SCIENCE: Taking action in order to discover, through the process of elimination, operations with which we can, as a consequence, conduct our reasoning – and where the principle objective of science consists in removing ignorance, error, bias and deceit from free association, we call hypothesizing.
MATHEMATICS: the use of positional names to describe averages of operations that result in constant relations, themselves resulting in different symmetries at different scales.
Consequently we can use mathematics to discover patterns which we then seek to reduce to operations. And within the human world we can know these operations thorugh subjective testing (sympathy/empathy/self-experience) whether internal (above the intuitive) or external (physical world).
Once we have discovered that set of operations, we can seek the set of operations beneath it – and so on, until we find the lowest possible set of operations from which the universe is constructed.
The physical universe, at its lowest level, consists of a market, just like our own markets, wherein humans are just a very complex (high) scale, across multiple hierarchical markets, each of which consists of symmetries, produced by the limits of operations – just as man is limited by his physical, emotional, and intellectual operations that we call ‘actions’.
When we operate by markets we operate in harmony with the physical universe – meaning the lowest possible friction – and we fulfill life’s purpose at the highest extant level of symmetry, wherein all life serves the purpose of defeating entropy. As such we defeat entropy by the incrementally fastest means possible.
Western man was not first, but he was fastest. Because through truth and eugenics (domestication) he lived in the greatest harmony with the universe.
The explanatory power of (number of philosophical problems this model solves) is profound. In metaphysics we often discuss levels of reality, but again that is another ideal, where operations are actions.
There. I have done it. I have figured out how to say it in simple terms.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Cooperation is Only Useful, Until it is Not.
Cooperation, whether personal, commercial, political, or military, is only valuable until it is not valuable personally, familially, tribally, or nationally, or not valuable organizationally or politically. Cooperation is not an intrinsic good any more than violence is an intrinsic bad. They are just useful or not in producing goods and bands. When cooperation is no longer beneficial, then boycott is in one’s interest. When boycott is no longer beneficial then predation is in one’s interest. And while it is very common that cooperation and boycott are often more valuable, there are many conditions under which violence is preferable to boycott or cooperation. This is the left’s mistake. This is the state’s mistake. This is most everyone’s mistake. Never has an empire been so fragile. Revolutions are always suspect in prospect but deterministic in retrospect. The question is – can I deprive those with the interest in change of confidence in all alternatives such that they will work in very small groups to bring about constitutional, political, and civil change? I think so. Desperation will sink in. When desperate, and with vision of the future, and a plan of action, it’s all possible. Trivial even. Deterministic.
-
Cooperation is Only Useful, Until it is Not.
Cooperation, whether personal, commercial, political, or military, is only valuable until it is not valuable personally, familially, tribally, or nationally, or not valuable organizationally or politically. Cooperation is not an intrinsic good any more than violence is an intrinsic bad. They are just useful or not in producing goods and bands. When cooperation is no longer beneficial, then boycott is in one’s interest. When boycott is no longer beneficial then predation is in one’s interest. And while it is very common that cooperation and boycott are often more valuable, there are many conditions under which violence is preferable to boycott or cooperation. This is the left’s mistake. This is the state’s mistake. This is most everyone’s mistake. Never has an empire been so fragile. Revolutions are always suspect in prospect but deterministic in retrospect. The question is – can I deprive those with the interest in change of confidence in all alternatives such that they will work in very small groups to bring about constitutional, political, and civil change? I think so. Desperation will sink in. When desperate, and with vision of the future, and a plan of action, it’s all possible. Trivial even. Deterministic.
-
There Are No Non-military Activities In The Conduct Of Revolutions
Your plan is one of conquest and defense, and if you are successful enough to propagandize then your plan of maneuver, conquest, defense, and exit was successful. There are no discounts in war that do not cause loss of capability of soldiers, other than defeating your enemy completely by use of concentration of power, deception, and surprise.
-
There Are No Non-military Activities In The Conduct Of Revolutions
Your plan is one of conquest and defense, and if you are successful enough to propagandize then your plan of maneuver, conquest, defense, and exit was successful. There are no discounts in war that do not cause loss of capability of soldiers, other than defeating your enemy completely by use of concentration of power, deception, and surprise.
-
We should thank female hypergamy for our existence. It’s just not a strategy ada
We should thank female hypergamy for our existence. It’s just not a strategy adapted to a society without adult males. The feminine endgame is not the c*ck carousel but to be a nurturing mother, grandmother and wife. A woman’s strategy to reach that place is hypergamy; to attract as much male attention and company as possible, as flagrantly as is permitted, so that she competitively maximizes her market demand as well as the market availability of males, until she is taken in possession by a deserving patriarch. It gets ugly when there are no such males. Hypergamy is not a stable evolutionary strategy without male dominance, which has been a ubiquitous feature of human existence, throughout and beyond the time of our existence. Sans the role of the responsible father and husband, males get to choose between being a beta cuck and an irresponsible thug. I know which one is reproductively more successful when contraception runs short — no, the future is not feminine. -
We should thank female hypergamy for our existence. It’s just not a strategy ada
We should thank female hypergamy for our existence. It’s just not a strategy adapted to a society without adult males. The feminine endgame is not the c*ck carousel but to be a nurturing mother, grandmother and wife. A woman’s strategy to reach that place is hypergamy; to attract as much male attention and company as possible, as flagrantly as is permitted, so that she competitively maximizes her market demand as well as the market availability of males, until she is taken in possession by a deserving patriarch. It gets ugly when there are no such males. Hypergamy is not a stable evolutionary strategy without male dominance, which has been a ubiquitous feature of human existence, throughout and beyond the time of our existence. Sans the role of the responsible father and husband, males get to choose between being a beta cuck and an irresponsible thug. I know which one is reproductively more successful when contraception runs short — no, the future is not feminine. -
National (Middle Class) Socialism, Vs International (Underclass) Communism
National Socialism (Tribalism) Pro Western vs. International Communism (Classism) Anti-Western. National Socialism: Defensive Strategy: Monopoly High Culture, Industrialized production of commons, Public limits on and cooperation with Industry, Private commerce, Not autarkic but highly nationalist trade biases. With the purpose of policy the intergenerational family, and the suppression of the underclasses. Right of Exit. (Middle Class and Working Class Bias) International Communism: Offensive Strategy: Monopoly Low Culture, Industrialized production of commons, Public control of industry, public control of commerce, Not Autarkic but Expansionist. The purpose of policy the ‘individual’, and the expansion and ‘uplifting’ of the underclasses. (Laboring Class and Underclass Bias) You know the ancient world origins of judaism, christianity, and islam are in the underclass revolution against the (white) aristocracy, by replacing tragedy, sacrifice, and the trials of Achilles (the wealthy farmers), with the tragedy, sacrifice, and the trials of Jews, Jesus, Muhammed (the poor pastoralists). Why do you think that National Socialism (Nationalist Middle Class, Economic warfare) versus International Communism (Universalist Underclass Economic Warfare) is any different in our era than the battle between the high trust middle class agrarian traders, and the low trust lower class pastoralist laborers? What is the difference between postmodernism and christianity? None. They’re both for the purpose of making false promises to the underclasses so that they use their numbers to destroy the aristocracy and create a dark age.
-
National (Middle Class) Socialism, Vs International (Underclass) Communism
National Socialism (Tribalism) Pro Western vs. International Communism (Classism) Anti-Western. National Socialism: Defensive Strategy: Monopoly High Culture, Industrialized production of commons, Public limits on and cooperation with Industry, Private commerce, Not autarkic but highly nationalist trade biases. With the purpose of policy the intergenerational family, and the suppression of the underclasses. Right of Exit. (Middle Class and Working Class Bias) International Communism: Offensive Strategy: Monopoly Low Culture, Industrialized production of commons, Public control of industry, public control of commerce, Not Autarkic but Expansionist. The purpose of policy the ‘individual’, and the expansion and ‘uplifting’ of the underclasses. (Laboring Class and Underclass Bias) You know the ancient world origins of judaism, christianity, and islam are in the underclass revolution against the (white) aristocracy, by replacing tragedy, sacrifice, and the trials of Achilles (the wealthy farmers), with the tragedy, sacrifice, and the trials of Jews, Jesus, Muhammed (the poor pastoralists). Why do you think that National Socialism (Nationalist Middle Class, Economic warfare) versus International Communism (Universalist Underclass Economic Warfare) is any different in our era than the battle between the high trust middle class agrarian traders, and the low trust lower class pastoralist laborers? What is the difference between postmodernism and christianity? None. They’re both for the purpose of making false promises to the underclasses so that they use their numbers to destroy the aristocracy and create a dark age.
-
The Virtuous Cycle Of Western Civilization
Martial Risk Produces Reward. Opportunity for Reward produces Heroism. Martial Heroism produces Meritocracy. Meritocracy produces Sovereignty. Sovereignty produces Natural Law. Natural law produces markets. Markets produce Prosperity. Prosperity increases competitiveness. Competitiveness decreases martial risk.