Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Rings of Influence,

    Bill Joslin A model for this could be described as concentric rings of influence, centering on the individual and radiating out into the commons based on which domain one acts as judge-of-last-resort. Am I judge-of-last-resort for my mind (clarity of intention) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my body (voluntary intentional action) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my household (do I direct my domestic life) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my livelihood (do I direct my means of survival) Am I judge-of-last-resort which secures (ensures) my property-en-toto Am I judge-of-last-resort in the intergenerational shared commons (do I direct my place in history) For each of those questions, if there is another person to which you are beholden then the answer is no. Everyman a king of his household Everyman a rifleman Everyman a sheriff Everyman a judge ….in opportunity only, secured by demonstrations of ability. Cult of non-submission – cultivation of autonomy

  • Rings of Influence,

    Bill Joslin A model for this could be described as concentric rings of influence, centering on the individual and radiating out into the commons based on which domain one acts as judge-of-last-resort. Am I judge-of-last-resort for my mind (clarity of intention) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my body (voluntary intentional action) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my household (do I direct my domestic life) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my livelihood (do I direct my means of survival) Am I judge-of-last-resort which secures (ensures) my property-en-toto Am I judge-of-last-resort in the intergenerational shared commons (do I direct my place in history) For each of those questions, if there is another person to which you are beholden then the answer is no. Everyman a king of his household Everyman a rifleman Everyman a sheriff Everyman a judge ….in opportunity only, secured by demonstrations of ability. Cult of non-submission – cultivation of autonomy

  • Voluntary Disassociation – Trade vs Market

    Voluntary Association and Disassociation Must be Restored (its loss was a product of the unconstitutional 14th amendment). It is one thing to deny human beings commodities, water, and air. It is another thing altogether to force someone to engage in craftsmanship of any kind whatsoever. Ergo, if you package flour for distribution that’s one thing. If you make custom cakes thats something else. That is what separates a MARKET (production), from TRADE (craft). Unfortunately that is not (currently) recognized in the constitution, because it’s ASSUMED by the authors of it. The idea that we would be compelled to serve people against our will would have been an anathema. Secondly, it is one thing to fail to serve someone needs regardless of their biology, and another to choose not to serve someone for their beliefs, preferences, or choices, or behaviors due to that biology. Gasoline is a commodity produced for a market. Wheat is a commodity produced for a market. A box of corn flakes is a commodity produced for a market. All Markets are Produced by Commons. Cooking you a meal is a personal service. (trade) Making you a cake is a personal service (trade). Driving you from point a to point b is a service (trade). Direct and personal, vs indirect and impersonal.

  • Voluntary Disassociation – Trade vs Market

    Voluntary Association and Disassociation Must be Restored (its loss was a product of the unconstitutional 14th amendment). It is one thing to deny human beings commodities, water, and air. It is another thing altogether to force someone to engage in craftsmanship of any kind whatsoever. Ergo, if you package flour for distribution that’s one thing. If you make custom cakes thats something else. That is what separates a MARKET (production), from TRADE (craft). Unfortunately that is not (currently) recognized in the constitution, because it’s ASSUMED by the authors of it. The idea that we would be compelled to serve people against our will would have been an anathema. Secondly, it is one thing to fail to serve someone needs regardless of their biology, and another to choose not to serve someone for their beliefs, preferences, or choices, or behaviors due to that biology. Gasoline is a commodity produced for a market. Wheat is a commodity produced for a market. A box of corn flakes is a commodity produced for a market. All Markets are Produced by Commons. Cooking you a meal is a personal service. (trade) Making you a cake is a personal service (trade). Driving you from point a to point b is a service (trade). Direct and personal, vs indirect and impersonal.

  • Don’t congratulate yourself on circumstance.

    Let me help you both: 1) We produce the social orders we can afford to produce. 2) We have the values we can afford to have in that social order. 3) We have the social orders and values that our demographics allow us to have. It’s physics and economics. Don’t congratulate yourself on circumstance.

  • Don’t congratulate yourself on circumstance.

    Let me help you both: 1) We produce the social orders we can afford to produce. 2) We have the values we can afford to have in that social order. 3) We have the social orders and values that our demographics allow us to have. It’s physics and economics. Don’t congratulate yourself on circumstance.

  • Why Women Live Longer

    By Eric Kristof Reasons women live longer: 1) Genetics: women’s telomeres are longer than men’s. 2) Genetics: women’s XX chromosomes provide a “backup” of sorts in comparison to men’s XY chromosomes. 3) Hormones: estrogen protects women from cardiovascular disease in comparison to men. 4) Hormones: testosterone increases risk taking behaviors. Women have less of it. Women with higher testosterone levels don’t live as long as their peers who don’t (and are more likely to bring a U-haul to their second dates). 5) Men have higher body mass and higher metabolisms. Body mass (people over 6 feet tall tend to die of cancer more often than shorter people). Higher metabolism means that men tend to burn through their stem cells quicker. 6) Social factors: men are more often convicted of criminal activity and incarcerated (men get prison while women get therapy). Higher risk environments and working conditions. Wars and military service. Men are less health conscious and tend to avoid doctors more when their health takes a dump. 7) Evolutionary factors: women have historically been the primary caretakers in societies throughout the world and tend to have more social connections than men . Isolation is the ultimate poison as Howard Bloom likes to point out.

  • Why Women Live Longer

    By Eric Kristof Reasons women live longer: 1) Genetics: women’s telomeres are longer than men’s. 2) Genetics: women’s XX chromosomes provide a “backup” of sorts in comparison to men’s XY chromosomes. 3) Hormones: estrogen protects women from cardiovascular disease in comparison to men. 4) Hormones: testosterone increases risk taking behaviors. Women have less of it. Women with higher testosterone levels don’t live as long as their peers who don’t (and are more likely to bring a U-haul to their second dates). 5) Men have higher body mass and higher metabolisms. Body mass (people over 6 feet tall tend to die of cancer more often than shorter people). Higher metabolism means that men tend to burn through their stem cells quicker. 6) Social factors: men are more often convicted of criminal activity and incarcerated (men get prison while women get therapy). Higher risk environments and working conditions. Wars and military service. Men are less health conscious and tend to avoid doctors more when their health takes a dump. 7) Evolutionary factors: women have historically been the primary caretakers in societies throughout the world and tend to have more social connections than men . Isolation is the ultimate poison as Howard Bloom likes to point out.

  • One of Propertarianism’s Cures for Iq Shredding

    One of the cures for “IQ Shredding” is to follow the postwar german example, of limiting housing in cities to those for families. So that the benefits of low cost of commons (density) are only available to those who produce generations. This is a very simple alternative. In other words, today, large organizations can use stock market capital, to bring young people to cities, profit from them, at the expense of IQ by way of reproductive rates. When, as whites and jews have shown us, the objective must always be to do the opposite: distribute reproduction upwards. Combined with one-child policy for the underclasses this will work by a means regularly unconscionable to libertines: redistribution of opportunity costs to those that pay the costs of intergenerational reproduction.  

    https://blog.jim.com/economics/the-cure-for-iq-shredders/
    THE CURE FOR “IQ SHREDDERS” (CITIES) from Jim’s Blog Our best hopes for a high tech future, for avoiding a dark age, are consuming the genes needed for a high tech future. Smart people go to Hong Kong and Singapore and fail to reproduce. Singapore has taken numerous measures, similar to those of the Nazis and Emperor Augustus, to improve fertility, which will doubtless be as ineffectual as those of the Nazis and Emperor Augustus. Just as the cure for Chinese poverty was to import the economic laws and customs of Hong Kong into Shanghai, the cure for Singaporean infertility is to import the marital laws and customs of Timor Leste, where women cannot own property, because they are wards of their parents until they become wards of their husbands. Dubai already has a system where low status expat workers are effectively wards of their employers. This typically applies to Indian construction workers (who are all male and unaccompanied by their wives and families) and Filipino “maids”, who are all female and normally single when they arrive. If an employee’s sponsor is her employer, the employee is effectively a ward of the employer. A higher status employee usually has the free zone authority is his sponsor, not his employer, even though his employer asked the free zone to sponsor the employee so the process looks very similar. An employee sponsored by her employer normally resides in accommodation provided by the employer. The employee cannot change jobs without her employers permission. If the employer dismisses the maid, he normally cancels her visa, her bank accounts, her phone, and gives her a ticket back to her homeland. He has to give her a ticket out, because he paid a deposit to obtain her work visa, and because if she fails to leave by her employer’s fault, the employer is in trouble. If the employer cancels his employees visa, he is supposed to provide the employee with the means to leave. Often however, she fails to show up by her fault, in which case the employer still loses his deposit, so if he can, he drags her off to the airport whether she will or not. Male Indian construction workers seldom do a run. If fired, they leave without any drama. “Maids” frequently do a run and fail to show up at the airport, because the usual cause of a falling out with her employer is raging hormones. If she does a run, her phone stops working, her credit cards stop working, her bank account stops working and if she does not withdraw any money in her bank account in a timely fashion, she loses the money. She cannot get a new phone, bank account or legal accommodation, and is subject to a large fine for every day she fails to show up. If caught, and unable to pay the fine, goes to jail for considerable time, then is sent out of the country and forbidden ever to return.

  • One of Propertarianism’s Cures for Iq Shredding

    One of the cures for “IQ Shredding” is to follow the postwar german example, of limiting housing in cities to those for families. So that the benefits of low cost of commons (density) are only available to those who produce generations. This is a very simple alternative. In other words, today, large organizations can use stock market capital, to bring young people to cities, profit from them, at the expense of IQ by way of reproductive rates. When, as whites and jews have shown us, the objective must always be to do the opposite: distribute reproduction upwards. Combined with one-child policy for the underclasses this will work by a means regularly unconscionable to libertines: redistribution of opportunity costs to those that pay the costs of intergenerational reproduction.  

    https://blog.jim.com/economics/the-cure-for-iq-shredders/
    THE CURE FOR “IQ SHREDDERS” (CITIES) from Jim’s Blog Our best hopes for a high tech future, for avoiding a dark age, are consuming the genes needed for a high tech future. Smart people go to Hong Kong and Singapore and fail to reproduce. Singapore has taken numerous measures, similar to those of the Nazis and Emperor Augustus, to improve fertility, which will doubtless be as ineffectual as those of the Nazis and Emperor Augustus. Just as the cure for Chinese poverty was to import the economic laws and customs of Hong Kong into Shanghai, the cure for Singaporean infertility is to import the marital laws and customs of Timor Leste, where women cannot own property, because they are wards of their parents until they become wards of their husbands. Dubai already has a system where low status expat workers are effectively wards of their employers. This typically applies to Indian construction workers (who are all male and unaccompanied by their wives and families) and Filipino “maids”, who are all female and normally single when they arrive. If an employee’s sponsor is her employer, the employee is effectively a ward of the employer. A higher status employee usually has the free zone authority is his sponsor, not his employer, even though his employer asked the free zone to sponsor the employee so the process looks very similar. An employee sponsored by her employer normally resides in accommodation provided by the employer. The employee cannot change jobs without her employers permission. If the employer dismisses the maid, he normally cancels her visa, her bank accounts, her phone, and gives her a ticket back to her homeland. He has to give her a ticket out, because he paid a deposit to obtain her work visa, and because if she fails to leave by her employer’s fault, the employer is in trouble. If the employer cancels his employees visa, he is supposed to provide the employee with the means to leave. Often however, she fails to show up by her fault, in which case the employer still loses his deposit, so if he can, he drags her off to the airport whether she will or not. Male Indian construction workers seldom do a run. If fired, they leave without any drama. “Maids” frequently do a run and fail to show up at the airport, because the usual cause of a falling out with her employer is raging hormones. If she does a run, her phone stops working, her credit cards stop working, her bank account stops working and if she does not withdraw any money in her bank account in a timely fashion, she loses the money. She cannot get a new phone, bank account or legal accommodation, and is subject to a large fine for every day she fails to show up. If caught, and unable to pay the fine, goes to jail for considerable time, then is sent out of the country and forbidden ever to return.