchy or order, relatively invariant), vs. categorize(concepts, terms, that might be categorized differently in different contexts). So just as english words have origins in german(commoners, farmers, craftsmen), french(nobility, ruling class, wealthy), Latin and Greek(scholarly or educated classes), English (like all european languages) uses specialized vocabulary for mathematical, philosophical, political/Legal, and scientific classes of vocabulary. English is very ‘precise’ in its use of sets of terms the same way that german is precise in its precisely descriptive terms. Now, do uneducated people conflate terms? All the time. In fact educated people do all the time as well. My favorite examples being the conflation of mathematic (axiomatic), philosophical(rational), and scientific (theoretic), terminology. It’s not uncommon to hear someone make an argument with terms from math, philosophy, and science without having the faintest idea that the terms in each limit the possible properties of argument. For example, True in math and logic is binary(Deductive and Necessary). In philosophy it can be binary(non contradictory), in law it’s ternary(True false and undecidable), in and in science it’s multivalued with False being the only certainty, and truth being little more than an ordinality by triangulation). If someone disagrees with you on usage you can correct them. 😉 -
“My question concerns technical and scientific language rather than colloquial l
—“My question concerns technical and scientific language rather than colloquial language: I would like to ask if there is any inclination in English to give the words class and category more or less different meanings or shades of meaning, or are they completely interchangeable in all kinds of use?”— From Elsewhere You CLASSIFY things that exist (Science – referents that exist into a hierarchy) whose organization doesn’t change, and you CATEGORIZE ideas (Philosophy – referents that have meaning into a list) because they can change. So classify(things, hierarchy or order, relatively invariant), vs. categorize(concepts, terms, that might be categorized differently in different contexts). So just as english words have origins in german(commoners, farmers, craftsmen), french(nobility, ruling class, wealthy), Latin and Greek(scholarly or educated classes), English (like all european languages) uses specialized vocabulary for mathematical, philosophical, political/Legal, and scientific classes of vocabulary. English is very ‘precise’ in its use of sets of terms the same way that german is precise in its precisely descriptive terms. Now, do uneducated people conflate terms? All the time. In fact educated people do all the time as well. My favorite examples being the conflation of mathematic (axiomatic), philosophical(rational), and scientific (theoretic), terminology. It’s not uncommon to hear someone make an argument with terms from math, philosophy, and science without having the faintest idea that the terms in each limit the possible properties of argument. For example, True in math and logic is binary(Deductive and Necessary). In philosophy it can be binary(non contradictory), in law it’s ternary(True false and undecidable), in and in science it’s multivalued with False being the only certainty, and truth being little more than an ordinality by triangulation). If someone disagrees with you on usage you can correct them. 😉 -
Hammonasset beach. Two pm. Quite nice really
Hammonasset beach. Two pm. Quite nice really.