Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Translating Left Speech

    by Ely Harman

    —“Blah blah blah…”—

    Translation: “I’m at the bottom of the ability distribution and I’m worried about being left behind and envious of the people on top. For that reason I will simply disagree, deny, and derail no matter what you say…”

  • You can learn how to ‘operate humans’ in one year.

    (FB Timestamp) [Y]ou can learn the three fundamental models of project management, basic accounting, basic contract law, and micro economics (incentives), in a single course in about a year, and be good at all of those in two. If you can write a contract, run a project, manage the finances, and understand incentives of everyone involved you know the plumbing of the entire world system. Everything else is the craft you employ under that model, and your dress, manners, diction, vocabulary, hygiene, and how much of an ass you are (or not). It’s not difficult to be competent.

  • “How much different things could be with a Propertarian law school curriculum.”

    by Daniel Roland Anderson [Y]ou know Curt, as I’ve been ruminating on this issue for the last year (I can’t believe Ive been following you that long already!), and I find myself becoming frustrated and angry at how much different things could be with a Propertarian law school curriculum. And I’ll bet the results would be highly durable, because the longer you went, the more naturally things would flow. The civil court case load would drop drastically I think. And the vastly more predictable results would make it much less likely that parties would take their cases to court, because any Propertarian lawyer would be able to tell his client very quickly what is likely to happen. (CD: made my month … ’cause EXACTLY.)

  • Ok. We Are Here. Npr Is Talking About Revolution

    October 31st, 2018 5:56 PM [T]his is worth a video, but in short, when I said in 06, the correction would happen in 08, recover by 14, tinker along till 17, and that we would have a revolution by 2020 to 2025 at the latest, I was correct. Why? Because DEMOGRAPHICS IS DESTINY: Demographic outcomes are deterministic. While it’s true that the left are NPC’s, it’s also true that the right is empirical. But without a THEORETICAL basis of social science to PREDICT, alter, and adapt to outcomes, one lacks agency. So when I started out and said: 1) we are going to have a revolution 2) nothing can stop it. 3) all we can do is control it. 4) the optimum means of controlling it is to provide a plan 5) that plan needs to provide sufficient incentives that the majority of the population will not RESIST. 6) because they won’t resist if the obtain material, emotional, and intellectual, rewards. 7) And because we have removed the ‘doubt’ (uncertainty) as to the function of a polity after that revolution. 8) And to provide greater fear of uncertainty due to revolutionary chaos if they DO resist. I wasn’t wrong before, I haven’t been wrong so far, and I won’t be wrong in the future. Cheers

  • Rahim Makes Tells the Story so That I Don’t Have To:

    October 31st, 2018 2:10 PM RAHIM MAKES TELLS THE STORY SO THAT I DON’T HAVE TO: The Weaponization of the Commons as means of FUNDING the KNIGHTS. Rahim Taghizadegan, Why Are Western Europens So Naive (PFS 2018) http://propertyandfreedom.org/2018/10/rahim-taghizadegan-why-are-western-europens-so-naive-pfs-2018/

  • LONG (3HR TALK) with DYLAN THOMAS, JOSH AND DICK

    October 31st, 2018 1:21 PM [T]hey ‘get it right’ in the beginning, then go sideways. They invite me in after the first hour? Somewhere in there. And then we have a pretty good and helpful discussion for everyone. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6I0lLmRtwg0&feature=youtu.be

  • Incremental Suppression.

    Incremental Suppression. Everyone wants to preserve their way of deceit in the current era. Just as people wanted to preserve their way of fraud in the recent era. Just as people wanted to preserve their way of violence in the prior era. Just as people wanted to preserve their way of theft in the previous era. Just as people wanted to preserve their way of murder in the previous era. Just because  you don’t want to give up your cherished falsehoods, doesn’t mean it’s  not good for you and every ne else to do so.    

  • Ok. We Are Here. Npr Is Talking About Revolution

    October 31st, 2018 5:56 PM [T]his is worth a video, but in short, when I said in 06, the correction would happen in 08, recover by 14, tinker along till 17, and that we would have a revolution by 2020 to 2025 at the latest, I was correct. Why? Because DEMOGRAPHICS IS DESTINY: Demographic outcomes are deterministic. While it’s true that the left are NPC’s, it’s also true that the right is empirical. But without a THEORETICAL basis of social science to PREDICT, alter, and adapt to outcomes, one lacks agency. So when I started out and said: 1) we are going to have a revolution 2) nothing can stop it. 3) all we can do is control it. 4) the optimum means of controlling it is to provide a plan 5) that plan needs to provide sufficient incentives that the majority of the population will not RESIST. 6) because they won’t resist if the obtain material, emotional, and intellectual, rewards. 7) And because we have removed the ‘doubt’ (uncertainty) as to the function of a polity after that revolution. 8) And to provide greater fear of uncertainty due to revolutionary chaos if they DO resist. I wasn’t wrong before, I haven’t been wrong so far, and I won’t be wrong in the future. Cheers

  • Under nationalism we love one another

    October 31st, 2018 9:47 AM [U]nder nationalism we love one another despite our differences because costs of kinship domestication, rule, management, and evolution are under each of our controls – and as such we are all equal. Under globalism we merey restore the barbarism, tribalism of the middle east, and export those costs upon one another, and in doing so make us universal enemies rather than universal allies. We are all equal only in conflict and poverty.

  • Rahim Makes Tells the Story so That I Don’t Have To:

    October 31st, 2018 2:10 PM RAHIM MAKES TELLS THE STORY SO THAT I DON’T HAVE TO: The Weaponization of the Commons as means of FUNDING the KNIGHTS. Rahim Taghizadegan, Why Are Western Europens So Naive (PFS 2018) http://propertyandfreedom.org/2018/10/rahim-taghizadegan-why-are-western-europens-so-naive-pfs-2018/