October 10th, 2018 12:28 PM [I]’m not anti-anyone (genetically). If we all practice nationalism then we do not prey upon one another by exporting costs of domestication upon one another, and then can ameliorate our differences through trade, trade policy, and international (natural) law, while producing those commons most suitable to our peoples. I am however against violations of natural law both in display, word, and deed, including those traditions we all rely upon, the group strategies in those traditions, and the means of argument used in perpetuating those strategies. So do I think the people whose strategies are HERD strategies, (Semitic Monotheists, Women, and Gypsies) going to stop following their instincts and traditions? Um no I don’t. Do I think we can fight with our very lives to restore natural law so that we ameliorate those differences through separatism, nations, trade, and law? Yes I do. And I am right, and it is impossible to make a moral argument counter to it, without violating the very law that prevents us from conquering, enserving, enslaving, or worse. So the choice is simple – we either separate and cooperate or we remain artificially unified for the purposes of conquest by the herd, and fight out a bloody civil war. Carry your own genetic water.
Source: Original Site Post
-
‘Crazy’ is a reproductive advantage
October 10th, 2018 1:17 PM
Let me make it simple: “Crazy” is a reproductive advantage in seizing opportunities for gene capture.
-
The Choices Are Limited
October 10th, 2018 11:54 AM THE CHOICES ARE LIMITED I mean, by and large, you get to choose one or the other. Either your upper (professional class) will flee, your middle class will flee or your underclass will flee (third world), or you will practice eugenics, and manage empirically (middle class), and everyone will stay. This is the evidence.
-
Female Reproductive Traits and Six Psychiatric Disorders.
October 10th, 2018 1:07 PM The genetic relationship between female reproductive traits and six psychiatric disorders.
Abstract Female reproductive behaviors have an important implication in evolutionary fitness and health of offspring. Previous studies have shown that age at first birth of women (AFB) is genetically associated with schizophrenia (SCZ). However, for most other psychiatric disorders and reproductive traits, the latent shared genetic architecture is largely unknown. Here we used the second wave of UK Biobank data (N=220,685) to evaluate the association between five female reproductive traits and polygenetic risk scores (PRS) projected from genome-wide association study summary statistics of six psychiatric disorders (N=429,178). We found that the PRS of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were strongly associated with AFB (genetic correlation of -0.68 +/- 0.03 with p-value = 1.86E-89), age at first sexual intercourse (AFS) (-0.56 +/- 0.03 with p-value = 3.42E-60), number of live births (NLB) (0.36 +/- 0.04 with p-value = 4.01E-17) and age at menopause (-0.27 +/- 0.04 with p-value = 5.71E-13). There were also robustly significant associations between the PRS of eating disorder (ED) and AFB (genetic correlation of 0.35 +/- 0.06), ED and AFS (0.19 +/- 0.06), Major depressive disorder (MDD) and AFB (-0.27 +/- 0.07), MDD and AFS (-0.27 +/- 0.03) and SCZ and AFS (-0.10 +/- 0.03). Our findings reveal the shared genetic architecture between the five reproductive traits in women and six psychiatric disorders, which have a potential implication that helps to improve reproductive health in women, hence better child outcomes. Our findings may also explain, at least in part, an evolutionary hypothesis that causal mutations underlying psychiatric disorders have positive effects on reproductive success.
-
Choose How Fast You Suicide
October 10th, 2018 11:42 AM CHOOSE HOW FAST YOU SUICIDE
[O]rganizing your country to profit from demographic expansion and immigration is not very different from organizing it for drug use – just on a slightly slower scale. China(Heroin), America(drugs and immigration), and Canada, UK, German (immigration). Yet this is the entire basis of the west’s postwar economic policy.
-
Carry your own genetic water.
October 10th, 2018 12:28 PM [I]’m not anti-anyone (genetically). If we all practice nationalism then we do not prey upon one another by exporting costs of domestication upon one another, and then can ameliorate our differences through trade, trade policy, and international (natural) law, while producing those commons most suitable to our peoples. I am however against violations of natural law both in display, word, and deed, including those traditions we all rely upon, the group strategies in those traditions, and the means of argument used in perpetuating those strategies. So do I think the people whose strategies are HERD strategies, (Semitic Monotheists, Women, and Gypsies) going to stop following their instincts and traditions? Um no I don’t. Do I think we can fight with our very lives to restore natural law so that we ameliorate those differences through separatism, nations, trade, and law? Yes I do. And I am right, and it is impossible to make a moral argument counter to it, without violating the very law that prevents us from conquering, enserving, enslaving, or worse. So the choice is simple – we either separate and cooperate or we remain artificially unified for the purposes of conquest by the herd, and fight out a bloody civil war. Carry your own genetic water.
-
Chinese vs Indian IQ Distributions
October 10th, 2018 11:39 AM
—“One only has to talk with illiterate Chinese and Indians and compare to understand how different their IQs are. You cannot train Indians to do basic manufacturing. Anyone who thinks that India can ever be anything like China is dreaming. “— Jayant Bhandari
(Again, as a social order, I don’t really have ANY criticisms of india at all, on any grounds. As an economic order I just have a hard time seeing how any window hasn’t passed.)
-
The Choices Are Limited
October 10th, 2018 11:54 AM THE CHOICES ARE LIMITED I mean, by and large, you get to choose one or the other. Either your upper (professional class) will flee, your middle class will flee or your underclass will flee (third world), or you will practice eugenics, and manage empirically (middle class), and everyone will stay. This is the evidence.
-
India’s Window Has Passed
October 10th, 2018 11:38 AM WISDOM ON INDIA
—“In a democratic country the rule slowly passes to the lowest-51%. This means that as is happening in SAfrica, smarter people of India (the tail-end) are leaving or will be culled (as happened in Pakistan).”— Jayant Bhandari
(My understanding is that the window has passed for india but the idea of the nw and upper population fleeing makes perfect sense to me, and in my view are welcome. )
-
Choose How Fast You Suicide
October 10th, 2018 11:42 AM CHOOSE HOW FAST YOU SUICIDE
[O]rganizing your country to profit from demographic expansion and immigration is not very different from organizing it for drug use – just on a slightly slower scale. China(Heroin), America(drugs and immigration), and Canada, UK, German (immigration). Yet this is the entire basis of the west’s postwar economic policy.