Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • THE DEMANDING NATURE OF THE GAME ON THE AUDIENCE. Working in public in the curre

    THE DEMANDING NATURE OF THE GAME ON THE AUDIENCE.

    Working in public in the current era requires playing a certain game that avoids emotional antagonization of the island 115 and below. Now I can address taboos that the Molyneux’s of the world can’t, because I use legal, economic, and scientific prose, fragments of arguments that the audience must piece together across posts, play king of the hill games, and let the audience infer what they must – and then issue very clear analytic posts on ‘the natural law on issue X’ on issues where it’s possible. But all of this game playing requires an audience that is capable of inference and pattern recognition. Ergo this game limits the discourse of taboos to the smart folk, and the island 115 crowd is sort of left in the dark – and frustrated. But they are so for good reason. They are only capable of moralistic, emotive, GSRRM speech.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:45:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426182767869028

  • “When something shocks and is too immoral for even Curt, it must be pretty damn

    —“When something shocks and is too immoral for even Curt, it must be pretty damn bad. It’s like when Himmler wrote to fascist Croatia, asking them to tone down the ultraviolence as it was making the Axis look bad… when you’re too violent for the SS or CD, you really are fucked.”—Schlaam Alaam

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:55:51 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425752455674333

  • @DanielandMegan we are just about there. no rush. just more skulls for the pyram

    @DanielandMegan we are just about there. no rush. just more skulls for the pyramid.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:16:34 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425598007819169

  • (… continued) Men feel as they do for the simple reason that not all of us are

    (… continued)

    Men feel as they do for the simple reason that not all of us are of merit, but that we must preserve collective care taking while at the same time limiting the reproduction of the undomesticated animal classes who would reverse the past 50K years of evolutionary progress from animal to human.

    Women are the greatest mass murderers in history, since exposure and dumping of babies and children is the most common source of mortality in human history. Men and their wars are nothing by comparison. The great plagues are nothing by comparison. Yet when women and betas like you are able to force costs upon the rest of us, to produce and immigration dysgenia, you no longer limit your reproduction, no longer delay your reproduction, no longer are denied reproduction, no longer face the hard choice of harsh winters or sexual impulse.

    So no. I’s not an ‘opinion’.
    I’m not stating a difference of opinion or value – I’m stating a FACT.
    Dysgenia is measurable.
    The consequences are measurable.

    You are nothing more than a repeat of the jewish-christian-muslim destruction of the ancient world using the same vocabulary arguments and strategy differing only in using pseudoscience and sophism this time versus supernaturalism and sophism the last.

    You and all like you are the source of dark ages.

    You and all like you are a cancer upon this earth – an uncontrolled dysgenic out-of-control, resource consuming disease consuming society, civilization, man, the planet, and the entirety of human potential with your infantilism.

    You and all like you are a disease upon us all.
    A Cancer. A Cancer we are willing to separate from and let run its course.
    But a cancer we must isolate, inoculate, prevent, and cure our people of.

    So when we say ‘be a man’ we mean ‘save yourselves, our people, our civilization, mankind, the planet and the entirety of human potential from that cancerous non-rational infantilized dysenic group we call marxists, socialists, feminists, postmodernists, politically correct, and inadequate.’

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:11:03 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425576276514819

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425573316009260

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    (… continued) So you do not know what and why you feel the way you do. You only sense it is a good. The libertarian does not know why he feels the way he does, he only senses it is good. The conservative does not know why he feels the way he does, only that he senses it is good. However, in the long run the conservative is the only one making use of all available knowledge over the long run. Everything liberals thought would be true in their pseudoscientific rage against the darwinian machine has been false. Man was no oppressed. Semi domesticated human animals like all other animals we domesticated, have been eugenically governed in eastern and western civilization – largely through climate, competitors, and manorialism to produce society with superior distributions. ANd your ‘privilege’ of hyperconsumption and violation of the many compromises between the generations, genders, classes, and masculine-feminine minds, was made and still is made, possible by those who domesticated your ancestors – and apparently failed to domesticate your line. What do we do? We are sufficiently wealthy to separate and go our own ways, and return to our process of speciation. You may pursue your dysgenic goals, and we will pursue our eugenic goals, and we will rapidly see what occurs to a ‘liberal, feminine, redistributionist, equalitarian’ order without the libertarians and conservatives striving at all times to preserve what they and their ancestors have made, while you do nothing but continue to overpopulate a planet, drive down the averages, and reduce you and yours to yet another failed effeminate equalitarian utopia. You will not however take us down with you. (We would rather …. revolt and end you.) We will continue to rebuild our society from the catastrophe of century of pseudoscience (marx, freud, adorno, cantor, derrida, chomsky et al) and their marxism, postmodernism, neoliberalism, feminism, and denialism – and we will continue to build ours on the centuries of western tradition (aristotle, hume, darwin, menger, and the common law of reciprocity. So that is what noah and I are talking about. Him about finding happiness in the present, and I about how to solve the political problem of your feminine dysgenic animal desire to reverse our evolutionary progress and turn us to state of animals, ignorance, and poverty. So no it is not an act of GSRRM to state what I have stated. It is a scientific description of the cognitive processes and their dysgenic (herd) outcomes that you seek to implement despite knowing very little, thinking very little, and feeling only what an animal feels. Women feel as they do for the simple reason that at maturity their nervous system develops into a shared one so that they are willing to bear any cost to preserve a costly offspring regardless of merit. (continued…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425573316009260

  • (… continued) So you do not know what and why you feel the way you do. You onl

    (… continued)

    So you do not know what and why you feel the way you do. You only sense it is a good. The libertarian does not know why he feels the way he does, he only senses it is good. The conservative does not know why he feels the way he does, only that he senses it is good.

    However, in the long run the conservative is the only one making use of all available knowledge over the long run.

    Everything liberals thought would be true in their pseudoscientific rage against the darwinian machine has been false.

    Man was no oppressed. Semi domesticated human animals like all other animals we domesticated, have been eugenically governed in eastern and western civilization – largely through climate, competitors, and manorialism to produce society with superior distributions. ANd your ‘privilege’ of hyperconsumption and violation of the many compromises between the generations, genders, classes, and masculine-feminine minds, was made and still is made, possible by those who domesticated your ancestors – and apparently failed to domesticate your line.

    What do we do? We are sufficiently wealthy to separate and go our own ways, and return to our process of speciation.

    You may pursue your dysgenic goals, and we will pursue our eugenic goals, and we will rapidly see what occurs to a ‘liberal, feminine, redistributionist, equalitarian’ order without the libertarians and conservatives striving at all times to preserve what they and their ancestors have made, while you do nothing but continue to overpopulate a planet, drive down the averages, and reduce you and yours to yet another failed effeminate equalitarian utopia.

    You will not however take us down with you. (We would rather …. revolt and end you.)

    We will continue to rebuild our society from the catastrophe of century of pseudoscience (marx, freud, adorno, cantor, derrida, chomsky et al) and their marxism, postmodernism, neoliberalism, feminism, and denialism – and we will continue to build ours on the centuries of western tradition (aristotle, hume, darwin, menger, and the common law of reciprocity.

    So that is what noah and I are talking about. Him about finding happiness in the present, and I about how to solve the political problem of your feminine dysgenic animal desire to reverse our evolutionary progress and turn us to state of animals, ignorance, and poverty.

    So no it is not an act of GSRRM to state what I have stated. It is a scientific description of the cognitive processes and their dysgenic (herd) outcomes that you seek to implement despite knowing very little, thinking very little, and feeling only what an animal feels.

    Women feel as they do for the simple reason that at maturity their nervous system develops into a shared one so that they are willing to bear any cost to preserve a costly offspring regardless of merit.

    (continued…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:10:18 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425573316009260

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425569468533065

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    HE ANTI-LIBERAL ARGUMENT (fresh weaponry for your use) Do you know the difference between virtue, rule, and outcome ethics? What about the difference between moral, normative, and outcome law? What is the difference between your line of argument(Empathy, Care Taking), Noah Revoy’s line of argument(Psychology, Success), and my line of argument(Law, Limits)? What is the genetic, institutional, traditional, normative, and psychological outcome of those three lines of argument? We demonstrate approximately six general moral rules (foundations) over the use of capital-in-toto. We demonstrate a bias between specializing in them: consumption (caretaking, proportionality) and dysgenia, production (opportunity, reciprocity) and eugenia, and preservation( disgust/purity, loyalty) and eugenia, while only the preservationists practicing all six equally, the productionists dropping loyalty, and the consumptionism dropping all but care and proportionality. These six moral rules roughly are divisible into private and common capital demands in exchange for our cooperation. These capital demands and moral demands roughly correspond to the feminine, ascendent male, and established male distributions. The structure of the human brain both physical, developmental, hormonal, and neurochemical corresponds to about the same distribution between female, beta male, and dominant male. The distribution of mental illness psychotic < solipsistic to < feminine < to > masculine > to autistic > anti-social reflects these brain structures and distributions. These developments appear to follow the general rule of 80% genetic and 20% something else (variation in developmental progress). (continued…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425569468533065

  • HE ANTI-LIBERAL ARGUMENT (fresh weaponry for your use) Do you know the differenc

    HE ANTI-LIBERAL ARGUMENT
    (fresh weaponry for your use)

    Do you know the difference between virtue, rule, and outcome ethics?

    What about the difference between moral, normative, and outcome law?

    What is the difference between your line of argument(Empathy, Care Taking), Noah Revoy’s line of argument(Psychology, Success), and my line of argument(Law, Limits)?

    What is the genetic, institutional, traditional, normative, and psychological outcome of those three lines of argument?

    We demonstrate approximately six general moral rules (foundations) over the use of capital-in-toto. We demonstrate a bias between specializing in them: consumption (caretaking, proportionality) and dysgenia, production (opportunity, reciprocity) and eugenia, and preservation( disgust/purity, loyalty) and eugenia, while only the preservationists practicing all six equally, the productionists dropping loyalty, and the consumptionism dropping all but care and proportionality.

    These six moral rules roughly are divisible into private and common capital demands in exchange for our cooperation.

    These capital demands and moral demands roughly correspond to the feminine, ascendent male, and established male distributions.

    The structure of the human brain both physical, developmental, hormonal, and neurochemical corresponds to about the same distribution between female, beta male, and dominant male.

    The distribution of mental illness psychotic < solipsistic to < feminine < to > masculine > to autistic > anti-social reflects these brain structures and distributions.

    These developments appear to follow the general rule of 80% genetic and 20% something else (variation in developmental progress).

    (continued…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:09:19 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425569468533065

  • MARKETS IN EVERYTHING INCLUDING ECONOMICS We don’t need an homogenous economy, b

    MARKETS IN EVERYTHING INCLUDING ECONOMICS

    We don’t need an homogenous economy, but prisoner, slave (soldier), serf (labor), freeman (craftsman), citizen (professional), sovereign, nobility. There are at least three different economies in there and we need to stop ‘screwing’ the bottom half.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:06:51 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425559798484675

  • THE GAINS TO BE HAD FLUSHING AND CUTTING TIES WITH WEAKNESS AND TREACHERY —“Th

    THE GAINS TO BE HAD FLUSHING AND CUTTING TIES WITH WEAKNESS AND TREACHERY

    —“The harder you go against enemies; the more of your own, moved by sympathy or weakness, will defect to the other side. This too, can have positive returns, up to a point. But there is probably also a limit beyond which it is counter productive. The main risk is endangering the eventual achievement of any kind of victory. The secondary risk is of achieving one at too high a cost. But to the side of the optimum on which we presently find ourselves, there are still gains to be picked up in flushing out and cutting ties with weakness and treachery among our supposed ingroup.”—Ely Harman

    We don’t want ALL our own. This is an OPPORTUNITY to exit them not a challenge to be overcome.

    (eli as master of the game, writing in poetry)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:06:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425558507118949

  • @mwill

    @mwill

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:05:42 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425555255953062

  • THE PHILISTINES WERE AGEANS ie: the minoan relocation theory is true. —“The an

    THE PHILISTINES WERE AGEANS
    ie: the minoan relocation theory is true.

    —“The ancient Mediterranean port city of Ashkelon, identified as “Philistine” during the Iron Age, underwent a marked cultural change between the Late Bronze and the early Iron Age. It has been long debated whether this change was driven by a substantial movement of people, possibly linked to a larger migration of the so-called “Sea Peoples.” Here, we report genome-wide data of 10 Bronze and Iron Age individuals from Ashkelon. We find that the early Iron Age population was genetically distinct due to a European-related admixture. This genetic signal is no longer detectible in the later Iron Age population. Our results support that a migration event occurred during the Bronze to Iron Age transition in Ashkelon but did not leave a long-lasting genetic signature.

    The most likely scenario has long been that the Biblical Philistines were a composition population, made of Aegean folk who mixed with the local Canaanite substrate. These results confirm that.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 23:53:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425508775576115