—“It is perhaps misleading even to say that there was such a religion as paganism at the beginning of [the Common Era] … It might be less confusing to say that the pagans, before their competition with Christianity, had no religion at all in the sense in which that word is normally used today. They had no tradition of discourse about ritual or religious matters (apart from philosophical debate or antiquarian treatise), no organized system of beliefs to which they were asked to commit themselves, no authority-structure peculiar to the religious area, above all no commitment to a particular group of people or set of ideas other than their family and political context. If this is the right view of pagan life, it follows that we should look on paganism quite simply as a religion invented in the course of the second to third centuries AD, in competition and interaction with Christians, Jews and others. — North 1992, 187—88, [34]
Source: Original Site Post
-
We Had No Religion. We Had Law, Festival, and Myth.
—“It is perhaps misleading even to say that there was such a religion as paganism at the beginning of [the Common Era] … It might be less confusing to say that the pagans, before their competition with Christianity, had no religion at all in the sense in which that word is normally used today. They had no tradition of discourse about ritual or religious matters (apart from philosophical debate or antiquarian treatise), no organized system of beliefs to which they were asked to commit themselves, no authority-structure peculiar to the religious area, above all no commitment to a particular group of people or set of ideas other than their family and political context. If this is the right view of pagan life, it follows that we should look on paganism quite simply as a religion invented in the course of the second to third centuries AD, in competition and interaction with Christians, Jews and others. — North 1992, 187—88, [34]
-
Superior Distributions and Ideas
There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior ideas. The jews, despite being the most literate people in the dark and middle ages (a darkness they contributed to) achieved precisely NOTHING. Every Jewish achievement was made by their nearly forcible indoctrination into aristotelianism, in exchange for integration. They managed to produce the most murderous ideas in ancient history (judaism, christianity, islam), and the most murderous ideas in modern history (marxism), and the pseudosciences and deceits of the modern world (boasianism, fruedianism, cantorian supernaturalism in mathematics, the frankfurt school, and nearly single handedly destroyed both the academy and rule of law. And have nearly destroyed our civilization through the 1965 immigration act, and their continuing efforts at making the world safe for judaism, which roughly translates to turning the world into the levant. The ONLY thinker they have is Einstein and he is overplayed because everything other than the Frame was the product of Europeans – even E=MC^2. He did manage to explain why. But he is their only non-pseudoscentific thinker. There are plenty of minor players, and a masterful effort for nepotism in the awards process. But data is data is data. Europeans did everything worth doing in history and did it faster for the simple reason that we tell the truth, —- and on one else does. So no, I don’t play superiority games, I just look the data. It’s notable that Babbage and Turing were Brits, and the Logicians were frequently Jewish, and so was Chomsky’s grammatical take on Turing. Turns out the logics were a total waste of time – there is no closure. Turns out mathematical set theory (logic) was harmful. Turns out the Grammars have far more to do with Turing than Chomsky. Everything is easily explained by jewish pilpul, pseudoscience, pseudomathematics, and psuedo-logic, versus anglo testimony, science, mathematics, and computation.
-
Superior Distributions and Ideas
There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior ideas. The jews, despite being the most literate people in the dark and middle ages (a darkness they contributed to) achieved precisely NOTHING. Every Jewish achievement was made by their nearly forcible indoctrination into aristotelianism, in exchange for integration. They managed to produce the most murderous ideas in ancient history (judaism, christianity, islam), and the most murderous ideas in modern history (marxism), and the pseudosciences and deceits of the modern world (boasianism, fruedianism, cantorian supernaturalism in mathematics, the frankfurt school, and nearly single handedly destroyed both the academy and rule of law. And have nearly destroyed our civilization through the 1965 immigration act, and their continuing efforts at making the world safe for judaism, which roughly translates to turning the world into the levant. The ONLY thinker they have is Einstein and he is overplayed because everything other than the Frame was the product of Europeans – even E=MC^2. He did manage to explain why. But he is their only non-pseudoscentific thinker. There are plenty of minor players, and a masterful effort for nepotism in the awards process. But data is data is data. Europeans did everything worth doing in history and did it faster for the simple reason that we tell the truth, —- and on one else does. So no, I don’t play superiority games, I just look the data. It’s notable that Babbage and Turing were Brits, and the Logicians were frequently Jewish, and so was Chomsky’s grammatical take on Turing. Turns out the logics were a total waste of time – there is no closure. Turns out mathematical set theory (logic) was harmful. Turns out the Grammars have far more to do with Turing than Chomsky. Everything is easily explained by jewish pilpul, pseudoscience, pseudomathematics, and psuedo-logic, versus anglo testimony, science, mathematics, and computation.
-
Anglicans vs Jews
The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112) The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom and more at the top. So they produce an extra 10% above 130, and it is 130 and 140’s that provide executive (130) and academic (140) competitive ability.
The size of the world jewish population is about 6.5m. World anglican population is about 85m. Jews pursue a narrower set of careers than Anglicans/Episcopalians. Jews practice more nepotism. And Jewish excellence, which is verbal, is in demand in an era of mass communication. So, Anglicans are white equivalent of the jews (which we have known for 400 years, and is why we had the scientific revolution in britain, and both the English and Scottish enlightenments). If whites returned to practicing nepotism, and outlawed fictionalism in the commons by involuntary warranty of due diligence, and elminated financialization – all of which are easy – the numbers would stabilize. My observation which I cannot find research to confirm or deny is that jews have not only obtained female verbal ability, but the abilty of women to work on details for long periods of time. This ‘reverse dimorphism’ combined with culling of the underclasses, upward redistribution of reproduction to rabbis, extreme clannishness and nepotism, and specialization in extractive professions explains the statistical differences. So, anglicans choose a wider distribution of careers, are not nepotistic but universal, and produce about as many outliers. Jews are people of words, cunning, and mysticism, and europeans are people of metalsmithing, truth, and magic. We still specialize in our ancient traditional occupations. -
Anglicans vs Jews
The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112) The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom and more at the top. So they produce an extra 10% above 130, and it is 130 and 140’s that provide executive (130) and academic (140) competitive ability.
The size of the world jewish population is about 6.5m. World anglican population is about 85m. Jews pursue a narrower set of careers than Anglicans/Episcopalians. Jews practice more nepotism. And Jewish excellence, which is verbal, is in demand in an era of mass communication. So, Anglicans are white equivalent of the jews (which we have known for 400 years, and is why we had the scientific revolution in britain, and both the English and Scottish enlightenments). If whites returned to practicing nepotism, and outlawed fictionalism in the commons by involuntary warranty of due diligence, and elminated financialization – all of which are easy – the numbers would stabilize. My observation which I cannot find research to confirm or deny is that jews have not only obtained female verbal ability, but the abilty of women to work on details for long periods of time. This ‘reverse dimorphism’ combined with culling of the underclasses, upward redistribution of reproduction to rabbis, extreme clannishness and nepotism, and specialization in extractive professions explains the statistical differences. So, anglicans choose a wider distribution of careers, are not nepotistic but universal, and produce about as many outliers. Jews are people of words, cunning, and mysticism, and europeans are people of metalsmithing, truth, and magic. We still specialize in our ancient traditional occupations. -
The Secret To Jewish Success: Radical Feminism
Jews have, more successfully than all other people, and somewhat by accident of selective upward redistribution of reproduction, transferred feminine cognitive ability (language and perception) to the males, and male cognitive ability(agency) to females, at the cost of higher rates of homosexuality and mental illness, and lower rates of creativity. (yes, really). This ‘blending’ of traits combines the best of both worlds. The mistake is to think that they are necessarily more exceptional than our most exceptional whites (Anglicans). Anglicans produce higher average IQ. But the Jews produce more outliers because of a wider standard deviation in their distributions. And they practice nepotism on a scale that westerners can’t imagine – the same way women advance their children. There is quite a bit of work studying these things now. So it’s getting much easier to explain the differences. I try to explain Jewish behavior by saying “all Jews are female” and while that’s an exaggeration it does explain the entirety of Jewish success: adopting the female cognitive, collective, and reproductive strategy. This is probably the most explanatory argument available today.
-
The Secret To Jewish Success: Radical Feminism
Jews have, more successfully than all other people, and somewhat by accident of selective upward redistribution of reproduction, transferred feminine cognitive ability (language and perception) to the males, and male cognitive ability(agency) to females, at the cost of higher rates of homosexuality and mental illness, and lower rates of creativity. (yes, really). This ‘blending’ of traits combines the best of both worlds. The mistake is to think that they are necessarily more exceptional than our most exceptional whites (Anglicans). Anglicans produce higher average IQ. But the Jews produce more outliers because of a wider standard deviation in their distributions. And they practice nepotism on a scale that westerners can’t imagine – the same way women advance their children. There is quite a bit of work studying these things now. So it’s getting much easier to explain the differences. I try to explain Jewish behavior by saying “all Jews are female” and while that’s an exaggeration it does explain the entirety of Jewish success: adopting the female cognitive, collective, and reproductive strategy. This is probably the most explanatory argument available today.
