October 17th, 2018 9:54 AM TO ELDERS OF THE BLACK SUN 3 – ARISTOCRACY AND LAW 1) All religions are substitutes for the Initiatic Brotherhood of Warriors. There is no bond as strong – even kin. 2) The right is organized like christian denominations, as a class hierarchy with most literal at the bottom and most allegorical at the top. 3) Aristocratic orders (law) are always and everywhere imposed by Force (violence), and consist of 3.1) Law stated as myth 3.2) Law stated as process 3.3) Law stated as Law. 4) Religion is the cheapest means of TEACHING the Law by indoctrination (repetition). This is why ARISTOCRACY conquerors with violence, and adopts Religions and Priesthood to Rule (morally) and retains Law to Rule (commercially), and retains Violence to Rule (militarily). 5) All religious content contains (a) group evolutionary strategy (method of cultural warfare), (b) normative law, and (c) constitutional law (limitations on the people and the ruler). 6) The western Myth during our ascent was Homer (The Tragedy of Achilles) (Heroic Aristocracy). The semites adopted this and reversed it as the Tragedy of Jesus (victim as hero). Our ascent in the late medieval world was due to the restoration of Aristotle (Power over nature) and restoration of commerce (HRE/Hansa Trade), and rapid expansion (colonialism by sail). The Semites retaliated with The Tragedy of Labor (victim as hero), followed by the revolt against Darwin (The Anti-Nazi Cult – victim as hero). What narrative will compete with them?
Source: Original Site Post
-
To Elders of The Black Sun 3 : Possible Orders
October 17th, 2018 9:46 AM TO ELDERS OF THE BLACK SUN 3 : POSSIBLE ORDERS [O]K, so you are producing sufficient depth of thought so that if you work at it enough you can produce a canon. Organizational charts (prescriptions) are open to implementation the way simple sentimental resonance (Evola) is not. However, all civilizations are organized by law (or more precisely, rules). Islam is ‘easy’ because the rules are so complete, and an imbecile can memorize the myth, and principles through repetition. Christianity was imposed by coercion (literacy), as a market competition between church (nobility) and military (aristocracy). Judaism is used to preserve separatism. Hindu ‘law’ is limited but the mythos vast. Buddhism always and everywhere coexists with a martial or bureaucratic state. Hinduism and Shintoism do not need so much ‘authority’ because of genetic and cultural homogeneity. Christianity was germanicized for the same reason. Orthodoxy and islam exist across less developed (market) peoples (orthodoxy), and islam across both less developed and tribal peoples (constant hostility). We do not succeed with ideal religions. We succeed with religions that solve a problem. What religion will solve the problem of modernity AND ethnocentrism, since ethnocentrism is the optimum organizing method as long as it’s not regressive. Jews survived by parasitism on existing civilizations through profit from moral hazard, accumulating capital, and then using it for more moral hazard, until they were cast out. During that entire time they contributed nothing to humanity (competitiveness) until converted to aristotelianism. In general, either (a) produce a fiction that people want to run to for economic or political reasons (marxism, postmodernism, feminism); (b) produce an economic order that people want to run to for economic reasons; (c) Produce a Myth of Conquest by which a small group of men can take advantage of a weakness in a current order; (d) produce an improvement in a mythos over a homogenous polity that provides greater explanatory power, and greater utility, and greater methods of cooperation in new (current) conditions. There are only three possible incentives in the production of order: Law/Violence, Commerce/Wealth, Cult/Cooperation
-
To Elders of The Black Sun 3 : Evola
October 17th, 2018 9:49 AM TO ELDERS OF THE BLACK SUN 3 : EVOLA [E]vola, like Nietzsche was trying to create a new mythos of criticism. The problem is, that all cults are likewise, cultural warfare against something (others), but provide a positive corpus. The reason we have not solidified an alternative is the lack of a positive corpus (mythos).
-
To Elders of The Black Sun 3 : On Stasis
October 17th, 2018 9:31 AM TO ELDERS OF THE BLACK SUN 3 : ON STASIS 1 – consciousness (awareness) declines as population increases. 2 – ancient orders (as proposed) preserved agrarian stasis, and as such members were enforcers not problem solvers (innovators, competitors). 3 – we no longer live in an era where we can seek stasis and survive (compete against competitors), but in an era where he who adapts fastest wins. It is normal for the human mind to seek an order he comprehends at the expense of the continuous fragility of that order to conquest (christianity, islam, hinduism). The great (powerful) civilizations (China, Carthage, Rome, HRE, British Empire, American Empire imposed legal order (negative) and ritual (continuous reminders of the importance of the order), The weak civilizations collapsed (Arab > Turkic > Now Iranic?, Hindu) only appear powerful because they sat (prior to sail) in the territorial axis of the continents, and could tax the world center of trade because of it. We don’t live in an agrarian (stasis) world any longer. We can, if you want to return to a world population of under 1b, but the people who outnumber us (we are in total less than 700M, and those of us who are conservative a fraction of that) will resist any such thing.
-
To Elders of The Black Sun 3 : Possible Orders
October 17th, 2018 9:46 AM TO ELDERS OF THE BLACK SUN 3 : POSSIBLE ORDERS [O]K, so you are producing sufficient depth of thought so that if you work at it enough you can produce a canon. Organizational charts (prescriptions) are open to implementation the way simple sentimental resonance (Evola) is not. However, all civilizations are organized by law (or more precisely, rules). Islam is ‘easy’ because the rules are so complete, and an imbecile can memorize the myth, and principles through repetition. Christianity was imposed by coercion (literacy), as a market competition between church (nobility) and military (aristocracy). Judaism is used to preserve separatism. Hindu ‘law’ is limited but the mythos vast. Buddhism always and everywhere coexists with a martial or bureaucratic state. Hinduism and Shintoism do not need so much ‘authority’ because of genetic and cultural homogeneity. Christianity was germanicized for the same reason. Orthodoxy and islam exist across less developed (market) peoples (orthodoxy), and islam across both less developed and tribal peoples (constant hostility). We do not succeed with ideal religions. We succeed with religions that solve a problem. What religion will solve the problem of modernity AND ethnocentrism, since ethnocentrism is the optimum organizing method as long as it’s not regressive. Jews survived by parasitism on existing civilizations through profit from moral hazard, accumulating capital, and then using it for more moral hazard, until they were cast out. During that entire time they contributed nothing to humanity (competitiveness) until converted to aristotelianism. In general, either (a) produce a fiction that people want to run to for economic or political reasons (marxism, postmodernism, feminism); (b) produce an economic order that people want to run to for economic reasons; (c) Produce a Myth of Conquest by which a small group of men can take advantage of a weakness in a current order; (d) produce an improvement in a mythos over a homogenous polity that provides greater explanatory power, and greater utility, and greater methods of cooperation in new (current) conditions. There are only three possible incentives in the production of order: Law/Violence, Commerce/Wealth, Cult/Cooperation
-
To Elders of The Black Sun 3 : On Stasis
October 17th, 2018 9:31 AM TO ELDERS OF THE BLACK SUN 3 : ON STASIS 1 – consciousness (awareness) declines as population increases. 2 – ancient orders (as proposed) preserved agrarian stasis, and as such members were enforcers not problem solvers (innovators, competitors). 3 – we no longer live in an era where we can seek stasis and survive (compete against competitors), but in an era where he who adapts fastest wins. It is normal for the human mind to seek an order he comprehends at the expense of the continuous fragility of that order to conquest (christianity, islam, hinduism). The great (powerful) civilizations (China, Carthage, Rome, HRE, British Empire, American Empire imposed legal order (negative) and ritual (continuous reminders of the importance of the order), The weak civilizations collapsed (Arab > Turkic > Now Iranic?, Hindu) only appear powerful because they sat (prior to sail) in the territorial axis of the continents, and could tax the world center of trade because of it. We don’t live in an agrarian (stasis) world any longer. We can, if you want to return to a world population of under 1b, but the people who outnumber us (we are in total less than 700M, and those of us who are conservative a fraction of that) will resist any such thing.
-
Curt: What About Caste Cultures?
October 17th, 2018 12:39 PM CURT: WHAT ABOUT CASTE CULTURES?
—“Genuine question: wasnât that the upside to caste in traditional cultures?”— Jim Yankowsky
[S]ocial orders with Casts prevent people from feeling left behind or of lower status (left out or discarded by the herd) As long as (as in the hindu model, or the western model, or the chinese model) rotation is possible by achievement, absolutely nothing. The west had wild animal (barbarian), slave, serf, freeman, citizen, nobility, aristocracy under agrarianism. At present we have about the same hierarchy but military, commercial, and intellectual are in competition for the body politic (labor and women). SO the hierarchy goes in three directions, rather than one. And the three directions compete (gossip/talk, commerce/trade, law/force). At present the court mediates the market between the directions. The difference with castes is that you are justifying someone’s status by the beneficial function that they serve in society ,a nd preserving defense against outbreeding (downbreeding), and all sorts of ‘democracy’ and its religious equivalents. There is nothing bad about hindu religion at all other than the fact that they are weak, and lack sufficient middle class to produce courts free of familial corruption. I don’t like the silly mystical stuff. But that aside it’s a good system. Islam is the worst of all possible worlds. Equalitarian ignorance with mandated hostile aggression to perform consumption on the capital of other civilizations.
-
Who Owns Their Soul (intuitions and Scripts)
October 17th, 2018 12:27 PM WHO OWNS THEIR SOUL (INTUITIONS AND SCRIPTS) by Nick Heywood
—“I mean, judaism christianity and islam all but outright manufacture ignorance and deceit.—CD
From a higher cognitive position, yes. But the [less able, those lacking agency] don’t know that! They can’t get past their #npc’ness. [Lack of ability and agency] In fact, That’s a Good! #NPC’s are needed. The problem is, who owns (produces) their soul (instincts and scripts)?
-
Curt: What About Caste Cultures?
October 17th, 2018 12:39 PM CURT: WHAT ABOUT CASTE CULTURES?
—“Genuine question: wasnât that the upside to caste in traditional cultures?”— Jim Yankowsky
[S]ocial orders with Casts prevent people from feeling left behind or of lower status (left out or discarded by the herd) As long as (as in the hindu model, or the western model, or the chinese model) rotation is possible by achievement, absolutely nothing. The west had wild animal (barbarian), slave, serf, freeman, citizen, nobility, aristocracy under agrarianism. At present we have about the same hierarchy but military, commercial, and intellectual are in competition for the body politic (labor and women). SO the hierarchy goes in three directions, rather than one. And the three directions compete (gossip/talk, commerce/trade, law/force). At present the court mediates the market between the directions. The difference with castes is that you are justifying someone’s status by the beneficial function that they serve in society ,a nd preserving defense against outbreeding (downbreeding), and all sorts of ‘democracy’ and its religious equivalents. There is nothing bad about hindu religion at all other than the fact that they are weak, and lack sufficient middle class to produce courts free of familial corruption. I don’t like the silly mystical stuff. But that aside it’s a good system. Islam is the worst of all possible worlds. Equalitarian ignorance with mandated hostile aggression to perform consumption on the capital of other civilizations.
-
Three Generations of European vs West Asian Conflict
October 17th, 2018 12:03 PM THREE GENERATIONS OF EUROPEAN VS WEST ASIAN CONFLICT1) Generation One: …. Supernatural Religion of the weak) …. …. WAS to …. Aryanism (the strong) …. AS 2) Generation Two: …..Abrahamic Monotheism …. …. WAS to …. Greco-Roman Science, Philosophy, and Law …. AS 3) Generation Three: …. Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism …. …. ARE to …. Locke/Smith/Hume + …. Maxwell/Darwin/Menger/Spencer/Nietzsche PROPERTARIANISM IS THE CURE.