@Abellonia38 Depends on if you are a supernatural or natural christian. I am a natural christian for scientific reasons. I let common folk play with the supernatural.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:57:38 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426231340829546
YOU DON’T PERSUADE PARASITES
—“You don’t persuade parasites – you implement law that disincentivizes their behaviour. Persuasion is for moral posturing and marketing – law is for molding human behaviour.”—Bill Joslin
Three sentences. All quotable. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:53:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426216262854360
(…)
THE METHODOLOGY
The methodology consists largely of using algorithmic (like programming) operational language, the vocabulary and concepts of economics and law, to produce operationally formal arguments, that satisfy all dimensions of human perception (consistency, correspondence, operational (existential) possibility, rational choice, reciprocity, limits, full accounting, parsimony, coherence, and warrantied for due diligence against ignorance error bias and deceit for having done so. If you want to learn the methodology, it’s formal, and its relatively difficult, not because the principles are difficult, but because it exposes whether you know what you’re talking about or not, and forces you to speak and write in terms demonstrating that you have the knowledge to claim what you speak is true.
This method, produces the long sought after ‘strictly constructed law’ closed to interpretation, on one end and the ability to limit political speech to that which is not false parasitic, predatory.
So that’s the evidence I can and have summarized the work. It’s not philosophy or ideology so it’s not something you intuit, it’s like the calculus, formal logic, programming, economics, and law, which is something you study and learn by repeated application until it’s a skill.
This is the most important work being produced in the field at present. nothing else compares. I know. And I know why, and I explain why, and it’s not a good thing that the enemy has been so successful at sophism pseudoscience propaganda and denial.
Now, if that’s too much for your big boy pants, I’m sorry for you. But learning this if you have studied literary philosophy instead of science, logic, algorithms, economics, and law can be burdensome because you are the equivalent of a theologian in the empirical enlightenment, given that this formal logic of the social sciences deprecates literary philosophy forever to the realm of pseudosciences.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:52:34 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426211274373936
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426209481700160
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
(…) 3. A Methodology: i) Epistemology: “The Completion of the Scientific Method and its application to the full scope of human knowledge, resulting in a universal, formal, epistemological method sufficient for adjudication of differences in court.“ ii) Ethics, Law, Politics: “The strict, algorithmic, construction of the natural, common law, of reciprocity (tort);” 4. A Body of Law: ii) Law: “A body of law answering the cannon of questions – providing a common law of equally sovereign men, alternative to Roman, Napoleonic, and Continental law of unequally sovereign men” iii) Constitution: A Constitution of that law, completing the Aristotelian, Roman, British, and American Constitutional Project.” iiii) Policies: “A set of policies under that constitution, solving the otherwise unsolvable problems of the current age.” 5. A Reformation: i) Reformation: “A reformation and unification of all fields” – Language, Logic, and Mathematics – Psychology, Sociology, and Group Strategy – Money, Credit-Finance, and Economics – Ethics, Law, and Politics – Mindfulness-Religion, Education-Academy, and Government-Rule 6. A Solution i) A Solution: “A solution to the political problem of our age.” ii) A Declaration: “A Declaration demanding the implementation of this constitution, as reformations of, by amendments to, the existing American constitution, restoring the historical European, Germanic, English, British, and American rights of equally sovereign men, and a means of successful insurrection to force its adoption if force is required – which it will be.” THE LIST OF IDEAS Too long to list here but the overview lists all of the major themes in order by aristotelian category. From there you have to link to specific articles. ANd then there is the courseware. ANd finally I will ship the book when ready. (…)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426209481700160
(…)
3. A Methodology:
i) Epistemology: “The Completion of the Scientific Method and its application to the full scope of human knowledge, resulting in a universal, formal, epistemological method sufficient for adjudication of differences in court.“
ii) Ethics, Law, Politics: “The strict, algorithmic, construction of the natural, common law, of reciprocity (tort);”
4. A Body of Law:
ii) Law: “A body of law answering the cannon of questions – providing a common law of equally sovereign men, alternative to Roman, Napoleonic, and Continental law of unequally sovereign men”
iii) Constitution: A Constitution of that law, completing the Aristotelian, Roman, British, and American Constitutional Project.”
iiii) Policies: “A set of policies under that constitution, solving the otherwise unsolvable problems of the current age.”
5. A Reformation:
i) Reformation: “A reformation and unification of all fields”
– Language, Logic, and Mathematics
– Psychology, Sociology, and Group Strategy
– Money, Credit-Finance, and Economics
– Ethics, Law, and Politics
– Mindfulness-Religion, Education-Academy, and Government-Rule
6. A Solution
i) A Solution: “A solution to the political problem of our age.”
ii) A Declaration: “A Declaration demanding the implementation of this constitution, as reformations of, by amendments to, the existing American constitution, restoring the historical European, Germanic, English, British, and American rights of equally sovereign men, and a means of successful insurrection to force its adoption if force is required – which it will be.”
THE LIST OF IDEAS
Too long to list here but the overview lists all of the major themes in order by aristotelian category.
From there you have to link to specific articles.
ANd then there is the courseware.
ANd finally I will ship the book when ready.
(…)
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:52:05 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426209481700160
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426205598779546
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
—“He needs to state it plainly and stop comparing himself to great philosophers. I’ve read Kant, Hegel, Locke, Darwin, and a lot more. They were far more eloquent and articulate with their ideas. Even Kant, who writes with even more arrogance than this guy, but at least deserved it.”— Frank Anthony Overton Jr. Frank, Summarize any three of aristotle, hume, kant, hegel, (locke and darwin are easy). They were creating paradigm shifts. Frank says (a) he doesn’t understand it, (b) by he can opine on it. If you read those people then read the Overview and comment. Otherwise you’re just jerking off in public. Criticism is a good thing – if it’s in fact criticism. THE VIDEO SUMMARIZES “Propertarianism consists of a collection of ideas. The core insight in that collection of ideas consists in the completion of the scientific method. The remaining body of work consists of the application of the scientific method to the full scope of human disciplines.” THE WEB SITE HOME PAGE, SUMMARIZES: “Propertarianism consists of the completion of the Scientific Method; its application to the totality of human knowledge; a universally commensurable language of all thought; its embodiment in the common law of tort; and as a consequence the eradication of superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit from the commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational commons.” THE OVERVIEW SUMMARIZES An Explanation: i) The Uniqueness of Western Civilization: “The Group Strategy (Philosophy) of Western Civilization in Scientific Terms: Excellence and Heroism, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Truth and Duty, The Jury and Markets in Everything.” ii) The Failure of the Enlightenment: “The Crisis of the 20th and 21st Centuries as a failure to apply that strategy and adapt to counter the industrialization of pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit; iii) The Second Conquest of the West: The Crisis of the 20th and 21st century as a repetition of the revolt against western civilization, truth, reason, and law, under Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and the dark ages of ignorance and destruction that resulted from them.” 2. A System of Measurement, Logic, Vocabulary, and Grammar: i) System Of Measurement: ( … ) “A system of measurement – Propertarian – that provides universal commensurability in thought, display, word, and deed. (Action, Acquisitionism, Propertarian.)” ii) Vocabulary: “A set of fully commensurable cross-disciplinary definitions in operational language. iii) Grammars: “A reduction of language to the equivalent of a periodic table of the elements, and the underlying geometry of thought.” iiii) Logic: “An Operational Logic using Operational Grammar for using these definitions.” v) Value Neutral Language: “A Value Neutral Language of metaphysics, epistemology, psychology, sociology, ethics, politics, and group evolutionary strategy, suitable for the construction of law, delivery of testimony, and adjudication of differences in court.” (…)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426205598779546
—“He needs to state it plainly and stop comparing himself to great philosophers. I’ve read Kant, Hegel, Locke, Darwin, and a lot more. They were far more eloquent and articulate with their ideas. Even Kant, who writes with even more arrogance than this guy, but at least deserved it.”— Frank Anthony Overton Jr.
Frank,
Summarize any three of aristotle, hume, kant, hegel, (locke and darwin are easy). They were creating paradigm shifts. Frank says (a) he doesn’t understand it, (b) by he can opine on it. If you read those people then read the Overview and comment. Otherwise you’re just jerking off in public. Criticism is a good thing – if it’s in fact criticism.
THE VIDEO SUMMARIZES
“Propertarianism consists of a collection of ideas. The core insight in that collection of ideas consists in the completion of the scientific method. The remaining body of work consists of the application of the scientific method to the full scope of human disciplines.”
THE WEB SITE HOME PAGE, SUMMARIZES:
“Propertarianism consists of the completion of the Scientific Method; its application to the totality of human knowledge; a universally commensurable language of all thought; its embodiment in the common law of tort; and as a consequence the eradication of superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit from the commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational commons.”
THE OVERVIEW SUMMARIZES
An Explanation:
i) The Uniqueness of Western Civilization: “The Group Strategy (Philosophy) of Western Civilization in Scientific Terms: Excellence and Heroism, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Truth and Duty, The Jury and Markets in Everything.”
ii) The Failure of the Enlightenment: “The Crisis of the 20th and 21st Centuries as a failure to apply that strategy and adapt to counter the industrialization of pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit;
iii) The Second Conquest of the West: The Crisis of the 20th and 21st century as a repetition of the revolt against western civilization, truth, reason, and law, under Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and the dark ages of ignorance and destruction that resulted from them.”
2. A System of Measurement, Logic, Vocabulary, and Grammar:
i) System Of Measurement: ( … ) “A system of measurement – Propertarian – that provides universal commensurability in thought, display, word, and deed. (Action, Acquisitionism, Propertarian.)”
ii) Vocabulary: “A set of fully commensurable cross-disciplinary definitions in operational language.
iii) Grammars: “A reduction of language to the equivalent of a periodic table of the elements, and the underlying geometry of thought.”
iiii) Logic: “An Operational Logic using Operational Grammar for using these definitions.”
v) Value Neutral Language: “A Value Neutral Language of metaphysics, epistemology, psychology, sociology, ethics, politics, and group evolutionary strategy, suitable for the construction of law, delivery of testimony, and adjudication of differences in court.”
(…)
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:51:08 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426205598779546
I am a Christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity:
1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.
2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.
3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost,
4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.
Faith in the works of jesus. Because the ultimate prisoner’s dilemma strategy – christianity – requires faith that one’s sacrifices will bear fruit in producing high trust cooperation and the outsized returns thereof.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:48:45 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426196355781885
(…continued)
Why? “The desire for equality under poverty, monopoly under the herd, authority over markets, and feminine dysgenia over masculine eugenia.:
“The Mindless Equalitarian Dysgenic Herd.”
There is and can never be equality. The demand for equality is to devolve mankind to one’s own lowest level – as an animal. The demand of aristocracy is to evolve mankind into one’s own level – transcend the animal into reason. THe anglo enlightenment experiment has been one of attempting to raise man into an ‘aristocracy of everyone’ and it has failed because only our kin appear able to do so – and even then some men and many women resist it.
The reason Jewish Christians are “Cucks’ and do not fight against the enemy is because their debt, loyalty, and fealty, is to the ancestral enemy of our people – and not to Family, Kith, Kin, Nature, Excellence and heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law and Markets in Every Aspect of Life.
The reason Aryan Christians are ‘not cucks’ is that we fight against the enemy because our debt, loyalty, reality is to our ancestors, Family, Kith, Kin, Nature, Excellence and heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law and Markets in Every Aspect of Life.
Choose Aryan Christianity of Kin and our persistence, or Semitic Christianity of the Enemy against our kin and your extermination.
I am An Aryan, An Aristotelian, A Heathen, A Christian.
Because that is all I can be, while maintaining the debt, loyalty, and fealty to my kin, my people, my ancestors, nature, the universe, and transcendence of man into the great gods our ancients imagined.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:48:00 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426193407615382
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426191435493947
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
CHOOSE ARYAN CHRISTIAN OF KIN OR SEMITIC CHRISTIAN AGAINST THEM I am, first, and foremost: 1) An Aryan(The primacy of man, heroism, excellence, reciprocity, truth before face, aristocratic egalitarianism), 2) Aristotelian(Naturalism, Truth regardless of cost), an;d 3) Heathen (Debt only to Nature and Ancestors, Ward of Nature). I cannot be those things, if I practice the supernatural over the natural, the irrational over the rational, and false debt over existential debt. I can however, be: 4) a scientific and rational christian, if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: i) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. ii) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. iii) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, iiii) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. These are truths. And no claim of truth nor good can require I: a) abandon the difference between man and animal by abandoning reason; b) claim belief in a falsehood; c) owe debt, loyalty, or fealty to other than my kith and kin. Yet it is Abrahamic Semitism that asks (a) abandon reason, (b) claim belief in falsehood, and (c) owe debt loyalty or fealty to other than my kith and kin. The Semitic technique of Abrahamic lying is: (a) False promise(lying), (b) Sophism(lying), (c) Straw Manning(lying), (d) Critique (lying), GSRRM(avoiding truth), (e) Denial(lying), (f) in exchange for ‘membership’ in a false family whose common interests is propagation of the lie, false promise, sophism, straw manning, critique, GSRRM, and denial. There is no difference between: (a) Judaism, (c) Christianity, (c) Islam and; (b) Marx-Freud-Frankfurt-Derrida et al: the marxists, socialists, psychologists, sociologists, feminists, postmodernists, denialists, and politically corrects (truth suppression) The First wave of Abrahamists created (a) Judaism to undermine, (b) Christianity to undermine further, and (c) Islam to conquer the undermined and weakened. … Against Aristocracy Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and Reason. The Second wave of Abrahamists replaced religion of the supernatural false promise, sophism, critique, and denial, with two attempts: (a) first Abrahamic pseudoscientific false promises sophism critique, and denial in marxism-socialism-freudianism-feminism. (b) then the Abrahamic sophistic false promises sophism critique, and denial with postmodernism, neo-liberalism, and political correctness. … Against Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and (Darwin!). (continued…)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426191435493947
CHOOSE ARYAN CHRISTIAN OF KIN OR SEMITIC CHRISTIAN AGAINST THEM
I am, first, and foremost:
1) An Aryan(The primacy of man, heroism, excellence, reciprocity, truth before face, aristocratic egalitarianism),
2) Aristotelian(Naturalism, Truth regardless of cost), an;d
3) Heathen (Debt only to Nature and Ancestors, Ward of Nature).
I cannot be those things, if I practice the supernatural over the natural, the irrational over the rational, and false debt over existential debt.
I can however, be:
4) a scientific and rational christian, if I have adopted the teaching of christianity:
i) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.
ii) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.
iii) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost,
iiii) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
These are truths. And no claim of truth nor good can require I:
a) abandon the difference between man and animal by abandoning reason;
b) claim belief in a falsehood;
c) owe debt, loyalty, or fealty to other than my kith and kin.
Yet it is Abrahamic Semitism that asks
(a) abandon reason,
(b) claim belief in falsehood, and
(c) owe debt loyalty or fealty to other than my kith and kin.
The Semitic technique of Abrahamic lying is:
(a) False promise(lying),
(b) Sophism(lying),
(c) Straw Manning(lying),
(d) Critique (lying), GSRRM(avoiding truth),
(e) Denial(lying),
(f) in exchange for ‘membership’ in a false family whose common interests is propagation of the lie, false promise, sophism, straw manning, critique, GSRRM, and denial.
There is no difference between:
(a) Judaism, (c) Christianity, (c) Islam and;
(b) Marx-Freud-Frankfurt-Derrida et al: the marxists, socialists, psychologists, sociologists, feminists, postmodernists, denialists, and politically corrects (truth suppression)
The First wave of Abrahamists created
(a) Judaism to undermine,
(b) Christianity to undermine further, and
(c) Islam to conquer the undermined and weakened.
… Against Aristocracy Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and Reason.
The Second wave of Abrahamists replaced religion of the supernatural false promise, sophism, critique, and denial, with two attempts:
(a) first Abrahamic pseudoscientific false promises sophism critique, and denial in marxism-socialism-freudianism-feminism.
(b) then the Abrahamic sophistic false promises sophism critique, and denial with postmodernism, neo-liberalism, and political correctness.
… Against Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and (Darwin!).
(continued…)
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:47:30 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426191435493947
IT”S NOT A CONSPIRACY (AS MUCH AS) ITS GENETICS AND CULTURE
They specialized in the female group strategy of false promise of sex affection support and loyalty to guarantee the advantage of her offspring regardless of merit, by the use of GSSRM to undermine or advance others in pursuit of her status and her children’s.
This is why they have reversed (or limited) sexual and cognitive dimorphism, and transferred female intuition and competitive strategy to males and vica versa.
“They’re all female”. (so to speak)
It’s not a conspiracy any more than females against males are a conspiracy.
It’s a genetic disposition to parasitic rent seeking on the POLITY just as women have a genetic (and necessary) disposition to parasitic rent seeking upon the MALES in their polity.
Rates of homosexuality, feminine aspect of male speech patterns, female cognitive and verbal traits in males and visa versa, differences in distribution of mental illness between genders…. Etc.
“They’re all female” so to speak, and therefore they compete as females. They use the female group competitive strategy. And they have weaponized it effectively against the one group that is most trusting and therefore vulnerable to it:europeans. We are the least racist, clannish, classist peoples but we are also the most vulnerable to the female technique.
Once you see it you can’t UNSEE it.
They don’t produce commons. They seek host countries that produce commons that they can parasitically produce rents upon through the same techniques women extract resources from men: false promise, gsrrm, etc, non-rational purely moralistic thought. etc….
They sound moral.
They’re not.
They are amoral or immoral.
Just like women.
We evolved to tolerate female behavior.
I don’t know yet whether our reaction to their mastery of the feminine means of persuasion is evoking evolutionary or purely cultural biases to tolerance.
I think macdonald and I differ in this one bias: him genetic and me cultural, but in many things it’s probably both.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:46:29 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426187468145353
TOURNAMENT, PAIR BONDING, CAPITAL, POLITICAL ORDER, POLICY
—“What are your thoughts in this case and specifically how it relates to tournament species v. pair bonding species. When society has comfortable stores and capital, where does that leave the pair bonded class compared to the tournament class of human. Considering both male and female it would be common to see the tournament class dominate every time. How does the pair bonded male compete and in socialist arena where the female is taken care of by the greater part of society? Is the socialist economical model naturally doomed by progress of the human condition to become a communal type and deficit living situation?”—Craig Michael
1. Restore political reciprocity (eliminate redistributions).
2. Restore voluntary disassociation and association.
3. Eliminate interest on consumer credit.
4. Restore the Militia, Regiment and Barracks system (soak up men) and the WPA so we have defense, emergency, and commons production programs for single males.
5. Enact singapore retirement that is non-attachable or transferrable.
6. Convert legal marriage to an exchange of limited powers of attorney, and private contract.(what it legally exists as)
7. Restore the legal definition of ‘marriage’ to a publicly subsidized corporation for the intergeneration production of children.(which is what it exists as)
8. Restore fault divorce, and restitution for interference in a marriage (make cheating extremely expensive).
9. Eliminate Alimony, Support, Common property. (restore male contributory portability)
10. Restore the primacy of policy to family rather than individual.
11. Eliminate the marriage penalty and maintain the individual penalty (increased taxes on unmarried childless).
You cannot fix the natural differences between males and females but you can stop the damage we have done to the production of the institution of marriage as a corporation for reproduction production insurance and care.
TOURNAMENT SPECIES.
–“Tournament species in zoology are those species in which members of one sex (usually males) compete in order to mate. In tournament species, the reproductive success of the small group of competition winners is predominantly higher than that of the large group of losers.”—
PAIR BONDING SPECIES
—“In biology, a pair bond is the strong affinity that develops in some species between a pair consisting of a male and female, or in some cases as a same-sex pairing, potentially leading to producing offspring and/or a lifelong bond.”—
DISTRIBUTION
—“Humans are a hybrid between the two, and different individuals fall into different places on the spectrum of pair-bonding vs. tournament. And, tournament women will pretend to be pair bonding to increase their reproductive success, and pair-bonding trending men will adapt themselves to be more tournament-oriented (TheRedPill/Pickup Game is basically all of these).—Anon
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:46:05 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426185858126992