Humans have very high loss aversion on the one hand, desire attention by cheap means, and jockey for status by means of gossip. As such negative news spreads far faster that opportunity news. Seizing opportunities costs, avoiding losses and buying attention with gossip is cheap.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Humans have very high loss aversion on the one hand, desire attention by cheap m
Humans have very high loss aversion on the one hand, desire attention by cheap means, and jockey for status by means of gossip. As such negative news spreads far faster that opportunity news. Seizing opportunities costs, avoiding losses and buying attention with gossip is cheap.
-
The Female Political Instinct Is to Marry the State to Escape the Costs of Male Maintenance.
—“That was the whole point all the time: destroy the nuclear family, replace the father with the State.”—Tomás Rodriguez Villegas The female political instinct is to marry the state to escape the costs of male maintenance. Totally logical … IF YOU LET IT HAPPEN.
-
The Female Political Instinct Is to Marry the State to Escape the Costs of Male Maintenance.
—“That was the whole point all the time: destroy the nuclear family, replace the father with the State.”—Tomás Rodriguez Villegas The female political instinct is to marry the state to escape the costs of male maintenance. Totally logical … IF YOU LET IT HAPPEN.
-
The Ongoing Semitic Revolt in Historical Context
SOCIALISM: THE VILLAGE Socialism is an economy in which productive property (factories, farms, workshops) is controlled socially. This can mean direct workers’ control, or community ownership, or state control on behalf of the people. There are a great deal of socialist ideologies. Broad categories include democratic socialism, Marxism, and anarchism. COMMUNISM: THE HUNTER GATHERER BAND Communism is a classless, stateless society in which productive property is commonly owned and economic distribution is operated on the principle of “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” It also refers to a group of ideologies which hold this form of social organization as their end goal. The most significant form of communism is Marxism, and the 20th century was characterized by a number of Marxist-Leninist states. Anarchist communism is also historically significant, though has not been nearly as popular as the various forms of Marxist communism since the late-19th and early-20th centuries, except in select countries or localities. MARXISM: THE SECOND RETALIATION AGAINST THE AGRARIANS. Marxism is an analytical framework based on the writings of 19th century German philosopher, economist, and sociologist Karl Marx and political philosopher and social scientist Friedrich Engels. It holds that human society is built primarily on economic relations between classes and that political and social structures are built around these relations. One’s class is defined by one’s relationship to production—who owns capital, who works it for a wage? Marxism analyzes social changes and developments as the product of conflicting classes changing the structure of the economy. Modern capitalism as the result of the bourgeoisie, the current capital-owning class, having wrested control of the economy away from the aristocracy, or the feudal owning-class. Bourgeois democracy follows as political structures adapt. The primary class conflict in capitalism is between the capital-owning class (the bourgeoisie) and the working-class (the proletariat). Marx argued that the proletariat would seize control of the economy and society, in a stage he described as socialism. In Marxist analysis, every state is the “dictatorship” of the economically dominant class. The socialist stage is therefore the “dictatorship of the proletariat,” in which the workers will reorganize the economy until there are no longer any classes. Without a class that needs to enforce its dominance over others, Marxists believe that the state will wither away and the final stage, communism, will be reached. These socialist revolutions will happen when capitalism reaches its final stages of development and becomes consumed by its own contradictions. CAIN AND ABLE: THE ETERNAL REBELLION OF SEMITIC PASTORALIST PRIMITIVISM AGAINST EUROPEANS Read Cain and Abel Abel (literally “herdsman”), works with livestock (Pastoralist/Female/Equalitarian) Cain (literally “metalsmith”) works with agriculture (Agrarian/Masculine/Hierarchical) The Jews had been in a war with the people of Crete (the Philistines) who were, among other things, metalworkers. The Jews (so far as I know) had no metalworking. As far as I know, once defeated by the Assyrians, the Jews committed their first genocide and killed every living person of the Philistines, and burned their cities. (This is the current archaeological evidence as I understand it). So as we can see, ancient judaism, rabbinical judaism, christianity, and islam are all revolts against the people of PROPERTY, TECHNOLOGY, and HIERARCHY. -
The Ongoing Semitic Revolt in Historical Context
SOCIALISM: THE VILLAGE Socialism is an economy in which productive property (factories, farms, workshops) is controlled socially. This can mean direct workers’ control, or community ownership, or state control on behalf of the people. There are a great deal of socialist ideologies. Broad categories include democratic socialism, Marxism, and anarchism. COMMUNISM: THE HUNTER GATHERER BAND Communism is a classless, stateless society in which productive property is commonly owned and economic distribution is operated on the principle of “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” It also refers to a group of ideologies which hold this form of social organization as their end goal. The most significant form of communism is Marxism, and the 20th century was characterized by a number of Marxist-Leninist states. Anarchist communism is also historically significant, though has not been nearly as popular as the various forms of Marxist communism since the late-19th and early-20th centuries, except in select countries or localities. MARXISM: THE SECOND RETALIATION AGAINST THE AGRARIANS. Marxism is an analytical framework based on the writings of 19th century German philosopher, economist, and sociologist Karl Marx and political philosopher and social scientist Friedrich Engels. It holds that human society is built primarily on economic relations between classes and that political and social structures are built around these relations. One’s class is defined by one’s relationship to production—who owns capital, who works it for a wage? Marxism analyzes social changes and developments as the product of conflicting classes changing the structure of the economy. Modern capitalism as the result of the bourgeoisie, the current capital-owning class, having wrested control of the economy away from the aristocracy, or the feudal owning-class. Bourgeois democracy follows as political structures adapt. The primary class conflict in capitalism is between the capital-owning class (the bourgeoisie) and the working-class (the proletariat). Marx argued that the proletariat would seize control of the economy and society, in a stage he described as socialism. In Marxist analysis, every state is the “dictatorship” of the economically dominant class. The socialist stage is therefore the “dictatorship of the proletariat,” in which the workers will reorganize the economy until there are no longer any classes. Without a class that needs to enforce its dominance over others, Marxists believe that the state will wither away and the final stage, communism, will be reached. These socialist revolutions will happen when capitalism reaches its final stages of development and becomes consumed by its own contradictions. CAIN AND ABLE: THE ETERNAL REBELLION OF SEMITIC PASTORALIST PRIMITIVISM AGAINST EUROPEANS Read Cain and Abel Abel (literally “herdsman”), works with livestock (Pastoralist/Female/Equalitarian) Cain (literally “metalsmith”) works with agriculture (Agrarian/Masculine/Hierarchical) The Jews had been in a war with the people of Crete (the Philistines) who were, among other things, metalworkers. The Jews (so far as I know) had no metalworking. As far as I know, once defeated by the Assyrians, the Jews committed their first genocide and killed every living person of the Philistines, and burned their cities. (This is the current archaeological evidence as I understand it). So as we can see, ancient judaism, rabbinical judaism, christianity, and islam are all revolts against the people of PROPERTY, TECHNOLOGY, and HIERARCHY. -
The Communist Party of Russia
The Communist Party of Russia was comprised of two factions of people. One faction belonged to the moderates who were of the opinion to slowly bring in the social change step by step and ultimately lead the country towards a socialist state. This faction was called the Mansheviks, or “menshinstvo” (minority). However there was another faction which did not believe in gradual evolution but complete social revolution and these were called the Bolsheviks, or “bolshinstvo” (majority) Bolshevik, in Russian means: “One of the Majority”: a member of a wing of the Russian Social-Democratic Workers’ Party – the communist party of Russia. Both these groups: the Bolsheviks and the Mansheviks evolved from the same party. In the revolution of 1917 it was this Bolshevik faction led by Lenin, that was able to seize control of the government in Russia (October 1917) and became the dominant political power. The further development of communism in soviet union and elsewhere were carried out by these bolsheviks so the word Bolshevik is often associated with communism. This approach of complete social revolution is therefore many times referred to as bolshevism. (compiled from separate sources on quora)
-
The Communist Party of Russia
The Communist Party of Russia was comprised of two factions of people. One faction belonged to the moderates who were of the opinion to slowly bring in the social change step by step and ultimately lead the country towards a socialist state. This faction was called the Mansheviks, or “menshinstvo” (minority). However there was another faction which did not believe in gradual evolution but complete social revolution and these were called the Bolsheviks, or “bolshinstvo” (majority) Bolshevik, in Russian means: “One of the Majority”: a member of a wing of the Russian Social-Democratic Workers’ Party – the communist party of Russia. Both these groups: the Bolsheviks and the Mansheviks evolved from the same party. In the revolution of 1917 it was this Bolshevik faction led by Lenin, that was able to seize control of the government in Russia (October 1917) and became the dominant political power. The further development of communism in soviet union and elsewhere were carried out by these bolsheviks so the word Bolshevik is often associated with communism. This approach of complete social revolution is therefore many times referred to as bolshevism. (compiled from separate sources on quora)
-
How to Study Any Subject
Some idiot on Quora counter-signaling one of my posts on ethnicity, by demanding sources. You know, I don’t put sources for a lot of things because it requires a second copy-paste, and google image search or text search will always find it. (and maybe subconsciously i like to bait these assholes.) As usual, it’s a diagram and quotes from Nature. Which is pretty much the top of the scientific stack. and… Fuck. Do people think I make this shit up? Fucking read something other than stupid shit…. You know how easy getting a grasp of anything is? You find a subject. You search wiki and read the articles and copy the references. Now you search for those references. you read reviews of published papers that were published later, and you read reviews of books on amazon. You read the reviews of all related books suggested by amazon. You make a list of names, and terms, and key-phrases. You repeat this process until ‘I cant find anything that isn’t a duplicate of something someone else said’. Once you’ve done that pick the best book, and read it’s table of contents. Try figure out which chapter makes the argument rather than prepares for it or explains it. Scan that chapter. then read it. Then if you think there is more to learn read more until there isn’t. Check the back of the book’s glossary and bibliography. Just scan them for things you either don’t know or sound interesting. Pick another book. Do the same. Most of the time BOOKS CAN BE REDUCED TO A SET OF KEY PAPERS REFERENCED IN THE BIBLIOGRAPHY. If not, they can be reduced to a central thesis, and the rest of the book is just DEFENSE of it. My opinion on research is not to put a lot of stock in any defense, but to put stock tin the competition of books and papers that compete with one another on the topic. So I recommend using the cheapness of the internet to survey a subject and then get into the books. Most of the time I work by finding an author that has created a novel insight and then reading the papers in his bibliography. It may seem like a lot is published but the truth is very few books in any year are of substance at the level of group evolutionary strategy and politics. Once you are ‘current’ with the state of knowledge you just literally follow the top blogs, and read the relatively few papers that have any meaning. What you find is that all the discipilnes duplicate effort on what you would consider awfully obvious matters. By contrast, what most people do is the other way around: try to find one book and they get ‘hooked by the authors frame.’ and then they’re anchored. Start with an overview of the ‘market for ideas’. This isn’t the middle ages. Nearly every book more than a year old is available for free somewhere somehow. In fact, we have just about everything worth reading already in our library in digital form. (Rant off.)
-
How to Study Any Subject
Some idiot on Quora counter-signaling one of my posts on ethnicity, by demanding sources. You know, I don’t put sources for a lot of things because it requires a second copy-paste, and google image search or text search will always find it. (and maybe subconsciously i like to bait these assholes.) As usual, it’s a diagram and quotes from Nature. Which is pretty much the top of the scientific stack. and… Fuck. Do people think I make this shit up? Fucking read something other than stupid shit…. You know how easy getting a grasp of anything is? You find a subject. You search wiki and read the articles and copy the references. Now you search for those references. you read reviews of published papers that were published later, and you read reviews of books on amazon. You read the reviews of all related books suggested by amazon. You make a list of names, and terms, and key-phrases. You repeat this process until ‘I cant find anything that isn’t a duplicate of something someone else said’. Once you’ve done that pick the best book, and read it’s table of contents. Try figure out which chapter makes the argument rather than prepares for it or explains it. Scan that chapter. then read it. Then if you think there is more to learn read more until there isn’t. Check the back of the book’s glossary and bibliography. Just scan them for things you either don’t know or sound interesting. Pick another book. Do the same. Most of the time BOOKS CAN BE REDUCED TO A SET OF KEY PAPERS REFERENCED IN THE BIBLIOGRAPHY. If not, they can be reduced to a central thesis, and the rest of the book is just DEFENSE of it. My opinion on research is not to put a lot of stock in any defense, but to put stock tin the competition of books and papers that compete with one another on the topic. So I recommend using the cheapness of the internet to survey a subject and then get into the books. Most of the time I work by finding an author that has created a novel insight and then reading the papers in his bibliography. It may seem like a lot is published but the truth is very few books in any year are of substance at the level of group evolutionary strategy and politics. Once you are ‘current’ with the state of knowledge you just literally follow the top blogs, and read the relatively few papers that have any meaning. What you find is that all the discipilnes duplicate effort on what you would consider awfully obvious matters. By contrast, what most people do is the other way around: try to find one book and they get ‘hooked by the authors frame.’ and then they’re anchored. Start with an overview of the ‘market for ideas’. This isn’t the middle ages. Nearly every book more than a year old is available for free somewhere somehow. In fact, we have just about everything worth reading already in our library in digital form. (Rant off.)