@wacko2 Sorry man…Impulse. Out of context. I shouldn’t have responded. This is a conversation I’ve had with endless numbers of customers, and with my own people and I let my frustration slip. Apologies. Just tired.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-15 01:55:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102442975115490212
@wacko2 Downvote buttons serve as a moron-satisfaction device. The best negative reinforcement is to ignore and block morons so that they don’t spread.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-15 01:46:08 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102442937110502206
I can’t figure out what you’re trying to tell me.
As far as I know a marriage consists of a partnership, which in turn consists of exchanges of powers of attorney(universal), and privately negotiated terms of contract, that are insured by the polity (therefore a corporation), by reciprocal guarantee (between partners and polity) of priority in commons, non-interference, defense, and punishment of those who interfere, in exchange for insulation of the polity from the consequences of reproduction, and the externalization of costs of that reproduction, by moral hazard.
This is my understanding of the institution of marriage and why it evolved, and why it is necessary for the continuous survival of a polity given human natural externalization of costs whenever possible (cheating, corruption, free riding, etc).
If by ‘government interference’ you mean, interference in the intergenerational order of marriage and the commons produced therefrom, then yes the government has no such say other that to attempt to preserve it at all costs, and if not, then the peaceful dissolution of corporation (insurance), partnership (exchanges), and contract on terms agreed.
As far as I know the 20th century interference in marriage has been for the purpose of destroying the family, and the incentives to preserve the family, so that costs are not externalized to the polity by way of moral hazard.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-15 00:56:54 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102442743473869711
LIBERTARD ANCAPITARD FOOLS FOR (((FALSE))) DICHOTOMY
—“Govt helping business isn’t #capitalism Know this. Grasp this. Learn this.”—
You mean like providing limited liability? Or providing rule of law, courts, generating trust, risk tolerance, and the market and monetary velocity the results from it? You mean like providing commons despite the problem of free riders, parasites, those who privatize public goods and socialize private losses? You mean that every major country’s competitive advantage WASN’T a product of private-state partnership?
Democratic Governments sell rents. Bureaucratic employees seek rents. Solve the problem of selling rents.
The problem isn’t state (defense) or government (production of commons) but corruption and rent seeking.
The problem is democracy, and deprivation of standing in matters of the commons before the courts.
Otherwise we would have this country cleaned up by Tuesday.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-15 00:33:45 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102442652470992882
—“Is there data out that suggests what our numbers would *actually* be?”—Johnny Kelly
a) tell me why you care?
b) do you mean how many will not resist our solution?
c) how many will advance or assist?
d) how many will show up?
e) how many will fight?
—“how many will show up?”—
There are something on the order of 25m who will fight.There are at least 6m who will show up – that’s about right.
We can only use a percentage of those.Logistically we only want so many. Because you have to supply them all. Logistics begins to outweigh additional numbers rather quickly.
Speed of movement matters.
It’s more whether they publicly demand implementation of the new constitution, …
…. and will they ‘clean house’ locally.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-15 00:33:26 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102442651213001575
You do not understand the meaning of idealism either. You are using it as you did monarchy analogistically rather than operationally – this is a sophomoric means of attempting deception by conflation.
You do not understand the use of competition. you do not know the evidence (history) of dictators vs kings. The value of the west in defeating the rest is continuous competition preventing the accumulation of power, and forcing men into markets, where merit determines outcome, by means of technological, economic, or political innovation.
So stop wasting my time with your lies.
Islam like judaism and christianity is just a way of dysgenic-ally destroying the gene pool, recivilization, and consuming all accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, knowledge and territorial capital.
islam = cancer.
You want intolerance. I’ll give you the most intolerant rule of law possible, and the most intolerant government possible.
But I do it without sophism, supernaturalism, pseudoscience, denial, and lying.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-15 00:13:49 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102442574096666990
3. HOW DO WE CREATE A REVOLUTION?
Starting a revolution as an expression of frustration doesn’t necessarily bring change for the better. And some revolutions are far worse than their original states: France and Russia in particular.
To implement change one has to have something to demand. And what one demands has to satisfy a lot of people‘s interests. Those demands have to be possible to put into operational processes that we call ‘institutions‘. They have to be possible to persist regardless of the beliefs of the participants. To persist they have to create the right incentives.
So to create a revolution you need moral authority – something that people will willingly use violence to bring about. And as a moral imperative, and moral justification, TRUTH IS ENOUGH. We are tired of lies, pseudoscience, and obscurant rational justifications. We are tired of our elites burning our civilization.The truth is enough. Unlike gossip, guilting and shaming. And unlike pseudo-science and propaganda, the truth is expensive. Truth is the most powerful argumentative weapon ever developed. And Propertarianism teaches us how to demand truth and speak the truth.
After moral authority – then you need a political solution – a set of demands, and in sufficient detail that it is possible to discuss rationally, and implement as formal institutions.
Then you need a sufficient plan of transition that a revolution isn‘t necessary, and people don‘t die by the millions to do it.
Then you need a method of altering the status quo – not a plan – for nullification, secession, revolution, and civil war – and hope you can accomplish it with incremental nullification and secession … but willing to conduct a revolution or civil war if need be. And you pursue all of them at once.
Then you need an ‘organization‘ – a group of people who act as the general staff that answer questions, and propose ideas on how to implement, how to transition and how to raise the cost of the status quo so that the transition is preferable to the uncertainty and instability.
Then you need a small number of people willing to die for their people, culture, and civilization, but who have reasonable belief that their sacrifice is not in vain.
I don’t go into tactics because that‘s unwise. But in general, I try to get across this idea: How many hours of electricity, days of water, days of food, days of ‘order‘ are in the production line every day? I mean, if bad stuff happens in Ukraine and Russia, 40% of food is produced by the people. Everyone can go back to the village to relatives and the farm. What happens in the developed world if it‘s disrupted?
We live in the most fragile time in history. It no longer takes masses in the streets to bring about revolution. It takes a small number of people to increase the friction of daily life. It has never been easier to create a revolution. People just need a plan, moral authority, and something to demand.
It‘s our job to give it to them.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-14 22:25:34 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102442148401144550
Boost of @curtd
3. HOW DO WE CREATE A REVOLUTION?
Starting a revolution as an expression of frustration doesn’t necessarily bring change for the better. And some revolutions are far worse than their original states: France and Russia in particular.
To implement change one has to have something to demand. And what one demands has to satisfy a lot of people‘s interests. Those demands have to be possible to put into operational processes that we call ‘institutions‘. They have to be possible to persist regardless of the beliefs of the participants. To persist they have to create the right incentives.
So to create a revolution you need moral authority – something that people will willingly use violence to bring about. And as a moral imperative, and moral justification, TRUTH IS ENOUGH. We are tired of lies, pseudoscience, and obscurant rational justifications. We are tired of our elites burning our civilization.The truth is enough. Unlike gossip, guilting and shaming. And unlike pseudo-science and propaganda, the truth is expensive. Truth is the most powerful argumentative weapon ever developed. And Propertarianism teaches us how to demand truth and speak the truth.
After moral authority – then you need a political solution – a set of demands, and in sufficient detail that it is possible to discuss rationally, and implement as formal institutions.
Then you need a sufficient plan of transition that a revolution isn‘t necessary, and people don‘t die by the millions to do it.
Then you need a method of altering the status quo – not a plan – for nullification, secession, revolution, and civil war – and hope you can accomplish it with incremental nullification and secession … but willing to conduct a revolution or civil war if need be. And you pursue all of them at once.
Then you need an ‘organization‘ – a group of people who act as the general staff that answer questions, and propose ideas on how to implement, how to transition and how to raise the cost of the status quo so that the transition is preferable to the uncertainty and instability.
Then you need a small number of people willing to die for their people, culture, and civilization, but who have reasonable belief that their sacrifice is not in vain.
I don’t go into tactics because that‘s unwise. But in general, I try to get across this idea: How many hours of electricity, days of water, days of food, days of ‘order‘ are in the production line every day? I mean, if bad stuff happens in Ukraine and Russia, 40% of food is produced by the people. Everyone can go back to the village to relatives and the farm. What happens in the developed world if it‘s disrupted?
We live in the most fragile time in history. It no longer takes masses in the streets to bring about revolution. It takes a small number of people to increase the friction of daily life. It has never been easier to create a revolution. People just need a plan, moral authority, and something to demand.
It‘s our job to give it to them.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-14 22:25:34 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105752656831957631
Boost of @LMel The Trump administration is promoting apprenticeships as an alternative to higher education. What a great idea. Let’s crank out some skilled workers instead of having kids get brainwashed, waste money on useless degrees and rack up huge debt.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-14 21:29:39 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102442944166965923
Boost of @Art-Vandeleah BREAKING: Twitter Hides All of Trump’s Tweets After Viral Tweet Calling Out ‘Hamas Caucus’ https://par.pw/l/Tlpe9
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-14 20:26:14 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102442943597535452