Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Japan and Face

    October 30th, 2018 8:29 AM

    —“I lived in Japan for five years. Pet peeve. Face is a weak male pretending to be dominant. Only weak males give a shit about face.—Richard Nikoley

    [W]estern civilization is heroic (and we are the subject of worldwide ridicule for it.) Honor (telling truth regardless of the consequences) is our promise we are NOT weak. And because we are not weak, peers rather than subjects. We pay a high cost to create the high trust society we live in, and we actively suppress ‘the weak’, their parasitism, their behavior, and reproduction because of it.

  • The Grammar Used Tells You Everything About the Argument Used.

    October 30th, 2018 10:07 AM IT’S NOT COMPLICATED:

    Law       (Science)............= Testimony (Measurements)
Philosophy(Rationalism)........= Excuse    (Justifications)
Theology  (Fictionalism).......= Fiction   (Deception)

    The Grammar Used Tells You Everything About The Argument Used.

  • Theists and Their Permanent Totalitarianism

    THEISTS AND THEIR PERMANENT TOTALITARIANISM by @Goran Dahl [T]here is one word that theists and occultists in general hate above all other words in the entire world, and that word is “evidence”. When they see this word, they are appalled and provoked. How can someone not believe in their religion or the esoteric? How can someone read their religious texts and not take their word for it? Before you know it, they let out a resounding shriek: “Fedora!”, soon to be followed by “Scientism!” – as if they knew what that meant. They are all predictable; not one of them differs from the other in the least. Theists will never be pleased with you until you subscribe to their ways unconditionally. Nobody in the so-called alt-right is even remotely as dangerous as the theists, because if they could, they would relegate us back to the Middle Ages and beyond.

  • Idiot Report

    October 30th, 2018 9:42 AM TUESDAY MORNING IDIOT REPORT

    —“When you put it in all caps.. .it is much more convincing.”—Brandon Zicha

    Don’t be an ass. The Formatting of Posts https://propertarianinstitute.com/…/23/the-formatting-of-posts/ (Link To “Formatting Posts”:how I format posts for readability)

    —“How could anyone think this was a cult?”–Brandon Zicha

    [I] dunno how formatting posts in lieu of font size, bold, and italic has anything to do with a cult rather than increasing readability. How could anyone be stupid enough to make that accusation? How could anyone be stupid enough refer to formatting over content? How could anyone be stupid enough to come to my page and demonstrate he’s that overwhelmingly stupid?

  • Curt, What is your taste in music?

    October 30th, 2018 9:05 AM

    —“Curt, What is your taste in music?”—

    Not sure why it matters, but prog-indi-alt-rock-grunge-metal. https://www.facebook.com/notes/curt-doolittle/wiki-alt-rock-and-metal-quick-references/10151991065721103/ (“Note: music is an unimportant part of my life except when I’m driving. I don’t listen to music unless I’m relaxing, and that’s a very infrequent thing. Work <-> Eat <-> Sleep is pretty much what I do. And if it is possible to assimilate information then I do so, rather than ‘relax’.)

  • Theists and Their Permanent Totalitarianism

    THEISTS AND THEIR PERMANENT TOTALITARIANISM by @Goran Dahl [T]here is one word that theists and occultists in general hate above all other words in the entire world, and that word is “evidence”. When they see this word, they are appalled and provoked. How can someone not believe in their religion or the esoteric? How can someone read their religious texts and not take their word for it? Before you know it, they let out a resounding shriek: “Fedora!”, soon to be followed by “Scientism!” – as if they knew what that meant. They are all predictable; not one of them differs from the other in the least. Theists will never be pleased with you until you subscribe to their ways unconditionally. Nobody in the so-called alt-right is even remotely as dangerous as the theists, because if they could, they would relegate us back to the Middle Ages and beyond.

  • Again, All Stereotypes Are True

    October 30th, 2018 12:55 PM AGAIN, ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE

    First Impressions of Personality Traits From Body Shapes Ying Hu, Connor J. Parde, Matthew Q. Hill, … First Published October 22, 2018 Research Article https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618799300 https://t.co/zCti4BNwcT Abstract People infer the personalities of others from their facial appearance. Whether they do so from body shapes is less studied. We explored personality inferences made from body shapes. Participants rated personality traits for male and female bodies generated with a three-dimensional body model. Multivariate spaces created from these ratings indicated that people evaluate bodies on valence and agency in ways that directly contrast positive and negative traits from the Big Five domains. Body-trait stereotypes based on the trait ratings revealed a myriad of diverse body shapes that typify individual traits. Personality-trait profiles were predicted reliably from a subset of the body-shape features used to specify the three-dimensional bodies. Body features related to extraversion and conscientiousness were predicted with the highest consensus, followed by openness traits. This study provides the first comprehensive look at the range, diversity, and reliability of personality inferences that people make from body shapes.

  • Joslin Demonstrates The Argument

    October 30th, 2018 12:24 PM by Bill Joslin [T]ruth, as a semantic axiom, with limitless constellations of interpretive frames. Correspondence presumes an existential frame. An existential frame provides a means of checking and vetting outside of the presumptions of the context one might bring to an assertion – that being testability of its existence. This testability then defines the methodology. The methodology then presumes the existential frame and uses said method to update the interpretive frame. By doing so a feedback between interpretation, methodology occurs and is measured by existence (what can be measured or observed – and how) this allows both the interpretive frame and methodology to be updated (both are provisional). This affords the most robust means of coherence to truth (small ‘t’ truth) in the context of truth as a semantic axiom i.e truthful and honest reporting. (CD: when you can understand and make that argument on your own, ” you are there “.

  • Curt, What Do You Mean by Common Law and Tort Law

    October 30th, 2018 12:19 PM —“CURT, WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY COMMON LAW AND TORT LAW AND HOW ARE THEY RELATED.”— [O]K. Um I’m talking about the common law in the old sense as ‘the traditional law’ which consists of sovereignty and tort. In both UK and USA ‘common law’ often includes legislation that violates sovereignty and tort. In my work I make a clear distinction between the one law (reciprocity) common law (findings of the court), legislative law (improving or undermining the common law and the one law) and regulation (enforcement of legislative law whether it improves or undermines the common law and the one law) I refer to tort when I want to remind people that legislation and regulation do not necessarily (and often do not) preserve our natural, customary, traditional, rule of law by findings of law. The legislature’s original purpose was to choose whether the monarchy’s demand for the population to bear costs was acceptable to the regions,the warriors, the militia, and sometimes out of pragmatism) to the people. The ‘enlightenment’ took the power of commons choice out of the hands of the monarchy and put it into the republic (elected representatives, and the peerage (local governors)). The marxist and social democratic movement reversed our civilization by expanding the commons such that they violated our underlying natural law of reciprocity, in favor of the rest of humanity’s underclass demand for proportionality, and upon receiving proportionality, the political and underclass demand for equality of outcome. So, great question.

  • Again, All Stereotypes Are True

    October 30th, 2018 12:55 PM AGAIN, ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE

    First Impressions of Personality Traits From Body Shapes Ying Hu, Connor J. Parde, Matthew Q. Hill, … First Published October 22, 2018 Research Article https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618799300 https://t.co/zCti4BNwcT Abstract People infer the personalities of others from their facial appearance. Whether they do so from body shapes is less studied. We explored personality inferences made from body shapes. Participants rated personality traits for male and female bodies generated with a three-dimensional body model. Multivariate spaces created from these ratings indicated that people evaluate bodies on valence and agency in ways that directly contrast positive and negative traits from the Big Five domains. Body-trait stereotypes based on the trait ratings revealed a myriad of diverse body shapes that typify individual traits. Personality-trait profiles were predicted reliably from a subset of the body-shape features used to specify the three-dimensional bodies. Body features related to extraversion and conscientiousness were predicted with the highest consensus, followed by openness traits. This study provides the first comprehensive look at the range, diversity, and reliability of personality inferences that people make from body shapes.