Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543453038 Timestamp) —“I would love to see EMJ destroy you in a debate.”— Twittiot Who is EMJ?

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543511143 Timestamp) For Gods, Truth provides spirituality: potential. It’s those who are weak, dishonest, or but animals that need falsehoods.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543425047 Timestamp) MORE ON DE-PROPAGANDIZING “CAPITALISM” (required reading)

    1. Trade has always existed (generating exchange)

    2. Markets have almost always existed (generating prices).

    3. Capitalists have existed as long as there have been markets (generating means of production).

    4. Northern Europeans (Venetians less so. Saxons largely, the Hansa in particular, the English systematically, the Dutch first at political scale), developed rule of law – which is why they escaped the church with the reformation.)

    5. Capitalism consists of rule of law consisting nearly entirely of markets, and socialism of rule of men eliminating or vastly reducing markets – but all polities have some mixed economy and must do so. The problem is that the state is superior at investing in some commons, but the private sector is far better at allocating and maximizing the returns on capital.

    6. So capitalism and socialism only evolved once the industrial revolution came into play – and the socialists demanded control over production. Capitalism then was the name they used for ‘market bias under rule of law’ , and socialism ‘state bias under rule of men’.

    So any statement about when was capitalism invented, is rater ‘stupid’ really. The answer is very simple: capitalism was the ‘jewish’ view of markets, and socialism the ‘jewish’ view of the state. And suckers bought into this false dichotomy. The question is and always will be the utilities of the state monopoly vs the private sector market. And as it stands, the lesson is quite clear: when it is simple and you know how to do it, but it’s risky and expensive, the state can provide startup capital and market protections. Once that investment is running, it can be ‘sold’ to the private sector who can then maximize its potential. The USA has mastered the art of moving this high risk investment into the private sector, but this has had the effect of hollowing out predictable sectors of the economy. So it appears that once again, there are those things it is better for the state to produce (labor-consuming and strategic companies, that are less speculative and produce slower longer returns), and things that it is better for the private sector to produce (IQ consuming and highly speculative things with shorter higher returns.) CONVERSELY The flood river and irrigation valleys of the fertile, crescent, pakistan-india, and china, could produce state-capital easily, just as the west could produce private-capital easily. The west and east homogenous peoples higher trust. The center tribal heterogenous people lower trust. It’s not complicated. You do what you can with the people and geography you have.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543451370 Timestamp) WHAT ABOUT SLAVERY? —“Curt; Are you opposed to slavery?”— Um. “Opposed” is an opinion. My opinion is irrelevant. My job is the Law. This is how I understand The Law: If you mean voluntary or indentured servitude in its many forms, then no, it’s within the law. It’s just a contract. In fact I would advocate for its restoration since it’s just a good way of absorbing labor and taking good care of our people who are less able. I mean, room, clothing, board, healthcare is expensive enough and paying someone to maintain a household unnecessarily isn’t good. There are plenty of people for whom household management is not a preference but a burden. If you mean civic-slavery (military service) then of course I advocate it – and I don’t think militaries can function otherwise. If you mean prisoner-slavery (putting prisoners to work on the commons) then yes, of course, I advocate as much of it as possible. On the other hand the law recommends a return to as much capital punishment as possible. But If you mean chattel slavery (what most people think of) the Law would say that it is always harmful to your people and their genome (unless you sterilize them), it is is too expensive for the meagre returns, and it violates the one law, with which we must force those able to transcend to do so, rather than leave them as undomesticated wild animals so to speak. In general, chattel slavery is bad. It’s worse if its with aliens. It’s much worse if it’s with devolutionary aliens. And it’s much, much worse if it’s common whatsoever. The externalities are some of the worst possible. Slavery was an agrarian utility that is no longer of any utility.

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    (FB 1543511026 Timestamp) ALL CRITIQUE IS “LYING” – AND HERE IS WHY ( worth repeating ) ( very important piece ) ( propertarianism core ) 1 – Either we are engaged in productive, fully informed(truthful), warrantied (skin in the game), voluntary transfers (exchanges), free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated investments of others (externalities), or we are not. 2 – Every forced transfer is a lost opportunity for exchange – even if an exchange of good, for norm (behavior). 3 – In other words, all demands for goods independent of exchange are simply use of threats of disassociation (boycott) as a means of extraction (rent seeking). IGNORANCE IS NOT EXCUSE FOR FAILURES OF DUE DILIGENCE The fact that one has habituated a means of deception (continental conflationary philosophy and literature) rather than habituated a means of transparency (anglo analytic deflation – ie: science and law) and therefore argues for the profoundly dishonest and immoral out of cultural habit, has nothing to do with whether one INTENDS to argue immorally – it just means one’s CULTURE is endemically immoral. Which is just an argument to ignorance. It doesn’t absolve you from the failure of due diligence for the consequences of your display, speech, or action. Reciprocity (morality) requires one do nothing (by display, word, or deed) that one cannot perform restitution for – else one is externalizing risk upon others (conducting a theft). And some costs are impossible to perform restitution for. For example, what has been the cost of the pseudosciences and pseudo-rationalisms and pseudo-histories, of the French (Derrida, Rorty, et all) and Ashkenazi (Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Adorno (et all), Mises, Rothbard, Leo Strauss) – all failures of due diligence against the immorality of their habits (cultural assumptions and argumentative grammar)? If you cannot make an operational argument in economics and politics ( that means a procedural model) that tests your theory then you do not know of what you speak. These people made Rousseauian (false) assumptions of human nature, and economic possibility – most notably because Rousseau was a profoundly immoral (irreciprocal) man, and the entirety of the french and ashkenazi, and some of the german intelligentsia, produce a reactionary movement misrepresented as ‘the enlightenment’, as always do people of armies, or of diaspora, seeking ‘liberty’ and thereby lacking the ‘sovereignty’ of the scandinavian sea-farers. They attempted to return the church’s demands upon others (appeals to the common good) counter to the british (anglo empirical) intellectual revolution (markets in everything.) In law, (conflict resolution by tests of reciprocity), and in war (conflcit prevention by tests of reciprocity), we do not make excuses for ignorance – ignorance and indiscipline (failure of due diligence) are just means of reducing costs and externalizing risk upon others. That is what these people did. They were liberated (no thanks to them) by the atlantic transport, agrarian, and industrial revolutions and made arguments that they were ‘kept down’, and politically liberated, rather than that they sexual, social, and political market value, and that with increased productivity they could not consume vastly more of everything, and create a little market value despite their lower previous market value. GRAMMARS OF TRUTH AND DECEIT Argument in the broadest sense (colloquial persuasion) is a technology like any other, consisting of a hierarchy of grammars (rules of continuous disambiguation covering the spectrum from sounds through sentences), from the intuitionistic logics through mathematics, physics, contract, testimony, fiction, and the fictionalisms (‘mythologies) through the deceits. Those grammars are either deflationary, commensurable, and testable, or they are not – and instead, like all fictions, operate by suggestion using selection, obscurantism, loading, framing, overloading. And they all make use of the trust (free association) we place in one another when listening (opening ourselves to suggestion for the purpose of communication). So one can create or criticize a model in deflationary prose, or one can create or criticize a fictionalism in conflationary (selected, obscurant, loaded, framed, overloaded) prose. That technique we call ‘critique’ is simply the modern version of ‘pilpul’ (Religious interpretation, numerology, astrology) which seeks to criticize (straw man) some solution without creating a testable model open to transparent comprehension, and thereby taking advantage of the fact that in that overloaded state you will (the human mind must) appeal to intuition by free association. In other words, you will substitute whatever you think and feel, thereby creating a sense of agreement on critique without agreement on MODEL (actions, reciprocity, and consequences.) That is a very techichical means of saying that ALL CRITIQUE IS LYING BY SUGGESTION. Either you can propose a complete alternative model or you can’t. (Think on that one a bit and be justifiably horrified.) ALL CRITIQUE IS LYING Critique is simply the technology invented in the Levant for the purpose of ‘selling’ the monotheisms to the underclasses as a revolt against the great civilizations of the ancient world – but this time in pseudo-scientific (ashkenazi marxist) and pseudo-rational (french post modern ) prose. We are all gene machines. Hence why the language of science(due diligence), and natural law (reciprocity) are so important to speech, and why literature and literary argument are always and everywhere – like most of intellectual history – attempts at some form of fraud. Cheers Curt Doolittle

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    (FB 1543423166 Timestamp) THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A EUROPEAN IDENTITY (worth repeating) (edited) All that is required to claim one is a Christian is to have adopted the teachings of Christianity: THE UNIVERSAL IDENTITY: THE VIA-NEGATIVA 1. Do not covet (envy) 2. Do not lie, cheat, gossip, or conspire. 3. Do not rape, adulter, or prostitute. 4. Do not murder, steal, or harm. THE CHRISTIAN IDENTITY: THE VIA-POSITIVA 1. The eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2. The extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3. The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. 4. The commitment to personal acts of charity for those who are in need. THE ARYAN EUROPEAN IDENTITY 1. Demand and Do: Sovereignty and Reciprocity, 2. Demand and Do: Truth and Duty 3. Demand and Do: The Law and Markets 4. Demand and Do: Insure the Good, Punish the Wicked. THE HEATHEN EUROPEAN IDENTITY 1. The laws of nature are binding on all of existence; and; 2. Nature is sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and; 3. To leave the universe changed for the better – a Garden – for having lived in it. 4. To die a good death in the service of my people. THE TRANSCENDENCE OF MAN INTO GODS. Through the continuous competition between trial and error, as we calculate perfection one thought, word, and deed at a time. “ONE DROP RULE” For kin, the One Drop Rule. That this is the optimum ingroup evolutionary strategy is simply a matter of logic and evidence.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543450124 Timestamp) EMOTIONS TELL US SOMETHING. BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THEY ARE CORRECT, USEFUL, OR WISE. —“Hatred Is also Scarce resource to be acted upon.”–Jaromír MiÅ¡kovský Well, that’s not true. Like all emotions, the emotion of hatred tells you something. Hatred tells you that you must invest heavily in eliminating a threat to you and yours. It is the instinct for Altruistic (costly) Punishment taken to its limits. On the other hand, it causes you to think very poorly, and act foolishly. So: Turn rage to hatred, hatred to anger, anger to resolution, resolution to conviction, conviction to investigation, investigation to plan, plan to action, action to completion. Hate, Like Fear, Weakens the Mind.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543510782 Timestamp) —“Disambiguation provides the path to godhood”— Bill Joslin

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543449355 Timestamp) —“Yeah, a problem with current schools and universities is that they don’t teach children about who they are and what their ancestry is, and a law as a natural set of rules protecting the lineage, not some arbitrary game.”—Igor Rogov

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543510631 Timestamp) Truth is the one religion that unites good men against the multitude of evils.