Source: Original Site Post

  • Learning via King of The Hill

    —“You have some deep rooted narcissism;”—Nicholas

    [Y]ou clearly haven’t followed me long enough to understand the game. The person doing this job, the person I am as a CEO, the person I am in discourse, and the person I am among family and friends are quite different people. My job is to play king of the hill and bait men to try to take me down. This is how men learn best. It is the method of professing, teaching, debating that is the least affected by norm, signaling, and pretense. It is how men can and should be taught. Those that can’t learn as men – I understand. But if they can’t they are of no use as judges.

  • Learning via King of The Hill

    —“You have some deep rooted narcissism;”—Nicholas

    [Y]ou clearly haven’t followed me long enough to understand the game. The person doing this job, the person I am as a CEO, the person I am in discourse, and the person I am among family and friends are quite different people. My job is to play king of the hill and bait men to try to take me down. This is how men learn best. It is the method of professing, teaching, debating that is the least affected by norm, signaling, and pretense. It is how men can and should be taught. Those that can’t learn as men – I understand. But if they can’t they are of no use as judges.

  • The reach-cost is higher than the reach-value. But yes

    The reach-cost is higher than the reach-value. But yes.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-16 21:13:20 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/9082160041278008

  • No We Don’t. We Don’t Need You. We Don’t Want You – At All

    2018-11-13 T 11:39:57

    —“…you need us…”— the left

    No we don’t. We don’t need you. We don’t WANT YOU – AT ALL. You are disgusting. Really. You ruin everything. Our neighborhoods, our schools, our city streets, our workplaces, our public buildings and parks, our history, our academy, our governments, our religion, our festivals, are armies, or civic order, even our gene pool… .. I mean…. you’re just bad, disgusting, primitive people. We don’t want you. You are like locusts that consume everything beautiful. You are a plague against our people, our civilization, and the efforts of our ancestors. So no. We don’t need you. You have no value. You are more than a cost, you are a disease. Civilizations prosper most by getting rid of the underclass through harsh prosecution, harsher winter starvation, and the harshest possible taxation. And the fewer of you the better for us and for the planet, and for the future of mankind. You are a living breathing waste of the planet’s mankind’s and the universe’s potential.

  • No We Don’t. We Don’t Need You. We Don’t Want You – At All

    2018-11-13 T 11:39:57

    —“…you need us…”— the left

    No we don’t. We don’t need you. We don’t WANT YOU – AT ALL. You are disgusting. Really. You ruin everything. Our neighborhoods, our schools, our city streets, our workplaces, our public buildings and parks, our history, our academy, our governments, our religion, our festivals, are armies, or civic order, even our gene pool… .. I mean…. you’re just bad, disgusting, primitive people. We don’t want you. You are like locusts that consume everything beautiful. You are a plague against our people, our civilization, and the efforts of our ancestors. So no. We don’t need you. You have no value. You are more than a cost, you are a disease. Civilizations prosper most by getting rid of the underclass through harsh prosecution, harsher winter starvation, and the harshest possible taxation. And the fewer of you the better for us and for the planet, and for the future of mankind. You are a living breathing waste of the planet’s mankind’s and the universe’s potential.

  • The underclass is so because of low sexual, social, economic, political, and mil

    The underclass is so because of low sexual, social, economic, political, and military value. We hung them in droves before women had the right to vote. But having the right to vote, women did what they always do….


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 12:25:03 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/9044430340880426

  • I want a platform where I can openly discuss a revolution to restore the constit

    I want a platform where I can openly discuss a revolution to restore the constitution. On what platform is that possible?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 01:43:33 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/9040581340850338

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE NORMAL WORLD VS THE ABNORMAL HIGH TRUST WEST —“Japanese are basically as irreciprocal and asymmetric as jews – but with a twist. In that, while they don’t like cheating, defrauding, lying, and stealing, etc. that would cause retaliation, they are always asking the question “is it good for japan?” the way jews ask “is it good for jews?” India does that too – the question is always “is it good for india? And they are very clear on ingroup vs outgroup in everything – and not just race, but family. There are different pronouns for things like mother, father, our company, your company, etc. depending on how you are talking to and your relative position. The Vietnamese language is same way. In vietnam its blatantly clear that everything inside is from your fathers side: patriarchy.”– James

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Studying legal papers and theory you quickly learn that law is ignorant of economics and scale. You learn that the problems lawyers and the courts face are problems of economics and scale. You learn that they are trying to solve a social science problem with a crude instrument that changes slowly. Jurist and Lawyers have seen the atomic but not the aggregate. and so it creates a kind of disciplinary blindness. The problem with the profession is that while we have common and continental law, we have lost or only just discovered natural tort law, which solves problems of juridical decision making, where conflating the law with legislation and regulation and to some degree command, create all those problems of interpretation.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    When I negotiate in a hostile environment I take the position of holding the moral high ground and ‘stay on message’ creating evidence of a narrative of holding the moral high ground. Most of the time we are punished or sued for honest errors, and get away with our most dishonest and immoral plans. The secret of legal success is holding the moral high ground and betting that the jury will side with you for doing so. I usually go all in and risk the jury. When my peers (board) disagree with me, they lose. Always. I never do a deal where I think I might get sued where I can’t construct a narrative of holding the moral high ground. And the secret is … largely, because you always try to actually do so. its simply the optimum business strategy. There will always be people who think your errors are plans, and don’t see the immoral plans you either did or didn’t take. But build a reputation for never surrendering, favoring litigation, and holding the high ground and it works.