(FB 1550690335 Timestamp) WHAT IS THE PURPOSE? —“Interesting. What do you think is the purpose of religion?”—@HHBenedictXVII The training of intuition by Myth, Ritual, and Repetition which as a consequence produces interpersonal Regularity and personal Mindfulness, by reduction of need for comprehension of increasingly complex information where we have increasing limits to agency, in complex polities. Hence the distribution of religiosity vs rationality by intelligence and agency. Humans, esp women, have vulnerability to neuroticism (‘worry’, stress) if they lack agency. Intelligence provides agency. Religiosity decreases. Moral behavior remains constant.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550674797 Timestamp) TRICKS IN MATH, TEXT …. AND LAW by JWarren Prescott My wife and I have had this conversation several times. Being both electrical engineers we are used to not just regular college level maths, but engineering maths. The first thing we say when we see these internet âmath problemsâ is they are written either wrongly or purposefully to confuse. Many times there may be two answers due to this obfuscation and ideally, this is supposed to lead someone to say, âWait, what is really being asked here? What actual or physical problem is trying to be solved?â Because if all you have is a disembodied equation with no practical application and the parameters are ill defined, then there is no perceived difference between deception and incompetence. Think about this and how our current legal system is written.
-
(FB 1550687130 Timestamp) —âTEACHING AS TRUE BY LAW RATHER THAN TRUE BY FAIT
(FB 1550687130 Timestamp) —âTEACHING AS TRUE BY LAW RATHER THAN TRUE BY FAITHâ— CLARIFICATION Over the past few weeks I have been trying to find a means of limiting abrahamic means of false promise, baiting into moral hazard, and pilpul and critique, from application outside of christian doctrine, thereby ending the ability to pursue marxism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism and other application of abrahamic persuasion (deceit) in the ongoing war against our people by the globalists (mostly semites and their allies). The solutions were either prohibit, gain compromise, or give compromise, which is the ancient one that faced the romans when attempting to bring the jews into the empire. The ‘give compromise’ is an exchange: “spiritual is true by faith, and material is true by law”. This frustrates both parties a bit but is the only truly reciprocal exchange under the law. And it works for christianity alone because the law also requires compatibility with natural law. Judaism and Islam as well as marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism are not compatible with the law. So the remaining challenge is just to define christianity as some set of existing sects sharing some long standing tradition, limited to compliance with natural law AND the demarcation between the spiritual faith and the material law. I felt it was not possible even to achieve this compromise, so it was better to state the law as the law, and grant christians a specific license under the law. The exchange gives christianity peerage with the law. The exemption gives it permission under the law. And legal scholars will have to debate these things for centuries – because I cannot close the loophole of truthful speech because of the christian demand for identity between truth and myth. So that is where I ended up. To avoid the question by specific license rather than compromising on the question as a difference between faith and law. -Curt
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550672089 Timestamp) —“Can anyone explain what separates @curtdoolittleâs view of Christianity from someone like Jeffersonâs? âJesus just wants you to love your neighbor. All the miracle stuff is sugar coating to help the medicine go down.â Itâs the oldest most milquetoast view ever.”— @HHBenedictXVII It doesn’t matter. I attempted to discover a means of legal tolerance of christianity with intolerance for other religions and it’s not possible because christians really do need their “woo woo”.The founders were Deists, and Jefferson (like me) saw Jesus as primitive philosopher. Because of demographics, and incentives, Xianity will continue to die off with each generation, resulting in the Benedict Option, leaving around a quarter of the population devout, but politically and economically powerless, while the rest continue with political and material rather than supernatural means of mindfulness. By demanding their ideal, being unwilling to compromise with secularists, and by being unwilling to use islamic levels of violence, Xians are done. Because it is a philosophy of the weak. Aryanism under the ‘excuse’ of Xianity was how our aristocracy ruled. w/o Aryans, no Xians. PEOPLE FOLLOW INCENTIVES NOT SHOULDS. It is possible to license christianity because of its adherence to natural law under the scholastics. It is not possible to license christianity if we tell people the dogma is ‘true’ rather than inspirational mythology. Ergo it is only possible to grant christianity special dispensation under the law. This is unacceptable for the devout because they cannot and do not hold to their faith in competition with truth, science, and law despite their claims to strong faith. The christian cannot tolerate separation between faith and truth because his faith is not strong enough to carry him. To the contrary. the truthful can tolerate the faithful when it comes to the commons in which they must act, when action in accordance with existential reality is always in their interests. There is no difference between Propertarian Natural Law, Moral Intuition, and Christian Morality EXCEPT that christians must show their devotion to this morality by lying (belief in nonsense) and the rest of us show our devotion to this morality simply by NOT LYING. I’m done with the trial run. It’s really, really, obvious that Xians demonstrate addiction responses to threats to their source of mindfulness (medication). And given the current state of xianity as not sufficiently desperate to compromise, while at the same time we are invaded by aliens, and under increasing rule by parasites, it appears that christians are the limiting factor on reform.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550686043 Timestamp) No man has any rights over any other, except in the group’s righthing of a wrong before the jury. “The Rights of Anglo Saxons”. A man has duty to a landholder (sovereign), in exchange for land and service. This is the meaning of ‘sovereignty’. It is not ‘individualism’. It is SOVEREIGNTY.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550685529 Timestamp) WE PLAN ON CONTINUOUSLY ROLLING COURSES – AT LEAST THE CORE ONES…. —“Hi Curt, I’ve taken a look at the website and am very keen on the courses available. Propertarianism is essential. Unfortunately I am way too busy with the final year of my degree and British politics at the moment. Will the opportunity to join classes roll over continuously, or is there a set window? Thanks”—, Reece Oh yes. Of course. It’s continuous as long as we hae someone willing to run the course, answer questions, and grade assignments. Courses need a minimum number of students in order for the instructor to have it worth his time, and students need each other to dialog with. We start this coming week on the law (provided I don’t have any crisis that delays me a day or two… lol )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550683824 Timestamp) FRIENDS: Assistance pls. Via PM or email (not public), need mailing address for:
- Jared Howe
- Distribut(ist?)
- NWG(Josh?)
- And my “stalker”
( Just for letters, not immediate action. Don’t do substantial work. Just help us save some time if you can. )
-
(FB 1550678219 Timestamp) Very Smart Strategy…. very smart
(FB 1550678219 Timestamp) Very Smart Strategy…. very smart.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550783269 Timestamp) —“The difference between repressing a thought and dismissing It is the level of confidence in your own agency”—Gunther Traffinstead well done.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550775965 Timestamp) GO GET YOUR OWN LEADER OR BECOME ONE YOURSELF. Let me help you. I don’t want to ‘lead’. Especially losers. I want to provide a solution. I want to arm people with possibility. I want leadership to emerge by attracting talent to the solution. I want our people to win. And it won’t be ANYONE on the alt right that emerges. OK? NO ONE. NEVER HAPPEN. EVER. Getting alt-righters what they want as working class men and leading the alt right are contradictory propositions. I’m in it for the little guy. They guy with a job, a family, and who is being fked by the Cathedral complex. And for our people’s persistence. I don’t need to be inspiring. I don’t seek to be. I need to manufacture a weapon that will work. And I need people to not cause damage to that weapon through stupidity, ignorance, arrogance, and signaling. And I’ve led most of my life thanks. The only reason I end up leading is if everyone better than I am fails. So stop trying to make me a cult leader, OR insult me for NOT being a cult leader. Because you do both. Which is ironic. I am either not a cult leader and therefore not good, or a cult leader and therefore bad. When the fact is I am an educator and solution provider, and that is all. What you mean is, you want me to carry your water. Because you can’t. I’ve done the engineering. You need to do the work. But your bullshit just hurts you. Not me. I can’t lose. The worst that happens to me is I produce a Tome that will bear my name for years, while I enjoy what remains of my life. The worst that happens to you is exactly what you fear. -cheers