Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • The False Promise of Universalism vs … Eugenics

    October 10th, 2018 9:50 AM

    —“Could we come up with a better term than ‘tribalism’ please?”— Marginal Revolution

    OMG….. How about we use operational (scientific language) instead of postmodern (pseudoscientific language)? I mean, is economics a science or a pseudoscience? The world doesn’t need more sophisms. |PACK| Family > Kin > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Civilization > Race = Markets for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law, trade policy ameliorating differences in purchasing power), producing universal EUGENIC reproduction. –versus– |HERD| Individual > Corporation > Universalism = NO MARKETS for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law), instead involuntary transfers between groups producing UNIVERSAL DYSGENIC REPRODUCTION. Economics if anything consists of the full accounting of costs. NOT THE CHERRY PICKING OF RETURNS INDEPENDENT OF COSTS. I don’t make mistakes such as these. The reason is that I don’t engage in cherry-picking (Pseudoscience) Justificationism (sophism) and Postmodern (denial and deceit) “empty verbalism” for the purpose of producing frames that perpetuate the frauds of involuntary transfer, and the spread of dysgenia. Simple facts: those groups that practiced eugenic reproduction under manorialism (east and west) succeeded precisely because of those eugenics, and those that did not, and still do not, are those that struggle. And those that were sold the false promise of universalism whether in the ancient world (the Abrahamic Dark Age and the destruction of all great civilizations of the ancient world), and in the Modern world (marxist-libertarian-postmodern-feminist destruction of the modern world) but lacked the reserve capital (europe, east asia), were sufficiently distracted by the false promise of pseudoscientific sophism, that they have missed the window for using the industrial and technological revolution to organize their societies for eugenic middle class reproduction. Reductive Explanation: The HERD (Universalist) doesn’t know it’s a HERD, but the PACK (Nationalist) knows it’s a pack, and the herd a herd. Selective use of economics to justify an instinct is just pseudoscience. Either you engage in full accounting or you don’t.  

  • Irony In ‘Holocaust’ Memes

    October 10th, 2018 4:14 PM

    ( The irony of the hard right using oven metaphors with utter confidence that they didn’t exist, and gas metaphors with utter confidence the only gas was used for delousing linens. And yes, I understand that the right wing mind loves irony and hyperbole. It’s still strange somehow. )

  • India’s Window Has Passed

    October 10th, 2018 11:38 AM WISDOM ON INDIA

    —“In a democratic country the rule slowly passes to the lowest-51%. This means that as is happening in SAfrica, smarter people of India (the tail-end) are leaving or will be culled (as happened in Pakistan).”— Jayant Bhandari

    (My understanding is that the window has passed for india but the idea of the nw and upper population fleeing makes perfect sense to me, and in my view are welcome. )

  • ‘Crazy’ is a reproductive advantage

    October 10th, 2018 1:17 PM

    Let me make it simple: “Crazy” is a reproductive advantage in seizing opportunities for gene capture.

  • Organized Dysgenia

    October 10th, 2018 11:22 AM

    —“It’s the elite foisting dysgenics onto their countries.”—Croib Maga

  • Female Reproductive Traits and Six Psychiatric Disorders.

    October 10th, 2018 1:07 PM The genetic relationship between female reproductive traits and six psychiatric disorders.

    Abstract Female reproductive behaviors have an important implication in evolutionary fitness and health of offspring. Previous studies have shown that age at first birth of women (AFB) is genetically associated with schizophrenia (SCZ). However, for most other psychiatric disorders and reproductive traits, the latent shared genetic architecture is largely unknown. Here we used the second wave of UK Biobank data (N=220,685) to evaluate the association between five female reproductive traits and polygenetic risk scores (PRS) projected from genome-wide association study summary statistics of six psychiatric disorders (N=429,178). We found that the PRS of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were strongly associated with AFB (genetic correlation of -0.68 +/- 0.03 with p-value = 1.86E-89), age at first sexual intercourse (AFS) (-0.56 +/- 0.03 with p-value = 3.42E-60), number of live births (NLB) (0.36 +/- 0.04 with p-value = 4.01E-17) and age at menopause (-0.27 +/- 0.04 with p-value = 5.71E-13). There were also robustly significant associations between the PRS of eating disorder (ED) and AFB (genetic correlation of 0.35 +/- 0.06), ED and AFS (0.19 +/- 0.06), Major depressive disorder (MDD) and AFB (-0.27 +/- 0.07), MDD and AFS (-0.27 +/- 0.03) and SCZ and AFS (-0.10 +/- 0.03). Our findings reveal the shared genetic architecture between the five reproductive traits in women and six psychiatric disorders, which have a potential implication that helps to improve reproductive health in women, hence better child outcomes. Our findings may also explain, at least in part, an evolutionary hypothesis that causal mutations underlying psychiatric disorders have positive effects on reproductive success.

  • Sorry But I Understand Religion Completely.

    October 10th, 2018 11:21 AM

    —“None of these three ideologies has anything to do with abrahamic religions: …”Universalism. Universalism. Monopoly. Monopoly. Communist monopoly, libertarian monopoly, neocon monopoly = abrahamic monopoly. THE HERD DOES NOT UNDERSTAND IT IS A HERD. -CD…”—

    1) I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job not to. 2) Each social order (Wisdom literature), whether legal(western), rational(chinese) theological(Semitic), or literary(Indian), relies on criteria of decidability and method of argument in support those criteria. 3) We can train physical abilities, intuition-emotion, reason, and skills of transformation. We have developed ritual, religion, stoicism, and philosophy to train intuition & emotion and intuition, and developed calculation for reason, and techne for skills 4) Semitic argument consists of the sophisms of pilpul, critique, false promise, moral hazard, monopoly control of information, using threats of ostracization, disapproval, shaming, gossip, rallying and reputation destruction to impose a monopoly by suggestion and intimidation. 5) We call this combination of sophism (psuedo-rationalism), supernaturalism (occult), false history (pseudoscience) ritual indoctrination, false promise (fraud) to create a monopoly of conformity to falsehoods a “Religion” even though doing so is unique to the Semitic Religions. 6) This form of argument like mathematics, logic, writing, language or any other technology, is traceable throughout history as the incremental evolution of a technique of deception. It is used to produce natural neurochemical (opiate) responses and functions as an addiction. 7) So just as the Romans invented empirical law with the help of aristotle and zeno, the Greeks invented idealism and ideal argument, the semites invented the sophistries of pilpul and critique and threats of ostracization thus weaponizing the female group strategy in argument. 8) meanwhile the west produced hero-worship, civic ritual, the cult of the empirical law of tort, reason, rationalism, empiricism, science as an evolution of their criteria of decidability: individual sovereignty, with disputes resolved by law of tort, and a MARKET for ideas. 9) It’s not that I don’t understand religion. It’s that I understand it completely; how to replace its falsehoods completely; and that abrahamic religions were responsible for the dark ages, and the destruction of all the great civilizations in the ancient world – and modern. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Carry your own genetic water.

    October 10th, 2018 12:28 PM [I]’m not anti-anyone (genetically). If we all practice nationalism then we do not prey upon one another by exporting costs of domestication upon one another, and then can ameliorate our differences through trade, trade policy, and international (natural) law, while producing those commons most suitable to our peoples. I am however against violations of natural law both in display, word, and deed, including those traditions we all rely upon, the group strategies in those traditions, and the means of argument used in perpetuating those strategies. So do I think the people whose strategies are HERD strategies, (Semitic Monotheists, Women, and Gypsies) going to stop following their instincts and traditions? Um no I don’t. Do I think we can fight with our very lives to restore natural law so that we ameliorate those differences through separatism, nations, trade, and law? Yes I do. And I am right, and it is impossible to make a moral argument counter to it, without violating the very law that prevents us from conquering, enserving, enslaving, or worse. So the choice is simple – we either separate and cooperate or we remain artificially unified for the purposes of conquest by the herd, and fight out a bloody civil war. Carry your own genetic water.

  • Um. No. It’s not inequality.

    October 10th, 2018 10:51 AM

    [Y]ou don’t get it. It’s not inequality. It’s a failure of elites to impose eugenics.

  • The Choices Are Limited

    October 10th, 2018 11:54 AM THE CHOICES ARE LIMITED I mean, by and large, you get to choose one or the other. Either your upper (professional class) will flee, your middle class will flee or your underclass will flee (third world), or you will practice eugenics, and manage empirically (middle class), and everyone will stay. This is the evidence.