(FB 1546006955 Timestamp) EMMANUEL TODD AND FAMILY STRUCTURES https://morganwlfc.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/an-introduction-to-emmanuel-todd-in-english-part-one/
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546013376 Timestamp) Um, while I favor nationalism, and I’m definitely against miscegenation, I’m not ‘against’ anyone or any people – I’m against bad and false information, whether it be in genetic, cultural, normative, conceptual, or spoken form. And that’s because the science says that Ethnocentrism, science, truth, sovereignty, and markets, defended under the natural law, produce the optimum evolutionary strategy – and the more intolerant the better.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546016910 Timestamp) INCOMPATIBILITY https://archive.org/details/TheClashOfCivilizations-anIslamicView.pdf
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546006702 Timestamp) THE HAJNAL LINE —“What is it called? Hansa line? Hanja line? I can’t find anything when searching for it”— Hajnal Line: Line where bipartite manorialism spread in northern europe, producing delayed marriage and higher investment parenting, and seems to have been the cause of low clannishness, the work ethic, and high trust. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajnal_line Just as Kevin Macdonald worked on the Jewish Question, Jayman/Steve Hsu and others on the genetic question, to a large degree HBD_Chick (who stays anonymous just as did Jayman) works on clannishness and she popularized (among the HBD movement) the work of both Emmanuel Todd (French historian), and John Hajnal (Hungarian-British Mathematician) in their work on the differences between populations in europe – particularly given their family structures. This work dovetails with Hannan’s “Albion’s Seed” argument about the retention of local british culture as waves of british immigrants spread across the states. -Curt Doolittle
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546012930 Timestamp) (Again, In keeping with my quarterly reminders: I am not at all the person you see here. This is my job. I am good at my job. I do my job this way because it is the optimum means of doing my job – at least until the institute’s classes have graduated enough people to do otherwise. I am an artist, a philosopher of the law, and a social scientist first and foremost, and I will insure my brothers to the end. I was a rather ruthless entrepreneur – and I wasn’t happy being so. I am, like most people on the low end of the spectrum, naturally a fairly nice, friendly person, who happens to have low agreeableness when it comes to falsehoods. And I am willing to fight for my people to the death without question. This does not mean I seek or enjoy conflict – only that I will not flee from it, and if I engage in it, I will give it my all. -cheers. )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546015311 Timestamp) Nationalism: keeping all polities alive and well and responsible for their own domestication and transcendence.
-
For Newbies: My Workflow
FOR NEWBIES: WORKFLOW (worth repeating) (FB 1546005070 Timestamp) The way I work is by relating ideas across the spectrum in a series of shorter arguments – because I ‘whittle away’ at the stone so to speak, turning it to view it from different angles, working to gradually expose the figure (truth) below. I try to produce operational definitions in series, and to describe behavior as supply and demand using those series of definitions. Then I attempt to turn the fundamental insight into one or more aphorisms (summaries). Then to create a narrative that explains the topic and its applications. Then to weave these narratives together using the same constant language – this editing is what exhausts me and is why it takes me so long to produce a work. WORKFLOW I work from an outline of the complete scope of human thought. I work through the outline from metaphysics to group competitive strategy. Then I work with (many) sketches on FB. I move most of them to the web site. Then I collect the best of them into what I call ‘short courses’ or collections of posts. Then I take those ‘short courses’ and put them into the book. Then edit it all into an explanation. That’s my workflow. It’s actually painfully methodical. It just doesn’t look like it to the casual observer, because most people are desirous of rushing to judgment whereas i tend to exhaust a topic completely (very) before adding it to the canon. Then refine the network of concepts added to the canon once there. cheers.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546012377 Timestamp) Evolution or Scope of Religion over time. Phase 1: Burials > (Possible 1a: Marking as Monument?) > Phase 2: Sacrifices > Phase 3: Seasons > Phase 4: Politics > Phase 5: Education Each of these is rather obvious in progression as complexity increases. The only ‘evil’ here is monotheism. The greatest evil in history is Abrahamic Monotheism. And it is our duty to eradicate this mental disease from mankind over the next few centuries. It is the most important advance we can give to our people. Truth is enough.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546015145 Timestamp) —“What spectrum?”— |SPECTRUM| Psychosis <- Solipsism <- sensitive <- Feminine <-> Masculine -> analytic -> Aspie -> Autism Female Psychosis <– to –> Male Autism Spectrum. Now, produce a vertical axis that is from prosocial at the top to antisocial at the bottom. Then use dominance submission on the z axis. That gives you a pretty good graph of how people think.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545943056 Timestamp) RE: Nassim Nicholas Taleb ON HIS IQ RANT I will still take this debate, but not interwoven with twitter-spam. (a) g measures what we attempt to measure (b) chance of success corresponds to a distribution of traits, plus the utility of those traits, in service of the population under the bell curve within 1 SD. Those of us with exceptional abilities favor working with our region of the bell curve – puzzles – that are of INDIRECT value rather than DIRECT value. WE HAVE KNOWN THIS FOR DECADES. Lastly, we go to university etc to avoid the marketplace (‘work’). This is the value of higher education: to provide a non-market means of identifying selection. In this sense your criticism is correct. In the sense that you’re criticizing IQ measurements, you’re WRONG …PERIOD. All of this is OLD NEWS. If you want to encourage people to prosper by pairing their skills to those necessary to serve the market that they understand, then yes. If you mean very bright people are fooled by sophism, innumeracy, pseudoscience – then yes. But likewise, just as it has taken you many years to migrate from the positivist search for mathematical discovery of units of informational prediction, to the demand for warranty of due diligence (falsification), you too are vulnerable to innumeracy, pseudoscience, ‘literature’.