(FB 1546009084 Timestamp) YOU DON”T THINK OF IT BUT… Delayed marriage and reproduction not only decrease infant mortality, increase investment in children, but they force CLASS SORTITION by demonstrated evidence of success. This is the ‘big sort’ that is going on. Except we are not compensating by reducing the reproduction of the underclasses and upwardly redistributing reproduction to their betters. THIS STUFF MATTERS.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546016910 Timestamp) INCOMPATIBILITY https://archive.org/details/TheClashOfCivilizations-anIslamicView.pdf
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546006702 Timestamp) THE HAJNAL LINE —“What is it called? Hansa line? Hanja line? I can’t find anything when searching for it”— Hajnal Line: Line where bipartite manorialism spread in northern europe, producing delayed marriage and higher investment parenting, and seems to have been the cause of low clannishness, the work ethic, and high trust. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajnal_line Just as Kevin Macdonald worked on the Jewish Question, Jayman/Steve Hsu and others on the genetic question, to a large degree HBD_Chick (who stays anonymous just as did Jayman) works on clannishness and she popularized (among the HBD movement) the work of both Emmanuel Todd (French historian), and John Hajnal (Hungarian-British Mathematician) in their work on the differences between populations in europe – particularly given their family structures. This work dovetails with Hannan’s “Albion’s Seed” argument about the retention of local british culture as waves of british immigrants spread across the states. -Curt Doolittle
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546008938 Timestamp) DOOLITTLE VS HUNTINGTON – MINOR DIFFERENCE WITH MAJOR CONSEQUENCES —âThe underlying problem for the West is not Islamic Fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority ol°their power. The problem for Islam is not CIA orthc US. Department of defense. It is the West, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the universality of their culture and believe that their superior, if declining, power imposes on them the obligation to impose that culture throughout the world. These are the basic ingredients that fuel conï¬ict between Islam and the West.”— Huntington. DOOLITTLE’S EXPANSION OF HUNTINGTON: My position is that it is not just the west against islam (since islam is the only civilization hostile to modernity remaining), but that it is Western Aryanism: Truth, Sovereignty, Agency, and Eugenics and the Male Pack Strategy of Nation States, against Semitic Abrahamism: Deceit, Submission, and Dysgenics, and the female herd strategy of empires of ignorance. In other words, it is against the Abrahamic Method, and it’s instantiations in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and Marxism (jewish), postmodernism (christian), Feminism (secular), and Islamism (islamic), forms The evidence is what it is. Nothing can change it. HUNTINGTON VS DOOLITTLE It’s not just culture and belief, but the survival and transcendence of mankind rather than it’s continuous devolution and destruction that occurs wherever islam, judaism spread. Huntington was arguing in the cold war model of political and military strategy. I’m arguing against extinction of mankind, by the extinction of truth, reason, science, and sovereignty. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are technologies not of rebellion but of undermining, conquest, consumption, and destruction through devolution and consumption. Islame consumed each civilization. It is cancer.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546015311 Timestamp) Nationalism: keeping all polities alive and well and responsible for their own domestication and transcendence.
-
For Newbies: My Workflow
FOR NEWBIES: WORKFLOW (worth repeating) (FB 1546005070 Timestamp) The way I work is by relating ideas across the spectrum in a series of shorter arguments – because I ‘whittle away’ at the stone so to speak, turning it to view it from different angles, working to gradually expose the figure (truth) below. I try to produce operational definitions in series, and to describe behavior as supply and demand using those series of definitions. Then I attempt to turn the fundamental insight into one or more aphorisms (summaries). Then to create a narrative that explains the topic and its applications. Then to weave these narratives together using the same constant language – this editing is what exhausts me and is why it takes me so long to produce a work. WORKFLOW I work from an outline of the complete scope of human thought. I work through the outline from metaphysics to group competitive strategy. Then I work with (many) sketches on FB. I move most of them to the web site. Then I collect the best of them into what I call ‘short courses’ or collections of posts. Then I take those ‘short courses’ and put them into the book. Then edit it all into an explanation. That’s my workflow. It’s actually painfully methodical. It just doesn’t look like it to the casual observer, because most people are desirous of rushing to judgment whereas i tend to exhaust a topic completely (very) before adding it to the canon. Then refine the network of concepts added to the canon once there. cheers.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546008419 Timestamp) THE COLD WAR AND POST-COLD WAR ERAS IN TWO ARTICLES – LITTLE IDEAS HAVE VAST CONSEQUENCES —“The Cold War was bookended by two articles: “The Sources of Soviet Conduct” (based on the “Long Telegram” ) in 1947 and the “Clash of Civilisations” in 1993. Both articles were published in the journal Foreign Affairs.”— THE SOURCES OF SOVIET CONDUCT http://www.historyguide.org/Europe/Kennan.html THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS 1) Summary https://www.beyondintractability.org/bksum/huntington-clash 2) Original Article (~28pp) The only copy of the original Foreign Affairs article that I can find is on Scribd, so publisher must be working hard to keep it off the internet. I’ll update this with 3) Book In our library.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546015145 Timestamp) —“What spectrum?”— |SPECTRUM| Psychosis <- Solipsism <- sensitive <- Feminine <-> Masculine -> analytic -> Aspie -> Autism Female Psychosis <– to –> Male Autism Spectrum. Now, produce a vertical axis that is from prosocial at the top to antisocial at the bottom. Then use dominance submission on the z axis. That gives you a pretty good graph of how people think.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545943056 Timestamp) RE: Nassim Nicholas Taleb ON HIS IQ RANT I will still take this debate, but not interwoven with twitter-spam. (a) g measures what we attempt to measure (b) chance of success corresponds to a distribution of traits, plus the utility of those traits, in service of the population under the bell curve within 1 SD. Those of us with exceptional abilities favor working with our region of the bell curve – puzzles – that are of INDIRECT value rather than DIRECT value. WE HAVE KNOWN THIS FOR DECADES. Lastly, we go to university etc to avoid the marketplace (‘work’). This is the value of higher education: to provide a non-market means of identifying selection. In this sense your criticism is correct. In the sense that you’re criticizing IQ measurements, you’re WRONG …PERIOD. All of this is OLD NEWS. If you want to encourage people to prosper by pairing their skills to those necessary to serve the market that they understand, then yes. If you mean very bright people are fooled by sophism, innumeracy, pseudoscience – then yes. But likewise, just as it has taken you many years to migrate from the positivist search for mathematical discovery of units of informational prediction, to the demand for warranty of due diligence (falsification), you too are vulnerable to innumeracy, pseudoscience, ‘literature’.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546007061 Timestamp) EMMANUEL TODD IN DEPTH: MARRIAGE DIFFERENCES MATTER – PERHAPS MOST OF ALL. https://www.samizdata.net/2013/11/first-thoughts-on-america-3-0-the-emmanuel-todd-connection/