by Lloyd De Jongh (Note from Curt: I am all for africa for africans, asia for asians, europe for europeans, but I am not too keen in killing each other) June 1990 to July 1993 saw a total of 8580 (92%) of the 9,325 violent deaths during the period June 1990 to July 1993 caused by Africans killing Africans, or as the news media often calls it, “Black on Black” violence – hostel killings, ANC killlings of Inkatha Freedom Party members (a policy of the ANC), and taxi and turf war violence. HRC figures show 21 000 deaths between 1948 and 1994 – only 7 000 of which occurred during the 41 years of Apartheid proper – 1948-1989. Once the ANC was unbanned violence exploded, leading to 14 000 deaths between 1989 and 1994. The white SA government was accused of killing their political offenders: In 1979-1980 there were no deaths in SA prisons. In the previous 10 years 37 died versus 274 in the same period in Wales and England. The activities of the Civil Cooperation Bureau as outlined by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, were also included in these figures. The security forces of the RSA caused 518 deaths (5.6%) throughout this period. During the transitional period, the primary causes of death were not security forces nor white right-wing violence against blacks, but mainly due to “black-on-black necklace murders”, tribal conflict between the ANC-IFP, bombs by the ANC and PAC’s military wings in shopping centers, landmines on farm roads, etc. Violent deaths from 1994 to 2000: The SA Police reports for the month August 2001 show a total of 174,220 people died violent deaths, from crime-related violence or related to hate-crime against whites, and especially against the Boers, between 1994 and the year 2000. So 29 000 murders per year after the ANC took power for the next 6 years. It was a little safer under the previous government. • In 1972, SA blacks owned 360,000 vehicles. (More than all the black African states combined). • The monthly income of blacks per capita in 1988 was R352 per month in South Africa – Malawi and Mozambique was less than R20 per month. • In 1974, the average monthly income of black workers in South Africa were $ 127 versus the $ 140 in the US, the richest country in the world. • In 1970, black workers earned R1,751 million, or 25.5% of the total wage fees in SA and increased to R17,238 million in 1984 (1,000% growth) and 32.3% of total wages in SA. • Between 1962 and 1972 the UN paid $ 298 million to underdeveloped countries compared to South Africa that spent $ 558 million on the development of its black areas. • The budget amount for black education increased every year from 1970 to almost 30% more than any other government department. • From 1955 to 1984 the number of black scholars increased from 35,000 to 1,096,000. In 1988 71% of the adult black population could read and write versus 47% in Kenya, 38% in Egypt and 34% in Nigeria. On average during the year 15 new classrooms per working day were built for black scholars. • In 1985 there were 42,000 black students enrolled at SA universities. • There were 5 black universities and 28 higher education institutions funded by the government. • Soweto with its population of 1.2 million had 5 modern stadiums versus Pretoria with its 600,000 whites who had three. Soweto had 365 schools versus Pretoria 229. In Soweto in 1978, there were 115 football fields, three rugby fields, 4 athletic tracks, 11 cricket fields, two golf courses, 47 tennis courts, 7 swimming pools, 5 bowling halls, 81 basketball fields, 39 children playgrounds and countless community halls, cinemas and clubhouses. • In Soweto in 1978, there were 300 churches, 365 schools, 2 technicons, 8 clinics, 63 kindergartens, 11 post offices and its own fruit and vegetable market. On the matter of number of deaths pre- and post-Apartheid, we know there were 7000 deaths during those 41 years up to 1989. There were 14000 deaths between 1989 and 1993. In 1994, once Nelson Mandela took office, he opened up the prisons and let out 1000s of hardened criminals. Murder numbers for that year were ~25000, many times the numbers prior to the ANC government. So in 41 years the white government recorded 7000 deaths, but under the ANC there were 40000 between 1989 and 1994, just a 5 year period. Murder rates have remained at or near those levels since then. Ok, so let’s take the nice black tribes that murdered 2 Million of each other (roughly half the population of the land) before the evil white people put a stop to the genicide. And then they separated them and said if you aren’t in each other’s faces maybe you won’t slaughter each other. Separation – the literal meaning of Apartheid. I know you have a preconceived idea about Apartheid, and obviously know much more than me about the situation, a poorly educated black South African. The Middle Class was integrating well, until the ANC put a definite stop to that. Change takes time, unless you like living next door to murderous, warlike tribes that are in the Stone Age and might go to war at any second with the tribe on the other side of you because “other tribe bad”. It’s a telling and consistent pattern that there is a subtle effort (overt too) to minimise, obscure or deflect from atrocities committed by blacks, especially when they surpass anything done by Europeans or European settlers. There would be endless recrimination of white people committed these sorts of crimes, but there is little engagement and discussion of black atrocity, incompetence, failure and corruption. Aborigines literally did crush the heads of newborns each year, but academics want to talk about their efforts in “Agriculture” (TED, you know you’re guilty). It is because of the lack of ability to provide food that the babies were killed, so these efforts at crop growing were patently crap. But we have to pretend that these efforts were superb and white academics have overlooked this remarkable achievement through misguided racism. When it comes to slavery it gets even worse, the bias is overwhelming. The Nguni in southern Africa made up some of the most primitive, warlike, barbaric tribes in the world – they were not paragons of virtue then or now. They were no strangers to committing genocide or the rights of conquest in their lust for “land”.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Review
REVIEWED BY REQUEST https://medium.com/@ciaran_92884/hierarchies-of-competence-competitive-proxies-and-the-conscious-generation-of-the-collective-df68e67bad03 Good try. Good thinking and good writing. But, you should study economics, law, political history, and war rather than whatever it is you are studying at the moment (software? computer games?), so that your framing, which is ‘ideal’ can be described in existential (real, operational) terms. If you did, you would grasp that you are saying what is common knowledge. So while you correctly understand the problem in ‘private language’ and you argue by ideal analogy, you are stating the obvious to those who are informed, and who argue not by analogy but by descriptive example of demonstrated human behavior. A market allows people with dissimilar ends to cooperate on similar means. A government creates markets by the suppression of murder, harm, theft, fraud, conspiracy, immigration, conversion, economic warfare, and physical warfare, using law, and communicating that law honestly (jurists, education), or dishonestly (priests, indoctrination). These markets function as the ‘games’ you refer to. They government and it’s military and judiciary in particular are compensated indirectly via taxation for suppression of the multitude of rents extracted otherwise. A ‘good’ government is merely one that survives competition so that people can organize, plan, produce, and inter-generationally survive. A ‘better’ government is one that is suitable to the needs of the population in competition with other populations, not one that is ideal and may or may not survive in competition with other governments. A ‘better’ government is one that creates survivable markets yet does not do so by creating rents, and whose externalities are not devolutionary. A ‘best’ government is one that provides higher returns from the markets to the people, than others so that their productivity is higher (time necessary to produce competitie returns is lower). Network effects always and everywhere create a majority (practical monopoly) player, where capital as previously a competitive advantage it no longer is so. And all of that said, people seek at all times to circumvent markets because they ARE competitive. If it is possible for people to seek and obtain power by political means they will do so rather than circumvent the market by cheating somehow, or compete in the market. People don’t want fair. The want unfair in their advantage. Why? Markets (games) produce Meritocracy, and Meritocracy screws the incapable and so, the incapable organize to circumvent the market by cheating, or circumvent the market by political control. Games exist precisely because they have immaterial outcomes. Markets exist because they have material outcomes. Political markets in particular either create more market conditions or less. So how do you get from where we are to the circumstance you are describing, as a series of steps? People don’t want fair. Markets do not seek equilibrium, but disequilibrium until crash. Because people do not seek fair, they seek advantage. And the seek advantage through every unethical immoral, and illegal means available Hence why we have such enormous institutions to prosecute those who circumvent the market. More than half of the population cannot read a manual and repair a device. The world must be organized for them. Because they are the problem. Not us. And organizing it for them requires continuous diligent education, training, disciplining, monitoring, policing, prosecution and punishment. -
Review
REVIEWED BY REQUEST https://medium.com/@ciaran_92884/hierarchies-of-competence-competitive-proxies-and-the-conscious-generation-of-the-collective-df68e67bad03 Good try. Good thinking and good writing. But, you should study economics, law, political history, and war rather than whatever it is you are studying at the moment (software? computer games?), so that your framing, which is ‘ideal’ can be described in existential (real, operational) terms. If you did, you would grasp that you are saying what is common knowledge. So while you correctly understand the problem in ‘private language’ and you argue by ideal analogy, you are stating the obvious to those who are informed, and who argue not by analogy but by descriptive example of demonstrated human behavior. A market allows people with dissimilar ends to cooperate on similar means. A government creates markets by the suppression of murder, harm, theft, fraud, conspiracy, immigration, conversion, economic warfare, and physical warfare, using law, and communicating that law honestly (jurists, education), or dishonestly (priests, indoctrination). These markets function as the ‘games’ you refer to. They government and it’s military and judiciary in particular are compensated indirectly via taxation for suppression of the multitude of rents extracted otherwise. A ‘good’ government is merely one that survives competition so that people can organize, plan, produce, and inter-generationally survive. A ‘better’ government is one that is suitable to the needs of the population in competition with other populations, not one that is ideal and may or may not survive in competition with other governments. A ‘better’ government is one that creates survivable markets yet does not do so by creating rents, and whose externalities are not devolutionary. A ‘best’ government is one that provides higher returns from the markets to the people, than others so that their productivity is higher (time necessary to produce competitie returns is lower). Network effects always and everywhere create a majority (practical monopoly) player, where capital as previously a competitive advantage it no longer is so. And all of that said, people seek at all times to circumvent markets because they ARE competitive. If it is possible for people to seek and obtain power by political means they will do so rather than circumvent the market by cheating somehow, or compete in the market. People don’t want fair. The want unfair in their advantage. Why? Markets (games) produce Meritocracy, and Meritocracy screws the incapable and so, the incapable organize to circumvent the market by cheating, or circumvent the market by political control. Games exist precisely because they have immaterial outcomes. Markets exist because they have material outcomes. Political markets in particular either create more market conditions or less. So how do you get from where we are to the circumstance you are describing, as a series of steps? People don’t want fair. Markets do not seek equilibrium, but disequilibrium until crash. Because people do not seek fair, they seek advantage. And the seek advantage through every unethical immoral, and illegal means available Hence why we have such enormous institutions to prosecute those who circumvent the market. More than half of the population cannot read a manual and repair a device. The world must be organized for them. Because they are the problem. Not us. And organizing it for them requires continuous diligent education, training, disciplining, monitoring, policing, prosecution and punishment. -
Never Extend Beyond Your Kin
Greece was done more harm than good by the hellenic expansion east. Rome was done more harm than good by the roman extension east. Old Europe (Byzantium-Balkans), Mediterranean Europe (Classical Civilization), Northern europe (Germania), Slavic Intermarium Europe (borderlands), and Russian Europe are unique sub-civilizations. North African civilization was previously mediterranean and caucasian but has been destroyed by the muslim conquest. Byzantine, Anatolian, Persian civilizations have been destroyed by muslim conquest. Roman civilization was destroyed by germanic raids, christian undermining, byzantine conquest, and the accumulation of raids by the muslim conquest. NEVER EXPAND BEYOND YOUR KIN
-
Never Extend Beyond Your Kin
Greece was done more harm than good by the hellenic expansion east. Rome was done more harm than good by the roman extension east. Old Europe (Byzantium-Balkans), Mediterranean Europe (Classical Civilization), Northern europe (Germania), Slavic Intermarium Europe (borderlands), and Russian Europe are unique sub-civilizations. North African civilization was previously mediterranean and caucasian but has been destroyed by the muslim conquest. Byzantine, Anatolian, Persian civilizations have been destroyed by muslim conquest. Roman civilization was destroyed by germanic raids, christian undermining, byzantine conquest, and the accumulation of raids by the muslim conquest. NEVER EXPAND BEYOND YOUR KIN
-
Conflict Between Different Races is Conflict Between Different Needs
[S]tereotypes are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences, because they survive large scale observations over many years, by many people. People see other people with similar behaviors and say ‘these people act like this’. When many people make the same constant observation they develop into stereotypes. Stereotypes reflect the majority of people who they encounter with these behaviors. And all human populations under democracy vote heavily together, and whether under democracy or not, defend each other and rely upon one another, and favor one another, In marriage, friendships, neighborhoods, and workplaces style of dress manner of speech, body language, and a thousand other ways of signaling loyalty to the group. Groups stick together. They compete. They compete for status, wealth, access to political power. This is true everywhere in the world – except among the upper midd e and upper classes that have more in common with each other than they do with their lower classes – which is why it feels often t at our upper classes conspire against us – because they unintentionally do. The problem facing black people is not that blacks are somehow inferior. The problem is that a very large percentage of the black population is either (a) below the minimum employability, or (b) in the “evil 80’s”, where people resort to criminal and impulsive behavior. Fully 2/3 of the black population is in the high risk category of early sexual maturity, high testosterone aggression, high impulsivity, extremely costly education, low employability, high untrustworthiness, high risk of immorality, and high risk of criminality. Moreover, people remember immoral and criminal, and anti-social, and rude behavior many more times as intensely as they do kindness. And so the stereotype is created by the reality of the high number of people in ANY population wit large underclasses is *true’. White people have less of this problem because for thousands of years, they killed so many of their problem people by manorialism, cold, famine, war, and hanging a lot of them every single year europeans were all genetically middle class. A tactic which they practiced on black people in America as well. Domestication was a tactic that they had used on their own people for thousands of years. Criminals were hanged and had their throats slit, and were left to rot, and not buried. Asians did the same at even greater scale. Black people didn’t. The curse of warm climates lacking winters with hard freezes haunts people of color around the world today. he same reason they have dark skin is the same reason they have large underclasses. What is the lesson? There are only two solutions for black people. 1) separatism, so that they can use norms, eduction, laws, and institutions that suit the distribution of their population. Or, 2) stop your ‘dumb’ people from having children for four or five generations, and you will be equal to or superior to whites. OR, 3, do both. This is the source of Jewish excellence. They have been forcing their smartest to have extra children, and forcing their dumbest not to have any or to leave the community altogether. The primary difference between races, civilizations, and nations, is the degree to which the lower classes have been reduced in size relative to the middle and upper. And this problem will only get worse as we and technology evolve. Arabs are in worse condition than blacks. South American Indians in better condition. But this is not a problem of the color of one’s skin. It applies to all human groups of all sizes. Either stop your ‘dumb’ people from having children or pay the price of not stopping your ‘dumb’ people from having children. Because the time has passed when we will tolerate hanging your problem people in large numbers every year. We prefer to pay people not to reproduce.
-
Conflict Between Different Races is Conflict Between Different Needs
[S]tereotypes are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences, because they survive large scale observations over many years, by many people. People see other people with similar behaviors and say ‘these people act like this’. When many people make the same constant observation they develop into stereotypes. Stereotypes reflect the majority of people who they encounter with these behaviors. And all human populations under democracy vote heavily together, and whether under democracy or not, defend each other and rely upon one another, and favor one another, In marriage, friendships, neighborhoods, and workplaces style of dress manner of speech, body language, and a thousand other ways of signaling loyalty to the group. Groups stick together. They compete. They compete for status, wealth, access to political power. This is true everywhere in the world – except among the upper midd e and upper classes that have more in common with each other than they do with their lower classes – which is why it feels often t at our upper classes conspire against us – because they unintentionally do. The problem facing black people is not that blacks are somehow inferior. The problem is that a very large percentage of the black population is either (a) below the minimum employability, or (b) in the “evil 80’s”, where people resort to criminal and impulsive behavior. Fully 2/3 of the black population is in the high risk category of early sexual maturity, high testosterone aggression, high impulsivity, extremely costly education, low employability, high untrustworthiness, high risk of immorality, and high risk of criminality. Moreover, people remember immoral and criminal, and anti-social, and rude behavior many more times as intensely as they do kindness. And so the stereotype is created by the reality of the high number of people in ANY population wit large underclasses is *true’. White people have less of this problem because for thousands of years, they killed so many of their problem people by manorialism, cold, famine, war, and hanging a lot of them every single year europeans were all genetically middle class. A tactic which they practiced on black people in America as well. Domestication was a tactic that they had used on their own people for thousands of years. Criminals were hanged and had their throats slit, and were left to rot, and not buried. Asians did the same at even greater scale. Black people didn’t. The curse of warm climates lacking winters with hard freezes haunts people of color around the world today. he same reason they have dark skin is the same reason they have large underclasses. What is the lesson? There are only two solutions for black people. 1) separatism, so that they can use norms, eduction, laws, and institutions that suit the distribution of their population. Or, 2) stop your ‘dumb’ people from having children for four or five generations, and you will be equal to or superior to whites. OR, 3, do both. This is the source of Jewish excellence. They have been forcing their smartest to have extra children, and forcing their dumbest not to have any or to leave the community altogether. The primary difference between races, civilizations, and nations, is the degree to which the lower classes have been reduced in size relative to the middle and upper. And this problem will only get worse as we and technology evolve. Arabs are in worse condition than blacks. South American Indians in better condition. But this is not a problem of the color of one’s skin. It applies to all human groups of all sizes. Either stop your ‘dumb’ people from having children or pay the price of not stopping your ‘dumb’ people from having children. Because the time has passed when we will tolerate hanging your problem people in large numbers every year. We prefer to pay people not to reproduce.
-
The Science On Racial Differences: We Are Very Different.
Science on racial differences
Some people in society have been under the false impression that the only differences between the human races is that of skin colour – a belief which is patently untrue. The races, or sub-species, of mankind have evolved over many thousands of years, and – as with sub-species of non-human species – they evolved in different ways, causing many differences: some physical, some mental, some readily apparent, and some not so obvious. Many Multiculturalists even deny that races themselves exist, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.[1] Scientists across the world have been discovering more and more differences between the races, and for the political orthodoxy of Multiculturalism to deny these differences is as ridiculous as the medieval religious orthodoxy denying that the Earth revolves around the Sun.
(more…) -
The Science On Racial Differences: We Are Very Different.
Science on racial differences
Some people in society have been under the false impression that the only differences between the human races is that of skin colour – a belief which is patently untrue. The races, or sub-species, of mankind have evolved over many thousands of years, and – as with sub-species of non-human species – they evolved in different ways, causing many differences: some physical, some mental, some readily apparent, and some not so obvious. Many Multiculturalists even deny that races themselves exist, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.[1] Scientists across the world have been discovering more and more differences between the races, and for the political orthodoxy of Multiculturalism to deny these differences is as ridiculous as the medieval religious orthodoxy denying that the Earth revolves around the Sun.
(more…) -
Crime: Science Answers the Question: Geography, Economy, Neoteny and Class Size.
Black males are (extremely) disproportionately responsible for crime, which corresponds to black disproportionality of the lower IQ curve, and the black disproportionality of the faster rate of maturity curve, and black disproportionality of the testosterone curve, and black dominance of the reverse-neoteny curve. Blacks have shorter gestation periods. Blacks have lower metabolisms useful in heat, but lower industriousness as a consequence, when this factor alone will produce as great a difference in income potential as intelligence. Stereotypes are not only a necessity of temporal and cognitive efficiency, but they are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences because they must survive daily falsification (survival from competition). Because blacks mature earlier, and are more socially dependent for judgement and experience teen status pressure earlier and more deeply, they are disproportionately affected by awareness of lower social, sexual, economic, and political market value – when in proximity to other groups (Diversity is a ‘bad’). Despite the fact that (affect of deeper maturity) have higher self confidence at conflict with signal feedback. Worse, black males are disproportionately from single mother homes. And single mothers produce the majority of children with problems, particularly with children that mature early. So it is somewhat ‘torturous’ to mix black, muslim, and Hispanic with white, asian, and jewish populations, which creates conflict when what each group needs is homogeneity so that they can develop norms, laws, and institutions that suit their rates and depths of maturity and their vastly different class distributions. The worst crime whites have done was not slavery, which was endemic, it was to copy the soviets and force integration and deprive blacks of their emerging norms and institutions, but also their emerging middle, professional, and upper classes, who ‘defected’ due to the cost of carrying the vast black underclass and laboring class, that cannot compete outside of it’s own demographic. Africans evolved to survive heat, disease gradient, parasite gradient, many predators, many many human competitors. They have superior physical traits from bones, to sprinting to hearing, to skin. This is because neoteny is dangerous in their ancestral environment wich rewards rapid and deep maturity, and they were not able due to distance from trade routes, able to institute an agrarian empire sufficiently concentrated per square mile to cause upward reproduction of the upper classes due to continuous starvation of the underclasses. The lower latitudes produce greater ability to expand the upper classes (higher neoteny), and the higher latitudes produce greater abiity to sustain the lower classes (Less neoteny). Ethnocentrism is always superior for the simple reason that we can produce norms and institutions that suit our group’s distributions without competing for norms and institutions with others that require different norms and institutions. We use the examples of ashkenazim and sub saharan african as extremes at both ends of the spectrum. But the spectrum of success at shrinking the population below the minimum necessary for self training (105) is available to every group. The question is whether the elites in any group can force this reproductive change. Because by and large that seems very difficult with the development of rifles, that produced military equality offset only by numbers, and prohibited a professional military caste from domesticating the population through agrarian production.