Source: Original Site Post

  • Tying It All Together

    (Important post) SCIENCE: Taking action in order to discover, through the process of elimination, operations with which we can, as a consequence, reason – where the principle problem is removing ignorance, error, bias and deceit from free association, we call hypothesizing. MATHEMATICS: the use of positional names to describe averages of operations that result in constant relations, themselves resulting in different symmetries at different scales.

    Consequently we can use mathematics to discover patterns which we then seek to reduce to operations. And within the human world we can know these operations thorugh subjective testing (sympathy/empathy/self-experience) whether internal (above the intuitive) or external (physical world). Once we have discovered that set of operations, we can seek the set of operations beneath it – and so on, until we find the lowest possible set of operations from which the universe is constructed. The physical universe, at its lowest level, consists of a market, just like our own markets, wherein humans are just a very complex (high) scale, across multiple hierarchical markets, each of which consists of symmetries, produced by the limits of operations – just as man is limited by his physical, emotional, and intellectual operations that we call ‘actions’. When we operate by markets we operate in harmony with the physical universe – meaning the lowest possible friction – and we fulfill life’s purpose at the highest extant level of symmetry, wherein all life serves the purpose of defeating entropy. As such we defeat entropy by the incrementally fastest means possible. Western man was not first, but he was fastest. Because through truth and eugenics (domestication) he lived in the greatest harmony with the universe. The explanatory power of (number of philosophical problems this model solves) is profound. In metaphysics we often discuss levels of reality, but again that is another ideal, where operations are actions. There. I have done it. I have figured out how to say it in simple terms.
  • “The pen serves to multiply the swords.”—Steve Pender

    –“The pen serves to multiply the swords.”—Steve Pender
  • “The pen serves to multiply the swords.”—Steve Pender

    –“The pen serves to multiply the swords.”—Steve Pender
  • THE PRODUCTION OF HUMANS | Animal > Slave(dependent) > Serf(self supporting) > F

    | THE PRODUCTION OF HUMANS | Animal > Slave(dependent) > Serf(self supporting) > Freeman(rights to property) > Citizen(rights to commons) > Sovereign(king/judge)
  • THE PRODUCTION OF HUMANS | Animal > Slave(dependent) > Serf(self supporting) > F

    | THE PRODUCTION OF HUMANS | Animal > Slave(dependent) > Serf(self supporting) > Freeman(rights to property) > Citizen(rights to commons) > Sovereign(king/judge)
  • “The pen is mightier than the sword” is not a case for a benevolent pen, it is a

    —“The pen is mightier than the sword” is not a case for a benevolent pen, it is a demonstration of how to give order and efficiency to violence in one form or another.”— Hreodbeorht Røe (brilliant)
  • “The pen is mightier than the sword” is not a case for a benevolent pen, it is a

    —“The pen is mightier than the sword” is not a case for a benevolent pen, it is a demonstration of how to give order and efficiency to violence in one form or another.”— Hreodbeorht Røe (brilliant)
  • “Is cooperation with the natural dominance (competence) hierarchy more rewarding

    —“Is cooperation with the natural dominance (competence) hierarchy more rewarding than predation or boycott?”— Oliver Wescott ||Unaware-no_oppy > Aware-oppy(Boycott, Cooperation, Predation) The profitability of any set of interactions is contingent upon the time value of boycott, cooperation, or predation, in some combination. In general, boycott preserves opportunity for future cooperation, cooperation increases the opportunity for future cooperation, and predation decreases the opportunity for future cooperation. In general, the value of predation increases with the advantage of some form of power, the chance of success, and the sustainability of a pool of available prey. The value of predation decreases with the chance of failure or retaliation, and the unsustainability of a pool of available prey. As an economic system, the domestication of the animal man (aryanism) which applied the domestication of animals to humans through the developmental sequence slave > serf > freeman > citizen > sovereign, was the most successful in history.
  • “Is cooperation with the natural dominance (competence) hierarchy more rewarding

    —“Is cooperation with the natural dominance (competence) hierarchy more rewarding than predation or boycott?”— Oliver Wescott ||Unaware-no_oppy > Aware-oppy(Boycott, Cooperation, Predation) The profitability of any set of interactions is contingent upon the time value of boycott, cooperation, or predation, in some combination. In general, boycott preserves opportunity for future cooperation, cooperation increases the opportunity for future cooperation, and predation decreases the opportunity for future cooperation. In general, the value of predation increases with the advantage of some form of power, the chance of success, and the sustainability of a pool of available prey. The value of predation decreases with the chance of failure or retaliation, and the unsustainability of a pool of available prey. As an economic system, the domestication of the animal man (aryanism) which applied the domestication of animals to humans through the developmental sequence slave > serf > freeman > citizen > sovereign, was the most successful in history.
  • How do you make your living? The stuff you post on Facebook obviously requires h

    How do you make your living? The stuff you post on Facebook obviously requires hours and hours of thought and concentration. this made me wonder how do you spend so much time thinking of these ideas and do you get paid for them?