September 16th, 2018 10:52 AM OWNERSHIP OF OUR LINES [W]e no longer own our children. If we owned our children still, we could influence their marriages. If we owned our government still, we could end alien immigration. We own neither and therefore no longer own self-determination of our line or our kin. As such you ask me to do what I cannot in the circumstance, and I ask you to do what we can do in the circumstance: fight to return our ownership – to create an alternative circumstance. The question is, will you fight? If you will not fight then your words are those of a woman: the ridicule of scolds is evidence of their powerlessness and lack of agency. And you are of no matter other than to be punished for your scolding.
Source: Original Site Post
-
No, Supernatural Authoritarian Religion Is Not Best – and The Externalities Are Horrid.
September 16th, 2018 10:40 AM NO, SUPERNATURAL AUTHORITARIAN RELIGION IS NOT BEST – AND THE EXTERNALITIES ARE HORRID. [T]he cognitive bias of cherrypicking is everywhere. That is why we must always seek falsification not justification. Our biological need is to create regularity in order to limit demands on our individual and group neural (cognitive) economy. The most scientific method of doing so is self authoring. we can self author by the disciplined construction of virtues, by imitation of archetypes, or by submission to the pack and authority. We do not comprehend this as ‘self authoring’ – discipline of the intuition just as we discipline our bodies and reason through training – but it is as necessary if not the most necessary of the three. In practice only ‘repetitive rituals’ matter. The question is only how we perform those rituals, and what we program ourselves to do by performing those rituals, and the externalities caused by that programming (self authoring). We can program ourselves (virtues), or we can insulate our selves (buddhism, ritualism), or we can take programming from our kin (familialism) or we can take programming from authoritarian submission (prayer and community prayer). We can produce training to defeat nature (west), to live in harmony with nature (east), to an ideal (india), and to abandon reality (semitic). When augmented by festival (feast), sport, and civic ritual, we build training in trust of one another – the ritual of running with the pack is still in our genes. Piety and all synonyms are just submission to the pack. The more competitive the rituals the more militial. The more submissive the rituals the more slaves. China is the most durable civilization, our only substantial competitor, and not in any way like the semitic. Heterogeneity creates demand for authority. Homogeneity not. It was semitic heterogeneity, and east asian and western homogeneity that prevented demand. Just as today, the religion of postmodernism is a result of demand due to heterogeneity. In fact, they have and continue to ridicule us over our superstitions. We have a fairly good understanding of the evolution of authoritarian religion in response to demand for cooperation among peoples with demographically disadvantaged populations. Just as we have a fairly good understanding of the creation of familialism (emperor, king, ancestor) ‘worship’ (thanks, respect) in homogeneous societies. The dumber your people the greater your heterogeneity (number of signal competitors) the greater demand for authority. That authority will come in the form of propaganda (religion) and violence (the state), and not civil society and rule of traditional common law of property (tort). Choose: Kin (homogenous high), corporation (expansionary middle ), authoritarian religion (exhausted low). Human capital determines everything.
-
There Is No Postmodern Conservatism
September 16th, 2018 1:34 PM THERE IS NO POSTMODERN CONSERVATISM -ONLY ADOPTION OF LEFTIST TECHNIQUE OF Ridicule, shaming, rallying, straw manning, superstition, moralism, psychologism, pseudoscience, and the denial of truth and reason. CONFUSING EMPIRICAL METHOD WITH INTUITIONISTIC JUSTIFICATION
Claims of Postmodern conservatism are an error that confuses the universal fictionalism of the left, with the universal empiricism of the right. In other words, no conservatives are postmodernists, they have merely adopted the TECHNIQUES of the Marxists-Feminists-Postmodernists in Rhetoric (industrialization of lying) and abandoned their tradition of Truth and Honor, because they have abandoned HOPE of the integration of the left into the ANGLO empirical enlightenmentâs ambition of an aristocracy of everyone, versus the cult of Semitic-Catholic authoritarian equality, and returned to their traditional Hierarchy of Priesthood, Aristocracy, Burgher, Craftsman, and Peasant, because the Academy, State, Media (priesthood fictional and equalitarian) is allied against the Aristocracy, Burgher, Craftsman (empirical and meritocratic â the parasitic top and bottom against the productive middle. And as such the natural markets for parasitism (pastoralists and women) against productivity (Farmers and men) continues its long march from 10000 bc to the present. THERE IS NOTHING NEW HERE.
Islamism-Marxism-Feminism-Postmodernism weaponized against meritocracy in the modern world, is just version two of Judaism-Christianity-Islam weaponized against the aristocratic civilizations of the ancient world. THE DARK AGES REPEATED
Whether the current generation of revolt (Islamism, Marxism, Feminism, Postmodernism) that makes use of supernaturalism, pseudoscience, and pseudo-rationalism, is to bring us to yet another dark age as did the revolt by Judaism-Christianity-Islam is yet to be seen. But if the current generations in the west are any indication our Empirical Enlightenment will be crushed just as it was in the past, through fraud and immigration, leaving, once again, only the Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese to survive the worldwide decline, using the walls, warfare, and that form of nepotism we call ethnocentrism. Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine. -
September 16th, 2018 12:04 AM [G]od is a name for a hero a people never had. Tho
September 16th, 2018 12:04 AM
[G]od is a name for a hero a people never had.
Those who invent gods do so because they have no ancestors worthy of appealing to for wisdom, or imitating as heroes, or for submitting to the leader of the tribe for the kin’s pursuit of the common good.
The weak.
-
September 16th, 2018 12:53 PM [W]e don’t really use the term ‘Free Will’, becaus
September 16th, 2018 12:53 PM
[W]e don’t really use the term ‘Free Will’, because it is an ideal, and so tainted that it’s meaningless. We use the terms Agency (via positiva) and Sovereignty (via negativa) and Reciprocity (via voluntary, productive), and we state operationally what those mean.
-
The Moral Foundations by Gender Bias (M vs F)
MALE RECIPROCITY(OPPORTUNITY) VS FEMALE PROPORTIONALITY (CONSUMPTION) The Moral Foundations by Gender Bias (M vs F) SELF (ACTION) – ASCENDENT BIAS 1) (M) Negative Freedom (Liberty) vs (F) Positive Freedom OTHERS FEMALE BIAS – THE HERD 2) (M) Reciprocity (Fairness) vs (F) Proportionality(Equality): rendering justice according to shared rules; opposite of cheating 3) (M) Defense (Negative) vs (F) Care (Positive): cherishing and protecting others; opposite of harm COMMON – ESTABLISHED MALE BIAS – THE PACK 4) (M) Loyalty vs (F) Devotion(Ingroup): standing with your family, group, nation; opposite of betrayal. 5) (M) Authority vs (F) Respect: submitting to tradition and legitimate authority; opposite of subversion 6) (M) Sanctity vs (F) Purity: abhorrence for disgusting things, foods, actions; opposite of degradation. (M) Absorb Cellular Damage. (F) Limit Cellular Damage
-
The Moral Foundations by Gender Bias (M vs F)
MALE RECIPROCITY(OPPORTUNITY) VS FEMALE PROPORTIONALITY (CONSUMPTION) The Moral Foundations by Gender Bias (M vs F) SELF (ACTION) – ASCENDENT BIAS 1) (M) Negative Freedom (Liberty) vs (F) Positive Freedom OTHERS FEMALE BIAS – THE HERD 2) (M) Reciprocity (Fairness) vs (F) Proportionality(Equality): rendering justice according to shared rules; opposite of cheating 3) (M) Defense (Negative) vs (F) Care (Positive): cherishing and protecting others; opposite of harm COMMON – ESTABLISHED MALE BIAS – THE PACK 4) (M) Loyalty vs (F) Devotion(Ingroup): standing with your family, group, nation; opposite of betrayal. 5) (M) Authority vs (F) Respect: submitting to tradition and legitimate authority; opposite of subversion 6) (M) Sanctity vs (F) Purity: abhorrence for disgusting things, foods, actions; opposite of degradation. (M) Absorb Cellular Damage. (F) Limit Cellular Damage
-
Differences Are in Cognitive Load
AGAIN, ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE. BUT AS I’VE SAID THE MAJOR DIFFERENCES ARE IN COGNITIVE LOAD OF PERSONALITY TRAIT, NOT TRAIT DIFFERENCES, AND ERGO – SIZE OF UNDERCLASSES. —“there are no differences between Blacks and Whites on four of the seven personality constructs. Blacks are slightly more extroverted and emotionally stable, and Whites are slightly more agreeable. … (but) differences in the Big 5 are moderated by the cognitive loading of the personality scales.”— Tate and McDaniel [1]
