I understand the primacy of violence and law because I understand that there are many men like me, who are quite capable of predation, organizing predation at scale, and enjoying a life of predation – if not for arbitrary reasons for choosing production. There is a lot of evil in this world and never forget for a moment that any presumption of safety exists only because of a long line of men between you and the hordes.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Any Presumption of Safety Exists only Because of A Long Line of Men Between You and The Hordes.
I understand the primacy of violence and law because I understand that there are many men like me, who are quite capable of predation, organizing predation at scale, and enjoying a life of predation – if not for arbitrary reasons for choosing production. There is a lot of evil in this world and never forget for a moment that any presumption of safety exists only because of a long line of men between you and the hordes.
-
For Newbs
Yes, I stir the pot, because teaching argument on the internet is like running a class in a locker room, and I can’t issue quizzes and demand homework, so the way to cause discourse is to create controversy. I know this because in marketing and advertising it is the secret to getting the public to talk about a subject and learn about it. Hence talking head shows on tv, survivor, and every other damned idiot-nonsense. And hence *controversial positioning*.
-
For Newbs
Yes, I stir the pot, because teaching argument on the internet is like running a class in a locker room, and I can’t issue quizzes and demand homework, so the way to cause discourse is to create controversy. I know this because in marketing and advertising it is the secret to getting the public to talk about a subject and learn about it. Hence talking head shows on tv, survivor, and every other damned idiot-nonsense. And hence *controversial positioning*.
-
(humor) —“Hello @curtdoolittle what’s the best way to reach you for potential
(humor) —“Hello @curtdoolittle what’s the best way to reach you for potential guest appearances? Thank you.”— This is fine. 😉 Facebook is better: curt.doolittle Email the institute if you’d like propertarian.institute@gmail.com. I also will accept dancing telegrams (from women). But no clowns. I hate clowns. (Followed back. PM will work.) 😉 —“Dancing Telegram coming up Curt 😉 “— omg… no…. lolz…. the strippers will be offended by the competition, and I can’t possibly clean up the vodka and beer bottles in time….
-
(humor) —“Hello @curtdoolittle what’s the best way to reach you for potential
(humor) —“Hello @curtdoolittle what’s the best way to reach you for potential guest appearances? Thank you.”— This is fine. 😉 Facebook is better: curt.doolittle Email the institute if you’d like propertarian.institute@gmail.com. I also will accept dancing telegrams (from women). But no clowns. I hate clowns. (Followed back. PM will work.) 😉 —“Dancing Telegram coming up Curt 😉 “— omg… no…. lolz…. the strippers will be offended by the competition, and I can’t possibly clean up the vodka and beer bottles in time….
-
The King of The Hill Method of Teaching Online
—“…. largest problem is your obnoxious temperament 😉”— I bitch slap ignorance. yes. It’s so I can bait man-ginas. lol But listen….. You want my job? Do you have any idea how many overconfident, ignorant, sophomoric, posturing young single male ass-wipes there are on the internet? I have developed the “King of the Hill” strategy of discourse (teaching) because it is actually THE BEST method of teaching (masculine) men. I’ve been doing this since we used 300 baud dial up modems and 80 character monochrome screens. And I learned it early. Men can attack me and my ideas, without acting vulnerable, or submissive, or begging for attention, but by exercising their dominance. And they can fail and no one cares. This is actually the optimum method of reaching men: we create a dominance game of low risk. We learn from playing this dominance game. The secret is to reward dominance expression if it’s backed by insight, argument, or wit. And to stop on effeminate, abrahamic, and non-argument. I make serious arguments to teach. I make half arguments to encourage debate. And I push controversial ideas to encourage them to refute them. My role in this ‘game’ is to play king of the hill, and say ‘come get me’. I provide symbolic rewards (sharing quotes), and meaningful rewards (investing time in those with potential), and lifetime rewards (skill development). That is why this game works. Not everyone can play this game. But if they can play this game, and get good at it they will master a very special skill. And it’s that collection of talent I’m interested in creating. The internet does change. Men don’t change. The number of stupid men with access to digital discourse simply increases. The internet of such men requires street fighting, and I try to create a locker room for street fighters. In that locker room we play king of the hill. WE PUT DOMINANCE PLAY TO CONSTRUCTIVE USE. If you want beta-and-chick-friendly theatre watch TED videos. It’s a cult of pseudoscience. I teach argument.. I teach men. (And the occasional woman with character, intellectual honesty, and brains.) You might not realize I know this is a game, and that we are playing a game until you meet me in person or talk to me in an interview – because I’m not very much like my online persona. This is educational entertainment and theatre. 😉
-
The King of The Hill Method of Teaching Online
—“…. largest problem is your obnoxious temperament 😉”— I bitch slap ignorance. yes. It’s so I can bait man-ginas. lol But listen….. You want my job? Do you have any idea how many overconfident, ignorant, sophomoric, posturing young single male ass-wipes there are on the internet? I have developed the “King of the Hill” strategy of discourse (teaching) because it is actually THE BEST method of teaching (masculine) men. I’ve been doing this since we used 300 baud dial up modems and 80 character monochrome screens. And I learned it early. Men can attack me and my ideas, without acting vulnerable, or submissive, or begging for attention, but by exercising their dominance. And they can fail and no one cares. This is actually the optimum method of reaching men: we create a dominance game of low risk. We learn from playing this dominance game. The secret is to reward dominance expression if it’s backed by insight, argument, or wit. And to stop on effeminate, abrahamic, and non-argument. I make serious arguments to teach. I make half arguments to encourage debate. And I push controversial ideas to encourage them to refute them. My role in this ‘game’ is to play king of the hill, and say ‘come get me’. I provide symbolic rewards (sharing quotes), and meaningful rewards (investing time in those with potential), and lifetime rewards (skill development). That is why this game works. Not everyone can play this game. But if they can play this game, and get good at it they will master a very special skill. And it’s that collection of talent I’m interested in creating. The internet does change. Men don’t change. The number of stupid men with access to digital discourse simply increases. The internet of such men requires street fighting, and I try to create a locker room for street fighters. In that locker room we play king of the hill. WE PUT DOMINANCE PLAY TO CONSTRUCTIVE USE. If you want beta-and-chick-friendly theatre watch TED videos. It’s a cult of pseudoscience. I teach argument.. I teach men. (And the occasional woman with character, intellectual honesty, and brains.) You might not realize I know this is a game, and that we are playing a game until you meet me in person or talk to me in an interview – because I’m not very much like my online persona. This is educational entertainment and theatre. 😉
-
Restoring the Market for Parental Roles
Parenting (Training, Risk Taking) and Care-taking (Maintenance, Risk Reduction) are very different things. As in all things the competition (market) between via-positiva and via-negativa produces optimums. Why? Anything else would require evolution not err, and frequently fail to adapt. We are not ants. We are special because of how rapidly we adapt. As such it is this market competition that creates a healthy human. Ergo, we education to produce an optimum (failure point, fragility point) because of female influence in education, whereas producing competitions (stresses, adaptions, anti-fragility) produces humans because of male competition. Women have destroyed civilization because they have undue influence in children, education (religion), and government. Pandora was a catastrophe. We have to restore competition (differences) between the genders, not seek equality.
-
Restoring the Market for Parental Roles
Parenting (Training, Risk Taking) and Care-taking (Maintenance, Risk Reduction) are very different things. As in all things the competition (market) between via-positiva and via-negativa produces optimums. Why? Anything else would require evolution not err, and frequently fail to adapt. We are not ants. We are special because of how rapidly we adapt. As such it is this market competition that creates a healthy human. Ergo, we education to produce an optimum (failure point, fragility point) because of female influence in education, whereas producing competitions (stresses, adaptions, anti-fragility) produces humans because of male competition. Women have destroyed civilization because they have undue influence in children, education (religion), and government. Pandora was a catastrophe. We have to restore competition (differences) between the genders, not seek equality.