Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Propertarianism’s Position in Intellectual History

    September 17th, 2018 10:09 AM PROPERTARIANISM’S POSITION IN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY
    (from The Introduction) [P]ropertarianism is an answer to, refutation of, and solution to, the invention of lying: Cantor’s restoration of mathematical platonism, Marx’s pseudoscientific economics and sociology, Boaz’s pseudo-scientific anthropology and sociology, Freud’s pseudo-scientific psychology, the Frankfurt School’s pseudo-scientific aesthetics, and the French Catholic via Rousseau, and Postmoderns including Foucault, Baudrillard, Derrida, and an academy of followers propagating the . These thinkers constitute the main actors in the Counter-Enlightenment: the Second Abrahamic attack on Western Civilization. The first fictionalist attack was the west asian caucasian invention of scripture: authoritarian mystical religion as a successor to explanatory mythology. The first Abrahamic fictionalist attack was the fabrication of authoritarian mysticism with the promise of utopia after death by the professionalization of lying about scripture; The second Abrahamic Fictionalist attack is the pseudo-scientific (Ashkenazi), pseudo-rational (German), and literary, meaning pseudo-moral (French) attack on Western Civilization which promised the underclasses not only an escape from evolutionary and material constraints, but a utopia of consumption and a permanently expanding technology that would end all wants – using new mass media for the industrialization of lying. Propertarianism’s purpose is to end all lying in all its elaborate forms within the informational commons: including the supernatural, pseudo-rational, the pseudo-mathematical, and the pseudoscientific.

  • September 17th, 2018 2:59 AM by James Santagata T he only sport left worth watch

    September 17th, 2018 2:59 AM by James Santagata

    The only sport left worth watching is politics, and sport left worth participating in is civil war.

  • September 17th, 2018 2:18 PM Curt Doolittle —” ….since January he had been p

    September 17th, 2018 2:18 PM Curt Doolittle —” ….since January he had been putting together a binder cataloguing drug arrests in the state, and that “90-plus per cent of those pictures in my book, and it’s a three-ringed binder, are black and Hispanic people”.—- He is speaking truthfully. —“He never said the majority of criminals were black he said the ones he put in his book were but read right below that and you see the actual unbiased evidence from the FBI which shows the majority is White and only 14% were Black.”— I am still chasing the data. the data from maine is that 1% blacks 14% arrests. —“But the photos of the 51 people facing heroin or other opioid drug charges show that only 47 percent, or 24 individuals, appear to be black or Hispanic. The remaining 53 percent, or 27 people, are white”— So half his book … less than 5% of the population produced half his book. But that doesn’t tell us if the distributors are coming from ct and ny, which is what I understood him to stay. lots of spam. not much content. The question is why, given the state collects the data, he was compiling his own…. So he was vastly overstating his case. —“The person who made the book made the racist claim. The FBI gathered the actual data that show the claim is wrong. The circumstances and the actions of the person who made the claim show the person to be racist.”—Frank Mueller Well you can make that claim. the data on out of state dealers is not yet available. when it is, we will see. —“They are talking about 2014 they have all the data.”—Frank Mueller I have found no data in any one’s hands that states the composition of the dealers transiting supply from NY and CT to Maine. So if they have the data it is not mentioned anywhere that I have found (hard to imagine it doesn’t exist). And I specialize in debunking pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational fictionalisms. Until I see some evidence that the man was wrong in those claims, I am assuming he is making a deduction from his study of the sample cases he referred to in his binder, and for the purpose of his hyperbolic expression (which is how conservatives demonstrate their bias for the intertemporal categorical imperatives), overstated the case. As in all things a sample size of less than one thousand is very hard to test. As in all things a self-selected sample size is questionable – intentional or not. The import trade in Heroin is largely from mexico and the import distribution network, and the end user distribution network are of different composition. As far as I know the heroin import trade from mexico remains largely a hispanic organization. I haven’t done any research on the NY/NJ import trade. As far as I know the end user distribution trade mirrors the demographic distribution. As far as I know, as always, the crime rates are highly asymmetrical cross racial groups for the simple reason that they describe the ‘ability’ distribution (median) of each group – and both groups demonstrate lower medians on the ability distribution. In other words, people of color are far more likely to engage in criminal activities for the simple reason that there are more of them per capita in the demographic distribution of ability that chooses black market activity, and therefore have fewer alternative options in outside of the black market we call the drug trade. And furthermore, as in all things, people of lesser ability are more likely to make errors that result in their getting caught. In other words as far as I know the biases are not racial in the first place but racial due to asymmetry of distributions in racial groups. ie: ashkenazim wider standard deviation than whites. East asians higher median, lower standard deviation than whites. This is just data. But since people rely out of necessity on stereotypes and stereotypes are the most accurate measure in the social sciences; and since we do not educate people about the inequality of the class distributions between the races, people rationally intuit that what is a class size problem is a racial problem. Denying it doesn’t do anything but simply drive truthful reporting underground which is why the accuracy of surveys has been in rapid decline: people simply self report the pretense of equality while demonstrating belief in inequality in their actions. Anyway. This isn’t important other than another demonstration of the fact that the herd (left/female) and the pack (right/male) are able to express their reproductive, moral, social, and cognitive biases, and that while the right understands the left but can’t imagine how they could be mistaken, the left cannot imagine the right (see Haidt). Equalitarian Herd vs Meritocratic Pack. So you are arguing from the position of the herd and displaying your cognitive bias, and he is arguing from the pack and displaying his but you attribute to him evil, and he attributes to you error. We don’t have all that much agency unfortunately. So we think we reason, where we are just riders on the elephant of our genetic instructions. —“You need to go to the FBI UCR for that year. All the data is there. Our titles and our ability do not decide this, the facts decide it. The facts are there for those who read them.”–Frank Mueller Not it is not. There is no data to describe the composition from the import trade from ny and ct into maine. If you can find it, fine. Otherwise, as I ‘ve said you’re playing the same game he is by misrepresenting the facts or even their existence in order to justify your biases. —“The reports from the FBI UCR cover the nation and each state. They break down All occurrences by race.”— Frank Mueller They do not cover the composition of the distribution network, and merely conflate arrest data. so no. i don’t make mistakes. its my job. 😉 You are engaging in distortion no better than he. where he exaggerates, you obscure and justify. NO DIFFERENCE

  • Propertarianism: The Central Idea

    September 17th, 2018 10:22 AM PROPERTARIANISM: THE CENTRAL IDEA
    (from the introduction) The central idea is the completion of the scientific method, and its application to the entire spectrum of human knowledge. Although understanding the full scope of what that means isn’t at all obvious from that statement. The completion of the scientific method is contained in Propertarianism’s Testimonial Truth (Epistemology). Acquisitionism (Psychology), Propertarianism (sociology), and Natural Law (Ethics, Politics, and Group Competitive Strategy). The rest of the work consists of application of that scientific method to the scope of human knowledge: “Here is the completed scientific method. If we apply the completed scientific method to the full scope of human knowledge, organized by combining categories of philosophy and social science into a single hierarchy, the result is all of these ideas.” The consequence of completing such a reformation of the scope of human knowledge, is our ability to explain not only all of human behavior, but to compare all human civilizations and explain why each excelled (The West), developed (China), fell into stasis (India), or regressed (Islam, Australian aboriginals, and possibly central africans), were conquered (far too many), or Collapsed (Mesoamericans). This reformation is on the same scale of the previous generations of the scientific method: aristotelian reason and stoic psychology of the late ancient world, anglo empiricism of the early modern era, anglo-germanic science of the 19th and 20th centuries, and brings the social soft-sciences from pseudoscientific into the hard sciences. But, given human defense of malinvestment in falsehoods, I suspect these arguments will take as long to propagate through our civlization as did those previous reformations of human knowledge. Whether you consider Propertarianism the Completed Scientific Method, Natural Law (social science), or the codification of the strategy of western civilization, depends upon your interest: intellectual (method), institutional (natural law), or anthropological (the reasons for western rapidity of progress in the ancient and modern worlds.) My original purpose was only to provide a scientific language for describing the group competitive and evolutionary strategy of western civlization. The result is the completion of the scientific method, an explanation for the success of the west, a reformation of human knowledge, and a Constitution of Natural Law by which any and all may live.

  • Mapping Propertarianism to Philosophy and The Sciences

    September 17th, 2018 10:21 AM MAPPING PROPERTARIANISM TO PHILOSOPHY AND THE SCIENCES
    (from the introduction) While propertarianism serves as an anti-philosophy system of thought, we rely upon the traditional hierarchy of categories: 

    SOVEREIGNTY:
    
-From Reals to Feels-
    
Metaphysics:..Vitruvianism: Man is the measure of all things man (cog. sci.)

    Psychology:...Acquisitionism: Man acquires and defends.

    Sociology:....Compatibilism: Intertemporal division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy wherein we combine information and calculate compatible means to the achievement of different ends through voluntary conflict, competition, cooperation, and boycott.

    Ethics:.......Propertarianism. (Reciprocity) The Ethics of Non Imposition, production, and investment.

    Epistemology:.Testimonialism. The competition between imaginary associations and existential measurements in all dimensions of actionable reality.

    Law:..........Algorithmic Natural Law.  The Natural Law of Reciprocity. Strictly constructed from the test of reciprocity.

    Politics:.....Markets in Everything. (Which I call “Market Fascism”  with tongue in cheek.)

    Strategy:.....Agency: Maximization of agency through Transcendence, Sovereignty, and Heroism

    Spirituality:.Transcendence: Masculine Stoicism, Feminine Epicureanism, Ritual Familialism, Feast Naturalism,…….Festival Nationalism.

    Aesthetics:...Truth(Testimonial), Excellence(Density), Goodness(Morality[‘the commons’]) and Beauty(Bounty).

  • The First Complete Statement of The Philosophy of Western Civilization

    September 17th, 2018 10:20 AM THE FIRST COMPLETE STATEMENT OF

    THE PHILOSOPHY OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION
    (from the Introduction) The Heroic Civilization.
    For reasons we are unsure of, the west combined bronze horse and wheel, and in doing so transformed from egalitarian earth worshippers to hierarchical sun worshippers. From submissive to heroic. Sovereignty.
    But because of their military strategy – a strategy that required large personal investments and large personal risk – they chose sovereignty: the right of the individual to act as his own legislature in his family’s affairs, as the first ‘law, rule or principle’ of their society upon which all others were to depend. Markets in Everything.
    The only institutional solution to choosing the strategy of sovereignty is to resort to markets in everything: relationships, marriage, production, commons, adjudication of differences, and rule. And the only means of resolving conflicts between them is the natural, judge discovered common law. In other words the only solution to sovereignty is : the absence of discretion (choice). And the only solution to the absence of choice, is rule of natural, judge-discovered law. The Rapidity of Suppression of Parasitism.
    The by-product of this choice of sovereignty is the rapidity with which new methods of free riding, parasitism, predation, can be suppressed – by the first case adjudicated and recorded. And secondly, the ease of expanding risk taking when such rapidity and lack of discretion is visible. And third, the trust that evolves from the consistent suppression of corruption in the state, and free riding in the commons, and parasitism and fraud in commerce, and predation by any criminal means. Not First but Fastest.
    In summary, the choice of sovereignty allowed the west to advance FASTER than the rest by process of DISCOVERY faster than the rest. So the West was not first, it was fastest, except in the medieval world when (like now) we were defeated by the first great lie: mysticism. Class Structure.
    The west has always practiced tri-partism: the estates of the realm – in one way or another. Since our origins on the steppes of Ukraine and Russia. Priests, Warriors, Laborers. We have always used the class structure ‘honestly’. Testimonial Truth and Deflationism.
    The west has (uniquely) practiced deconflationism (specialization) in various forms – never mixing Law, religion, and festival – and resisting the church’s usurpation of our nature worship and related festivals. We have even had in some cases, different languages for our estates of the realm: Latin, French, and German. Polytheistic (And PolyArgumentative).
    And so the west has always practiced polytheism of sorts: martial sovereignty, commercial rule of law, craftsman’s technology, intellectual philosophy, commoner religion, and the mythology of nature and the hearth. And each has used different forms of communication and different methods of argument. No Single ‘Book’.
    Because of this tripartism, this unconflated set of competing yet compatible ideas produced a very complex unwritten social order never captured in a single book in a single language using a single argument. Possibly because it could not have been until now. We simply didn’t know how. It took us hundreds of years in the ancient world, and hundreds of years in the modern to discover how to complete our single language of truthful speech: that language we call ‘science’ – a language that evolved not from our priesthood, not from our intellectuals, but from our empirical, natural, common law. The Great Lies of the 19th and 20th Centuries.
    Our current century and the last, and part of the previous, were victims of the same strategy that Zoroaster, Jerusalem and Mecca used against us in the ancient world: the first great lie of supernatural mysticism. We have been fighting the second great lie of pseudoscience for over a century. We are now fighting the second version of the first lie: Islam, and Islam has replaced the pseudoscience of marxists: world communism with the fundamentalist, absolutist, mysticism of religion.

  • Propertarianism’s Position in Intellectual History

    September 17th, 2018 10:09 AM PROPERTARIANISM’S POSITION IN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY
    (from The Introduction) [P]ropertarianism is an answer to, refutation of, and solution to, the invention of lying: Cantor’s restoration of mathematical platonism, Marx’s pseudoscientific economics and sociology, Boaz’s pseudo-scientific anthropology and sociology, Freud’s pseudo-scientific psychology, the Frankfurt School’s pseudo-scientific aesthetics, and the French Catholic via Rousseau, and Postmoderns including Foucault, Baudrillard, Derrida, and an academy of followers propagating the . These thinkers constitute the main actors in the Counter-Enlightenment: the Second Abrahamic attack on Western Civilization. The first fictionalist attack was the west asian caucasian invention of scripture: authoritarian mystical religion as a successor to explanatory mythology. The first Abrahamic fictionalist attack was the fabrication of authoritarian mysticism with the promise of utopia after death by the professionalization of lying about scripture; The second Abrahamic Fictionalist attack is the pseudo-scientific (Ashkenazi), pseudo-rational (German), and literary, meaning pseudo-moral (French) attack on Western Civilization which promised the underclasses not only an escape from evolutionary and material constraints, but a utopia of consumption and a permanently expanding technology that would end all wants – using new mass media for the industrialization of lying. Propertarianism’s purpose is to end all lying in all its elaborate forms within the informational commons: including the supernatural, pseudo-rational, the pseudo-mathematical, and the pseudoscientific.

  • September 17th, 2018 2:18 PM Curt Doolittle —” ….since January he had been p

    September 17th, 2018 2:18 PM Curt Doolittle —” ….since January he had been putting together a binder cataloguing drug arrests in the state, and that “90-plus per cent of those pictures in my book, and it’s a three-ringed binder, are black and Hispanic people”.—- He is speaking truthfully. —“He never said the majority of criminals were black he said the ones he put in his book were but read right below that and you see the actual unbiased evidence from the FBI which shows the majority is White and only 14% were Black.”— I am still chasing the data. the data from maine is that 1% blacks 14% arrests. —“But the photos of the 51 people facing heroin or other opioid drug charges show that only 47 percent, or 24 individuals, appear to be black or Hispanic. The remaining 53 percent, or 27 people, are white”— So half his book … less than 5% of the population produced half his book. But that doesn’t tell us if the distributors are coming from ct and ny, which is what I understood him to stay. lots of spam. not much content. The question is why, given the state collects the data, he was compiling his own…. So he was vastly overstating his case. —“The person who made the book made the racist claim. The FBI gathered the actual data that show the claim is wrong. The circumstances and the actions of the person who made the claim show the person to be racist.”—Frank Mueller Well you can make that claim. the data on out of state dealers is not yet available. when it is, we will see. —“They are talking about 2014 they have all the data.”—Frank Mueller I have found no data in any one’s hands that states the composition of the dealers transiting supply from NY and CT to Maine. So if they have the data it is not mentioned anywhere that I have found (hard to imagine it doesn’t exist). And I specialize in debunking pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational fictionalisms. Until I see some evidence that the man was wrong in those claims, I am assuming he is making a deduction from his study of the sample cases he referred to in his binder, and for the purpose of his hyperbolic expression (which is how conservatives demonstrate their bias for the intertemporal categorical imperatives), overstated the case. As in all things a sample size of less than one thousand is very hard to test. As in all things a self-selected sample size is questionable – intentional or not. The import trade in Heroin is largely from mexico and the import distribution network, and the end user distribution network are of different composition. As far as I know the heroin import trade from mexico remains largely a hispanic organization. I haven’t done any research on the NY/NJ import trade. As far as I know the end user distribution trade mirrors the demographic distribution. As far as I know, as always, the crime rates are highly asymmetrical cross racial groups for the simple reason that they describe the ‘ability’ distribution (median) of each group – and both groups demonstrate lower medians on the ability distribution. In other words, people of color are far more likely to engage in criminal activities for the simple reason that there are more of them per capita in the demographic distribution of ability that chooses black market activity, and therefore have fewer alternative options in outside of the black market we call the drug trade. And furthermore, as in all things, people of lesser ability are more likely to make errors that result in their getting caught. In other words as far as I know the biases are not racial in the first place but racial due to asymmetry of distributions in racial groups. ie: ashkenazim wider standard deviation than whites. East asians higher median, lower standard deviation than whites. This is just data. But since people rely out of necessity on stereotypes and stereotypes are the most accurate measure in the social sciences; and since we do not educate people about the inequality of the class distributions between the races, people rationally intuit that what is a class size problem is a racial problem. Denying it doesn’t do anything but simply drive truthful reporting underground which is why the accuracy of surveys has been in rapid decline: people simply self report the pretense of equality while demonstrating belief in inequality in their actions. Anyway. This isn’t important other than another demonstration of the fact that the herd (left/female) and the pack (right/male) are able to express their reproductive, moral, social, and cognitive biases, and that while the right understands the left but can’t imagine how they could be mistaken, the left cannot imagine the right (see Haidt). Equalitarian Herd vs Meritocratic Pack. So you are arguing from the position of the herd and displaying your cognitive bias, and he is arguing from the pack and displaying his but you attribute to him evil, and he attributes to you error. We don’t have all that much agency unfortunately. So we think we reason, where we are just riders on the elephant of our genetic instructions. —“You need to go to the FBI UCR for that year. All the data is there. Our titles and our ability do not decide this, the facts decide it. The facts are there for those who read them.”–Frank Mueller Not it is not. There is no data to describe the composition from the import trade from ny and ct into maine. If you can find it, fine. Otherwise, as I ‘ve said you’re playing the same game he is by misrepresenting the facts or even their existence in order to justify your biases. —“The reports from the FBI UCR cover the nation and each state. They break down All occurrences by race.”— Frank Mueller They do not cover the composition of the distribution network, and merely conflate arrest data. so no. i don’t make mistakes. its my job. 😉 You are engaging in distortion no better than he. where he exaggerates, you obscure and justify. NO DIFFERENCE

  • September 17th, 2018 2:59 AM by James Santagata T he only sport left worth watch

    September 17th, 2018 2:59 AM by James Santagata

    The only sport left worth watching is politics, and sport left worth participating in is civil war.

  • There Is No Postmodern Conservatism

    September 16th, 2018 1:34 PM THERE IS NO POSTMODERN CONSERVATISM -ONLY ADOPTION OF LEFTIST TECHNIQUE OF Ridicule, shaming, rallying, straw manning, superstition, moralism, psychologism, pseudoscience, and the denial of truth and reason. CONFUSING EMPIRICAL METHOD WITH INTUITIONISTIC JUSTIFICATION
    Claims of Postmodern conservatism are an error that confuses the universal fictionalism of the left, with the universal empiricism of the right. In other words, no conservatives are postmodernists, they have merely adopted the TECHNIQUES of the Marxists-Feminists-Postmodernists in Rhetoric (industrialization of lying) and abandoned their tradition of Truth and Honor, because they have abandoned HOPE of the integration of the left into the ANGLO empirical enlightenment’s ambition of an aristocracy of everyone, versus the cult of Semitic-Catholic authoritarian equality, and returned to their traditional Hierarchy of Priesthood, Aristocracy, Burgher, Craftsman, and Peasant, because the Academy, State, Media (priesthood fictional and equalitarian) is allied against the Aristocracy, Burgher, Craftsman (empirical and meritocratic – the parasitic top and bottom against the productive middle. And as such the natural markets for parasitism (pastoralists and women) against productivity (Farmers and men) continues its long march from 10000 bc to the present. THERE IS NOTHING NEW HERE.
    Islamism-Marxism-Feminism-Postmodernism weaponized against meritocracy in the modern world, is just version two of Judaism-Christianity-Islam weaponized against the aristocratic civilizations of the ancient world. THE DARK AGES REPEATED
    Whether the current generation of revolt (Islamism, Marxism, Feminism, Postmodernism) that makes use of supernaturalism, pseudoscience, and pseudo-rationalism, is to bring us to yet another dark age as did the revolt by Judaism-Christianity-Islam is yet to be seen. But if the current generations in the west are any indication our Empirical Enlightenment will be crushed just as it was in the past, through fraud and immigration, leaving, once again, only the Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese to survive the worldwide decline, using the walls, warfare, and that form of nepotism we call ethnocentrism. Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine.