Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • PLEASE FIX BLOCKING NOW. 😉 (1) blocking isn’t working and some idiot is spammin

    PLEASE FIX BLOCKING NOW. 😉

    (1) blocking isn’t working and some idiot is spamming my feed with porn. I’m not terribly fond of porn, especially gay anal porn, in my feed.
    (2) there is no reason comments can’t be deleted by the thread author. You need to get ahead of the curve because this is going to get far worse with all the new users – and the trolls will ruin the platform.

    Dear devs. (sarcastic humor) Should I auto forward the gay anal porn to this support channel? That would provide some incentive?. 😉 lol

    If you are short devs for fixing sh-t like this I’ll volunteer. -cheers. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 20:35:44 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105686220396617921

  • The question is simple: 1. Given that the Right is hopeless, arrogant, mob of cl

    The question is simple:

    1. Given that the Right is hopeless, arrogant, mob of clowns.
    2. That trying to organize them for success is fruitless.
    3. That continuing to fight is only moral a intuition.
    4. That the Government is threatening me despite the fruitlessness of it.

    Then?

    If the right can’t be organized, and if all that remains is for the common folk to descend into random violence, then I have no value to add. My goal has been to prevent it, or at least direct it to a solution that would allow us to reform to suit the needs of left, center and right.

    The left will use every single action to move closer to the totalitarian jewish bolshevik state repeating what they tried to do in germany, and what they did in Russia and Rome.

    The right will lose as the germans, russians, and romans lost.

    And the second dark age of ignorance pseudoscience and superstition will replace the promise of man’s transcendence.

    Because that is what the enemy does: destroy. Because they are pandora and they cannot help but open the box of lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 20:25:15 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105686179149163201

  • Q: What would it mean for the world if the USA became a fascist country? (Fascism Definition)

    Define Fascism. If you can’t define the political, economic, social, familial, and religious models then you don’t know enough to opine.

    How: Enumerate cooperative markets for cooperation: given territory, resources, people, their labor, their property, and existing built capital – those markets are association(friends), reproduction(the family), production of education, production of cooperation(social groups), production(the economy), production of commons(the government), production of polities (neighborhoods, villages, cities, states, empires), war.

    Then: Define how any political model organizes and operates each of these markets.

    Given: Territorial, Resource, Built Capital, Institutional, Genetic, Demographic (Human capital), Traditional, Normative, Knowledge, Technological, and Economic capital.

    Fascism has the following properties:

    1) Organizing the State for Total War (non-competition) against informational, ideological, philosophical, cultural, religious, or demographic undermining, insurrection, conversion, or invasion, by eliminating political, economic, social, ideological, philosophical religious, ethnic competition.

    The peace of Westphalia mandated state monopoly of violence, thereby ending the wars of religion and limiting states to war.

    Napoleon Restored Roman Total Military war, and destroyed the 1000-year-old holy roman empire of the greater german people, and the origin of the rebellion against the corruption of the church. The french revolution sought to replace the church and state with a secular equivalent on the roman model. Combined germanic Russian civilization ended french imperialism over continental Europe. Today’s ‘EU’ project is the french political rather than military attempt to repeat their Napoleonic conquest of Europe, using the temporary timidity of the german culture, and the enormous bankroll and industrial capacity of the German people.

    The Marxists (largely under Jewish leadership) conducted total information, ideological, philosophical, cultural, religious, class, and ethnic warfare. Marxism repeated the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim war of sedition and insurrection in the ancient world thanks to the modernization provided by roman commerce and roman roads, in the modern world thanks to the modernization provided by the anglo industrial revolution and the age of sail.

    Fascism was a counter-revolution against the Marxists as well as the classical liberals.

    So consider sectors of society as markets and total war as war against all markets that produce social coherence, trust, organization and production.

    Simple version: fascism biases the organs of the state, economy, society, family, education, and religion into an extension of the military model of organization to limit means of ‘betrayal’, insurrection, defection, and treason – war – against the markets necessary for the organization and preservation of cooperation that produces the available means of self determination.

    2) Ethnocentrism (non competition)

    3) Identitarian State Religion (non competition) –

    4) Conformity, Integration – (non-competition: status)

    5) Familism and Capitalization of Commons – not Individualism and consumption (non-competition) (qulality family commons reduce demand for income)

    6) Maximization of Autarky – (non-competition)

    7) Economic Socialism – (non-competition) There are four versions of socialism:

    1. Communist State Socialism (underclass rule) where the state eliminates private property and controls all investment, employment, production distribution, and trade: the soviet model. In this model the militarization of society is complete at the expense of the incentives provided by the pricing and merit system. This is possible, just as organizing any country for war is possible for a short time, but it incentivizes black markets, corruption, and maximization of rent-seeking.
    2. Prewar French State Socialism (Aristocratic Rule) – How french, germans, Italians understood it: Nationalizing the industrial revolution to maximize the production commons for common people rather than developing a capitalist class that was not responsible to the people. And leaving non-industrial production distribution and trade to the private sector. This is possible until industries are established, and corruption and rent-seeking emerge, and management must be privatized. Mixed Economy, State industrial Socialism, Consumer Capitalism.
    3. Postwar Democratic socialism: (Today’s continental socialism): where the state recognizes it is not competent in the management of capital and maximizes the extraction and redistribution of tax revenues. This is possible until rents are maximized indirectly through the state instead of directly through industry. Mixed Economy State ownership of private property, licensed to the public for the production of taxes, that are then redistributed.
    4. The Original Anglo Pro-Social Model: (Aristocratic Rule) The appropriation of taxes from the windfall of the industrial revolution and empire, to produce necessary and beneficial commons but NOT interfering with the continuation of natural selection by markets, and market suppression of reproduction of the unfit for markets.

    The State is Organized for Total War by:

    1. State Eradication of competition in all markets across the spectrum.
    2. State propagation of an ethnocentric, secular ‘religion’ of ethnicity, culture, and state, with tolerance for weak institutional religions if they are non-competitive. (Buddhism, orthodoxy).
    3. State-Private ‘partnership’ of finance – meaning virtual state ownership of banking and finance, limiting bank and financial investments to those that benefit the state and its mission to conduct total war against a
    4. State-Private partnership in the industrial invention, production, distribution and trade. And Maximizing Autarky (economic independence), and in particular (this is usually unstated) ending price arbitrage, and in particular wage arbitrage, that allows industry to profit from outsourcing labor, technology, or production.
    5. Maximizing Production of SHARED commons while reducing personal consumption. Investment in infrastructure (transport, water, power, data) and housing (apartments, condos, urbanization) and environment (parks, public spaces, religious spaces), and core consumer goods, services, and information, that reduce the need for individual and family income. (This serves as redistribution by commons instead of by cash redistribution and has the benefit of higher longer returns, and higher socialization.) However it requires a homogenous ethnocentric polity, that is capable of impulse control, and low tolerance for ‘inappropriate for family’ behavior. That’s why heterogeneous polities are ‘dumps’.
    6. State family formation.
    7. State social formation. State norm regulation
    8. State religion and education formation.
    9. State Direction of Capital to Military Defense

    Today’s China is fascist (Total war against the outside), not Communist(ideological war against all inside classes) or socialist(domestic economic war against inside capitalists).

    Fascism arises because of competition due to the failure of the french enlightenment false promise of the benevolence of man, the compatibility of nations religions and civilizations.

    The Optimum Political Order

    The optimum political order is a military federation of small ethnocentric polities for maximizing quality of life (Germanic Europe), or a vast conquering, assimilating, civilization state to maximize modernization and war (India, China).

    The Optimum Political System

    Rule of Law by the Natural Law of Reciprocity A Monarchy as a judge of last resort. An independent Judiciary A professional cabinet of ministers A parliament with houses for classes creating a market for commons between classes. Non-elected, but randomly selected, jurors to sit those houses EIther direct proportional (for policy) or economic voting (for expenditures) Meritocratic Criterial requiring earning of the vote. A Treasury with State monopoly on consumer credit. State hyper investment and ownership in research and development and heavy capital investment industries. An Insurer of last resort for disasters and emergencies A religion of nature, ancestor, and hero thanks (debt). A universal militia (swiss), emergency services, and hospitals, and a standing professional (elite) army. Deterrent by Nuclear weapons.

  • Q: What would it mean for the world if the USA became a fascist country? (Fascism Definition)

    Define Fascism. If you can’t define the political, economic, social, familial, and religious models then you don’t know enough to opine.

    How: Enumerate cooperative markets for cooperation: given territory, resources, people, their labor, their property, and existing built capital – those markets are association(friends), reproduction(the family), production of education, production of cooperation(social groups), production(the economy), production of commons(the government), production of polities (neighborhoods, villages, cities, states, empires), war.

    Then: Define how any political model organizes and operates each of these markets.

    Given: Territorial, Resource, Built Capital, Institutional, Genetic, Demographic (Human capital), Traditional, Normative, Knowledge, Technological, and Economic capital.

    Fascism has the following properties:

    1) Organizing the State for Total War (non-competition) against informational, ideological, philosophical, cultural, religious, or demographic undermining, insurrection, conversion, or invasion, by eliminating political, economic, social, ideological, philosophical religious, ethnic competition.

    The peace of Westphalia mandated state monopoly of violence, thereby ending the wars of religion and limiting states to war.

    Napoleon Restored Roman Total Military war, and destroyed the 1000-year-old holy roman empire of the greater german people, and the origin of the rebellion against the corruption of the church. The french revolution sought to replace the church and state with a secular equivalent on the roman model. Combined germanic Russian civilization ended french imperialism over continental Europe. Today’s ‘EU’ project is the french political rather than military attempt to repeat their Napoleonic conquest of Europe, using the temporary timidity of the german culture, and the enormous bankroll and industrial capacity of the German people.

    The Marxists (largely under Jewish leadership) conducted total information, ideological, philosophical, cultural, religious, class, and ethnic warfare. Marxism repeated the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim war of sedition and insurrection in the ancient world thanks to the modernization provided by roman commerce and roman roads, in the modern world thanks to the modernization provided by the anglo industrial revolution and the age of sail.

    Fascism was a counter-revolution against the Marxists as well as the classical liberals.

    So consider sectors of society as markets and total war as war against all markets that produce social coherence, trust, organization and production.

    Simple version: fascism biases the organs of the state, economy, society, family, education, and religion into an extension of the military model of organization to limit means of ‘betrayal’, insurrection, defection, and treason – war – against the markets necessary for the organization and preservation of cooperation that produces the available means of self determination.

    2) Ethnocentrism (non competition)

    3) Identitarian State Religion (non competition) –

    4) Conformity, Integration – (non-competition: status)

    5) Familism and Capitalization of Commons – not Individualism and consumption (non-competition) (qulality family commons reduce demand for income)

    6) Maximization of Autarky – (non-competition)

    7) Economic Socialism – (non-competition) There are four versions of socialism:

    1. Communist State Socialism (underclass rule) where the state eliminates private property and controls all investment, employment, production distribution, and trade: the soviet model. In this model the militarization of society is complete at the expense of the incentives provided by the pricing and merit system. This is possible, just as organizing any country for war is possible for a short time, but it incentivizes black markets, corruption, and maximization of rent-seeking.
    2. Prewar French State Socialism (Aristocratic Rule) – How french, germans, Italians understood it: Nationalizing the industrial revolution to maximize the production commons for common people rather than developing a capitalist class that was not responsible to the people. And leaving non-industrial production distribution and trade to the private sector. This is possible until industries are established, and corruption and rent-seeking emerge, and management must be privatized. Mixed Economy, State industrial Socialism, Consumer Capitalism.
    3. Postwar Democratic socialism: (Today’s continental socialism): where the state recognizes it is not competent in the management of capital and maximizes the extraction and redistribution of tax revenues. This is possible until rents are maximized indirectly through the state instead of directly through industry. Mixed Economy State ownership of private property, licensed to the public for the production of taxes, that are then redistributed.
    4. The Original Anglo Pro-Social Model: (Aristocratic Rule) The appropriation of taxes from the windfall of the industrial revolution and empire, to produce necessary and beneficial commons but NOT interfering with the continuation of natural selection by markets, and market suppression of reproduction of the unfit for markets.

    The State is Organized for Total War by:

    1. State Eradication of competition in all markets across the spectrum.
    2. State propagation of an ethnocentric, secular ‘religion’ of ethnicity, culture, and state, with tolerance for weak institutional religions if they are non-competitive. (Buddhism, orthodoxy).
    3. State-Private ‘partnership’ of finance – meaning virtual state ownership of banking and finance, limiting bank and financial investments to those that benefit the state and its mission to conduct total war against a
    4. State-Private partnership in the industrial invention, production, distribution and trade. And Maximizing Autarky (economic independence), and in particular (this is usually unstated) ending price arbitrage, and in particular wage arbitrage, that allows industry to profit from outsourcing labor, technology, or production.
    5. Maximizing Production of SHARED commons while reducing personal consumption. Investment in infrastructure (transport, water, power, data) and housing (apartments, condos, urbanization) and environment (parks, public spaces, religious spaces), and core consumer goods, services, and information, that reduce the need for individual and family income. (This serves as redistribution by commons instead of by cash redistribution and has the benefit of higher longer returns, and higher socialization.) However it requires a homogenous ethnocentric polity, that is capable of impulse control, and low tolerance for ‘inappropriate for family’ behavior. That’s why heterogeneous polities are ‘dumps’.
    6. State family formation.
    7. State social formation. State norm regulation
    8. State religion and education formation.
    9. State Direction of Capital to Military Defense

    Today’s China is fascist (Total war against the outside), not Communist(ideological war against all inside classes) or socialist(domestic economic war against inside capitalists).

    Fascism arises because of competition due to the failure of the french enlightenment false promise of the benevolence of man, the compatibility of nations religions and civilizations.

    The Optimum Political Order

    The optimum political order is a military federation of small ethnocentric polities for maximizing quality of life (Germanic Europe), or a vast conquering, assimilating, civilization state to maximize modernization and war (India, China).

    The Optimum Political System

    Rule of Law by the Natural Law of Reciprocity A Monarchy as a judge of last resort. An independent Judiciary A professional cabinet of ministers A parliament with houses for classes creating a market for commons between classes. Non-elected, but randomly selected, jurors to sit those houses EIther direct proportional (for policy) or economic voting (for expenditures) Meritocratic Criterial requiring earning of the vote. A Treasury with State monopoly on consumer credit. State hyper investment and ownership in research and development and heavy capital investment industries. An Insurer of last resort for disasters and emergencies A religion of nature, ancestor, and hero thanks (debt). A universal militia (swiss), emergency services, and hospitals, and a standing professional (elite) army. Deterrent by Nuclear weapons.

  • The Law Only Cares About Demonstrated Behavior

    THE LAW ONLY CARES ABOUT DEMONSTRATED BEHAVIOR Race and class only matter to the degree they creates incentives to avoid the natural law of sovereignty, reciprocity in display word and deed, and duty in their defense – and the rapid adaptation, prosperity, high trust, and plentiful commons that result. IOW: Fitness for Market Civ. “Whiteness” = Science = Laws of the Universe If you are fit for whiteness you’re fit to survive. If not – you aren’t. It’s natural selection. This isn’t man’s judgment. It’s the universe’s and the universe’s god’s judgment. Every people on earth can live by ‘whiteness’. If they control the reproduction of their non-performing (under) classes. And they fail as a people if they don’t. It’s not complicated. It’s just will.

  • The Law Only Cares About Demonstrated Behavior

    THE LAW ONLY CARES ABOUT DEMONSTRATED BEHAVIOR Race and class only matter to the degree they creates incentives to avoid the natural law of sovereignty, reciprocity in display word and deed, and duty in their defense – and the rapid adaptation, prosperity, high trust, and plentiful commons that result. IOW: Fitness for Market Civ. “Whiteness” = Science = Laws of the Universe If you are fit for whiteness you’re fit to survive. If not – you aren’t. It’s natural selection. This isn’t man’s judgment. It’s the universe’s and the universe’s god’s judgment. Every people on earth can live by ‘whiteness’. If they control the reproduction of their non-performing (under) classes. And they fail as a people if they don’t. It’s not complicated. It’s just will.

  • The Negative Value of Non STEM+EL Degrees

    Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in STEM fields- and eventually do 2) must ‘unlearn’ what they were taught was false – and eventually do 3) and the net difference is that non-STEM education cost was a LOSS, and STEM students earned it. There is never, ever a comparison between a conversation with a physicist, engineer, or economist that is vapid as someone in the humanities. It is however, more pleasant going through life in secular theology of the humanities, just as more blissful in supernatural theology. Very few people (relatively) get stem degrees. The disturbing reality is that despite the vast number of people put thru higher education the number of top talent, the marginal difference in theory, and innovations hasn’t increased since 63. Lower return on ed vs reproduction. So what’s ‘wrong’? The measure of any discipline is (a) reproducibility of research (b) survivability of claims and skills in time (c) demonstrated evidence of resulting productivity (d) improvement or decline in competency per person (e) non- substitutability by apprenticeship. So? How many disciplines dont fail? Better yet, what if Universities and professors had to warranty students for occupational fitness upon award of degree or return the educational funds to students? What would happen is that we would drop back to 10-12% of population. All of this is common knowledge in economics. All we have done is dumb down high school degrees, eliminate cheap vocational(manual) and junior(clerical-medical) training, in exchange for impoverishing parents in old age, delaying homeownership, and gutting reproduction. Gutting reproduction while causing declining productivity generates demand for immigration to pay for medical and retirement costs of people who were deprived of children and consequential consumption, causing a continuous reduction in the competitiveness of the economy. And that’s BEFORE we talk about the fact that colleges are teaching a secular religion of false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: marxism-postmodernism-pc/woke – that is marching through the institutions of cultural production and maintenance. Why? to feed higher ed. And if you were skilled in physics, economics, cognitive science, and not yourself indoctrinated into the social construction of false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe you would know this. But your keep perpetuating these lies like a priesthood justifying faith.

  • The Negative Value of Non STEM+EL Degrees

    Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in STEM fields- and eventually do 2) must ‘unlearn’ what they were taught was false – and eventually do 3) and the net difference is that non-STEM education cost was a LOSS, and STEM students earned it. There is never, ever a comparison between a conversation with a physicist, engineer, or economist that is vapid as someone in the humanities. It is however, more pleasant going through life in secular theology of the humanities, just as more blissful in supernatural theology. Very few people (relatively) get stem degrees. The disturbing reality is that despite the vast number of people put thru higher education the number of top talent, the marginal difference in theory, and innovations hasn’t increased since 63. Lower return on ed vs reproduction. So what’s ‘wrong’? The measure of any discipline is (a) reproducibility of research (b) survivability of claims and skills in time (c) demonstrated evidence of resulting productivity (d) improvement or decline in competency per person (e) non- substitutability by apprenticeship. So? How many disciplines dont fail? Better yet, what if Universities and professors had to warranty students for occupational fitness upon award of degree or return the educational funds to students? What would happen is that we would drop back to 10-12% of population. All of this is common knowledge in economics. All we have done is dumb down high school degrees, eliminate cheap vocational(manual) and junior(clerical-medical) training, in exchange for impoverishing parents in old age, delaying homeownership, and gutting reproduction. Gutting reproduction while causing declining productivity generates demand for immigration to pay for medical and retirement costs of people who were deprived of children and consequential consumption, causing a continuous reduction in the competitiveness of the economy. And that’s BEFORE we talk about the fact that colleges are teaching a secular religion of false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: marxism-postmodernism-pc/woke – that is marching through the institutions of cultural production and maintenance. Why? to feed higher ed. And if you were skilled in physics, economics, cognitive science, and not yourself indoctrinated into the social construction of false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe you would know this. But your keep perpetuating these lies like a priesthood justifying faith.

  • Universities Don’t Teach. They Sort by Work Capacity, Conscientiousness, and IQ.

    UNIVERSITIES DON’T TEACH. THEY SORT BY WORK CAPACITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, AND IQ. You pay 150k in debt, four years of earning, four years of life, one or two fewer children, delayed homeownership, on what’s nothing more than a class, personality, and IQ test. That’s all it is. There is no evidence you learn anything in university unless it’s math, comp-sci, or engineering, that can’t be taught part-time in two years or less. The rest is ‘recreation’ or ‘indoctrination’. Now, you will find that CEO’s tend to the 130 IQ range for deterministic reasons (I have an undergrad in art history and founded a dozen companies). And the demand for CEO talent varies dramatically by sector. Some are political (GM), some technical, some engineering, some finance. The difference is that they have 130 plus IQ’s, and have high conscientiousness, and can work harder than most people can imagine it’s possible to work, have extraordinary endurance, high pain tolerance – especially psychological. It’s equivalent to being a professional athlete. So your argument is well-intentioned but false: one’s chances of becoming a fortune X ceo have nothing at all to do with education. Just as almost everything in life has to do with one’s social and economic market value: determined by fitness, manners, conscientiousness, & IQ. If you study for example Harvard, Yale, Georgetown, and Stanford JD courses it’s postmodern drivel. It’s intellectually embarrassing. If you study at a state school or just read the literature, and apprentice (in the past) you’d do better. Universities don’t teach. They Sort. That’s all they do.

  • Universities Don’t Teach. They Sort by Work Capacity, Conscientiousness, and IQ.

    UNIVERSITIES DON’T TEACH. THEY SORT BY WORK CAPACITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, AND IQ. You pay 150k in debt, four years of earning, four years of life, one or two fewer children, delayed homeownership, on what’s nothing more than a class, personality, and IQ test. That’s all it is. There is no evidence you learn anything in university unless it’s math, comp-sci, or engineering, that can’t be taught part-time in two years or less. The rest is ‘recreation’ or ‘indoctrination’. Now, you will find that CEO’s tend to the 130 IQ range for deterministic reasons (I have an undergrad in art history and founded a dozen companies). And the demand for CEO talent varies dramatically by sector. Some are political (GM), some technical, some engineering, some finance. The difference is that they have 130 plus IQ’s, and have high conscientiousness, and can work harder than most people can imagine it’s possible to work, have extraordinary endurance, high pain tolerance – especially psychological. It’s equivalent to being a professional athlete. So your argument is well-intentioned but false: one’s chances of becoming a fortune X ceo have nothing at all to do with education. Just as almost everything in life has to do with one’s social and economic market value: determined by fitness, manners, conscientiousness, & IQ. If you study for example Harvard, Yale, Georgetown, and Stanford JD courses it’s postmodern drivel. It’s intellectually embarrassing. If you study at a state school or just read the literature, and apprentice (in the past) you’d do better. Universities don’t teach. They Sort. That’s all they do.