(FB 1545578598 Timestamp) I have to create a page for “Short Course in The Grammars” because I think that’s what’s missing from the ‘short courses’ that constitute the fundamentals of propertarian reasoning.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1545508157 Timestamp) RIO DE JANERIO IS CONSIDERING THE DUERTE METHOD OF CRIMINAL REDUCTION. Not exactly Judge Dredd but getting pretty close to it.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
(FB 1545577845 Timestamp) by @[572309326:2048:Bryan Nova Brey] This is why itâs important to help our people, our pack, and packs, understand the basics of Propertarianism. The Ivory Tower stands on quicksand of lies, deceit, pseudoscience, fictionalisms, wishful thinking, bias, propaganda, fallacies, rhetoric, errors, ignorance, and arrogance. Truth is enough and informs excellent agency.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1545541826 Timestamp) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXiFcOozypc
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1545659831 Timestamp) “Twas the day before christmas and all thru the village the men sharpened knives and the boys dreamt of pillage…” Wait… wrong story I think…. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/12/24/a-very-brief-christmas-story-audio/
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545534356 Timestamp) –“Yes please but when is the book coming!?”— Vladyslav Romanyuk IMO: just the constitution is probably the most practical. classes will be easier than the book. book still feels extremely difficult to me as i edit it. constitution widest reach. classes easiest to really learn it. online material using the outline, videos, selected posts, reading list, a bit less easy, but certainly accessible. book very technical and thorough, and pretty hard in my opinion. no way around it. going to need all of those methods. core is epistemology/grammars/operational language, defeating fictionalisms. everything built on it. but total scope and application is huge. ) i mean what bill keeps saying is that general knowledge is required. in that sense you sort of need the classes. i mean we are teaching western civ…. all of it … in scientific language. we are teaching the school and college education people did not receive. its big. its a degree in the science of civilization
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545588824 Timestamp) THE PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGY AND GENETICS OF LEFTISM by Rosenborg Predmetsky Cultural Marxists are all structural and no agency (perhaps a good propertarian description of “all talk and no walk”). I find it very telling that the advocates of structuralism and post-structuralism tended to be utterly degenerate and depraved idiots — the most obvious examples are Michel Foucault and Jacques Lacan. Both purely r-selected and also totally obsessed with the idea that humans in general lack agency and that human subjectivity is nothing but a function of some antecedent (linguistic or social) structure. They are projecting their own constitutional, biological lack of agency onto humanity at large. When a post-structuralist says “humans lack agency,” I say “speak for yourself, hypo-frontal-cortical wojack!” I see cultural Marxists as high openness to experience with its attendant divergent thinking + dopaminergic sensation seeking + Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS, intense negative effect), and so they are driven by their passions like a kite in a hurricane, lacking anything like authentic agency, and they just project their own pathology onto the rest of humanity. Sensation seeking + intense negative affect + high verbal IQ = quasi-bonobo degenerate reader of Derrida / Foucault. Hyper-feminine, articulate but garrulous, schizophrenia-spectrum, borderline personality with unstable sense of self (which they project onto others), borderline psychotic, highly diffuse and chaotic thought patterns, histrionic, a desire to be seen and desired rather than a desire to create and/or conquer through brilliance or authentic power wrought of discipline.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545532558 Timestamp) THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LIBERTY AND SOVEREIGNTY —“Are you a conservative or a libertarian?”– Well, technically I’m a “Sovereigntarian”. One has liberty by permission. One has Sovereignty because he and his allies possess a quality and quantity of violence to deny any and all alternatives to sovereignty and rule of the common law of tort. Jewish Libertarians (common property marxists), Anglo Libertarians (anglo saxon rule of law, with economic tolerance), conservatives (rule of law with normative intolerance). I’m pretty Jeffersonian in my world view and pretty much a Tory in my understanding of government, and particularly tripartite government: Monarchy and Nobility for war and rule, Burghers for the commons, with the Church responsible for Labor and Family. It has been our tradition since we invented western civilization 4000-3500 years ago. And has remained constant across every era of recorded history. However, as a conservative I am UNABASHEDLY a eugenicist, and it is the failure to openly discuss the success of western civilization due to the organization of the polity to produce eugenic evolution and thereby the continuous production of agency. So cognitively jeffersonian makes me libertarian, politically a tory makes me conservative, and honestly about the eugenic basis of our success makes me ultra-conservative. Curt
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1545588763 Timestamp) IR-RECIPROCITY AND LICENSE OF PREDATION AGAINST US. It breaks the contract and the law, since if they have no duty to protect, and we have no right to defend, it legalizes predation – which is precisely what we see. Ergo: return to the militia: every man a craftsman, a warrior, a sheriff, a judge, and his own legislator. EVERY MAN A SHERIFF.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545531996 Timestamp) —“Well, what’s the difference between NS and propertarianism?”— The similarity is nationalism, intolerance, emphasis on commons rather than consumption, and identity. The difference is the monarchy and the traditional government, with extremely limited (and strict) constraints on the government, and liability for anyone who serves in government. —“I haven’t really seen how a future Propertarian government would anoint their ruler.”– Its because aside from monarchy, I simply list the choices of government and leadership available, and tell people to make the choice most relative for their population and its demographics. In other words, it’s under rule of law the means of producing commons (‘ruler’) varies by condition (war, normalcy, windfalls), size of the population (small, medium, large), and the demographics (high quality, medium, low quality) . That said everything else is the same. —” is Propertarianism traditionalist Libertarianism with teeth and logic? And an emphasis on spiritualism and identity?”– It’s the western tradition of sovereign men, updated to be pessimistic about the left.