@RadioFreeNorthwest Yep.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 03:58:42 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107052579067715937
@RadioFreeNorthwest Yep.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 03:58:42 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107052579067715937
@Nocaster @RadioFreeNorthwest we understood that no matter what we did, the right was impossible to turn into a political movement because they were too wanting of violence to follow our strategy.
It was John’s idea to try. Not mine. I followed his vision. But the money wasn’t there for him to pay the front. Given the desperation of the time window I did my part for a small private launch that the left used to undermine us with our own.
Our conclusion was that we had dodged a bullet by being associated with the alt right. It’s low income, low competency, low agreeablness, males. THese are good under an authoritarian hierarchy but useless as a political faction.
The right is doomed to be a set of small easily defeatable factions each selfinshly demanding what they want on their terms, in small numbers that don’t matter, from elites that don’t exist, and don’t care about them. And they won’t show in the numbers necessary for controlling the political discourse that’s necessary for political victory.
Had we had another year to educate a base maybe we could have done better. If the base had paid john enough to be the frontman then maybe that would have helped. But unlike others, I was confident trump would lose – the suppression would expand and the right’s window would be lost. My predictions tend to be very good at the large scale, although no one can predict what will happen within that window.
I know my job. I returned to doing my job. My job is radical centrism: separation and the policies, law, and science to operationalize it.
The right is dead as other than a tiny irrelevant bit two to three percent difference in voter participation.
The fact that the right is ‘right’ about man, politics, civilization, and nature is very different from the equal fact that the right is politically incompetent without the military and the aristocracy.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 03:33:46 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107052481022206845
Sovereignty: the condition of existential self-determination by self-determined means produced by reciprocal insurance of that self-determination by self-determined means, by sufficient numbers, with sufficient force, to guarantee it against those others who would deprive you of it by the imposition of costs upon your demonstrated individual and potential group interests.
Sovereignty: the condition of existential self-determination by self-determined means produced by reciprocal insurance of that self-determination by self-determined means, by sufficient numbers, with sufficient force, to guarantee it against those others who would deprive you of it by the imposition of costs upon your demonstrated individual and potential group interests.
DEFINE “SOVEREIGNTY”
Sovereignty: the condition of existential self-determination produced by reciprocal insurance of that self-determination by sufficient numbers(force) to guarantee it against those who would deprive you of it by imposition of costs upon your demonstrated and potential interests.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 01:30:54 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107051997911289477
@theshellback No I say that because it’s true and I love sh—ting on you fucking bottom feeding, incel, losers that are being crushed by your leftist betters, because you’re too arrogant and ignorant to know you’ve been defeated, decimated, and shut out of the gene pool. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 01:24:49 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107051973934169534
@DMoney478 Yep
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 01:23:07 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107051967249611594
@theshellback My eyes are blue. ‘Cause I’m northern european, with light brown, red brown and blonde hair.
Peasants are so tedious.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 01:22:39 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107051965416587557
Sexual Redistribution vs Income Redistribution.
If they govt can redistribute our productive income that we exchange for marriage and family then why can’t the government force sexual reproduction? No practical difference.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 01:21:25 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107051960624220499
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107051918209825157
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MASCULINE AND FEMININE INTERPRETATION People who are called (Feminine) “social justice warriors” have a perplexing view of social justice, for I can think of few things that have promoted justice more successfully than free markets and Western civilization, both of which they constantly disparage. Classical liberals (Masculine) think that economic redistribution is an infringement on freedom in the same way that progressives think that sexual redistribution is. One should not be forced to depart involuntarily with one’s property. And one’s income is owned just as one’s body is.
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107051918209825157
@theshellback Exellent argument. 😉 All responses are measures of intelligence and therefore genetic fitness. You’re out of the gene pool fkwit. lol
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 01:20:03 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107051955214327855