Source: Original Site Post

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545531036 Timestamp) NIT: English has 470k words in the OED, and estimates of 1M, if we account for synonyms and references rather than just spellings, with 1.2-1.5M if we account for what are two and three word terms in english but one word in a compound language like german, and then there is scientific terminology. English is a very low context high precision language especially suited for science and law. (Although german appears to be better for engineering because it evolved to be.)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545532558 Timestamp) THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LIBERTY AND SOVEREIGNTY —“Are you a conservative or a libertarian?”– Well, technically I’m a “Sovereigntarian”. One has liberty by permission. One has Sovereignty because he and his allies possess a quality and quantity of violence to deny any and all alternatives to sovereignty and rule of the common law of tort. Jewish Libertarians (common property marxists), Anglo Libertarians (anglo saxon rule of law, with economic tolerance), conservatives (rule of law with normative intolerance). I’m pretty Jeffersonian in my world view and pretty much a Tory in my understanding of government, and particularly tripartite government: Monarchy and Nobility for war and rule, Burghers for the commons, with the Church responsible for Labor and Family. It has been our tradition since we invented western civilization 4000-3500 years ago. And has remained constant across every era of recorded history. However, as a conservative I am UNABASHEDLY a eugenicist, and it is the failure to openly discuss the success of western civilization due to the organization of the polity to produce eugenic evolution and thereby the continuous production of agency. So cognitively jeffersonian makes me libertarian, politically a tory makes me conservative, and honestly about the eugenic basis of our success makes me ultra-conservative. Curt

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545522537 Timestamp) THE OLDEST RELIGION? —“Which is the world’s oldest religion? What is the evidence of it?”— Quora The correct question is “What is the oldest political religion?”, because that is the function of all surviving religions from the Axial period. Sumerians first wrote down their religions in 3500 BCE and most political religions evolved evolved from competition with theirs. We see evidence if organized religion in Anatolia from 8–9,000 bc, predating stonehenge by 6000 years. It appears we developed religious practices (what we call sacred, but is more correctly, suppression of all self interest, status signal, and dominance expression ) no less than 40k years ago. There was our first and longest dark age around 20–21k bc. Then practices resumed, around 13k bc. it wasn’t that long – about 8000 bc – until farming, and farming creates folk religions in an and around anatolia -still burial focused. Around 5500 bc the indo europeans developed sacrificial religion, and spread it – man now bargaining with the gods. And again, by 3300 we see the rapid development of political religion in every region of eurasia. |Religion|: Burial > Sacrificial > Political > [Theraputic]

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545531996 Timestamp) —“Well, what’s the difference between NS and propertarianism?”— The similarity is nationalism, intolerance, emphasis on commons rather than consumption, and identity. The difference is the monarchy and the traditional government, with extremely limited (and strict) constraints on the government, and liability for anyone who serves in government. —“I haven’t really seen how a future Propertarian government would anoint their ruler.”– Its because aside from monarchy, I simply list the choices of government and leadership available, and tell people to make the choice most relative for their population and its demographics. In other words, it’s under rule of law the means of producing commons (‘ruler’) varies by condition (war, normalcy, windfalls), size of the population (small, medium, large), and the demographics (high quality, medium, low quality) . That said everything else is the same. —” is Propertarianism traditionalist Libertarianism with teeth and logic? And an emphasis on spiritualism and identity?”– It’s the western tradition of sovereign men, updated to be pessimistic about the left.

  • (FB 1545662889 Timestamp) IF YOU’RE GONNA BURN A YULE LOG, GO BIG OR GO HOME. (h

    (FB 1545662889 Timestamp) IF YOU’RE GONNA BURN A YULE LOG, GO BIG OR GO HOME. (humor)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545666396 Timestamp) SANTA – GIFTS WITHOUT DEBT by Eli Harman Santa’s a metaperson. The only way he can keep tabs on all those people, judge all those people, place all those gifts, and eat all those cookies is through division of labor. The reason we use a meta person to give gifts instead of just giving them to each other is to give gifts without giving a corresponding debt. Your debt to santa is already paid by the time you receive his gifts. You just have to keep being good if you want any more next year.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545660911 Timestamp) CHRISTMAS THOUGHTS War and pillaging are the most profitable entrepreneurial undertakings that a group of men can undertake. Not only because one brings home the dividends, but because one can take territory, reduce competitors, and create dependents who may be taxed by your family, tribe, clan, and nation. Policing is expensive but pillaging is wonderful. Look at the Prussians, Napoleon the British, and Caesar….. So this year, hang an ornament on the tree, burn a yule log, share a family feast, and sharpen your weapons. Because war and pillaging make christmas possible every day of the year!

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545664659 Timestamp) Seriously tho. Jests aside. Love you all and wish you a Joyful Yule, Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545926716 Timestamp) —“You are wedded to your jargon and do not care if the average person has a clue what you are talking about. Explaining it is fine, understand the jargon is another issue. You are in effect preaching to the converted.”—Steven Vandervelde (Criticizing John Mark and Propertarianism) We have been gaining more traction every year as the overton window moves closer to us. And enduring that same criticism all the while. Meanwhile we have produced a stream of people capable of practicing the discipline, in about the same time and effort required to get each level of university degree. We convert people daily. just ask them. John is the best at reaching larger numbers in a manner that they are comfortable with. This is neither my skill or ambition. We have planned on the emergence of talent as we evolve. it’s happening. It is a non trivial subject, as revolutionary in social science as as darwinism, larger than marxism/postmodernism, and cannot be understood any easier. While we can reduce marxism to class conflict and universal monopoly communism and reduce propertarianism to genetic conflict, conflict of civilizations, and universal market nationalism – polar opposites – that does not explain the vast difference between the underlying science and logic and method of propertarianism vs the lies, sophisms, and deceits, and denial, of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and the abrahamic means of argumentative deceit. Revolution Comes

  • (FB 1545663263 Timestamp) JAMES IS AT IT AGAIN (omg)

    (FB 1545663263 Timestamp) JAMES IS AT IT AGAIN (omg)