We are at war. A very nearly hot civil war. A civil war brought about by design, beginning in the postwar period, and one that would not have succeeded in overthrow except for underclass, and particularly Hispanic immigration. All liberal societies pursue commercial interests to the point of undermining the society. This is what separates military (armies) states from trading (naval) states: armies do not tolerate imposition of costs upon the civic order. When at war, people demand generals. And every single time any civilization has pursued liberalism to the point where they undermine the homogeneity of the population they have died at the hands of conflicts between despots. Because only a despot can rule over competing peoples. And we now have at least four hostile demographics in at least ten culturally separate regions. You get what you ask for. We got what we let HOSTILE PEOPLES ask for.
Source: Original Site Post
-
We Are At War. We Got What We Let Hostile Peoples Ask For
We are at war. A very nearly hot civil war. A civil war brought about by design, beginning in the postwar period, and one that would not have succeeded in overthrow except for underclass, and particularly Hispanic immigration. All liberal societies pursue commercial interests to the point of undermining the society. This is what separates military (armies) states from trading (naval) states: armies do not tolerate imposition of costs upon the civic order. When at war, people demand generals. And every single time any civilization has pursued liberalism to the point where they undermine the homogeneity of the population they have died at the hands of conflicts between despots. Because only a despot can rule over competing peoples. And we now have at least four hostile demographics in at least ten culturally separate regions. You get what you ask for. We got what we let HOSTILE PEOPLES ask for.
-
Religion is a Competitor To The Law
You still don’t get it. Monotheistic Religion was developed as a means of undermining the Indo European World Aristocracy, by providing a competitor to truth, duty, and nation. And it works. Religion is a competitor to the Law. The law is empirical. Literature is educational. But Religion is just lies.
-
Religion is a Competitor To The Law
You still don’t get it. Monotheistic Religion was developed as a means of undermining the Indo European World Aristocracy, by providing a competitor to truth, duty, and nation. And it works. Religion is a competitor to the Law. The law is empirical. Literature is educational. But Religion is just lies.
-
Organized Religion Is the Enemy of Man. Truth Is Enough.
You need a myth (archetypes), ritual (sacrifice), festival (feast), and Law, each of which produce commons most optimum for your people: mindfulness, discounts on cooperation, and material and institutional commons.
-
Organized Religion Is the Enemy of Man. Truth Is Enough.
You need a myth (archetypes), ritual (sacrifice), festival (feast), and Law, each of which produce commons most optimum for your people: mindfulness, discounts on cooperation, and material and institutional commons.
-
Romanticism
(our attempt at restoration of tradition, before the abrahamic attack on history and science) –Paganism resurfaces as a topic of fascination in 18th to 19th-century Romanticism, in particular in the context of the literary Celtic and Viking revivals, which portrayed historical Celtic and Germanic polytheists as noble savages.The 19th century also saw much scholarly interest in the reconstruction of pagan mythology from folklore or fairy tales. This was notably attempted by the Brothers Grimm, especially Jacob Grimm in his Teutonic Mythology, and Elias Lönnrot with the compilation of the Kalevala. The work of the Brothers Grimm influenced other collectors, both inspiring them to collect tales and leading them to similarly believe that the fairy tales of a country were particularly representative of it, to the neglect of cross-cultural influence. Among those influenced were the Russian Alexander Afanasyev, the Norwegians Peter Christen Asbjørnsen and Jørgen Moe, and the Englishman Joseph Jacobs.[67]Romanticist interest in non-classical antiquity coincided with the rise of Romantic nationalism and the rise of the nation state in the context of the 1848 revolutions, leading to the creation of national epics and national myths for the various newly formed states. Pagan or folkloric topics were also common in the Musical nationalism of the period.—
-
Romanticism
(our attempt at restoration of tradition, before the abrahamic attack on history and science) –Paganism resurfaces as a topic of fascination in 18th to 19th-century Romanticism, in particular in the context of the literary Celtic and Viking revivals, which portrayed historical Celtic and Germanic polytheists as noble savages.The 19th century also saw much scholarly interest in the reconstruction of pagan mythology from folklore or fairy tales. This was notably attempted by the Brothers Grimm, especially Jacob Grimm in his Teutonic Mythology, and Elias Lönnrot with the compilation of the Kalevala. The work of the Brothers Grimm influenced other collectors, both inspiring them to collect tales and leading them to similarly believe that the fairy tales of a country were particularly representative of it, to the neglect of cross-cultural influence. Among those influenced were the Russian Alexander Afanasyev, the Norwegians Peter Christen Asbjørnsen and Jørgen Moe, and the Englishman Joseph Jacobs.[67]Romanticist interest in non-classical antiquity coincided with the rise of Romantic nationalism and the rise of the nation state in the context of the 1848 revolutions, leading to the creation of national epics and national myths for the various newly formed states. Pagan or folkloric topics were also common in the Musical nationalism of the period.—
-
HEATHEN, NOT PAGAN
“the Correct Term Is Heathen (Hellene) Not Pagan”
-
HEATHEN, NOT PAGAN
“the Correct Term Is Heathen (Hellene) Not Pagan”