Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • @RadioFreeNorthwest I think at present I’m still the authority on disambiguating

    @RadioFreeNorthwest I think at present I’m still the authority on disambiguating political economic systems and you’re welcome to falsify that claim – but you won’t You can either make a constitution that produces a legal, political, economic, social, educational order or you can’t. I can. It’s excruciatingly difficult to operationalize a political idea which is why people write essays, articles, and pamphlets and books, and philosopy and ideology and all sorts of drivel rather than constitutions, institutions, laws, policies, rules, regulations that can be put into practice.

    So I do understand these things. The question is always the same: the difference betwewen storytelling and engineering is whether a sequence of events and transformations can be operationally put itno place with the people, resources, and incentives available, and how can those people, resources, and incentives be organized.

    The answer is you and yours and anyone who mentions natsoc will never, ever, under any circutstances be let near any category of influence or power. Never. Ever. Ever.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 20:14:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107056415478720785

  • @John_Connor @Rdanis @RadioFreeNorthwest I have no interest in ‘leading’ those w

    @John_Connor@Rdanis@RadioFreeNorthwest I have no interest in ‘leading’ those who cannot be led. We invested a year in a half in you ‘folks’ only to discover it was a lost cause – just like everyone elase has – which is why you have no leaders. You want feels not reals. Yo’re no better than girls or leftists. Feels over reals. You want what causes you to fail. And the enemy knows this.

    I should have not been eager to run our ‘experiment’ on you, and stayed within the libertarian domain, reforming that direction. it’s more meainstream, less frustrating, and with better cognitive capability.

    My only reason to engage with you is to learn whether or not there is any way to make you useful. I keep open the option that you’ll realize you have failed and can never succeed. But you don’t. You aren’t useful. No one can make use of you. That’s why you always fail. Because you poison every political well. Dancing with you leaves everyone who does covered with the sh-t of your shit personalities.

    The enemy knows your weakness. They know the own you. They know they will always own you. Because they just bait you, and you fall for it every fucking time. Every single time. They bait you into looking worse than they are, and then justifying the state suppression of you.

    And there is zero chance (as evidenced in this conversation) that any ‘adult’ can convince you to ‘take the hit, don’t take the bait, and hold the moral high ground.’

    We are still working with small groups of good people to see if they can learn to use that strategy. It’s our last ‘test’ of whether you’ve FAILED long enough and hard enough to give up on your instincts and to listen to adult reason.

    Personally I”m done with you. My position is quite different. The rest of the team is young, energetic, and thinks you will eventually fail so long and hard and so desperately that you might be useful.

    I don’t. And all you do is prove me right every single day of the week.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 20:09:56 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107056398111829419

  • @AtomDio @Rdanis @RadioFreeNorthwest Minimizes the age. The fascists were trying

    @AtomDio@Rdanis@RadioFreeNorthwest Minimizes the age. The fascists were trying to create a nationalist rather than universalist version of communism in the french model. They saw the excesses of british empiricism and french despotism on one hand, and the excesses of jewish communism on the other. Worse, they understood that the emergence of a nationalist state would displace the jews from their creation of a parasitic financial state within a productive miltiary state. National socialism could never work and every economist knows this. What our people need is a political religion of ethnocentirsm that isn’t false with equally false promises. This is possible. But natsoc is never gonna sell and never gonna survive. It’s just something you can undrestand and so you seek to bring about what you understand rather than what you dont. The primary difference between the communist and fascist eras is that labor has lost all productive value. So neither strategy will work. The past doesn’t include economic solutoins given that the agrarian AND industrial eras are over. We need a new model for an economy. And as far as I can tell the only advantage we have is genetic and cultural and no one can repeat it. For that reason we want to separate. Not rule. If we rule we are eventually defeated – always. So we have to separate and self rule.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 20:01:01 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107056363013314743

  • THE LAMENT OF PHILOSOPHERS IS THE SAME AS HISTORIANS There is a reason so many p

    THE LAMENT OF PHILOSOPHERS IS THE SAME AS HISTORIANS

    There is a reason so many philosophers of the ancient world sought to detach from society – because once you are aware of the gordian not of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit, wound from a fiber of idiocy, immorality, and malincentives it causes cognitive and emotional overload.

    historians say ‘Those of us who undrestand history are the victims of those who are ignorant of history.” But historians still seem to get along, because theyre documenting and explaining. Philosophers are not just documenting and explaining but trying to change the criteria by which we make our choices. And it’s very easy to come to see it as a futile effort.

    For me it’s gone from a problem to a curiosity to a joy to a duty. And I only keep at it because of foolish white man enlightenment optimism I have no rational justification for maintaining. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 19:41:35 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107056286609664124

  • @Rdanis @RadioFreeNorthwest Rdanis: only … subtley I would ask you to consider

    @Rdanis@RadioFreeNorthwest Rdanis: only … subtley I would ask you to consider is that we use individuals soveriegnty as a means of producing collective commons – a high trust, low cost, hihgly rewarding society economy polity and military by meritocratic hierarchy. The enemy uses collective sovereignty to produce individual goods producing a low trust high cost, devolutionary society polity and economy by non-meritocratic equality. -cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 19:38:04 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107056272828272751

  • @MapleCurtain @RadioFreeNorthwest @JohnYoungE um… this is comedic ignorance if

    @MapleCurtain@RadioFreeNorthwest@JohnYoungE um… this is comedic ignorance if it wasn’t such a waste of time.

    There is no one that uses more precise langauge than I do. But as Dr Werrell says “it takes about five years of study to be able to talk to you, and it takes six months of working with you to understand you, because while you use english vocabulary, you’re talking in something between mathematics and programming code.”

    We know the requirements for the practice of this discipline, In general it requires about 130+ IQ, experince with or education in one of the hard sciences, high trait openness, low trait agreeablness, and nearly autistic system thinking bias. We know this. This is means the pool of people available is under three percent of the population.

    If you were ‘smart’ you would not mention Langan, because being fooled by that nonsense is evidence you’re not. Smart people speak in math, science, physics, engineering, economics, and law, with deep knowledge of one or more threads of the evolution of thought in a discipline. For me that’s art, science, technology, economics, law, logic and mathematics. For Michael it’s physics and mathematics. For martin it’s nearly the entire canon of philosphy. For others like Eli, it’s a natural bias and having worked with me for ten nearly a decade.

    Either you can think in equilibrial terms (economics) and grasp that all econmics is an extension of physics (physics with memory), and you can grasp my explanation of language and grammar, and you can grasp my explanation of truth and reciprocity – or you can’t.

    Learning P-logic unless you are intellectually predisposed to highly skeptical system thinking, and have exhausted the usual developmental chain of classical liberalism > libertarianism > Anarchism(hoppe) > Moldbug > Doolittle, then you haven’t learned enough of the subject matter to understand it.

    If you don’t know the founations of math and programming, have some non trivial understanding of economics and law, then you don’t have the requisite tools to undersand my work – or – to be frank – you aren’ knowledgable enough to have an opinion on solutions.

    Like Doug says. P is a solution to institutional operation. It’s not a ‘plan’. Bulter’s work is a plan. I did have a strategy and a plan and the window was narrow once covid had undermined Trumps economic achievements, and he lost the margins.

    At present our ‘plan’ is simply to work all the options, but those options do not include trying to mobilize the angry mob of poor lost incels. All you people do is destroy the discourse preventing victory by anyone.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 19:35:06 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107056261152690206

  • @RadioFreeNorthwest (Correct … as usual)

    @RadioFreeNorthwest (Correct … as usual)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 18:51:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107056090873902299

  • @HueyLewisAndTheNoose @data_overload @RadioFreeNorthwest We advocate what we und

    @HueyLewisAndTheNoose@data_overload@RadioFreeNorthwest We advocate what we understand. We understand at the limit of our competency. The limit of our competency is determined by the limit of our knowledge and experience. This is how men who will not ‘submit’ express their agency and self determination. But when we fail to understand the lmit of our competency our resistancde to submission results in the loss of our self determination and agency. In other words, if we are not aware of our own limitations in judgement then we are doing nothing more than demanding others serve us on our terms – factionalization, rather than together on a compromise between our terms – an army.

    I’m correct. (as usual)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 18:50:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107056084151751570

  • @data_overload @RadioFreeNorthwest You make a claim that we cannot defend agains

    @data_overload@RadioFreeNorthwest You make a claim that we cannot defend against them and actively prosecute them frome very walk of life, as well as our own who have joined them, as well as any new challenges that come upon us.

    You are not competent to make that claim and I am and I”ve ‘scienced’ their method of deceit and put it into a law that cannot be violated any more than reason itself. So, again, like usual, lazy, stupid, ignorant, overconflident, you waste your betters’ time demanding I (we) educate you rather than doing the work yoruself. In other words, you’re a common thief. A child raging against parents who choose not to invest in education over the heads of an infant.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 18:09:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107055925617486524

  • @data_overload @RadioFreeNorthwest You didn’t ask a direct or honest question. Y

    @data_overload@RadioFreeNorthwest You didn’t ask a direct or honest question. You made a conjecture and an accusation against me. And now you’re prevaricating , redirecting, and retreating because you’ve failed. So go ahead and ask an honest question if you’re capable of it. Becasue it’s true that I named the enemy, explained its origins, and how to defeat it, permanently. I’ve also explained that the enemy is an expression of the female means of anti social behavior, institutionalized as a method of cultural warfare, and I’ve explained why we are vulnerable to this method of warfare, and how christianity was created and used for that purpose first, and creates the same vulnerability today. So I mean, you want me to just agree with your dipshit version of reality and your dipshit understanding of solving the problem, despite only dipshits would even attempt a purge by violence, without correcting the problem that has infected our own over the past 200 years. It’s not like you or anyone as stupid, ignorant, delusional, and angry as you are is competent enough to participate in the governance of an advanced civilization. My solution is viable as long as I’m completely disassociated from cancerours morons like you who shit like n—gers in the pool of political discourse because no one will give you attention, because you’re not DESERVING of attention.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-06 16:52:56 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107055623488023766