The Great War against Cuckholdry.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Evolution Of Intelligence (Outwitting Determinism)
11 – Instrumentation(Artificial Intelligence) 10 – Language (late brain) 9 – Cooperation (Mid brain) 7 – Socialization (Early brain) 6 – Predation (Old brain) 5 – Escape (Brain Stem) 4 – Directional Movement (Nervous System) 3 – Movement (organisms) 2 – Reproduction (life – cells) 1 – Energy Conservation (we don’t have a name for this stage?) -
Evolution Of Intelligence (Outwitting Determinism)
11 – Instrumentation(Artificial Intelligence) 10 – Language (late brain) 9 – Cooperation (Mid brain) 7 – Socialization (Early brain) 6 – Predation (Old brain) 5 – Escape (Brain Stem) 4 – Directional Movement (Nervous System) 3 – Movement (organisms) 2 – Reproduction (life – cells) 1 – Energy Conservation (we don’t have a name for this stage?) -
1 – Communism: no state, people engaged in production, democratically decide how
1 – Communism: no state, people engaged in production, democratically decide how to allocate each according to his need. 2 – Socialism: total state ownership, with all income by redistribution. 3 – Fascism: Mixed private public ownership, with strict limits on commerce and behavior, such that maximum income is devoted to the production of commons. 4 – Social Democracy: Mixed public private ownership, but dividends (taxes) from the private sector redistributed for consumption. 5 – Classical Liberalism: Mixed public private Ownership with dividends (taxes) invested in commons, and without redistribution for consumption. 6 – Christian Monarchy: Monarchic ownership of territory, but nobility and property holders permission required for changes in taxation. 7 – Dictatorship: central ownership of everything and taxes collected by practical limitations, but with the intention of keeping the ‘public’ (cattle) productive. TWO AXES: X) Organization of production between involuntary(no property) and voluntary(Property). Y) Direction of proceeds of production and market activity to Government members, or to commons, or to consumers. That’s all the axes we have to work with. That’s all there is to do. Period. -
1 – Communism: no state, people engaged in production, democratically decide how
1 – Communism: no state, people engaged in production, democratically decide how to allocate each according to his need. 2 – Socialism: total state ownership, with all income by redistribution. 3 – Fascism: Mixed private public ownership, with strict limits on commerce and behavior, such that maximum income is devoted to the production of commons. 4 – Social Democracy: Mixed public private ownership, but dividends (taxes) from the private sector redistributed for consumption. 5 – Classical Liberalism: Mixed public private Ownership with dividends (taxes) invested in commons, and without redistribution for consumption. 6 – Christian Monarchy: Monarchic ownership of territory, but nobility and property holders permission required for changes in taxation. 7 – Dictatorship: central ownership of everything and taxes collected by practical limitations, but with the intention of keeping the ‘public’ (cattle) productive. TWO AXES: X) Organization of production between involuntary(no property) and voluntary(Property). Y) Direction of proceeds of production and market activity to Government members, or to commons, or to consumers. That’s all the axes we have to work with. That’s all there is to do. Period. -
Well, what we call consciousness: that continuous change in state between percep
Well, what we call consciousness: that continuous change in state between perception, search(perception-memory-prediction), focus, impulse, decision, and action – serves almost entirely as ‘the search for opportunities’ for acquisition of the host of things that are valuable to us. It’s not complicated. I am not sure why consciousness is so hard to understand. It’s not. Brains are not gears. Our various charges are affected by momentum, resistance and capacitance, and continuous iteration (echoes) create persistence of perception just as much as our eyes create persistence of vision. That’s consciousness. We seize opportunities for reward. -
Well, what we call consciousness: that continuous change in state between percep
Well, what we call consciousness: that continuous change in state between perception, search(perception-memory-prediction), focus, impulse, decision, and action – serves almost entirely as ‘the search for opportunities’ for acquisition of the host of things that are valuable to us. It’s not complicated. I am not sure why consciousness is so hard to understand. It’s not. Brains are not gears. Our various charges are affected by momentum, resistance and capacitance, and continuous iteration (echoes) create persistence of perception just as much as our eyes create persistence of vision. That’s consciousness. We seize opportunities for reward. -
( diary: health update. I seem to have sympathetic emotions again – yes you can
( diary: health update. I seem to have sympathetic emotions again – yes you can lose them, really. So still making progress. Thinking the rest is exercise. Maybe I can increase my stamina a bit. Still finding my work going slowly. Great progress then frustration. Book has begun to feel disjointed but right. Think I am going to continue to be periodically be frustrated until I finish the operational grammar and explain its use. Solving the universal grammar wasn’t really that hard. Hopefully some researchers will find a way to measure it. Not my job so to speak. Having fun listening to Searle this morning. But even he is still stuck on the math thing. Russell wasn’t stuck he just didn’t know the alternative. But at least he understood the problem. In retrospect it’s so freaking obvious. The luxury of hindsight. -
( diary: health update. I seem to have sympathetic emotions again – yes you can
( diary: health update. I seem to have sympathetic emotions again – yes you can lose them, really. So still making progress. Thinking the rest is exercise. Maybe I can increase my stamina a bit. Still finding my work going slowly. Great progress then frustration. Book has begun to feel disjointed but right. Think I am going to continue to be periodically be frustrated until I finish the operational grammar and explain its use. Solving the universal grammar wasn’t really that hard. Hopefully some researchers will find a way to measure it. Not my job so to speak. Having fun listening to Searle this morning. But even he is still stuck on the math thing. Russell wasn’t stuck he just didn’t know the alternative. But at least he understood the problem. In retrospect it’s so freaking obvious. The luxury of hindsight. -
coherence = commensurability
coherence = commensurability