October 13th, 2018 10:08 AM GROUP STRATEGY OF THE TRIBES [Y]ou don’t understand. [I]slam is a Militial Order of the poor and illiterate tribal alliances, devoting all resources to reproduction and predation thru raiding. Their wisdom literature, is the myth of the expansionary warrior, the raider, and their laws. (Herdsmen, and raiding) [E]uropeanism is a Militial order of the technological, upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction through kinship warriors, creating markets. Our wisdom literature is the law: reciprocity of heroes: conquest of self, man, nature, and the universe. (cattle, hose, and holding the land to feed them, and domesticating beast, land, and man for profit) [S]inism is a bureaucrat order of administrators upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction to administrators, administering their market. Their wisdom literature is literally ‘wisdom literature’ of Sun Tzu, Confucius, Lao Tzu and Mao. The literature of ‘harmony’. (Administering kin for profit). [J]udaism is a reactionary order of pacifist separatists (Female strategy) upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction through teachers, parasitically dependent upon the markets of others. Their wisdom literature is their history and their law – the literature of ‘suffering’. (Sustaining kin through Trade and Moral Hazard) [H]induism (‘The Way of Life”) is the optimum hierarchical social order for the massive poor. It is just defenseless and can afford to be given the isolation of the continent by oceans, mountains, and deserts. Buddhism attempts to reform hinduism but spawns something very different, because it is personal. TRIBAL ORDERS ALL.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Conservatism Understood as Empiricism: Quote and Counter Explanation
October 13th, 2018 9:31 AM CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD AS EMPIRICISM: QUOTE AND COUNTER EXPLANATION
—“Edmund Burke was an English politician who wrote his Reflections on the Revolution in France to express his disdain for the destructive havoc wrought by the French Revolution. As a traditionalist-conservative, he thinks about social change in a cautious and incremental way and characterizes the social contract as binding on those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are yet to be born. Studying the anti-Enlightenment differs from the study of the Enlightenment because traditional conservatives of the Burkean school reject the idea of formulating a theory upon which to base society. Their views can be more accurately characterized as attitudes or dispositions. Social change is possible, but it must reflect the thinking of “the man on the Clapham omnibus.” Thinkers like Burke and Devlin place individuals as subordinate to society and its traditions.”—
[T]his is a misrepresentation – individuals are not ‘subordinate’ to society and its traditions. It’s that man in every era overestimates his ability and insight (dunning-kruger), so the use of intergenerational contract property and exchange limits intertemporal action to the empirical just as contract and property do in the temporal, and prices and property and exchange do in the immediate. British (Anglo Saxons) are empiricists. They have been empiricists for a very long time. Burkean Conservatism (“Conservatism”) is merely the application of EMPIRICISM to all affairs, using time, property, contract, and markets to limit the hubris of the well intentioned, and the evil of the ill intentioned. ALL DOMINANT MALES ARE NATURALLY BURKEAN (CONSERVATIVE): EMPIRICAL.
-
Conservatism Understood as Empiricism: Quote and Counter Explanation
October 13th, 2018 9:31 AM CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD AS EMPIRICISM: QUOTE AND COUNTER EXPLANATION
—“Edmund Burke was an English politician who wrote his Reflections on the Revolution in France to express his disdain for the destructive havoc wrought by the French Revolution. As a traditionalist-conservative, he thinks about social change in a cautious and incremental way and characterizes the social contract as binding on those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are yet to be born. Studying the anti-Enlightenment differs from the study of the Enlightenment because traditional conservatives of the Burkean school reject the idea of formulating a theory upon which to base society. Their views can be more accurately characterized as attitudes or dispositions. Social change is possible, but it must reflect the thinking of “the man on the Clapham omnibus.” Thinkers like Burke and Devlin place individuals as subordinate to society and its traditions.”—
[T]his is a misrepresentation – individuals are not ‘subordinate’ to society and its traditions. It’s that man in every era overestimates his ability and insight (dunning-kruger), so the use of intergenerational contract property and exchange limits intertemporal action to the empirical just as contract and property do in the temporal, and prices and property and exchange do in the immediate. British (Anglo Saxons) are empiricists. They have been empiricists for a very long time. Burkean Conservatism (“Conservatism”) is merely the application of EMPIRICISM to all affairs, using time, property, contract, and markets to limit the hubris of the well intentioned, and the evil of the ill intentioned. ALL DOMINANT MALES ARE NATURALLY BURKEAN (CONSERVATIVE): EMPIRICAL.
-
Those with A History of Slavery and Peasantry Use Feminine Reasoning
October 13th, 2018 4:24 AM THOSE WITH A HISTORY OF SLAVERY AND PEASANTRY USE FEMININE REASONING
—“lots of words, lots of confusion mixed with lots of true facts which are unfortunately unrelated to the topic. It’s all very simple: The essence of Marx and Marxism is economic class. Marx and real Marxists focus on economic class–rich vs. poor, owners vs. employees, etc. Real Marxists call themselves “Marxists”. So-called “cultural Marxists” do not call themselves “cultural Marxists”, and they mainly ignore economic class. They focus instead on everything BESIDES economic class. Their thinking is in many important ways the OPPOSITE of Marxism. It’s very simple. I don’t know why so many people refuse to even acknowledge these basics.”– Illarion B. Bykov
[B]ecause you’re confusing what people intend with what occurs. Instead it matters: 1) What method of argument (sophism, and self deception) 2) Whether they are making true or false claims on true or false premises, 3) What people intend(or claim) vs the operations and consequences that they produce, 4) Whether they are advocating reciprocity and production and eugenics, or proportionality, parasitism, and dysgenics. IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU MEAN. It matters what you do, and the consequences of doing so. and whether you’re advocating theft and dysgenia, or reciprocity and eugenia. 1) People were not oppressed. inferior humans were incrementally domesticated just like all other animals, in the most peaceful way possible: manorialism, criminal prosecution, incompetence in the face of nature, and winter, disease, and war weeding them. And; 2) The classes exist because of competency despite nepotism and regression to the mean, because (a) we are materially different in the distribution of personality traits, and weighted to the bottom without continuous eugenic administration; (b) we are different in utility to one another due to Pareto distribution of ability (ten percent of people do half the work, recursively unto the last person); and (c) man MUST organize by Pareto (power) distributions for the same reason that the Iron Law of Oligarchy exists: decisions must be made from a distribution of coincidences of wants. And; 3) There are only three means of organizing people with those traits: force, remuneration (reward), and ostracization (conformity vs reputation destruction). And; 4) There are only three means of transforming the universe for our use: labor (physical transformation), calculation (numbers, science, etc), organization (priests, managers, executives), and rule (force law violence war). The use of which means of coercion (force/law/truth/science, religion/philosophy/ideology, commerce/law/credit) can be specialized into a monopoly (east), specialized into a market (west), or conflated into a monopoly (egypt, mesopotamia. 5) We do not believe, and the evidence is, marxists-postmodernist-feminists (and the feminine equalitarian mind in general) does not, possess the AGENCY (self awareness) to understand what they do, only what the experience and intuit and therefore seek to justify. It is inconceivable to a masculinist (conservative, aristocracy, meritocracy, reciprocity, loyalty, purity) how much time and effort marxist/postmodernist/feminist/ex-serf/slave (liberal, socialist, equalitarian, proportionality, individualist, devotional, impurist) worries about ‘being left behind’ (equality). Why? The pack can intuit the herd, but the herd can’t intuit the pack. Masculine Great Ape Packs, Female Great Ape Herds. And our minds (brains) are structured (evolved) for each bias. SO YES IT’S SIMPLE: IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT EXCUSES YOU MAKE FOR THE ARGUMENTS, ACTIONS, AND OUTCOMES YOU ADVOCATE.
-
Those with A History of Slavery and Peasantry Use Feminine Reasoning
October 13th, 2018 4:24 AM THOSE WITH A HISTORY OF SLAVERY AND PEASANTRY USE FEMININE REASONING
—“lots of words, lots of confusion mixed with lots of true facts which are unfortunately unrelated to the topic. It’s all very simple: The essence of Marx and Marxism is economic class. Marx and real Marxists focus on economic class–rich vs. poor, owners vs. employees, etc. Real Marxists call themselves “Marxists”. So-called “cultural Marxists” do not call themselves “cultural Marxists”, and they mainly ignore economic class. They focus instead on everything BESIDES economic class. Their thinking is in many important ways the OPPOSITE of Marxism. It’s very simple. I don’t know why so many people refuse to even acknowledge these basics.”– Illarion B. Bykov
[B]ecause you’re confusing what people intend with what occurs. Instead it matters: 1) What method of argument (sophism, and self deception) 2) Whether they are making true or false claims on true or false premises, 3) What people intend(or claim) vs the operations and consequences that they produce, 4) Whether they are advocating reciprocity and production and eugenics, or proportionality, parasitism, and dysgenics. IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU MEAN. It matters what you do, and the consequences of doing so. and whether you’re advocating theft and dysgenia, or reciprocity and eugenia. 1) People were not oppressed. inferior humans were incrementally domesticated just like all other animals, in the most peaceful way possible: manorialism, criminal prosecution, incompetence in the face of nature, and winter, disease, and war weeding them. And; 2) The classes exist because of competency despite nepotism and regression to the mean, because (a) we are materially different in the distribution of personality traits, and weighted to the bottom without continuous eugenic administration; (b) we are different in utility to one another due to Pareto distribution of ability (ten percent of people do half the work, recursively unto the last person); and (c) man MUST organize by Pareto (power) distributions for the same reason that the Iron Law of Oligarchy exists: decisions must be made from a distribution of coincidences of wants. And; 3) There are only three means of organizing people with those traits: force, remuneration (reward), and ostracization (conformity vs reputation destruction). And; 4) There are only three means of transforming the universe for our use: labor (physical transformation), calculation (numbers, science, etc), organization (priests, managers, executives), and rule (force law violence war). The use of which means of coercion (force/law/truth/science, religion/philosophy/ideology, commerce/law/credit) can be specialized into a monopoly (east), specialized into a market (west), or conflated into a monopoly (egypt, mesopotamia. 5) We do not believe, and the evidence is, marxists-postmodernist-feminists (and the feminine equalitarian mind in general) does not, possess the AGENCY (self awareness) to understand what they do, only what the experience and intuit and therefore seek to justify. It is inconceivable to a masculinist (conservative, aristocracy, meritocracy, reciprocity, loyalty, purity) how much time and effort marxist/postmodernist/feminist/ex-serf/slave (liberal, socialist, equalitarian, proportionality, individualist, devotional, impurist) worries about ‘being left behind’ (equality). Why? The pack can intuit the herd, but the herd can’t intuit the pack. Masculine Great Ape Packs, Female Great Ape Herds. And our minds (brains) are structured (evolved) for each bias. SO YES IT’S SIMPLE: IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT EXCUSES YOU MAKE FOR THE ARGUMENTS, ACTIONS, AND OUTCOMES YOU ADVOCATE.
-
The Most Intolerant Will Win
October 12th, 2018 3:45 PM
[A] church or temple is a claim on the norms, traditions, and laws used in a territory. There is no coexistence possible between conflicts. THE MOST INTOLERANT AND BOTTOM WILL WIN.
-
The Most Intolerant Will Win
October 12th, 2018 3:45 PM
[A] church or temple is a claim on the norms, traditions, and laws used in a territory. There is no coexistence possible between conflicts. THE MOST INTOLERANT AND BOTTOM WILL WIN.
-
Prescriptive Conflict
October 12th, 2018 1:07 PM PRESCRIPTIVE CONFLICT by William L. Benge [P]rescriptive Conflict: By describing conflagrations between groups in specific language and explicitly as “prescriptive conflict” we limit the possibility of r’s mis-framing the conflict (lying/ betrayal) midway, to escape reciprocity, and accounts preemptively for their typical “turn” toward the enemy; their switching loyalties for selfish gain; their opening the city gates at midnight for the right price. Simultaneously, this term connotes the polity has exercised positiva to establish sound positions on all relevant matters internally and externally, present, past and future. And balanced this with negativa. Positiva will manifest for outgroup interactions and ingroup legislation of policy. Policy shall form prescriptions, enforced in negativa. Outgroups defiant of these prescriptions enact warfare. Law, therefore, touches nearly all human action, except the required liberty for refinement, ASCENSION of the polity.
-
Prescriptive Conflict
October 12th, 2018 1:07 PM PRESCRIPTIVE CONFLICT by William L. Benge [P]rescriptive Conflict: By describing conflagrations between groups in specific language and explicitly as “prescriptive conflict” we limit the possibility of r’s mis-framing the conflict (lying/ betrayal) midway, to escape reciprocity, and accounts preemptively for their typical “turn” toward the enemy; their switching loyalties for selfish gain; their opening the city gates at midnight for the right price. Simultaneously, this term connotes the polity has exercised positiva to establish sound positions on all relevant matters internally and externally, present, past and future. And balanced this with negativa. Positiva will manifest for outgroup interactions and ingroup legislation of policy. Policy shall form prescriptions, enforced in negativa. Outgroups defiant of these prescriptions enact warfare. Law, therefore, touches nearly all human action, except the required liberty for refinement, ASCENSION of the polity.
-
Acceleration
October 13th, 2018 10:47 AM ACCELERATION By James Santagata I really cannot believe how fast this is all blowing up. The NPC meme is off the f—king charts now! At the same time, fist fights going on all over – just that media is blocking it out. Portland proud boys, american nationalists etc: 20 guys took on 100 antifa and kicked the living s–t out of them Antifas throwing white paint, urine, using sticks and police just sat there. Between that inaction + these “1st amendment audits” where the police at their stations beat anyone with a camera on public sidewalk – despite the supreme court rules okay. Everyone who matters red pilled. Now it is just a matter of scaling and helping people understand what their roles are and how to get immediately actionable training. Even if it is to sit in regular meetings at the govt with shitlibs and morph into a SJW , and record it all on your iphone and leak. NPC is a beautiful meme, because it is a metaphor for gaming BUT also triggers emotional dissociation and dehumanization – and we all know why that is necessary. This is why THE LEFT are sh—ting themselves.