October 14th, 2018 4:53 PM FOUND ON TWITTER omg…
Source: Original Site Post
-
Constant Relations with Reality and Ability
October 14th, 2018 2:48 PM
—“Humans have great agency within certain bounds (space/time/domain). The west was successful because it built a social web of boundaries, that closely aligned one’s freedoms, and responsibilities with one’s ability/agency.”—Dagmar Schmitt
CONSTANT RELATIONS WITH REALITY AND ABILITY
-
“Equality is just a feeling”
October 14th, 2018 4:49 PM
—“I rescued myself from egalitarianism by thinking in OO and really got hooked on your posts bc you where “light years” ahead in the direction I was already independently going. I started telling women who were open that equality is just a feeling… and they agreed.”— Brendan Hegarty
-
Communist Rules for Revolution
October 14th, 2018 2:12 PM FWIW: This is an interpretation of Communist Strategy produced at the end of WW2. We do not in fact know the author. But it was first published in the USA. The fact that communists don’t own up to it, doesn’t mean it isn’t the plan. Like “The Protocols” these are western articulations of the operational objectives of Abrahamic, Communist and now Postmodern and Feminist speech. So “Communist Denialism” of a QUOTE, isn’t the same as the operational description of Communist Tactics spoken in Abrahamic (Sophist) Code. —Communist Rules for Revolution–
Corrupt the young, get them away from religion. Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial. Destroy their ruggedness.
Get control of all means of publicity.
Get people’s minds off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books and other trivialities.
Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance.
Destroy the peopleâs faith in their natural leaders by holding the latter up to contempt, ridicule and obloquy.
Always preach true democracy, but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible.
By encouraging government extravagance, destroy its credit and produce fear of inflation with rising prices and general discontent.
Foment unnecessary strikes in vital industries, encourage civil disorders, and foster a lenient and soft attitude on the part of government toward such disorders.
By specious argument cause the breakdown of the old moral virtues, honesty, sobriety, continence, faith in the pledged word, ruggedness.
Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext, with a view to confiscating them and leaving the populace helpless.
-
—“Who Is a Conservative?”—
October 14th, 2018 3:16 PM —“WHO IS A CONSERVATIVE?”— (From Marginal Revolution) Avoiding the marxist-postmodern love of verbal sophistry: CONSERVATISM CONSISTS IN: – Empiricism as a defense against hubris. – Meritocracy as a defense against hubris. – Private Property as a defense against hubris. – Markets as a defense against hubris. – The common (natural) law of tort as a defense against hubris – The Jury-of-requisite-scale as a defense against hubris. – Late Marriage as a defense against hubris. – Intergenerational lending as a defense against hubris – Taking no action for which one cannot perform restitution(Reversal) as a defense against hubris. – Competition between the Scientific, Legal, Philosophical, and Theological as a defense against hubris. – Small Nation States as a defense against hubris. – Militias as a Defense against Hubris. (That should be enough to get the point across.) Not that Dunning-Kruger’s universal law, or the French Revolution, or all of continental philosophy, or the pseudosciences of Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Adorno; or the innumeracy of the general theory’s change of economics from measurement by balance sheet to measurement by income statement; or the sophisms of Derrida through Rorty and Rawls …. none need explaining to a Conservative. 😉
-
Constant Relations with Reality and Ability
October 14th, 2018 2:48 PM
—“Humans have great agency within certain bounds (space/time/domain). The west was successful because it built a social web of boundaries, that closely aligned one’s freedoms, and responsibilities with one’s ability/agency.”—Dagmar Schmitt
CONSTANT RELATIONS WITH REALITY AND ABILITY
-
Communist Rules for Revolution
October 14th, 2018 2:12 PM FWIW: This is an interpretation of Communist Strategy produced at the end of WW2. We do not in fact know the author. But it was first published in the USA. The fact that communists don’t own up to it, doesn’t mean it isn’t the plan. Like “The Protocols” these are western articulations of the operational objectives of Abrahamic, Communist and now Postmodern and Feminist speech. So “Communist Denialism” of a QUOTE, isn’t the same as the operational description of Communist Tactics spoken in Abrahamic (Sophist) Code. —Communist Rules for Revolution–
Corrupt the young, get them away from religion. Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial. Destroy their ruggedness.
Get control of all means of publicity.
Get people’s minds off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books and other trivialities.
Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance.
Destroy the peopleâs faith in their natural leaders by holding the latter up to contempt, ridicule and obloquy.
Always preach true democracy, but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible.
By encouraging government extravagance, destroy its credit and produce fear of inflation with rising prices and general discontent.
Foment unnecessary strikes in vital industries, encourage civil disorders, and foster a lenient and soft attitude on the part of government toward such disorders.
By specious argument cause the breakdown of the old moral virtues, honesty, sobriety, continence, faith in the pledged word, ruggedness.
Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext, with a view to confiscating them and leaving the populace helpless.
-
Religions need a framework that contain the basics
October 13th, 2018 10:13 AM
—“Do you see a new religion being built through the deliberate design of one or a few people, or something that evolves more organically? I think you’re right in that we have all the pieces (Stoicism, Ancestors, Archetypes etc) they just need to be laundered of any “nonsense” and developed into something that holds together that people can use. I see it as something that would have to evolve over time through a distributed effort, and of course be limited by the criteria of what not to do (via negitiva), if that makes sense.”— Andy Lunn
[R]eligions need a framework that contain the basics, and ‘communicators’ reform the message (narratives) over time.
-
Group Strategy of The Tribes
October 13th, 2018 10:08 AM GROUP STRATEGY OF THE TRIBES [Y]ou don’t understand. [I]slam is a Militial Order of the poor and illiterate tribal alliances, devoting all resources to reproduction and predation thru raiding. Their wisdom literature, is the myth of the expansionary warrior, the raider, and their laws. (Herdsmen, and raiding) [E]uropeanism is a Militial order of the technological, upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction through kinship warriors, creating markets. Our wisdom literature is the law: reciprocity of heroes: conquest of self, man, nature, and the universe. (cattle, hose, and holding the land to feed them, and domesticating beast, land, and man for profit) [S]inism is a bureaucrat order of administrators upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction to administrators, administering their market. Their wisdom literature is literally ‘wisdom literature’ of Sun Tzu, Confucius, Lao Tzu and Mao. The literature of ‘harmony’. (Administering kin for profit). [J]udaism is a reactionary order of pacifist separatists (Female strategy) upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction through teachers, parasitically dependent upon the markets of others. Their wisdom literature is their history and their law – the literature of ‘suffering’. (Sustaining kin through Trade and Moral Hazard) [H]induism (‘The Way of Life”) is the optimum hierarchical social order for the massive poor. It is just defenseless and can afford to be given the isolation of the continent by oceans, mountains, and deserts. Buddhism attempts to reform hinduism but spawns something very different, because it is personal. TRIBAL ORDERS ALL.
-
Conservatism Understood as Empiricism: Quote and Counter Explanation
October 13th, 2018 9:31 AM CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD AS EMPIRICISM: QUOTE AND COUNTER EXPLANATION
—“Edmund Burke was an English politician who wrote his Reflections on the Revolution in France to express his disdain for the destructive havoc wrought by the French Revolution. As a traditionalist-conservative, he thinks about social change in a cautious and incremental way and characterizes the social contract as binding on those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are yet to be born. Studying the anti-Enlightenment differs from the study of the Enlightenment because traditional conservatives of the Burkean school reject the idea of formulating a theory upon which to base society. Their views can be more accurately characterized as attitudes or dispositions. Social change is possible, but it must reflect the thinking of “the man on the Clapham omnibus.” Thinkers like Burke and Devlin place individuals as subordinate to society and its traditions.”—
[T]his is a misrepresentation – individuals are not ‘subordinate’ to society and its traditions. It’s that man in every era overestimates his ability and insight (dunning-kruger), so the use of intergenerational contract property and exchange limits intertemporal action to the empirical just as contract and property do in the temporal, and prices and property and exchange do in the immediate. British (Anglo Saxons) are empiricists. They have been empiricists for a very long time. Burkean Conservatism (“Conservatism”) is merely the application of EMPIRICISM to all affairs, using time, property, contract, and markets to limit the hubris of the well intentioned, and the evil of the ill intentioned. ALL DOMINANT MALES ARE NATURALLY BURKEAN (CONSERVATIVE): EMPIRICAL.