Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • IS TRUTH THE RESULT OF “FEELZ”? (NO). (Part 1) The neurology says it’s because o

    IS TRUTH THE RESULT OF “FEELZ”? (NO). (Part 1)

    The neurology says it’s because of the absence of feels. Given the absence of intuition all that remains is consistency correspondence and possibility. Females need intuition for children. Some of us maintain the feminine. Some of us are free of it. Rule(M) > Govern(MF) > Obey(F)

    Well, that’s an implication that there is not one most parsimonious, consistent, correspondent, and actionable paradigm for producing decidability. But there is. I’m trying to eliminate the left’s method of lying. The problem is, that eliminates everyone’s method of lying.

    The fact that it’s cognitively masculine is merely a fact. The fact that alternatives appear to be cognitively feminine is merely a fact. Those are the two directions of cognitive bias the brain can and does evolve.

    So if we want to say we need narratives that assist the range of human beings across the cognitive spectrum in coordinating their actions then that is fine. As long as they aren’t false. And as long as they don’t persist the Abrahamic method of deception. Which is ‘the problem’.

    So just as we need heroic ethics(empathy), rule ethics (reason), and outcome ethics(knowledge), we need Mythology(empathy), Philosophy(reason), and Science(Evidence), because we are children, adults, and aged. And all three must be coherent and scale up and down gracefully w/ us.

    Yes but reality is a costly data and algorithm set, given the distribution of age, and ability. We must provide wisdom lit for the young to old, and dim to wise. So the problem I see is that while I might state the first causes, they are too precise a tool for imprecise minds.

    Twitter and FB are sketchpads that assist in understanding how to simplify complex ideas so that they are within reach of the better of the common folk.

    ( … more … )

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 18:14:01 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105770597810412831

  • We use the Terms Marx, Marxist, Marxism, Communism as a General Category for the Leftist Revolt Against Darwin and Malthus

    For the sake of expediency, we categorize the second Jewish counter-revolution against western civilization by its first iteration: marxism-communism. And when we use the term Marxism we refer to the entire spectrum of Jewish anti-civilization movements whether Marxism(in all its iterations) > Neo-Marxism(Gramsci-Frankfurt) > Postmodernism(Derrida et al) > Anti-Male Feminism > PC/Woke > Anti-Colonialism > Anti-Whiteness > Anti-White > White Replacement > White Genocide movements. This is their strategy of total war against the institutions of cultural production and persistence of the same. They promise freedom from Logic, Malthus, Natural Law, and Darwin if whites are defeated, because whites discover, adapt to and apply the laws of the universe – which means that the ‘unfit’ for natural selection are left behind. This is why the unproductive elites (talking class) make the false promise to the unfit classes, if they defeat the Fit and Productive Middle classes. The top and bottom parasitic classes against the productive middle classes.

  • We use the Terms Marx, Marxist, Marxism, Communism as a General Category for the Leftist Revolt Against Darwin and Malthus

    For the sake of expediency, we categorize the second Jewish counter-revolution against western civilization by its first iteration: marxism-communism. And when we use the term Marxism we refer to the entire spectrum of Jewish anti-civilization movements whether Marxism(in all its iterations) > Neo-Marxism(Gramsci-Frankfurt) > Postmodernism(Derrida et al) > Anti-Male Feminism > PC/Woke > Anti-Colonialism > Anti-Whiteness > Anti-White > White Replacement > White Genocide movements. This is their strategy of total war against the institutions of cultural production and persistence of the same. They promise freedom from Logic, Malthus, Natural Law, and Darwin if whites are defeated, because whites discover, adapt to and apply the laws of the universe – which means that the ‘unfit’ for natural selection are left behind. This is why the unproductive elites (talking class) make the false promise to the unfit classes, if they defeat the Fit and Productive Middle classes. The top and bottom parasitic classes against the productive middle classes.

  • @Sqpatrick That’s demonstrably false. I think you mean there are no peers among

    @Sqpatrick That’s demonstrably false. I think you mean there are no peers among competitors?

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 16:55:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105770289174771374

  • Christian Pretense and Stolen Valor

    In the past, not today, there was enough endemic violence, and enough continuous warfare, and enough necessity of self-defense, familial defense, and local defense, that the Christian exhaustion of suppression of dominance expression mediated the presence of and incentive for violence. Yet today, what we see among Christians is not a conviction but convenience: escapism, cowardice, victimization, and eradication by a superior ancient religion (islam) and a superior modern religion (woke). It was not Christianity that made warrior saints. It was the search for booty under the permission of the church to violate the church’s ban on dominance expression. Until relatively recently war was pursued for booty because the returns on farming were barely sustainable. So whenever you say ‘warrior saints’ you’re appealing to the lie of ‘stolen valor’. You’re pretending you’re the same as those men. You aren’t. You’re just escapist little cowards like women creating a gossip circle to ameliorate your anxiety, powerlessness, and defeat. Because that’s what Abrahamic religions consist of: social construction of falsehoods that attempt to ameliorate the stress of being subject to gods logical, physical, cooperative, and evolutionary laws, which have determined, by your failure, that you’re unfit for God’s universe. Jesus taught us how to survive god’s laws – gods laws that only the Europeans and Persians had discovered, and used to conquer and rule the inferior peoples – including the Semites that had not. So Jesus told those who were ‘left behind by god’ how to tolerate gods leaving them behind – exhausting love for one another. Thus serving god by not doing harm against his laws. The jews (paulians, Christians) instead turned jesus’ teaching into another semitic system of lies. The abrahamic method of deceit is advanced a method of lying as european science is an advanced a method of speaking the truth: by aherence to the logical, physical, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe. Becuase why would god need to lie or teach men to lie? Why would god teach you to avoid his laws? Laws he had built the universe from by his own will?

  • Christian Pretense and Stolen Valor

    In the past, not today, there was enough endemic violence, and enough continuous warfare, and enough necessity of self-defense, familial defense, and local defense, that the Christian exhaustion of suppression of dominance expression mediated the presence of and incentive for violence. Yet today, what we see among Christians is not a conviction but convenience: escapism, cowardice, victimization, and eradication by a superior ancient religion (islam) and a superior modern religion (woke). It was not Christianity that made warrior saints. It was the search for booty under the permission of the church to violate the church’s ban on dominance expression. Until relatively recently war was pursued for booty because the returns on farming were barely sustainable. So whenever you say ‘warrior saints’ you’re appealing to the lie of ‘stolen valor’. You’re pretending you’re the same as those men. You aren’t. You’re just escapist little cowards like women creating a gossip circle to ameliorate your anxiety, powerlessness, and defeat. Because that’s what Abrahamic religions consist of: social construction of falsehoods that attempt to ameliorate the stress of being subject to gods logical, physical, cooperative, and evolutionary laws, which have determined, by your failure, that you’re unfit for God’s universe. Jesus taught us how to survive god’s laws – gods laws that only the Europeans and Persians had discovered, and used to conquer and rule the inferior peoples – including the Semites that had not. So Jesus told those who were ‘left behind by god’ how to tolerate gods leaving them behind – exhausting love for one another. Thus serving god by not doing harm against his laws. The jews (paulians, Christians) instead turned jesus’ teaching into another semitic system of lies. The abrahamic method of deceit is advanced a method of lying as european science is an advanced a method of speaking the truth: by aherence to the logical, physical, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe. Becuase why would god need to lie or teach men to lie? Why would god teach you to avoid his laws? Laws he had built the universe from by his own will?

  • Notes on Dyer and Thomas’ first video.

    Jay’s argument should be ‘Logical’ only means internally consistent in the pursuit of an end, vs True, meaning testimonial, meaning testifiable, meaning non-conflationary, consistent, actionable, correspondent, coherent, limited, and complete under realism, naturalism and operationalism, free of loading, framing, suggestion and obscurantism. Ergo as wisdom literature, all faiths are some degree of logical in the sense of internally consistent and utilitarian. They are true in the lower standard of providing a paradigm of action that produces desird ends. They are not “true” in the sense that they are also testifiable.

    The Christian faith is logical within the conflationary system of thought that is not limited by constraints of testimony under realism, naturalism, non-conflation (identity), operationalism (actionability) and correspondence. The fact that Christian theology as wisdom literature has produced the most complete system of non-aggression, tolerance, submission, non-adversarialism, and produces exceptional serfs, peasants, citizens, and to some degree sovereigns is simply a fact because it trains the intuition by continuous reinforcement of the suppression of dominance expression (at rather obvious costs).
    (I’ve come to agree with the criticism of Protestantism largely because it causes doubling down on occultism and sophistry rather than the nearly legalistic discipline of the catholic church. That said, as far as I can tell, the competition between romanticism – the restoration of natural religion – and Christianity, and marxism-secularism in the 1800’s in response to the scientific, industrial, and Darwinian evolution, meant a failure of romanticism was the great missed opportunity to restore our religion of the primacy of man and our transcendence through action INTO gods. The church failed to reform into natural law and science as evidence of our greater understanding of god’s will, and the success of marxism as a materialistic promise of reward in life after revolution in the modern world, like supernatural promise of reward in an afterlife in the ancient world. )
    The problem is that it teaches Christians to lie using the Abrahamic system of lying. Although again, there is a difference between an evolutionary one (science), a beneficial but stagnating wisdom literature (Christianity), a parasitic wisdom lit (Judaism), or a predatory and destructive one (Islam). (Dylan has gone from philosophy(justification) to sophistry (verbalism) to theology (occult). Some of us evolve from mythology to history to science producing testimony. Some of us evolve from mythology to theology to occultism. It depends on whether you were born with the feminine bias in empathic understanding or the masculine bias in analytic understanding. That’s why religiosity is heritable, and those of us who have a lesser NEED for empathy choose the sciences. It’s not complicated. Although we might have to separate just as the left and right must separate. Because as far as I can tell what I think we are seeing is a restoration of demand for speciation now that the agrarian age of homogenization is over.

  • Notes on Dyer and Thomas’ first video.

    Jay’s argument should be ‘Logical’ only means internally consistent in the pursuit of an end, vs True, meaning testimonial, meaning testifiable, meaning non-conflationary, consistent, actionable, correspondent, coherent, limited, and complete under realism, naturalism and operationalism, free of loading, framing, suggestion and obscurantism. Ergo as wisdom literature, all faiths are some degree of logical in the sense of internally consistent and utilitarian. They are true in the lower standard of providing a paradigm of action that produces desird ends. They are not “true” in the sense that they are also testifiable.

    The Christian faith is logical within the conflationary system of thought that is not limited by constraints of testimony under realism, naturalism, non-conflation (identity), operationalism (actionability) and correspondence. The fact that Christian theology as wisdom literature has produced the most complete system of non-aggression, tolerance, submission, non-adversarialism, and produces exceptional serfs, peasants, citizens, and to some degree sovereigns is simply a fact because it trains the intuition by continuous reinforcement of the suppression of dominance expression (at rather obvious costs).
    (I’ve come to agree with the criticism of Protestantism largely because it causes doubling down on occultism and sophistry rather than the nearly legalistic discipline of the catholic church. That said, as far as I can tell, the competition between romanticism – the restoration of natural religion – and Christianity, and marxism-secularism in the 1800’s in response to the scientific, industrial, and Darwinian evolution, meant a failure of romanticism was the great missed opportunity to restore our religion of the primacy of man and our transcendence through action INTO gods. The church failed to reform into natural law and science as evidence of our greater understanding of god’s will, and the success of marxism as a materialistic promise of reward in life after revolution in the modern world, like supernatural promise of reward in an afterlife in the ancient world. )
    The problem is that it teaches Christians to lie using the Abrahamic system of lying. Although again, there is a difference between an evolutionary one (science), a beneficial but stagnating wisdom literature (Christianity), a parasitic wisdom lit (Judaism), or a predatory and destructive one (Islam). (Dylan has gone from philosophy(justification) to sophistry (verbalism) to theology (occult). Some of us evolve from mythology to history to science producing testimony. Some of us evolve from mythology to theology to occultism. It depends on whether you were born with the feminine bias in empathic understanding or the masculine bias in analytic understanding. That’s why religiosity is heritable, and those of us who have a lesser NEED for empathy choose the sciences. It’s not complicated. Although we might have to separate just as the left and right must separate. Because as far as I can tell what I think we are seeing is a restoration of demand for speciation now that the agrarian age of homogenization is over.

  • Dr James Tour’s Use of Critique to Justify Miracles

    This is not a refutation of abiogenesis. It’s a claim of the absence of evidence of the sequence of molecular organization is evidence of absence of a sequence of molecular organization. It’s a claim that the recombination of standard model particles, elements, and molecules and systems of molecules cannot occur by the single causality of the defeat of entropy (producing equilibria). The observable evidence is that all primary forces, the hierarchy of equilibrial states that evolve from them (‘particles’, atoms, molecules, biomolecules on up) consist of recombinations that are in fact, observably possible, but we are as yet as unsure of the sequence of combinations that produced life as we are the geometry of the primary forces. This is very likely because (a) massive parallelization of elementary and molecular permutations (b) recombination of non-trivial resulting combinations, (c) information loss of inessential biomaterial during subsequent evolution. In other words, the evolutionary sequence is nontrivial. That doesn’t mean it’s impossible to discover, given that we can find nothing that we can’t explain that isn’t a function of either the lack of sufficient information to produce a testable theory, or the cost of testing those theories given the vast number of trials that would need to be run, until we know enough to run tests by simulation (calculation, computation, simulation). And the reason for both our ‘ignorances’ is quite simple: we cannot use deduction given the information available from acts of inspection using the tools available to us, so we have to use computable permutation (bottom up trial and error) until we do, and that will require a lot of computing power and a lot of time. In simple terms, the fact that equilibria do exist at increasing levels of complexity (subatomic, atomic, molecular, biomolecular, on up) is evidence that anything that IS computable (can evolve) from any given state will eventually be computed (evolve) as long as each step in the process produces a stable state. I don’t know why this is complicated. We face the same problems in subatomic physics, in chemistry, in materials science, in biochemistry, in consciousness, and in economics. These problems are identical because (a) we don’t yet know the primary geometry of the universe (we don’t know it’s number system or language so to speak), and (b) we can’t, therefore, calculate the permutations of stable states (under stable conditions – esp temperature). That said, yes, this “Hype” by attention-seeking students, researchers, universities, and the media, overstates just low little we know so far – and it’s offensive and unconstructive. And trying to justify the hand of god rather than that the universe is the mind of god and evolution is his means of creating tools (hands) by creating us, is just an attempt to defend rather ridiculous ancient supernatural mythology rather than trying to reform it with the evidence before us. Gods words are simple: it’s written in the formal physical cooperative and evolutionary laws of the universe for all to see if we can learn to read it. We have. The ancients didn’t. They invented lying instead. And the purpose of all of their lies is always the same: an attempt to avoid gods formal(logical), physical, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe. The only actor that would advise man to ignore gods laws that he so clearly built the universe from, and all of us can observe and read, is the devil. For this reason, Abraham was the devil, jesus tried to tell us how to escape him, and the jews and Muslims continue to do his work. Because they teach non-adaptation to gods laws of the universe.

  • Dr James Tour’s Use of Critique to Justify Miracles

    This is not a refutation of abiogenesis. It’s a claim of the absence of evidence of the sequence of molecular organization is evidence of absence of a sequence of molecular organization. It’s a claim that the recombination of standard model particles, elements, and molecules and systems of molecules cannot occur by the single causality of the defeat of entropy (producing equilibria). The observable evidence is that all primary forces, the hierarchy of equilibrial states that evolve from them (‘particles’, atoms, molecules, biomolecules on up) consist of recombinations that are in fact, observably possible, but we are as yet as unsure of the sequence of combinations that produced life as we are the geometry of the primary forces. This is very likely because (a) massive parallelization of elementary and molecular permutations (b) recombination of non-trivial resulting combinations, (c) information loss of inessential biomaterial during subsequent evolution. In other words, the evolutionary sequence is nontrivial. That doesn’t mean it’s impossible to discover, given that we can find nothing that we can’t explain that isn’t a function of either the lack of sufficient information to produce a testable theory, or the cost of testing those theories given the vast number of trials that would need to be run, until we know enough to run tests by simulation (calculation, computation, simulation). And the reason for both our ‘ignorances’ is quite simple: we cannot use deduction given the information available from acts of inspection using the tools available to us, so we have to use computable permutation (bottom up trial and error) until we do, and that will require a lot of computing power and a lot of time. In simple terms, the fact that equilibria do exist at increasing levels of complexity (subatomic, atomic, molecular, biomolecular, on up) is evidence that anything that IS computable (can evolve) from any given state will eventually be computed (evolve) as long as each step in the process produces a stable state. I don’t know why this is complicated. We face the same problems in subatomic physics, in chemistry, in materials science, in biochemistry, in consciousness, and in economics. These problems are identical because (a) we don’t yet know the primary geometry of the universe (we don’t know it’s number system or language so to speak), and (b) we can’t, therefore, calculate the permutations of stable states (under stable conditions – esp temperature). That said, yes, this “Hype” by attention-seeking students, researchers, universities, and the media, overstates just low little we know so far – and it’s offensive and unconstructive. And trying to justify the hand of god rather than that the universe is the mind of god and evolution is his means of creating tools (hands) by creating us, is just an attempt to defend rather ridiculous ancient supernatural mythology rather than trying to reform it with the evidence before us. Gods words are simple: it’s written in the formal physical cooperative and evolutionary laws of the universe for all to see if we can learn to read it. We have. The ancients didn’t. They invented lying instead. And the purpose of all of their lies is always the same: an attempt to avoid gods formal(logical), physical, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe. The only actor that would advise man to ignore gods laws that he so clearly built the universe from, and all of us can observe and read, is the devil. For this reason, Abraham was the devil, jesus tried to tell us how to escape him, and the jews and Muslims continue to do his work. Because they teach non-adaptation to gods laws of the universe.