(FB 1550668909 Timestamp) Rothbard (Jewish Pale) and Hoppe (German Free Cities) via positiva, via rationalism. Doolittle(Rights of Englishmen) via negativa, via empiricism. Construct a value system by appeal(RH), or prohibit an anti-value system with violence (D). Inspiration and indoctrination (RH) vs prohibition and market for prosecution(D). Unlimited suppression of parasitic behavior that generates retaliation (D), suppression limited to intersubjectively verifiable property (RH). Suppression of blackmail, defamation, public sophism, supernaturalism pseudoscience( marxism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism). Doolittle: existential survivable without imperial protection, vs Rothbard and Hoppe: dependent, non existential without imperial protection. Doolittle: demonstrated, vs Rothbard and Hoppe: not demonstrated, not modelable, not survivable under competition. RH not possible due to praxeological incentives, and D possible because of praxeological testable incentives. No RH community can form or survive market for polities without parasitic dependence upon an empire because of insufficient incentives for defense and production of commons and their resulting multipliers in competition with free riders. vs Any D community can survive in the market for polities because it does not depend upon an external empire because of sufficient incentives for defense and production of commons and their resulting multipliers in competition with free riders. Crusoe’s island depends upon the ‘free’ protection of a vast ocean. The ghetto depends upon the host city or state. And the Free Cities, The Pale (european wildlands), The American/Australian wildlands, and Iceland/Greenland – all depend upon the host empire, and are economically subsidized by lack of political competition, and the availability of cheap and settleable land. The ghetto ethics of the jews and being exterminated for it on a regular basis versus the high trust ethics of the people who dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance superstition poverty starvation disease hard labor early death…. and the quality of life that people seek despite the costs of commons required to do so. ie: RH consists of pretense that ‘children’ polities, subsidized by parents, can compete against adult polities on their own merits in competition by military, political, economic, religious, demographic, warfare that never ends.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550592348 Timestamp) (Giego Caleiro unblocked upon request despite my better judgement)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550691102 Timestamp) YOUR JOB (THE GOOD) VS MY JOB (THE TRUE) Your job is ‘inspiring, good and preferable’, Mine is ‘False, Un-testifiable, and Ir-reciprocal’. Anything that is not false, testifiable, and reciprocal is by definition not open to interference from the law. Your job is the via positiva market for goods, services, and information, and my job is the via negativa market for prosecution of the imposition of costs against the demonstrated interests of others.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550674797 Timestamp) TRICKS IN MATH, TEXT …. AND LAW by JWarren Prescott My wife and I have had this conversation several times. Being both electrical engineers we are used to not just regular college level maths, but engineering maths. The first thing we say when we see these internet âmath problemsâ is they are written either wrongly or purposefully to confuse. Many times there may be two answers due to this obfuscation and ideally, this is supposed to lead someone to say, âWait, what is really being asked here? What actual or physical problem is trying to be solved?â Because if all you have is a disembodied equation with no practical application and the parameters are ill defined, then there is no perceived difference between deception and incompetence. Think about this and how our current legal system is written.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550690335 Timestamp) WHAT IS THE PURPOSE? —“Interesting. What do you think is the purpose of religion?”—@HHBenedictXVII The training of intuition by Myth, Ritual, and Repetition which as a consequence produces interpersonal Regularity and personal Mindfulness, by reduction of need for comprehension of increasingly complex information where we have increasing limits to agency, in complex polities. Hence the distribution of religiosity vs rationality by intelligence and agency. Humans, esp women, have vulnerability to neuroticism (‘worry’, stress) if they lack agency. Intelligence provides agency. Religiosity decreases. Moral behavior remains constant.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550672089 Timestamp) —“Can anyone explain what separates @curtdoolittleâs view of Christianity from someone like Jeffersonâs? âJesus just wants you to love your neighbor. All the miracle stuff is sugar coating to help the medicine go down.â Itâs the oldest most milquetoast view ever.”— @HHBenedictXVII It doesn’t matter. I attempted to discover a means of legal tolerance of christianity with intolerance for other religions and it’s not possible because christians really do need their “woo woo”.The founders were Deists, and Jefferson (like me) saw Jesus as primitive philosopher. Because of demographics, and incentives, Xianity will continue to die off with each generation, resulting in the Benedict Option, leaving around a quarter of the population devout, but politically and economically powerless, while the rest continue with political and material rather than supernatural means of mindfulness. By demanding their ideal, being unwilling to compromise with secularists, and by being unwilling to use islamic levels of violence, Xians are done. Because it is a philosophy of the weak. Aryanism under the ‘excuse’ of Xianity was how our aristocracy ruled. w/o Aryans, no Xians. PEOPLE FOLLOW INCENTIVES NOT SHOULDS. It is possible to license christianity because of its adherence to natural law under the scholastics. It is not possible to license christianity if we tell people the dogma is ‘true’ rather than inspirational mythology. Ergo it is only possible to grant christianity special dispensation under the law. This is unacceptable for the devout because they cannot and do not hold to their faith in competition with truth, science, and law despite their claims to strong faith. The christian cannot tolerate separation between faith and truth because his faith is not strong enough to carry him. To the contrary. the truthful can tolerate the faithful when it comes to the commons in which they must act, when action in accordance with existential reality is always in their interests. There is no difference between Propertarian Natural Law, Moral Intuition, and Christian Morality EXCEPT that christians must show their devotion to this morality by lying (belief in nonsense) and the rest of us show our devotion to this morality simply by NOT LYING. I’m done with the trial run. It’s really, really, obvious that Xians demonstrate addiction responses to threats to their source of mindfulness (medication). And given the current state of xianity as not sufficiently desperate to compromise, while at the same time we are invaded by aliens, and under increasing rule by parasites, it appears that christians are the limiting factor on reform.
-
(FB 1550687130 Timestamp) —âTEACHING AS TRUE BY LAW RATHER THAN TRUE BY FAIT
(FB 1550687130 Timestamp) —âTEACHING AS TRUE BY LAW RATHER THAN TRUE BY FAITHâ— CLARIFICATION Over the past few weeks I have been trying to find a means of limiting abrahamic means of false promise, baiting into moral hazard, and pilpul and critique, from application outside of christian doctrine, thereby ending the ability to pursue marxism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism and other application of abrahamic persuasion (deceit) in the ongoing war against our people by the globalists (mostly semites and their allies). The solutions were either prohibit, gain compromise, or give compromise, which is the ancient one that faced the romans when attempting to bring the jews into the empire. The ‘give compromise’ is an exchange: “spiritual is true by faith, and material is true by law”. This frustrates both parties a bit but is the only truly reciprocal exchange under the law. And it works for christianity alone because the law also requires compatibility with natural law. Judaism and Islam as well as marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism are not compatible with the law. So the remaining challenge is just to define christianity as some set of existing sects sharing some long standing tradition, limited to compliance with natural law AND the demarcation between the spiritual faith and the material law. I felt it was not possible even to achieve this compromise, so it was better to state the law as the law, and grant christians a specific license under the law. The exchange gives christianity peerage with the law. The exemption gives it permission under the law. And legal scholars will have to debate these things for centuries – because I cannot close the loophole of truthful speech because of the christian demand for identity between truth and myth. So that is where I ended up. To avoid the question by specific license rather than compromising on the question as a difference between faith and law. -Curt
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550686043 Timestamp) No man has any rights over any other, except in the group’s righthing of a wrong before the jury. “The Rights of Anglo Saxons”. A man has duty to a landholder (sovereign), in exchange for land and service. This is the meaning of ‘sovereignty’. It is not ‘individualism’. It is SOVEREIGNTY.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550685529 Timestamp) WE PLAN ON CONTINUOUSLY ROLLING COURSES – AT LEAST THE CORE ONES…. —“Hi Curt, I’ve taken a look at the website and am very keen on the courses available. Propertarianism is essential. Unfortunately I am way too busy with the final year of my degree and British politics at the moment. Will the opportunity to join classes roll over continuously, or is there a set window? Thanks”—, Reece Oh yes. Of course. It’s continuous as long as we hae someone willing to run the course, answer questions, and grade assignments. Courses need a minimum number of students in order for the instructor to have it worth his time, and students need each other to dialog with. We start this coming week on the law (provided I don’t have any crisis that delays me a day or two… lol )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550683824 Timestamp) FRIENDS: Assistance pls. Via PM or email (not public), need mailing address for:
- Jared Howe
- Distribut(ist?)
- NWG(Josh?)
- And my “stalker”
( Just for letters, not immediate action. Don’t do substantial work. Just help us save some time if you can. )